Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Wisconsin by County

Breast, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Name

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 15.3?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Wisconsin N/A No 17.9 (17.3, 18.6) N/A 723 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -0.8)
United States N/A No 19.3 (19.2, 19.4) N/A 42,308 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.3, -1.1)
Wood County Rural No 21.4 (16.1, 28.1) 7 (1, 42) 13 stable stable trend 3.2 (-1.3, 20.6)
Winnebago County Urban No 18.4 (14.8, 22.5) 24 (4, 44) 21 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.1, -0.7)
Waushara County Rural No 22.9 (13.2, 38.0) 4 (1, 47) 4
*
*
Waupaca County Rural No 23.4 (16.6, 32.3) 2 (1, 43) 9 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.1)
Waukesha County Urban Yes 15.1 (13.2, 17.3) 40 (22, 46) 49 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.3, -2.2)
Washington County Urban No 19.3 (15.4, 23.8) 18 (2, 43) 19 stable stable trend 18.1 (-0.6, 41.3)
Walworth County Rural No 21.6 (16.8, 27.4) 6 (1, 39) 15 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.7, 7.9)
Vilas County Rural No 17.9 (11.0, 30.2) 25 (1, 47) 4 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.3, -1.3)
St. Croix County Urban No 18.8 (14.0, 24.7) 22 (2, 46) 11 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.2)
Sheboygan County Urban No 18.5 (14.6, 23.4) 23 (3, 45) 16 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.5, -1.0)
Shawano County Rural No 19.4 (12.4, 29.2) 17 (1, 47) 6
*
*
Sauk County Rural No 16.8 (11.8, 23.6) 33 (2, 47) 8 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.6, -0.3)
Rock County Urban No 20.3 (16.6, 24.5) 13 (2, 38) 23 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.7, -1.1)
Racine County Urban No 17.3 (14.3, 20.9) 29 (7, 44) 24 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.8, -1.2)
Portage County Rural No 16.2 (11.3, 22.7) 37 (4, 47) 8 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.5, -0.6)
Polk County Rural No 20.7 (14.4, 29.5) 11 (1, 46) 7 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.7, -0.8)
Pierce County Urban Yes 12.8 (7.2, 21.2) 47 (6, 47) 3 falling falling trend -7.7 (-43.5, -2.9)
Ozaukee County Urban Yes 14.4 (10.5, 19.4) 43 (12, 47) 10 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.5, -1.9)
Outagamie County Urban No 17.0 (13.9, 20.7) 32 (7, 45) 21 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.7)
Oneida County Rural No 27.3 (18.9, 38.9) 1 (1, 37) 9 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.4, 1.1)
Oconto County Urban No 20.2 (13.0, 30.3) 14 (1, 47) 6 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.1, 0.1)
Monroe County Rural No 21.8 (14.9, 31.2) 5 (1, 45) 7 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.0, -0.6)
Milwaukee County Urban No 20.5 (18.8, 22.3) 12 (4, 27) 113 stable stable trend -1.6 (-2.0, 0.3)
Marinette County Rural No 16.4 (10.6, 25.0) 36 (2, 47) 6 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.9, -1.6)
Marathon County Urban Yes 14.3 (11.1, 18.2) 44 (17, 47) 14 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.2, -1.6)
Manitowoc County Rural No 19.1 (14.0, 25.7) 20 (1, 46) 11 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.6, -0.2)
Lincoln County Rural Yes 14.6 (8.5, 24.5) 42 (3, 47) 4 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.8, -1.6)
La Crosse County Urban No 16.1 (12.3, 20.8) 38 (7, 47) 13 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.9, -0.3)
Kenosha County Urban No 21.2 (17.4, 25.7) 8 (1, 37) 23 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.1, -1.3)
Juneau County Rural No 17.9 (10.4, 29.7) 27 (1, 47) 4 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.4, 0.7)
Jefferson County Rural No 17.3 (12.8, 23.1) 30 (3, 47) 10 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.9, -0.1)
Green County Urban No 18.9 (11.7, 29.2) 21 (1, 47) 5 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.4, -0.2)
Grant County Rural No 17.0 (10.9, 25.5) 31 (1, 47) 6 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.2, -0.9)
Fond du Lac County Urban No 17.9 (13.8, 23.0) 26 (3, 46) 14 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.6, -1.1)
Eau Claire County Urban No 16.6 (12.2, 22.1) 35 (4, 47) 10 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.7, -0.8)
Dunn County Rural No 17.4 (10.8, 26.7) 28 (1, 47) 5 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.7, 0.2)
Douglas County Urban Yes 14.3 (8.9, 22.1) 45 (5, 47) 5 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.1, -1.5)
Door County Rural Yes 14.7 (8.1, 25.6) 41 (2, 47) 4 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.1, 0.0)
Dodge County Rural No 19.2 (14.7, 24.8) 19 (2, 44) 13 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.3, -2.0)
Dane County Urban No 16.6 (14.6, 18.8) 34 (15, 43) 54 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.8, -1.7)
Columbia County Urban No 21.1 (15.3, 28.8) 9 (1, 45) 9 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.3, -0.1)
Clark County Rural No 19.5 (11.4, 31.2) 16 (1, 47) 4 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.7, 0.5)
Chippewa County Urban Yes 12.9 (8.5, 19.1) 46 (10, 47) 6 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.7, -0.2)
Calumet County Urban Yes 15.3 (9.8, 23.0) 39 (3, 47) 5 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.1, 0.0)
Brown County Urban No 21.1 (18.0, 24.6) 10 (2, 32) 35 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.5)
Barron County Rural No 19.8 (13.5, 28.4) 15 (1, 47) 8 falling falling trend -2.1 (-4.1, -0.3)
Adams County Rural No 23.3 (12.3, 41.8) 3 (1, 47) 4
*
*
Ashland County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bayfield County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Buffalo County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Burnett County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crawford County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Florence County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Forest County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Green Lake County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Iowa County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Iron County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kewaunee County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lafayette County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Langlade County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marquette County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menominee County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pepin County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Price County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Richland County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rusk County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sawyer County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Taylor County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Trempealeau County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Vernon County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washburn County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/06/2024 3:16 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top