Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Wisconsin by County

Pancreas, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Wisconsin *** 11.7 (11.3, 12.0) N/A 895 rising rising trend 0.5 (0.3, 0.6)
United States *** 11.1 (11.0, 11.1) N/A 44,868 stable stable trend 0.1 (0.0, 0.2)
Burnett County *** 17.5 (11.2, 27.5) 1 (1, 58) 5
*
*
Marquette County *** 17.3 (11.0, 27.1) 2 (1, 59) 5
*
*
Washburn County *** 15.6 (9.8, 24.9) 3 (1, 60) 5
*
*
Monroe County *** 15.5 (11.2, 20.9) 4 (1, 55) 9 rising rising trend 2.3 (0.5, 4.2)
Oconto County *** 15.1 (10.9, 20.7) 5 (1, 56) 9 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.7, 2.7)
Clark County *** 14.9 (10.1, 21.4) 6 (1, 59) 7 rising rising trend 3.7 (2.0, 5.5)
Iowa County *** 14.6 (9.4, 22.1) 7 (1, 60) 5
*
*
Ashland County *** 14.4 (8.3, 24.1) 8 (1, 60) 3
*
*
Chippewa County *** 14.4 (11.1, 18.5) 9 (1, 52) 13 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.3, 2.3)
Rusk County *** 14.2 (8.4, 24.0) 10 (1, 60) 4
*
*
Lafayette County *** 14.0 (7.9, 23.3) 11 (1, 60) 3
*
*
Adams County *** 13.9 (9.3, 21.4) 12 (1, 60) 6
*
*
Shawano County *** 13.6 (9.7, 18.8) 13 (1, 59) 9 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.1, 3.8)
Grant County *** 13.5 (9.9, 18.1) 14 (1, 58) 9 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.4, 3.4)
Sauk County *** 13.3 (10.2, 17.3) 15 (2, 57) 12 rising rising trend 2.3 (0.8, 3.7)
Walworth County *** 13.2 (10.5, 16.4) 16 (2, 55) 18 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.2, 2.9)
Marinette County *** 13.1 (9.5, 18.0) 17 (1, 59) 9 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.7, 1.6)
Milwaukee County *** 12.8 (11.9, 13.9) 18 (9, 36) 133 stable stable trend 0.4 (0.0, 0.9)
St. Croix County *** 12.8 (9.8, 16.5) 19 (2, 58) 13 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.1, 2.4)
Lincoln County *** 12.8 (8.6, 18.8) 20 (1, 60) 6 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.5, 0.7)
Polk County *** 12.7 (9.2, 17.4) 21 (1, 59) 9 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.8, 2.6)
Price County *** 12.7 (7.4, 22.3) 22 (1, 60) 3
*
*
Eau Claire County *** 12.7 (9.9, 15.9) 23 (3, 57) 15 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.1, 2.4)
Sawyer County *** 12.6 (7.3, 21.3) 24 (1, 60) 4
*
*
Portage County *** 12.6 (9.4, 16.5) 25 (2, 59) 11 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.2, 1.2)
Juneau County *** 12.5 (8.1, 18.8) 26 (1, 60) 5
*
*
Outagamie County *** 12.4 (10.4, 14.7) 27 (5, 54) 28 stable stable trend 11.7 (-1.5, 26.7)
Ozaukee County *** 11.9 (9.5, 14.9) 28 (5, 58) 17 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.9, 1.5)
Kenosha County *** 11.8 (9.7, 14.3) 29 (7, 56) 23 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.5, 1.7)
Rock County *** 11.7 (9.7, 14.1) 30 (7, 56) 25 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.4, 1.4)
Green County *** 11.7 (7.8, 17.2) 31 (2, 60) 6 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.9, 2.9)
Columbia County *** 11.7 (8.5, 15.8) 32 (3, 60) 9 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.1, 2.5)
Fond du Lac County *** 11.6 (9.2, 14.5) 33 (6, 59) 17 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.7, 2.1)
Pierce County *** 11.5 (7.4, 17.1) 34 (1, 60) 5
*
*
Door County *** 11.4 (7.4, 17.4) 35 (1, 60) 6
*
*
Waukesha County *** 11.3 (10.1, 12.6) 36 (16, 54) 66 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.4, 1.0)
Oneida County *** 11.3 (7.8, 16.3) 37 (2, 60) 7 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.7, 1.6)
Washington County *** 11.2 (9.2, 13.6) 38 (10, 58) 22 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.9, 1.0)
Manitowoc County *** 11.1 (8.6, 14.1) 39 (7, 59) 14 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.6, 1.5)
Dunn County *** 11.0 (7.2, 16.2) 40 (3, 60) 5
*
*
Dane County *** 11.0 (9.7, 12.3) 41 (18, 55) 62 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.4, 0.9)
Winnebago County *** 10.9 (9.0, 13.1) 42 (12, 59) 24 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.7, 1.2)
Dodge County *** 10.9 (8.4, 14.0) 43 (8, 60) 13 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.4, 1.8)
Brown County *** 10.9 (9.3, 12.7) 44 (14, 58) 34 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.3, 1.0)
Wood County *** 10.9 (8.2, 14.2) 45 (6, 60) 13 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.1, 1.9)
Racine County *** 10.8 (9.0, 12.8) 46 (13, 58) 28 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.0, 1.2)
Langlade County *** 10.8 (6.6, 17.7) 47 (2, 60) 4 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.3, 2.7)
Waupaca County *** 10.7 (7.7, 14.7) 48 (6, 60) 9 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 0.7)
La Crosse County *** 10.5 (8.3, 13.2) 49 (11, 60) 16 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.2, 1.7)
Trempealeau County *** 10.3 (6.2, 16.4) 50 (2, 60) 4
*
*
Calumet County *** 10.2 (6.9, 14.7) 51 (5, 60) 6
*
*
Waushara County *** 10.1 (6.1, 16.5) 52 (3, 60) 4 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.8, 2.5)
Marathon County *** 10.0 (8.1, 12.3) 53 (16, 60) 19 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.2, 0.9)
Barron County *** 9.9 (6.9, 14.1) 54 (7, 60) 7 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.5, 1.6)
Sheboygan County *** 9.8 (7.8, 12.4) 55 (16, 60) 16 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.8, 1.2)
Vilas County *** 9.6 (6.2, 15.6) 56 (6, 60) 5
*
*
Vernon County *** 9.5 (5.8, 14.9) 57 (4, 60) 5 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.8, 0.4)
Jefferson County *** 9.4 (7.0, 12.4) 58 (15, 60) 11 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.8, 1.0)
Douglas County *** 9.3 (6.1, 13.6) 59 (8, 60) 6 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.4, -0.6)
Kewaunee County *** 9.2 (5.2, 15.8) 60 (3, 60) 3
*
*
Bayfield County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Buffalo County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crawford County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Florence County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Forest County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Green Lake County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Iron County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menominee County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pepin County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Richland County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Taylor County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/27/2022 10:57 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top