Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Wisconsin by County

Breast, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 15.3?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Wisconsin No 18.4 (17.8, 19.0) N/A 722 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.0)
United States No 19.6 (19.5, 19.7) N/A 42,101 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.4, -1.1)
Wood County No 21.3 (15.8, 28.3) 11 (1, 46) 12 stable stable trend -7.3 (-43.2, 51.4)
Winnebago County No 18.2 (14.6, 22.4) 32 (6, 47) 20 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.1, -1.3)
Waupaca County No 20.2 (14.1, 28.5) 15 (1, 49) 8 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.5)
Waukesha County No 17.5 (15.3, 19.8) 34 (13, 44) 54 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.2, -2.1)
Washington County Yes 13.5 (10.4, 17.5) 47 (22, 50) 13 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.4, -1.0)
Walworth County No 20.9 (16.2, 26.6) 13 (2, 44) 15 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.2, -1.1)
Vilas County No 23.3 (15.1, 36.9) 7 (1, 49) 5 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.8, -0.9)
Vernon County No 23.5 (14.9, 35.7) 5 (1, 48) 5 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.6, 1.4)
St. Croix County No 19.1 (14.1, 25.3) 26 (2, 48) 10 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.2)
Sheboygan County No 17.0 (13.3, 21.7) 39 (8, 49) 15 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.2, -1.2)
Shawano County Yes 14.1 (8.5, 22.5) 43 (6, 50) 4
*
*
Sauk County No 18.9 (13.5, 25.9) 27 (2, 49) 9 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.4, -0.1)
Rock County No 20.4 (16.7, 24.7) 14 (3, 42) 23 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.6, -1.1)
Racine County No 20.1 (16.7, 23.9) 18 (4, 41) 27 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.7, -1.1)
Portage County No 17.5 (12.4, 24.3) 33 (3, 50) 8 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.2, -0.4)
Polk County No 21.5 (14.6, 30.9) 9 (1, 49) 7 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.8, -1.1)
Pierce County Yes 12.9 (7.4, 21.3) 48 (6, 50) 3 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.0, -1.1)
Ozaukee County Yes 14.6 (10.7, 19.6) 42 (13, 50) 10 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.5, -2.1)
Outagamie County No 16.4 (13.2, 20.1) 40 (12, 49) 19 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.5, -0.9)
Oneida County No 27.3 (18.6, 39.3) 2 (1, 42) 8 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.5, 0.6)
Oconto County No 19.4 (12.0, 30.0) 23 (1, 50) 5 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.1, 0.1)
Monroe County No 20.0 (13.5, 28.8) 19 (1, 49) 6 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.1, -0.8)
Milwaukee County No 20.1 (18.4, 21.9) 17 (8, 33) 112 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.6, -1.8)
Marquette County No 23.4 (12.8, 41.6) 6 (1, 50) 3
*
*
Marinette County No 19.5 (12.8, 28.9) 21 (1, 50) 6 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.5, -1.3)
Marathon County No 17.3 (13.6, 21.7) 36 (7, 48) 16 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.0, -1.4)
Manitowoc County No 21.5 (16.3, 28.0) 10 (1, 44) 13 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.1)
Lincoln County Yes 13.5 (8.0, 23.0) 46 (6, 50) 4 falling falling trend -8.0 (-12.8, -2.8)
La Crosse County No 18.2 (14.1, 23.3) 31 (4, 48) 14 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.6, -0.2)
Kenosha County No 20.2 (16.4, 24.6) 16 (3, 43) 21 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.2, -1.5)
Juneau County No 21.2 (12.7, 34.0) 12 (1, 50) 4 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.7, 1.0)
Jefferson County No 19.7 (14.7, 26.0) 20 (2, 47) 11 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.0, -0.5)
Green Lake County No 17.1 (9.7, 30.0) 38 (1, 50) 3 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.0, 1.3)
Green County No 19.4 (12.4, 29.3) 24 (1, 50) 5 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.5, -0.3)
Grant County No 17.3 (11.2, 25.7) 35 (2, 50) 6 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.9, -0.7)
Fond du Lac County No 19.2 (14.8, 24.5) 25 (3, 46) 15 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.7, -1.0)
Eau Claire County Yes 12.5 (8.9, 17.3) 50 (21, 50) 8 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.0, -1.2)
Dunn County No 18.6 (12.0, 27.8) 29 (1, 50) 5 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.9, -0.1)
Douglas County No 16.2 (10.3, 24.6) 41 (3, 50) 5 falling falling trend -3.7 (-5.4, -2.0)
Door County No 18.9 (10.7, 31.7) 28 (1, 50) 4 falling falling trend -1.5 (-3.0, -0.1)
Dodge County No 17.2 (12.8, 22.8) 37 (5, 49) 11 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.4, -2.1)
Dane County No 18.3 (16.1, 20.6) 30 (10, 42) 56 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.7, -1.6)
Columbia County No 25.3 (18.4, 34.2) 3 (1, 41) 10 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.0, 0.0)
Clark County Yes 13.6 (7.9, 22.3) 45 (6, 50) 4 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.0, -0.4)
Chippewa County Yes 12.6 (8.0, 19.0) 49 (13, 50) 5 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.5, 0.0)
Calumet County Yes 13.7 (8.4, 21.4) 44 (6, 50) 4 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.2, 0.0)
Brown County No 22.6 (19.4, 26.2) 8 (2, 31) 37 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.6)
Bayfield County No 24.1 (13.3, 43.0) 4 (1, 50) 3
*
*
Barron County No 19.5 (13.1, 28.2) 22 (1, 50) 7 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.9, -0.6)
Ashland County No 27.9 (15.3, 47.8) 1 (1, 50) 3 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.4, 2.0)
Adams County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Buffalo County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Burnett County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crawford County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Florence County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Forest County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Iowa County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Iron County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kewaunee County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lafayette County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Langlade County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menominee County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pepin County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Price County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Richland County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rusk County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sawyer County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Taylor County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Trempealeau County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washburn County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Waushara County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/28/2024 11:27 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top