Interpretation of Demographics Data
Demographic Data Report for South Dakota by County
Poverty: Families below poverty
All Ages, All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes
2020-2024 American Community Survey 5-Year Data
Sorted by Percent
South Dakota
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : N/A
- Value (Percent) : The value is 7.5 percent.
- Families (Below Poverty) : The number of families (below poverty) is 16,825.
- Rank within US : This county is ranked 24 of 52
United States
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : N/A
- Value (Percent) : The value is 8.8 percent.
- Families (Below Poverty) : The number of families (below poverty) is 7,273,175.
- Rank within US : N/A
Aurora County
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Value (Percent) : The value is 7.8 percent.
- Families (Below Poverty) : The number of families (below poverty) is 52.
- Rank within US : This county is ranked 1185 of 3143
Beadle County
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Value (Percent) : The value is 7.0 percent.
- Families (Below Poverty) : The number of families (below poverty) is 334.
- Rank within US : This county is ranked 925 of 3143
Bennett County
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Value (Percent) : The value is 28.2 percent.
- Families (Below Poverty) : The number of families (below poverty) is 204.
- Rank within US : This county is ranked 3112 of 3143
Bon Homme County
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Value (Percent) : The value is 5.0 percent.
- Families (Below Poverty) : The number of families (below poverty) is 78.
- Rank within US : This county is ranked 363 of 3143
Brookings County
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Value (Percent) : The value is 5.2 percent.
- Families (Below Poverty) : The number of families (below poverty) is 362.
- Rank within US : This county is ranked 415 of 3143
Brown County
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Value (Percent) : The value is 6.8 percent.
- Families (Below Poverty) : The number of families (below poverty) is 606.
- Rank within US : This county is ranked 856 of 3143
Brule County
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Value (Percent) : The value is 5.2 percent.
- Families (Below Poverty) : The number of families (below poverty) is 62.
- Rank within US : This county is ranked 415 of 3143
Buffalo County
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Value (Percent) : The value is 29.3 percent.
- Families (Below Poverty) : The number of families (below poverty) is 95.
- Rank within US : This county is ranked 3115 of 3143
Butte County
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Value (Percent) : The value is 6.8 percent.
- Families (Below Poverty) : The number of families (below poverty) is 200.
- Rank within US : This county is ranked 856 of 3143
Campbell County
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Value (Percent) : The value is 6.3 percent.
- Families (Below Poverty) : The number of families (below poverty) is 31.
- Rank within US : This county is ranked 716 of 3143
Charles Mix County
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Value (Percent) : The value is 15.5 percent.
- Families (Below Poverty) : The number of families (below poverty) is 302.
- Rank within US : This county is ranked 2726 of 3143
Clark County
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Value (Percent) : The value is 5.4 percent.
- Families (Below Poverty) : The number of families (below poverty) is 46.
- Rank within US : This county is ranked 462 of 3143
Clay County
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Value (Percent) : The value is 3.1 percent.
- Families (Below Poverty) : The number of families (below poverty) is 80.
- Rank within US : This county is ranked 67 of 3143
Codington County
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Value (Percent) : The value is 4.8 percent.
- Families (Below Poverty) : The number of families (below poverty) is 349.
- Rank within US : This county is ranked 319 of 3143
Corson County
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Value (Percent) : The value is 34.0 percent.
- Families (Below Poverty) : The number of families (below poverty) is 283.
- Rank within US : This county is ranked 3134 of 3143
Custer County
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
- Value (Percent) : The value is 6.6 percent.
- Families (Below Poverty) : The number of families (below poverty) is 205.
- Rank within US : This county is ranked 809 of 3143
Davison County
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Value (Percent) : The value is 6.7 percent.
- Families (Below Poverty) : The number of families (below poverty) is 347.
- Rank within US : This county is ranked 831 of 3143
Day County
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Value (Percent) : The value is 7.9 percent.
- Families (Below Poverty) : The number of families (below poverty) is 111.
- Rank within US : This county is ranked 1213 of 3143
Deuel County
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Value (Percent) : The value is 5.2 percent.
- Families (Below Poverty) : The number of families (below poverty) is 60.
- Rank within US : This county is ranked 415 of 3143
Dewey County
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Value (Percent) : The value is 28.6 percent.
- Families (Below Poverty) : The number of families (below poverty) is 329.
- Rank within US : This county is ranked 3114 of 3143
Douglas County
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Value (Percent) : The value is 6.0 percent.
