State Cancer Profiles

Interpretation of Demographics Data

Demographic Data Report for United States by County
Poverty: Persons below 150% of poverty
All Ages, All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes
2020-2024 American Community Survey 5-Year Data
Sorted by Percent

United States

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : N/A
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 65,780,589.
• Rank within US : N/A

Loving County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 12.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 170 of 3143

Kalawao County, Hawaii

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 30.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 20.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2534 of 3143

King County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 50.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1738 of 3143

Hinsdale County, Colorado

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 5.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 52.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2 of 3143

Kenedy County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 41.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 60.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3058 of 3143

Roberts County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 8.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 69.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 23 of 3143

Kent County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 11.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 77.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 130 of 3143

Blaine County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 78.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 923 of 3143

Thomas County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 82.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 366 of 3143

Arthur County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 83.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 707 of 3143

Terrell County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 10.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 85.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 77 of 3143

Loup County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 87.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 425 of 3143

Bristol Bay Borough, Alaska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 10.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 95.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 93 of 3143

Logan County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 13.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 100.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 244 of 3143

Petroleum County, Montana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 100.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1547 of 3143

Banner County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 104.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 305 of 3143

Borden County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 106.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 400 of 3143

Grant County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 107.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 744 of 3143

Daggett County, Utah

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 111.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 436 of 3143

Wheeler County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 13.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 111.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 244 of 3143

Yakutat City and Borough, Alaska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 113.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1401 of 3143

Slope County, North Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 114.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 400 of 3143

Hooker County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 118.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 970 of 3143

Skagway Municipality, Alaska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 9.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 118.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 57 of 3143

Camas County, Idaho

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 10.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 119.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 93 of 3143

Harding County, South Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 10.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 119.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 90 of 3143

Sterling County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 8.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 123.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 30 of 3143

McPherson County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 124.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2075 of 3143

Hayes County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 145.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 721 of 3143

Mineral County, Colorado

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 147.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1174 of 3143

Foard County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 150.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 551 of 3143

Keya Paha County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 163.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1117 of 3143

Oliver County, North Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 9.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 167.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 45 of 3143

Billings County, North Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 171.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 666 of 3143

Sully County, South Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 11.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 174.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 140 of 3143

Armstrong County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 10.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 179.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 72 of 3143

Greeley County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 184.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 354 of 3143

San Juan County, Colorado

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 184.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1971 of 3143

Treasure County, Montana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 198.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2193 of 3143

Glasscock County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 200.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 955 of 3143

Denali, Alaska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 10.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 202.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 83 of 3143

Rock County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 202.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 512 of 3143

Burke County, North Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 9.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 205.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 57 of 3143

Haines Borough, Alaska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 10.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 210.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 72 of 3143

Hyde County, South Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 210.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 886 of 3143

Sheridan County, North Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 214.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 627 of 3143

Hodgeman County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 13.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 218.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 262 of 3143

McCone County, Montana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 231.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 305 of 3143

Garfield County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 236.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 334 of 3143

Golden Valley County, Montana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 236.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2102 of 3143

Issaquena County, Mississippi

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 39.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 242.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3017 of 3143

Wibaux County, Montana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 244.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1305 of 3143

Alpine County, California

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 249.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 462 of 3143

Kiowa County, Colorado

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 251.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 944 of 3143

Haakon County, South Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 252.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 413 of 3143

Garfield County, Montana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 253.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1696 of 3143

Divide County, North Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 12.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 256.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 180 of 3143

Wallace County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 256.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 905 of 3143

Campbell County, South Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 260.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 595 of 3143

Jerauld County, South Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 260.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 413 of 3143

Lane County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 262.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 837 of 3143

Irion County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 263.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 955 of 3143

Comanche County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 264.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 512 of 3143

Motley County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 264.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1523 of 3143

Clark County, Idaho

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 32.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 271.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2672 of 3143

Jones County, South Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 272.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2241 of 3143

Harding County, New Mexico

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 37.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 279.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2972 of 3143

Lake and Peninsula Borough, Alaska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 283.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2329 of 3143

Prairie County, Montana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 294.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1799 of 3143

Potter County, South Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 12.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 295.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 216 of 3143

Daniels County, Montana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 299.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1199 of 3143

Stonewall County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 302.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1995 of 3143

Carter County, Montana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 304.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1725 of 3143

Cheyenne County, Colorado

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 311.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 886 of 3143

Sheridan County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 13.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 322.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 262 of 3143

Stanley County, South Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 10.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 324.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 100 of 3143

Wheeler County, Oregon

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 324.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1476 of 3143

Steele County, North Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 325.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 837 of 3143

Renville County, North Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 330.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 378 of 3143

Sanborn County, South Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 333.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 334 of 3143

