Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Wyoming by County

All Cancer Sites, 2016-2020

White Non-Hispanic, Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Wyoming No 138.8 (134.7, 143.0) N/A 920 falling falling trend -1.7 (-1.9, -1.5)
United States 6 No 154.4 (154.1, 154.6) N/A 464,265 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.0, -1.7)
Albany County Yes 110.0 (93.3, 128.9) 20 (13, 23) 33 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.9, -1.5)
Big Horn County No 157.7 (130.4, 189.8) 6 (1, 18) 26 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.0)
Campbell County No 164.4 (144.5, 186.2) 3 (1, 14) 58 stable stable trend -1.0 (-1.9, 0.0)
Carbon County No 135.5 (110.4, 165.0) 14 (2, 21) 22 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.4)
Converse County No 148.4 (122.7, 178.2) 7 (1, 19) 25 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.6, -0.7)
Crook County No 160.5 (127.6, 200.7) 5 (1, 19) 18 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.1)
Fremont County No 140.7 (125.4, 157.7) 13 (3, 18) 66 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.7)
Goshen County No 164.7 (139.5, 194.0) 2 (1, 15) 33 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.3)
Hot Springs County No 183.8 (144.3, 234.7) 1 (1, 16) 16 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.1)
Johnson County No 129.1 (103.6, 160.8) 16 (3, 22) 19 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.7, -0.5)
Laramie County No 145.7 (135.4, 156.7) 8 (3, 16) 154 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.0)
Lincoln County Yes 111.5 (92.4, 133.6) 19 (11, 23) 26 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.2)
Natrona County No 141.7 (130.6, 153.6) 12 (4, 17) 127 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.3)
Niobrara County Yes 94.8 (57.5, 155.5) 22 (5, 23) 4 falling falling trend -6.3 (-9.3, -3.2)
Park County No 125.6 (110.6, 142.5) 18 (8, 21) 57 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.1, -1.0)
Platte County No 143.6 (117.3, 176.1) 11 (1, 20) 22 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -0.8)
Sheridan County No 143.8 (127.8, 161.5) 10 (3, 18) 63 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.8)
Sublette County Yes 80.8 (60.2, 107.3) 23 (19, 23) 11 falling falling trend -3.7 (-4.9, -2.5)
Sweetwater County No 163.0 (144.1, 183.8) 4 (1, 14) 59 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Teton County Yes 96.8 (79.3, 117.4) 21 (17, 23) 22 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.5, -1.6)
Uinta County No 127.9 (106.4, 152.6) 17 (4, 21) 27 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.5, -1.1)
Washakie County No 134.5 (106.7, 169.5) 15 (2, 22) 17 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.1)
Weston County No 145.5 (113.7, 185.2) 9 (1, 21) 15 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.3)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 04/16/2024 6:51 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

6 Hispanic mortality recent trend data for the United States has been excluded for the following states: Louisiana, New Hampshire, and Oklahoma. The data on Hispanic and non-Hispanic mortality for these states may be unreliable for the time period used in the generation of the recent trend (1990 - 2020) and has been excluded from the calculation of the United States recent trend. This was based on the NCHS Policy.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top