Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Wisconsin by County

Colon & Rectum, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 8.9?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Wisconsin No 12.1 (11.8, 12.5) N/A 901 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.6, -1.8)
United States No 13.1 (13.1, 13.2) N/A 52,152 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.1, -1.8)
Forest County No 19.5 (11.1, 33.9) 2 (1, 60) 3
*
*
Iowa County No 9.1 (5.1, 15.5) 57 (9, 60) 3
*
*
Taylor County No 11.3 (6.6, 18.8) 40 (3, 60) 4
*
*
Waushara County No 9.4 (5.3, 16.0) 55 (5, 60) 4 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.6, -0.4)
Ashland County No 16.2 (9.7, 26.3) 7 (1, 60) 4 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.4, -0.2)
Crawford County No 15.4 (9.1, 25.1) 12 (1, 60) 4 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.0, -0.4)
Kewaunee County No 14.7 (8.6, 23.6) 19 (1, 60) 4
*
*
Sawyer County No 13.8 (8.1, 22.9) 26 (1, 60) 4 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.9, -0.7)
Jackson County No 13.9 (8.6, 21.8) 24 (1, 60) 4 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.0, -0.5)
Vernon County No 11.2 (7.1, 17.2) 41 (4, 60) 5 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.4, -1.9)
Adams County No 14.3 (8.6, 23.1) 22 (1, 60) 5 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.8, -0.3)
Door County Yes 7.8 (5.0, 12.6) 60 (25, 60) 5 falling falling trend -4.0 (-5.3, -2.7)
Burnett County No 16.8 (10.9, 26.4) 6 (1, 59) 5
*
*
Calumet County No 9.3 (6.0, 13.7) 56 (14, 60) 5
*
*
Dunn County No 9.9 (6.5, 14.7) 52 (11, 60) 5 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.3, -1.3)
Trempealeau County No 13.3 (8.7, 19.7) 28 (2, 60) 5 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.5, -1.0)
Green County No 11.0 (7.4, 16.1) 44 (7, 60) 6 falling falling trend -5.9 (-8.3, -3.4)
Juneau County No 15.2 (10.1, 22.3) 14 (1, 59) 6 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.7, -0.8)
Clark County No 14.3 (9.7, 20.4) 23 (1, 59) 6 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.2, -0.8)
Langlade County No 19.2 (12.8, 28.3) 3 (1, 52) 6 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.2, -0.5)
Washburn County No 23.6 (15.7, 35.0) 1 (1, 38) 6
*
*
Pierce County No 14.4 (9.8, 20.4) 21 (1, 59) 7
*
*
Vilas County No 15.9 (10.1, 24.4) 10 (1, 59) 7 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.2, 0.4)
Marinette County No 10.6 (7.4, 15.1) 49 (10, 60) 7 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.1, -1.2)
Lincoln County No 15.7 (11.1, 22.2) 11 (1, 57) 8 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.0, -0.8)
Columbia County No 12.0 (8.6, 16.4) 35 (5, 60) 9 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.7, -1.3)
Oconto County No 14.9 (10.7, 20.6) 15 (2, 58) 9 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.9, -1.4)
Shawano County No 13.8 (9.8, 19.0) 27 (2, 59) 9 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.9, -1.4)
Douglas County No 16.0 (11.7, 21.6) 9 (1, 55) 10 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.1, -1.5)
Monroe County No 16.9 (12.4, 22.7) 5 (1, 50) 10 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.8, -0.4)
Polk County No 14.9 (10.9, 20.1) 16 (1, 57) 10 falling falling trend -20.1 (-35.1, -1.6)
Jefferson County No 9.4 (7.0, 12.5) 54 (21, 60) 10 falling falling trend -3.8 (-4.8, -2.9)
Chippewa County No 11.9 (8.8, 15.8) 36 (7, 60) 10 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.4, -1.7)
Portage County No 12.8 (9.5, 17.0) 31 (4, 59) 11 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.9, -1.2)
Grant County No 16.2 (12.1, 21.5) 8 (1, 50) 11 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.0, -0.9)
Oneida County No 18.9 (13.8, 25.6) 4 (1, 43) 11 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.6)
Barron County No 15.4 (11.5, 20.3) 13 (1, 52) 11 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.2)
Waupaca County No 14.7 (11.1, 19.4) 18 (2, 54) 12 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.2, -0.6)
Eau Claire County No 10.7 (8.2, 13.8) 48 (13, 60) 13 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.2, -2.3)
St. Croix County No 13.1 (10.0, 16.8) 29 (5, 58) 13 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.2, -1.6)
Manitowoc County No 10.9 (8.3, 14.1) 47 (13, 60) 13 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.8, -2.1)
Sauk County No 14.9 (11.4, 19.1) 17 (2, 54) 13 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.3, -1.1)
Ozaukee County No 11.0 (8.6, 13.9) 45 (15, 60) 15 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.6, -1.2)
Dodge County No 13.0 (10.2, 16.4) 30 (6, 57) 15 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.4, -1.5)
La Crosse County No 10.9 (8.5, 13.8) 46 (15, 60) 15 falling falling trend -3.4 (-4.3, -2.4)
Wood County No 13.9 (10.8, 17.6) 25 (4, 55) 15 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.9, -0.8)
Marathon County No 9.1 (7.2, 11.4) 58 (29, 60) 17 falling falling trend -3.5 (-4.3, -2.7)
Fond du Lac County No 11.7 (9.3, 14.6) 38 (11, 58) 17 falling falling trend -3.5 (-4.4, -2.7)
Walworth County No 11.9 (9.4, 14.9) 37 (11, 58) 17 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.4, -1.3)
Sheboygan County No 11.2 (8.9, 13.9) 42 (14, 59) 17 falling falling trend -3.1 (-3.9, -2.3)
Washington County No 11.1 (9.0, 13.6) 43 (17, 59) 20 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.1, -1.5)
Winnebago County No 10.4 (8.5, 12.6) 50 (22, 60) 22 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.3, -1.6)
Rock County No 11.4 (9.4, 13.8) 39 (15, 58) 23 stable stable trend -23.4 (-43.8, 4.5)
Kenosha County No 12.1 (10.0, 14.6) 34 (12, 56) 24 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.2, -1.7)
Outagamie County No 12.7 (10.6, 15.0) 32 (10, 53) 27 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.1, -1.4)
Brown County No 10.3 (8.8, 12.1) 51 (26, 59) 31 falling falling trend -3.1 (-3.7, -2.5)
Racine County No 12.6 (10.7, 14.8) 33 (11, 52) 31 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.3, -1.7)
Dane County No 9.0 (8.0, 10.2) 59 (42, 60) 52 falling falling trend -3.2 (-3.9, -2.4)
Waukesha County No 9.8 (8.7, 11.1) 53 (35, 59) 57 falling falling trend -3.0 (-3.5, -2.5)
Milwaukee County No 14.6 (13.6, 15.7) 20 (8, 30) 149 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.4, -1.7)
Bayfield County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Buffalo County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Florence County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Green Lake County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Iron County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lafayette County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marquette County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menominee County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pepin County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Price County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Richland County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rusk County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 01/31/2023 9:20 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top