Gosper County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 338.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 666 of 3143

Powder River County, Montana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 339.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1043 of 3143

Highland County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 345.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 413 of 3143

Cimarron County, Oklahoma

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 346.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 498 of 3143

McMullen County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 49.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 346.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3115 of 3143

Storey County, Nevada

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 8.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 349.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 25 of 3143

Kidder County, North Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 351.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 389 of 3143

Dundy County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 355.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1264 of 3143

Garfield County, Washington

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 361.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 472 of 3143

Miner County, South Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 374.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 684 of 3143

Nelson County, North Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 13.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 374.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 237 of 3143

DeBaca County, New Mexico

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 375.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1781 of 3143

Griggs County, North Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 375.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 759 of 3143

Boyd County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 378.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1606 of 3143

Clark County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 379.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1127 of 3143

Gove County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 13.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 382.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 291 of 3143

Rawlins County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 383.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 472 of 3143

Schleicher County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 384.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 581 of 3143

Hamilton County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 388.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 512 of 3143

Hettinger County, North Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 388.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 666 of 3143

Deuel County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 390.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1337 of 3143

Jackson County, Colorado

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 391.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2385 of 3143

Calhoun County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 9.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 392.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 53 of 3143

Briscoe County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 30.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 393.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2549 of 3143

McPherson County, South Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 397.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1127 of 3143

Esmeralda County, Nevada

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 39.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 402.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3019 of 3143

Cavalier County, North Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 11.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 407.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 140 of 3143

Logan County, North Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 409.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1677 of 3143

Petersburg Census Area, Alaska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 12.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 409.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 197 of 3143

Ness County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 410.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 528 of 3143

Perkins County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 411.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 389 of 3143

Kiowa County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 416.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 988 of 3143

Golden Valley County, North Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 417.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2015 of 3143

Greeley County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 420.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1043 of 3143

Sargent County, North Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 11.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 425.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 130 of 3143

Trego County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 425.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 487 of 3143

Frontier County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 430.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 799 of 3143

Niobrara County, Wyoming

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 432.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1154 of 3143

Sioux County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 37.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 433.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2945 of 3143

Rich County, Utah

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 434.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 627 of 3143

Cottle County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 32.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 444.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2713 of 3143

Harlan County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 444.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 528 of 3143

Wrangell Borough, Alaska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 446.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1401 of 3143

Edwards County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 35.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 447.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2898 of 3143

Stanton County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 447.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1523 of 3143

Aurora County, South Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 453.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 799 of 3143

Donley County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 453.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 528 of 3143

Gilliam County, Oregon

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 453.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1696 of 3143

Lake of the Woods County, Minnesota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 12.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 456.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 170 of 3143

Menard County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 458.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1781 of 3143

Piute County, Utah

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 458.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2205 of 3143

Bowman County, North Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 464.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 595 of 3143

Marshall County, South Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 11.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 465.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 114 of 3143

Hand County, South Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 467.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 425 of 3143

Meagher County, Montana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 474.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1799 of 3143

McIntosh County, North Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 475.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1127 of 3143

Shackelford County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 478.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 436 of 3143

Adams County, North Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 479.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1632 of 3143

Hemphill County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 485.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 436 of 3143

Sherman County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 489.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 666 of 3143

Taliaferro County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 32.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 498.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2682 of 3143

Chase County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 13.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 499.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 297 of 3143

Oldham County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 504.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2393 of 3143

Sherman County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 504.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1523 of 3143

Towner County, North Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 507.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1904 of 3143

Hoonah-Angoon Census Area, Alaska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 509.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1453 of 3143

Dickens County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 30.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 513.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2515 of 3143

Decatur County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 526.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1117 of 3143

Concho County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 533.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1401 of 3143

Fallon County, Montana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 533.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1103 of 3143

Wichita County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 533.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2030 of 3143

Judith Basin County, Montana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 534.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2030 of 3143

Morton County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 534.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1305 of 3143

Douglas County, South Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 536.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1103 of 3143

Garden County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 31.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 537.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2593 of 3143

Foster County, North Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 540.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 627 of 3143

Throckmorton County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 32.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 540.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2734 of 3143

Sutton County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 541.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 627 of 3143

Lincoln County, Nevada

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 13.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 542.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 254 of 3143

Jeff Davis County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 30.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 559.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2523 of 3143

Red Lake County, Minnesota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 560.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 334 of 3143

Keweenaw County, Michigan

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 562.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2132 of 3143

Hartley County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 563.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 378 of 3143

Chase County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 565.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1696 of 3143

Dunn County, North Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 567.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 334 of 3143

Elk County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 568.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1677 of 3143

Pawnee County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 572.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1644 of 3143

