Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Wisconsin by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

White Non-Hispanic, Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Wisconsin No 151.2 (149.9, 152.6) N/A 10,527 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.4)
United States 6 No 154.4 (154.1, 154.6) N/A 464,265 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.0, -1.7)
Milwaukee County No 158.8 (154.6, 163.1) 34 (19, 44) 1,172 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.2)
Waukesha County No 137.8 (133.4, 142.5) 61 (49, 69) 756 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.4, -1.5)
Dane County No 134.5 (130.0, 139.2) 66 (54, 70) 708 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.1, -1.2)
Brown County No 147.5 (141.0, 154.1) 48 (32, 62) 416 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.2, -0.8)
Racine County No 158.5 (150.9, 166.4) 35 (12, 50) 345 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -0.9)
Rock County No 164.8 (156.6, 173.3) 24 (6, 42) 320 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.7)
Winnebago County No 148.1 (140.7, 155.9) 46 (29, 64) 310 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.4, -0.9)
Outagamie County No 144.0 (136.7, 151.7) 54 (35, 67) 299 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.1)
Kenosha County No 166.1 (157.4, 175.2) 20 (5, 42) 285 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.7)
Marathon County No 142.2 (134.3, 150.5) 55 (35, 69) 253 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -0.9)
Washington County No 126.7 (119.3, 134.5) 71 (58, 71) 231 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.3, -1.6)
Sheboygan County No 142.0 (133.5, 151.0) 56 (34, 69) 217 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -0.8)
La Crosse County No 150.7 (141.6, 160.3) 43 (21, 63) 215 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -0.9)
Walworth County No 163.3 (153.3, 173.9) 27 (5, 49) 213 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.2, -0.7)
Fond du Lac County No 148.7 (139.6, 158.4) 44 (23, 65) 210 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.7)
Dodge County No 166.3 (155.9, 177.4) 19 (4, 45) 198 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.6)
Manitowoc County No 162.5 (152.0, 173.7) 29 (5, 51) 192 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.5)
Wood County No 168.0 (157.0, 179.7) 15 (3, 45) 187 stable stable trend -1.0 (-10.5, 9.6)
Ozaukee County No 135.9 (126.8, 145.5) 64 (41, 71) 175 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -1.1)
Eau Claire County No 140.6 (130.9, 150.8) 58 (35, 70) 164 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.8)
Jefferson County No 145.1 (134.9, 156.0) 53 (27, 69) 156 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.2)
St. Croix County No 159.5 (148.1, 171.6) 32 (6, 58) 152 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Sauk County No 169.5 (157.3, 182.6) 11 (2, 44) 148 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.9, -0.1)
Chippewa County No 153.4 (141.7, 166.0) 42 (10, 64) 131 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Waupaca County No 162.4 (149.8, 176.0) 30 (4, 55) 131 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Columbia County No 165.4 (152.5, 179.3) 21 (3, 50) 126 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.6)
Barron County No 164.9 (151.4, 179.6) 23 (3, 58) 117 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.5)
Portage County No 137.7 (126.5, 149.7) 62 (35, 71) 117 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.8)
Marinette County No 168.6 (154.6, 183.8) 13 (2, 49) 116 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
Oneida County No 179.9 (164.5, 196.7) 4 (1, 39) 114 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.3)
Grant County No 163.2 (149.5, 178.1) 28 (3, 56) 109 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.2)
Polk County No 161.7 (147.9, 176.7) 31 (3, 59) 107 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Douglas County No 170.7 (155.5, 187.2) 10 (1, 49) 98 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.2)
Monroe County No 168.4 (153.3, 184.7) 14 (2, 53) 96 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.2)
Shawano County No 147.4 (133.7, 162.3) 50 (14, 70) 90 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Oconto County No 156.6 (141.8, 172.7) 38 (5, 67) 88 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Green County No 147.6 (132.8, 163.9) 47 (11, 70) 77 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.2)
Dunn County No 141.2 (126.9, 156.7) 57 (20, 71) 75 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Clark County No 167.4 (150.5, 185.9) 18 (2, 59) 75 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.1)
Door County No 136.1 (121.4, 152.7) 63 (28, 71) 74 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.6)
Lincoln County No 158.4 (142.0, 176.7) 36 (3, 66) 72 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.7)
Calumet County No 128.1 (114.8, 142.5) 70 (42, 71) 72 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.5)
Juneau County No 182.0 (163.0, 202.9) 3 (1, 42) 72 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.3)
Adams County No 179.4 (158.9, 202.8) 5 (1, 49) 69 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.1)
Vernon County No 155.9 (139.2, 174.3) 39 (4, 69) 69 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.2)
Pierce County No 147.4 (131.7, 164.5) 49 (10, 71) 68 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
Waushara County No 164.3 (146.4, 184.4) 25 (2, 64) 68 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.4)
Vilas County No 148.3 (131.2, 168.0) 45 (8, 71) 67 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.7)
Trempealeau County No 154.8 (137.2, 174.2) 40 (4, 70) 60 falling falling trend -0.5 (-1.0, -0.1)
Washburn County No 188.0 (164.8, 214.4) 2 (1, 42) 54 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.1)
Langlade County No 159.2 (139.9, 181.1) 33 (2, 69) 53 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
Burnett County No 173.0 (151.0, 198.5) 8 (1, 62) 51 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.2)
Jackson County No 173.0 (151.4, 197.3) 7 (1, 60) 49 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.6)
Marquette County No 175.0 (152.4, 201.0) 6 (1, 59) 47 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.3)
Green Lake County No 145.6 (126.6, 167.3) 52 (7, 71) 45 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)
Sawyer County No 171.8 (148.1, 199.6) 9 (1, 63) 44 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.6)
Iowa County No 133.4 (115.6, 153.3) 68 (25, 71) 43 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.4)
Kewaunee County No 138.6 (119.7, 160.0) 60 (13, 71) 42 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.9)
Crawford County No 157.7 (135.9, 182.7) 37 (2, 70) 41 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Lafayette County No 167.5 (144.6, 193.5) 16 (1, 67) 41 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Richland County No 133.7 (115.0, 155.1) 67 (18, 71) 40 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -1.0)
Taylor County No 133.3 (114.5, 154.6) 69 (21, 71) 39 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.9)
Bayfield County No 145.6 (123.7, 171.6) 51 (4, 71) 38 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.8, -1.0)
Price County No 153.6 (131.5, 179.6) 41 (2, 71) 38 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
Rusk County No 164.0 (139.7, 192.1) 26 (1, 69) 38 falling falling trend -4.8 (-7.2, -2.4)
Ashland County No 169.3 (144.4, 197.9) 12 (1, 68) 35 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.0)
Buffalo County No 139.9 (117.7, 165.9) 59 (7, 71) 30 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6)
Forest County No 167.5 (137.4, 204.4) 17 (1, 71) 24 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.1)
Iron County No 165.2 (133.7, 206.3) 22 (1, 71) 21 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.1)
Florence County No 222.9 (174.3, 284.8) 1 (1, 51) 17 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.2, 1.5)
Pepin County No 135.7 (106.5, 171.9) 65 (3, 71) 16 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.0)
Menominee County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 04/16/2024 8:21 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

6 Hispanic mortality recent trend data for the United States has been excluded for the following states: Louisiana, New Hampshire, and Oklahoma. The data on Hispanic and non-Hispanic mortality for these states may be unreliable for the time period used in the generation of the recent trend (1990 - 2020) and has been excluded from the calculation of the United States recent trend. This was based on the NCHS Policy.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top