Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Wisconsin by County

Kidney & Renal Pelvis, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate

County
sort alphabetically by name ascending 		2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
sort by rural urban descending 		Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
 Age-Adjusted Death Rate †
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate ascending 		CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by CI rank descending 		Average Annual Count
sort by count descending 		Recent Trend
 Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
Wisconsin N/A *** 3.8 (3.6, 4.0) N/A 298 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.0, -0.4)
United States N/A *** 3.4 (3.4, 3.5) N/A 14,249 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -1.2)
Wood County Rural *** 6.2 (4.4, 8.7) 1 (1, 18) 8 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.8, 3.1)
Dodge County Rural *** 5.4 (3.7, 7.6) 2 (1, 21) 7
*
*
Eau Claire County Urban *** 5.2 (3.4, 7.4) 3 (1, 23) 6 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.9, 2.1)
Chippewa County Urban *** 5.1 (3.2, 7.8) 4 (1, 25) 5 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.4, 0.2)
Sauk County Rural *** 5.0 (3.2, 7.6) 5 (1, 24) 5
*
*
Brown County Urban *** 5.0 (3.9, 6.3) 6 (1, 19) 15 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.9, 2.2)
La Crosse County Urban *** 5.0 (3.5, 6.9) 7 (1, 23) 7 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.7, 1.8)
Grant County Rural *** 4.8 (2.7, 8.0) 8 (1, 26) 3
*
*
Polk County Rural *** 4.7 (2.8, 7.9) 9 (1, 26) 4
*
*
Portage County Rural *** 4.7 (2.8, 7.3) 10 (1, 26) 4
*
*
Jefferson County Rural *** 4.6 (3.0, 6.9) 11 (1, 25) 5 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.7, 1.0)
Manitowoc County Rural *** 4.5 (3.0, 6.7) 12 (1, 25) 6
*
*
Racine County Urban *** 4.1 (3.1, 5.4) 13 (3, 24) 11 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.7)
Washington County Urban *** 3.9 (2.8, 5.4) 14 (3, 25) 8
*
*
Kenosha County Urban *** 3.8 (2.7, 5.3) 15 (3, 26) 7 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.3)
Milwaukee County Urban *** 3.7 (3.2, 4.3) 16 (8, 23) 39 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.5)
Sheboygan County Urban *** 3.7 (2.5, 5.3) 17 (3, 26) 6 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.2, 0.1)
Rock County Urban *** 3.7 (2.6, 5.1) 18 (4, 26) 8 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.8, 0.9)
Outagamie County Urban *** 3.7 (2.7, 5.0) 19 (4, 26) 9 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.0, 0.1)
Fond du Lac County Urban *** 3.4 (2.2, 5.2) 20 (3, 26) 5
*
*
Walworth County Rural *** 3.4 (2.2, 5.2) 21 (4, 26) 5 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.6, 0.9)
Winnebago County Urban *** 3.2 (2.2, 4.5) 22 (7, 26) 7 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.0, -0.3)
Dane County Urban *** 3.0 (2.4, 3.7) 23 (13, 26) 19 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 1.3)
Marathon County Urban *** 2.6 (1.7, 3.9) 24 (12, 26) 5 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.3, -0.5)
Waukesha County Urban *** 2.6 (2.0, 3.2) 25 (17, 26) 16 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.6, -0.1)
Ozaukee County Urban *** 2.2 (1.3, 3.8) 26 (15, 26) 3
*
*
Adams County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ashland County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Barron County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bayfield County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Buffalo County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Burnett County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Calumet County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clark County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Columbia County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crawford County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Door County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Douglas County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dunn County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Florence County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Forest County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Green County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Green Lake County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Iowa County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Iron County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Juneau County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kewaunee County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lafayette County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Langlade County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lincoln County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marinette County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marquette County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menominee County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Monroe County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oconto County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oneida County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pepin County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pierce County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Price County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Richland County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rusk County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sawyer County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shawano County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
St. Croix County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Taylor County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Trempealeau County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Vernon County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Vilas County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washburn County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Waupaca County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Waushara County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/22/2024 4:01 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

*** No Healthy People 2030 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top