Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Wisconsin by County

All Cancer Sites, 2013-2017

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <65

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 161.4?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Wisconsin Yes 46.8 (46.1, 47.6) N/A 3,108 falling falling trend -1.8 (-1.9, -1.7)
United States Yes 50.4 (50.3, 50.5) N/A 175,590 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.4, -1.3)
Burnett County Yes 71.4 (54.4, 93.4) 1 (1, 45) 14 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.9)
Sawyer County Yes 65.4 (49.4, 85.7) 2 (1, 58) 14 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.2, -0.5)
Florence County Yes 63.9 (33.9, 114.3) 3 (1, 71) 4 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.1, 1.8)
Rusk County Yes 63.7 (46.7, 85.7) 4 (1, 63) 11 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.2, 2.5)
Langlade County Yes 62.6 (48.9, 79.6) 5 (1, 55) 17 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.7, 0.7)
Oneida County Yes 59.4 (49.1, 71.6) 6 (1, 50) 29 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.3, 0.0)
Ashland County Yes 59.3 (44.1, 78.6) 7 (1, 66) 12 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 0.6)
Marquette County Yes 58.4 (43.4, 77.9) 8 (1, 67) 12 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.9, 0.1)
Milwaukee County Yes 57.6 (55.5, 59.8) 9 (4, 21) 565 falling falling trend -1.8 (-1.9, -1.6)
Door County Yes 56.8 (44.5, 71.9) 10 (1, 61) 19 rising rising trend 4.2 (0.7, 7.9)
Juneau County Yes 56.4 (45.3, 69.8) 11 (1, 61) 20 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.2, -0.8)
Iron County Yes 56.3 (36.0, 90.4) 12 (1, 71) 5 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.5, 1.4)
Lafayette County Yes 55.5 (41.3, 73.5) 13 (1, 69) 11 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.3, 0.5)
Polk County Yes 55.3 (46.5, 65.5) 14 (1, 54) 32 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.3)
Douglas County Yes 55.2 (46.5, 65.3) 15 (2, 53) 32 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.6, -1.4)
Pepin County Yes 55.1 (34.9, 84.8) 16 (1, 71) 5 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.7, 1.8)
Oconto County Yes 54.6 (45.3, 65.6) 17 (2, 60) 28 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.7)
Manitowoc County Yes 54.4 (47.6, 62.1) 18 (3, 49) 53 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.1)
Lincoln County Yes 54.0 (42.8, 67.7) 19 (1, 65) 19 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.3)
Walworth County Yes 53.0 (46.9, 59.7) 20 (5, 50) 61 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -1.0)
Sauk County Yes 52.8 (45.4, 61.2) 21 (3, 57) 39 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.2)
Clark County Yes 51.8 (41.7, 63.9) 22 (2, 66) 20 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.1, -0.2)
Rock County Yes 50.8 (46.2, 55.9) 23 (9, 52) 94 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.4, -1.4)
Eau Claire County Yes 50.6 (44.4, 57.6) 24 (6, 58) 51 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.0)
Marinette County Yes 50.2 (41.7, 60.1) 25 (4, 65) 28 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.9, -1.0)
Waushara County Yes 50.1 (38.8, 64.2) 26 (1, 69) 16 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.8, -0.6)
Green Lake County Yes 50.0 (37.8, 65.7) 27 (1, 70) 13 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.4, -0.7)
Columbia County Yes 49.8 (42.3, 58.4) 28 (5, 62) 34 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.7, -1.3)
Dodge County Yes 49.6 (43.7, 56.3) 29 (7, 58) 54 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.8)
Crawford County Yes 49.6 (36.2, 67.1) 30 (1, 71) 10 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.8, -0.1)
Shawano County Yes 49.5 (40.6, 59.9) 31 (4, 66) 25 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -0.5)
Fond du Lac County Yes 49.2 (43.5, 55.6) 32 (8, 59) 59 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.7)
Waupaca County Yes 49.1 (41.5, 57.9) 33 (5, 65) 33 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.8)
Dunn County Yes 49.1 (40.1, 59.6) 34 (4, 68) 22 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.3)
Vilas County Yes 49.1 (35.9, 66.1) 35 (1, 71) 13 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.2, -0.5)
