Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Wisconsin by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <50

Sorted by Recentaapc
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Wisconsin Yes 13.9 (13.4, 14.5) N/A 475 falling falling trend -1.7 (-1.9, -1.5)
United States Yes 14.9 (14.8, 15.0) N/A 29,891 falling falling trend -1.7 (-1.9, -1.6)
Douglas County Yes 16.7 (10.3, 25.5) 5 (1, 35) 4 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.6, -1.0)
Marinette County Yes 16.2 (9.4, 25.9) 7 (1, 35) 3 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.1, -0.3)
Milwaukee County Yes 16.1 (14.7, 17.7) 8 (4, 20) 92 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.6, -1.9)
Dane County Yes 11.0 (9.4, 12.7) 32 (19, 35) 36 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.6, -1.5)
Ozaukee County Yes 9.3 (6.0, 13.9) 35 (13, 35) 5 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.8, -0.3)
St. Croix County Yes 11.2 (7.6, 15.8) 31 (7, 35) 6 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.4, -0.9)
Dodge County Yes 13.9 (9.9, 19.2) 21 (3, 35) 8 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.6, -0.4)
Rock County Yes 15.1 (11.9, 19.0) 17 (3, 31) 15 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.0, -0.7)
Columbia County Yes 15.5 (10.2, 22.6) 13 (1, 35) 5 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.5, -0.2)
La Crosse County Yes 12.6 (9.0, 17.1) 26 (5, 35) 8 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.9, -0.8)
Jefferson County Yes 12.0 (8.2, 17.0) 29 (4, 35) 6 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.3, -0.2)
Waukesha County Yes 11.3 (9.5, 13.4) 30 (17, 35) 27 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -0.9)
Washington County Yes 12.7 (9.4, 16.7) 25 (5, 35) 10 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.8, -0.1)
Wood County Yes 15.6 (10.5, 22.3) 12 (1, 35) 6 stable stable trend -1.5 (-2.9, 0.0)
Kenosha County Yes 12.1 (9.3, 15.5) 27 (8, 35) 13 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.5, -0.3)
Winnebago County Yes 12.1 (9.3, 15.5) 28 (8, 35) 12 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.5)
Monroe County Yes 15.3 (9.3, 23.5) 16 (1, 35) 4 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.1, 0.6)
Racine County Yes 15.3 (12.3, 18.9) 14 (3, 30) 18 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.4)
Walworth County Yes 16.6 (12.2, 22.0) 6 (1, 32) 9 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.6, -0.1)
Polk County Yes 13.9 (8.1, 22.3) 22 (1, 35) 3 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.1, 1.0)
Sauk County Yes 13.1 (8.5, 19.3) 23 (2, 35) 5 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.9, 0.7)
Fond du Lac County Yes 15.8 (11.6, 20.9) 11 (1, 33) 10 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.1)
Oconto County Yes 16.0 (9.5, 25.5) 10 (1, 35) 4 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.7, 0.9)
Brown County Yes 16.1 (13.4, 19.1) 9 (2, 26) 25 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
Eau Claire County Yes 14.3 (10.3, 19.4) 18 (3, 35) 8 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.3)
Outagamie County Yes 14.0 (11.1, 17.5) 20 (4, 33) 16 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.2)
Oneida County Yes 22.6 (13.7, 35.0) 1 (1, 32) 4 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.4, 1.3)
Manitowoc County Yes 21.4 (15.7, 28.5) 2 (1, 22) 9 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 0.9)
Calumet County Yes 17.3 (11.4, 25.2) 4 (1, 34) 5 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.1, 1.7)
Sheboygan County Yes 10.5 (7.3, 14.6) 33 (12, 35) 7 stable stable trend 0.0 (-5.9, 6.2)
Portage County Yes 13.0 (8.3, 19.3) 24 (2, 35) 5 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.8, 2.0)
Marathon County Yes 14.0 (10.6, 18.2) 19 (3, 34) 11 stable stable trend 3.1 (-0.6, 7.0)
Chippewa County Yes 9.9 (5.9, 15.4) 34 (8, 35) 4
*
*
Trempealeau County Yes 20.5 (11.9, 32.8) 3 (1, 35) 3
*
*
Waupaca County Yes 15.3 (9.6, 23.3) 15 (1, 35) 4
*
*
Adams County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ashland County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Barron County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bayfield County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Buffalo County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Burnett County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clark County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crawford County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Door County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dunn County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Florence County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Forest County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Green County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Green Lake County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Iowa County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Iron County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Juneau County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kewaunee County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lafayette County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Langlade County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lincoln County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marquette County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menominee County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pepin County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pierce County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Price County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Richland County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rusk County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sawyer County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shawano County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Taylor County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Vernon County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Vilas County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washburn County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Waushara County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/09/2022 3:35 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top