Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for West Virginia by County

Prostate, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Name

County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 16.9?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
West Virginia N/A No 18.0 (16.9, 19.2) N/A 202 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.9, 7.5)
United States N/A No 19.0 (18.9, 19.1) N/A 32,351 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.8, -0.1)
Berkeley County Urban No 23.8 (18.2, 30.4) 2 (1, 16) 14 stable stable trend 5.3 (-1.4, 24.5)
Cabell County Urban No 17.8 (13.0, 23.8) 14 (3, 23) 10 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.0, -1.6)
Fayette County Urban No 18.9 (11.8, 28.8) 12 (1, 24) 5 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.8, -0.7)
Greenbrier County Rural No 21.4 (13.5, 32.8) 6 (1, 23) 5
*
*
Hampshire County Urban No 17.5 (10.1, 29.6) 16 (1, 24) 4
*
*
Hancock County Urban Yes 15.3 (8.6, 26.0) 18 (2, 24) 3
*
*
Harrison County Rural Yes 12.2 (7.8, 18.3) 24 (10, 24) 5 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.9, -1.3)
Jackson County Rural No 17.6 (10.3, 28.9) 15 (1, 24) 4
*
*
Jefferson County Urban No 26.3 (17.9, 37.1) 1 (1, 18) 7 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.0, 1.5)
Kanawha County Urban No 23.3 (19.4, 27.8) 3 (1, 14) 26 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.0, -1.3)
Logan County Rural No 20.8 (12.8, 32.5) 9 (1, 24) 4 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.8, -0.3)
Marion County Rural Yes 13.0 (8.4, 19.6) 23 (9, 24) 5 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.1, -1.0)
Marshall County Urban Yes 14.9 (8.3, 25.2) 20 (2, 24) 3
*
*
Mason County Rural No 20.2 (11.6, 33.4) 11 (1, 24) 3
*
*
Mercer County Rural Yes 15.3 (10.2, 22.3) 19 (5, 24) 6 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.8, -2.1)
Monongalia County Urban Yes 13.8 (9.0, 20.1) 21 (7, 24) 6 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.3, -2.1)
Nicholas County Rural No 21.8 (12.7, 35.6) 4 (1, 24) 4
*
*
Ohio County Urban Yes 13.7 (8.2, 22.0) 22 (6, 24) 4 falling falling trend -3.5 (-5.5, -1.8)
Preston County Urban No 17.1 (9.7, 28.2) 17 (1, 24) 3
*
*
Putnam County Urban No 21.0 (14.2, 29.9) 8 (1, 22) 7 stable stable trend 2.6 (-2.4, 25.8)
Raleigh County Urban No 20.2 (14.6, 27.3) 10 (1, 22) 9 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.5, -0.8)
Randolph County Rural No 21.2 (13.0, 33.2) 7 (1, 24) 4 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.7, 0.1)
Wayne County Urban No 21.5 (14.4, 31.3) 5 (1, 22) 6
*
*
Wood County Urban No 18.2 (13.3, 24.5) 13 (2, 23) 10 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.9, -1.5)
Barbour County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Boone County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Braxton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brooke County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Calhoun County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Doddridge County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gilmer County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardy County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lewis County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lincoln County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McDowell County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mineral County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mingo County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Monroe County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morgan County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pendleton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pleasants County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pocahontas County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ritchie County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roane County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Summers County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Taylor County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tucker County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tyler County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Upshur County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Webster County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wetzel County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wirt County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wyoming County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/22/2024 3:59 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top