Sedgwick County, Colorado

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 573.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1958 of 3143

Nuckolls County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 579.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 334 of 3143

Perkins County, South Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 581.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1087 of 3143

Ouray County, Colorado

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 11.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 584.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 140 of 3143

Schuyler County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 584.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 366 of 3143

Wayne County, Utah

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 584.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1591 of 3143

LaMoure County, North Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 586.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 378 of 3143

Eddy County, North Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 591.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2143 of 3143

Kinney County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 593.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1323 of 3143

Adams County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 594.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 666 of 3143

Graham County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 595.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1971 of 3143

Grant County, North Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 598.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2178 of 3143

Smith County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 598.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 707 of 3143

Hitchcock County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 599.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1725 of 3143

Ringgold County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 13.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 602.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 262 of 3143

Scott County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 12.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 603.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 190 of 3143

Franklin County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 608.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1414 of 3143

Sierra County, California

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 611.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1757 of 3143

Kittson County, Minnesota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 614.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 472 of 3143

Mason County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 615.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 487 of 3143

Worth County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 32.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 615.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2701 of 3143

Wheatland County, Montana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 30.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 619.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2556 of 3143

Sherman County, Oregon

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 32.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 626.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2691 of 3143

Putnam County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 11.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 628.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 130 of 3143

Emmons County, North Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 631.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1127 of 3143

Florence County, Wisconsin

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 13.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 637.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 297 of 3143

Nantucket County, Massachusetts

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 4.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 641.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1 of 3143

Liberty County, Montana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 33.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 646.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2768 of 3143

Lincoln County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 647.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1571 of 3143

Pierce County, North Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 649.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 744 of 3143

Dolores County, Colorado

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 650.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2158 of 3143

Logan County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 650.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1813 of 3143

Collingsworth County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 652.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2030 of 3143

Crook County, Wyoming

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 8.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 661.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 39 of 3143

Woodson County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 667.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1414 of 3143

Faulk County, South Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 32.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 668.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2701 of 3143

Sweet Grass County, Montana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 670.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 873 of 3143

Clark County, South Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 672.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 799 of 3143

Brown County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 676.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1757 of 3143

Eureka County, Nevada

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 43.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 681.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3076 of 3143

Lipscomb County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 682.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1757 of 3143

Pope County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 685.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 998 of 3143

Traverse County, Minnesota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 691.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1453 of 3143

Carson County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 12.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 695.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 180 of 3143

Columbia County, Washington

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 695.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 776 of 3143

Fisher County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 696.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1043 of 3143

Hanson County, South Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 697.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1154 of 3143

Reagan County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 698.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1414 of 3143

Rush County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 703.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1857 of 3143

Osborne County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 709.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1323 of 3143

Gregory County, South Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 711.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 837 of 3143

Cheyenne County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 715.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2265 of 3143

Deuel County, South Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 720.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 666 of 3143

Morgan County, Utah

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 5.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 720.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3 of 3143

Rooks County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 724.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 512 of 3143

Hardeman County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 726.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1337 of 3143

Webster County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 726.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1501 of 3143

Oneida County, Idaho

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 732.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 472 of 3143

McCook County, South Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 13.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 733.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 244 of 3143

Johnson County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 735.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 707 of 3143

Aleutians East Borough, Alaska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 740.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1369 of 3143

Barber County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 742.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 955 of 3143

Edmunds County, South Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 742.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1013 of 3143

Craig County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 744.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 537 of 3143

Polk County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 744.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 366 of 3143

Edwards County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 745.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2232 of 3143

Harper County, Oklahoma

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 745.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1738 of 3143

Butte County, Idaho

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 753.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2367 of 3143

Real County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 756.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2305 of 3143

Aleutians West Census Area, Alaska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 757.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 400 of 3143

Meade County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 758.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1145 of 3143

Sheridan County, Montana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 759.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1323 of 3143

Kearny County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 762.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1154 of 3143

Hamlin County, South Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 12.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 763.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 184 of 3143

Granite County, Montana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 766.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1579 of 3143

Culberson County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 35.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 767.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2867 of 3143

Scotland County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 768.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 651 of 3143

Hardin County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 770.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1441 of 3143

Martin County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 770.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 413 of 3143

Haskell County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 773.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1453 of 3143

Washington County, Colorado

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 783.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 684 of 3143

Wells County, North Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 783.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1252 of 3143

Ellis County, Oklahoma

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 784.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1414 of 3143

Buffalo County, South Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 43.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 789.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3085 of 3143

Lexington City, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 792.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 905 of 3143

Kimball County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 793.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1925 of 3143

Gilpin County, Colorado

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 13.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 795.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 283 of 3143

Stanton County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 801.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 305 of 3143