- Families (Below Poverty) : The number of families (below poverty) is 48.
- Rank within US : This county is ranked 621 of 3143
Edmunds County
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Value (Percent) : The value is 6.4 percent.
- Families (Below Poverty) : The number of families (below poverty) is 71.
- Rank within US : This county is ranked 755 of 3143
Fall River County
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Value (Percent) : The value is 12.3 percent.
- Families (Below Poverty) : The number of families (below poverty) is 285.
- Rank within US : This county is ranked 2294 of 3143
Faulk County
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Value (Percent) : The value is 15.4 percent.
- Families (Below Poverty) : The number of families (below poverty) is 73.
- Rank within US : This county is ranked 2719 of 3143
Grant County
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Value (Percent) : The value is 8.3 percent.
- Families (Below Poverty) : The number of families (below poverty) is 162.
- Rank within US : This county is ranked 1332 of 3143
Gregory County
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Value (Percent) : The value is 5.1 percent.
- Families (Below Poverty) : The number of families (below poverty) is 50.
- Rank within US : This county is ranked 389 of 3143
Haakon County
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Value (Percent) : The value is 4.2 percent.
- Families (Below Poverty) : The number of families (below poverty) is 19.
- Rank within US : This county is ranked 209 of 3143
Hamlin County
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Value (Percent) : The value is 4.6 percent.
- Families (Below Poverty) : The number of families (below poverty) is 76.
- Rank within US : This county is ranked 283 of 3143
Hand County
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Value (Percent) : The value is 1.2 percent.
- Families (Below Poverty) : The number of families (below poverty) is 10.
- Rank within US : This county is ranked 13 of 3143
Hanson County
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Value (Percent) : The value is 4.7 percent.
- Families (Below Poverty) : The number of families (below poverty) is 41.
- Rank within US : This county is ranked 298 of 3143
Harding County
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Value (Percent) : The value is 4.2 percent.
- Families (Below Poverty) : The number of families (below poverty) is 12.
- Rank within US : This county is ranked 209 of 3143
Hughes County
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Value (Percent) : The value is 4.9 percent.
- Families (Below Poverty) : The number of families (below poverty) is 218.
- Rank within US : This county is ranked 341 of 3143
Hutchinson County
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Value (Percent) : The value is 5.6 percent.
- Families (Below Poverty) : The number of families (below poverty) is 106.
- Rank within US : This county is ranked 522 of 3143
Hyde County
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Value (Percent) : The value is 0.6 percent.
- Families (Below Poverty) : The number of families (below poverty) is 2.
- Rank within US : This county is ranked 9 of 3143
Jackson County
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Value (Percent) : The value is 40.3 percent.
- Families (Below Poverty) : The number of families (below poverty) is 242.
- Rank within US : This county is ranked 3141 of 3143
Jerauld County
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Value (Percent) : The value is 6.2 percent.
- Families (Below Poverty) : The number of families (below poverty) is 30.
- Rank within US : This county is ranked 673 of 3143
Jones County
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Value (Percent) : The value is 14.3 percent.
- Families (Below Poverty) : The number of families (below poverty) is 33.
- Rank within US : This county is ranked 2585 of 3143
Kingsbury County
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Value (Percent) : The value is 9.5 percent.
- Families (Below Poverty) : The number of families (below poverty) is 129.
- Rank within US : This county is ranked 1661 of 3143
Lake County
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Value (Percent) : The value is 4.6 percent.
- Families (Below Poverty) : The number of families (below poverty) is 133.
- Rank within US : This county is ranked 283 of 3143
Lawrence County
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Value (Percent) : The value is 7.8 percent.
- Families (Below Poverty) : The number of families (below poverty) is 525.
- Rank within US : This county is ranked 1185 of 3143
Lincoln County
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
- Value (Percent) : The value is 4.1 percent.
- Families (Below Poverty) : The number of families (below poverty) is 797.
- Rank within US : This county is ranked 196 of 3143
Lyman County
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Value (Percent) : The value is 18.3 percent.
- Families (Below Poverty) : The number of families (below poverty) is 142.
- Rank within US : This county is ranked 2915 of 3143
Marshall County
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Value (Percent) : The value is 1.5 percent.
- Families (Below Poverty) : The number of families (below poverty) is 16.
- Rank within US : This county is ranked 20 of 3143
McCook County
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
- Value (Percent) : The value is 5.9 percent.
- Families (Below Poverty) : The number of families (below poverty) is 91.
