Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Wisconsin by County

Lung & Bronchus, 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Wisconsin *** 37.0 (36.4, 37.6) N/A 2,770 falling falling trend -3.8 (-4.5, -3.1)
United States *** 36.7 (36.6, 36.8) N/A 146,023 falling falling trend -4.9 (-5.2, -4.5)
Milwaukee County *** 41.5 (39.7, 43.4) 25 (13, 36) 422 falling falling trend -3.4 (-4.2, -2.6)
Waukesha County *** 32.8 (30.7, 35.0) 55 (39, 64) 184 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.3, -2.3)
Dane County *** 27.8 (25.8, 29.9) 68 (56, 71) 154 falling falling trend -7.1 (-10.4, -3.6)
Racine County *** 43.5 (39.9, 47.5) 19 (5, 40) 107 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.3)
Brown County *** 33.2 (30.3, 36.3) 53 (33, 65) 100 falling falling trend -11.0 (-19.2, -1.9)
Rock County *** 45.6 (41.6, 50.0) 17 (3, 33) 96 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.6)
Kenosha County *** 45.8 (41.5, 50.5) 15 (3, 34) 85 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.5, -1.5)
Winnebago County *** 37.8 (34.2, 41.8) 40 (16, 57) 81 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.5)
Outagamie County *** 33.1 (29.6, 36.8) 54 (32, 67) 70 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.4, -1.2)
Marathon County *** 34.9 (31.1, 39.0) 45 (24, 64) 64 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.1)
Sheboygan County *** 34.5 (30.5, 39.0) 49 (23, 66) 55 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Manitowoc County *** 43.3 (38.1, 49.1) 20 (4, 46) 53 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.3)
Washington County *** 28.0 (24.7, 31.8) 65 (49, 71) 52 falling falling trend -5.5 (-8.3, -2.7)
La Crosse County *** 34.6 (30.4, 39.2) 48 (21, 65) 51 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.8)
Fond du Lac County *** 34.6 (30.3, 39.4) 47 (23, 66) 49 stable stable trend -8.9 (-17.2, 0.3)
Walworth County *** 34.7 (30.4, 39.6) 46 (21, 66) 47 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6)
Dodge County *** 38.3 (33.5, 43.8) 37 (11, 60) 47 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.1)
Eau Claire County *** 38.3 (33.4, 43.7) 38 (12, 60) 46 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.4)
Wood County *** 37.1 (32.2, 42.6) 41 (12, 63) 43 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.3)
Ozaukee County *** 31.2 (27.0, 36.0) 60 (33, 70) 40 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.1, -1.0)
St. Croix County *** 38.7 (33.2, 45.0) 33 (8, 63) 37 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.6)
Jefferson County *** 32.2 (27.6, 37.5) 56 (26, 70) 35 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.5, -1.0)
Sauk County *** 39.2 (33.5, 45.6) 30 (7, 60) 35 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.4)
Chippewa County *** 40.4 (34.5, 47.2) 28 (4, 58) 35 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 0.7)
Marinette County *** 47.5 (40.3, 55.8) 6 (1, 40) 33 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.1)
Waupaca County *** 39.2 (33.2, 46.0) 31 (5, 62) 33 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.7)
Oneida County *** 46.4 (39.1, 55.0) 11 (1, 48) 31 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.1)
Barron County *** 41.8 (35.3, 49.3) 22 (4, 59) 31 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.3)
Columbia County *** 36.3 (30.5, 42.9) 42 (11, 67) 29 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Douglas County *** 47.5 (39.6, 56.5) 7 (1, 46) 27 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.1)
Polk County *** 36.1 (30.0, 43.4) 43 (10, 68) 25 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.4)
Monroe County *** 41.4 (34.2, 49.7) 26 (3, 61) 25 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.8)
Grant County *** 35.6 (29.4, 42.7) 44 (11, 69) 24 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.4)
Portage County *** 27.0 (22.3, 32.5) 69 (44, 71) 24 falling falling trend -7.4 (-12.2, -2.2)
Oconto County *** 40.0 (32.9, 48.5) 29 (3, 64) 23 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.3)