Monroe County Yes 48.8 (40.2, 58.7) 36 (4, 66) 25 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.0, -0.8)
Price County Yes 48.5 (35.3, 66.6) 37 (2, 71) 10 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.5, -0.6)
La Crosse County Yes 47.9 (42.4, 54.1) 38 (11, 61) 59 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.4, -1.1)
Racine County Yes 47.8 (43.7, 52.2) 39 (15, 56) 111 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.5, -1.6)
Richland County Yes 47.2 (34.3, 64.0) 40 (2, 71) 11 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.4, -1.0)
Wood County Yes 47.1 (40.5, 54.6) 41 (8, 65) 41 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -0.8)
Washburn County Yes 47.0 (33.9, 64.7) 42 (2, 71) 10 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.6, -1.5)
Barron County Yes 46.3 (38.3, 55.7) 43 (7, 68) 26 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.6, -1.0)
Kenosha County Yes 46.2 (41.9, 50.9) 44 (17, 61) 88 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -0.8)
Bayfield County Yes 45.3 (31.5, 64.3) 45 (2, 71) 9 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.4, -0.8)
Brown County Yes 45.3 (41.8, 49.1) 46 (22, 60) 128 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.1, -1.1)
Chippewa County Yes 45.1 (38.4, 52.8) 47 (12, 68) 35 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.0, -1.0)
Marathon County Yes 44.3 (39.6, 49.5) 48 (21, 65) 70 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.4, -1.3)
Sheboygan County Yes 44.0 (38.9, 49.6) 49 (21, 66) 60 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.6, -1.3)
Trempealeau County Yes 43.6 (33.8, 55.7) 50 (6, 71) 15 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.9, 0.8)
Adams County Yes 43.1 (32.3, 57.6) 51 (5, 71) 13 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.0, -0.5)
Iowa County Yes 42.7 (32.6, 55.4) 52 (7, 71) 13 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.3, -0.6)
Calumet County Yes 42.6 (35.0, 51.4) 53 (12, 70) 24 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.1, -0.3)
Pierce County Yes 42.1 (34.0, 51.7) 54 (14, 71) 20 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.7, -0.2)
Vernon County Yes 42.0 (32.2, 54.1) 55 (8, 71) 15 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.6, -0.3)
Buffalo County Yes 42.0 (28.7, 60.4) 56 (3, 71) 7 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.2, 0.4)
Jefferson County Yes 41.5 (35.9, 47.9) 57 (24, 70) 41 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.7, -1.4)
Dane County Yes 41.1 (38.6, 43.6) 58 (42, 65) 224 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.2, -1.6)
Outagamie County Yes 40.7 (36.7, 44.9) 59 (37, 68) 83 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.4, -1.1)
Grant County Yes 40.6 (33.1, 49.4) 60 (15, 71) 23 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.7, -0.5)
Kewaunee County Yes 40.5 (29.6, 54.7) 61 (7, 71) 10 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.9, -1.5)
St. Croix County Yes 40.4 (34.8, 46.6) 62 (27, 70) 40 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.9, -1.2)
Winnebago County Yes 39.8 (35.7, 44.2) 63 (38, 70) 74 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.5, -1.7)
Taylor County Yes 38.9 (28.0, 53.1) 64 (9, 71) 9 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.8, -0.4)
Green County Yes 38.1 (30.0, 47.9) 65 (19, 71) 17 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.8, -0.6)
Washington County Yes 37.0 (32.8, 41.6) 66 (45, 71) 62 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.0, -1.7)
Waukesha County Yes 36.4 (33.9, 39.0) 67 (54, 70) 181 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.6, -1.8)
Forest County Yes 34.8 (21.1, 56.2) 68 (6, 71) 4 stable stable trend -2.3 (-4.5, 0.0)
Portage County Yes 33.2 (27.5, 39.7) 69 (49, 71) 26 stable stable trend -15.8 (-32.6, 5.4)
Ozaukee County Yes 33.1 (28.2, 38.7) 70 (51, 71) 37 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.3, -1.5)
Jackson County Yes 32.8 (23.4, 45.3) 71 (29, 71) 8 falling falling trend -3.7 (-5.2, -2.1)
Menominee County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 08/07/2020 6:10 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2017 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top