- Rank within US : This county is ranked 596 of 3143
McPherson County
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Value (Percent) : The value is 6.6 percent.
- Families (Below Poverty) : The number of families (below poverty) is 35.
- Rank within US : This county is ranked 809 of 3143
Meade County
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
- Value (Percent) : The value is 4.0 percent.
- Families (Below Poverty) : The number of families (below poverty) is 337.
- Rank within US : This county is ranked 182 of 3143
Mellette County
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Value (Percent) : The value is 27.5 percent.
- Families (Below Poverty) : The number of families (below poverty) is 110.
- Rank within US : This county is ranked 3107 of 3143
Miner County
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Value (Percent) : The value is 6.4 percent.
- Families (Below Poverty) : The number of families (below poverty) is 39.
- Rank within US : This county is ranked 755 of 3143
Minnehaha County
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
- Value (Percent) : The value is 5.9 percent.
- Families (Below Poverty) : The number of families (below poverty) is 2,921.
- Rank within US : This county is ranked 596 of 3143
Moody County
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Value (Percent) : The value is 8.3 percent.
- Families (Below Poverty) : The number of families (below poverty) is 148.
- Rank within US : This county is ranked 1332 of 3143
Oglala Lakota County
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Value (Percent) : The value is 54.1 percent.
- Families (Below Poverty) : The number of families (below poverty) is 1,305.
- Rank within US : This county is ranked 3143 of 3143
Pennington County
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
- Value (Percent) : The value is 6.7 percent.
- Families (Below Poverty) : The number of families (below poverty) is 1,862.
- Rank within US : This county is ranked 831 of 3143
Perkins County
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Value (Percent) : The value is 9.5 percent.
- Families (Below Poverty) : The number of families (below poverty) is 84.
- Rank within US : This county is ranked 1661 of 3143
Potter County
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Value (Percent) : The value is 3.2 percent.
- Families (Below Poverty) : The number of families (below poverty) is 20.
- Rank within US : This county is ranked 79 of 3143
Roberts County
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Value (Percent) : The value is 12.3 percent.
- Families (Below Poverty) : The number of families (below poverty) is 294.
- Rank within US : This county is ranked 2294 of 3143
Sanborn County
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Value (Percent) : The value is 5.5 percent.
- Families (Below Poverty) : The number of families (below poverty) is 32.
- Rank within US : This county is ranked 485 of 3143
Spink County
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Value (Percent) : The value is 5.1 percent.
- Families (Below Poverty) : The number of families (below poverty) is 76.
- Rank within US : This county is ranked 389 of 3143
Stanley County
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Value (Percent) : The value is 4.8 percent.
- Families (Below Poverty) : The number of families (below poverty) is 40.
- Rank within US : This county is ranked 319 of 3143
Sully County
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Value (Percent) : The value is 5.0 percent.
- Families (Below Poverty) : The number of families (below poverty) is 18.
- Rank within US : This county is ranked 363 of 3143
Todd County
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Value (Percent) : The value is 41.6 percent.
- Families (Below Poverty) : The number of families (below poverty) is 752.
- Rank within US : This county is ranked 3142 of 3143
Tripp County
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Value (Percent) : The value is 14.6 percent.
- Families (Below Poverty) : The number of families (below poverty) is 191.
- Rank within US : This county is ranked 2622 of 3143
Turner County
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
- Value (Percent) : The value is 6.0 percent.
- Families (Below Poverty) : The number of families (below poverty) is 135.
- Rank within US : This county is ranked 621 of 3143
Union County
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
- Value (Percent) : The value is 3.8 percent.
- Families (Below Poverty) : The number of families (below poverty) is 192.
- Rank within US : This county is ranked 147 of 3143
Walworth County
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Value (Percent) : The value is 13.3 percent.
- Families (Below Poverty) : The number of families (below poverty) is 190.
- Rank within US : This county is ranked 2441 of 3143
Yankton County
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Value (Percent) : The value is 7.6 percent.
- Families (Below Poverty) : The number of families (below poverty) is 415.
- Rank within US : This county is ranked 1114 of 3143
Ziebach County
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Value (Percent) : The value is 31.7 percent.
- Families (Below Poverty) : The number of families (below poverty) is 182.
- Rank within US : This county is ranked 3126 of 3143
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/23/2026 2:08 am.
Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.
Source: Demographic data provided by the Census Bureau and the American Community Survey.
For more information about Poverty: Families below poverty, see the dictionary.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.