Shawano County *** 32.1 (26.2, 39.1) 57 (21, 71) 21 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.0)
Waushara County *** 46.6 (37.8, 57.4) 9 (1, 57) 20 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.4)
Adams County *** 49.5 (40.0, 61.5) 4 (1, 50) 20 stable stable trend -11.7 (-22.5, 0.6)
Green County *** 38.6 (31.2, 47.3) 34 (5, 67) 20 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.5)
Juneau County *** 47.0 (37.8, 58.0) 8 (1, 55) 19 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.5, -1.4)
Dunn County *** 34.2 (27.4, 42.3) 51 (12, 70) 18 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.0, 1.5)
Lincoln County *** 38.0 (30.4, 47.3) 39 (4, 69) 18 stable stable trend -9.0 (-19.6, 3.1)
Clark County *** 39.1 (31.1, 48.6) 32 (3, 68) 17 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.3, 1.2)
Vilas County *** 33.5 (26.7, 42.6) 52 (12, 71) 17 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.0, -0.7)
Trempealeau County *** 42.3 (33.6, 52.8) 21 (2, 65) 17 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.2, 2.2)
Door County *** 27.9 (21.9, 35.7) 66 (32, 71) 16 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.1, 0.5)
Langlade County *** 44.9 (35.3, 57.0) 18 (1, 62) 15 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 0.8)
Sawyer County *** 48.4 (37.9, 62.0) 5 (1, 57) 15 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.4)
Calumet County *** 25.2 (19.7, 31.9) 70 (45, 71) 15 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.9, -0.5)
Burnett County *** 46.5 (36.0, 60.3) 10 (1, 60) 15 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.6, 0.9)
Vernon County *** 31.1 (24.2, 39.7) 62 (17, 71) 14 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.1, -0.1)
Green Lake County *** 45.9 (35.6, 58.9) 13 (1, 61) 14 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.0, 1.6)
Washburn County *** 46.0 (35.1, 60.3) 12 (1, 63) 13 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.5, -0.4)
Pierce County *** 27.9 (21.3, 35.9) 67 (30, 71) 13 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.1, -0.4)
Crawford County *** 45.9 (34.7, 60.1) 14 (1, 64) 12 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.3, 1.4)
Jackson County *** 38.4 (29.2, 50.1) 35 (2, 70) 12 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.5, -0.6)
Marquette County *** 41.6 (31.4, 55.0) 24 (1, 68) 12 falling falling trend -4.0 (-7.2, -0.7)
Taylor County *** 38.4 (29.1, 50.2) 36 (2, 70) 12 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.8, 1.1)
Ashland County *** 52.9 (39.6, 69.7) 3 (1, 58) 11 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.0, 1.6)
Price County *** 45.7 (33.8, 61.5) 16 (1, 67) 11 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.0, 1.7)
Iowa County *** 34.4 (25.7, 45.4) 50 (5, 71) 11 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.2)
Rusk County *** 41.0 (30.5, 55.1) 27 (1, 69) 10 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.2, 1.5)
Bayfield County *** 31.2 (22.7, 43.1) 61 (11, 71) 10 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.8, -0.2)
Richland County *** 31.2 (22.8, 42.4) 58 (12, 71) 10 stable stable trend -1.9 (-3.7, 0.0)
Kewaunee County *** 29.2 (21.1, 40.0) 64 (15, 71) 9 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.5)
Iron County *** 66.4 (46.8, 95.9) 1 (1, 40) 8 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.3, 1.4)
Lafayette County *** 31.2 (22.1, 43.5) 59 (8, 71) 8 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.9, 1.5)
Buffalo County *** 30.2 (20.7, 43.6) 63 (7, 71) 7 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.0, 1.5)
Forest County *** 41.7 (27.7, 61.6) 23 (1, 71) 6 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.1, 0.5)
Florence County *** 54.3 (34.1, 88.1) 2 (1, 71) 5
*
*
Pepin County *** 23.2 (13.2, 40.4) 71 (22, 71) 3 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.6, 0.7)
Menominee County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/26/2021 8:10 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top