Calhoun County, Arkansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 812.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 854 of 3143

Crockett County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 29.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 819.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2468 of 3143

Holt County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 820.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1127 of 3143

Kingsbury County, South Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 821.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 537 of 3143

Lac qui Parle County, Minnesota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 12.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 822.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 205 of 3143

Nance County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 824.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1986 of 3143

Webster County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 34.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 824.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2837 of 3143

Howard County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 12.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 827.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 229 of 3143

McHenry County, North Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 830.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 551 of 3143

Brown County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 831.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 998 of 3143

Glascock County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 29.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 832.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2436 of 3143

Valley County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 832.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1264 of 3143

Ransom County, North Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 837.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 472 of 3143

Knox County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 838.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1632 of 3143

Harmon County, Oklahoma

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 36.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 840.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2911 of 3143

Falls Church City, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 5.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 847.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 4 of 3143

Echols County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 851.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1615 of 3143

Mills County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 852.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1103 of 3143

Fillmore County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 853.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 528 of 3143

Hall County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 30.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 855.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2582 of 3143

Stafford County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 856.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1476 of 3143

Grant County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 12.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 858.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 162 of 3143

Ohio County, Indiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 859.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 354 of 3143

Quitman County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 38.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 864.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2988 of 3143

Dickey County, North Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 866.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 970 of 3143

Knox County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 873.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2241 of 3143

Pawnee County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 876.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 581 of 3143

Pierce County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 12.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 879.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 180 of 3143

Chautauqua County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 883.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2158 of 3143

Forest County, Pennsylvania

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 891.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1264 of 3143

Jewell County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 30.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 891.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2582 of 3143

Ellsworth County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 901.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 695 of 3143

Clay County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 906.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 436 of 3143

Weston County, Wyoming

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 909.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 334 of 3143

Hudspeth County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 31.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 911.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2601 of 3143

Pershing County, Nevada

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 914.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1043 of 3143

Garfield County, Utah

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 917.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 854 of 3143

Sheridan County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 919.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 998 of 3143

Kearney County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 13.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 920.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 297 of 3143

Roger Mills County, Oklahoma

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 923.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2281 of 3143

Robertson County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 41.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 925.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3055 of 3143

Kimble County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 927.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1369 of 3143

Clay County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 33.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 930.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2759 of 3143

Powell County, Montana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 931.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 776 of 3143

Cook County, Minnesota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 934.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 651 of 3143

Grand Isle County, Vermont

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 12.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 937.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 205 of 3143

Clear Creek County, Colorado

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 10.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 942.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 80 of 3143

Lincoln County, Idaho

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 944.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 810 of 3143

Big Stone County, Minnesota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 949.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 998 of 3143

Wabaunsee County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 13.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 949.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 297 of 3143

Gray County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 954.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 721 of 3143

Mellette County, South Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 50.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 956.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3122 of 3143

Sherman County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 956.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 744 of 3143

Cameron County, Pennsylvania

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 957.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1433 of 3143

Sitka Borough, Alaska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 11.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 958.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 149 of 3143

Sublette County, Wyoming

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 11.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 964.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 114 of 3143

Washington County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 966.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 810 of 3143

Boone County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 968.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 905 of 3143

Lake County, Colorado

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 13.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 968.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 262 of 3143

Bottineau County, North Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 969.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 528 of 3143

Stark County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 977.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 998 of 3143

Taylor County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 989.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 707 of 3143

Moody County, South Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 991.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 498 of 3143

Norton County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 993.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1606 of 3143

Lander County, Nevada

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 999.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 759 of 3143

Lincoln County, Colorado

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 999.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1579 of 3143

Cameron Parish, Louisiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,005.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1174 of 3143

Bland County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,009.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 955 of 3143

Scott County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,011.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1252 of 3143

Cedar County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 12.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,016.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 197 of 3143

Ziebach County, South Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 43.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,022.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3075 of 3143

Furnas County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,032.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1632 of 3143

Mineral County, Montana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,032.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1337 of 3143

Rio Blanco County, Colorado

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,032.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 595 of 3143

Custer County, Idaho

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,036.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1712 of 3143

Hamilton County, New York

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,038.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1233 of 3143

Tyrrell County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 34.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,039.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2837 of 3143

Traill County, North Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 13.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,041.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 297 of 3143

Sullivan County, Pennsylvania

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,047.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 923 of 3143

Bear Lake County, Idaho

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,052.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 537 of 3143

Phillips County, Colorado

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,055.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1781 of 3143

Thayer County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,058.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1476 of 3143

Beaver County, Utah

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,059.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 450 of 3143

Lewis County, Idaho

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 29.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,061.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2425 of 3143

Hamilton County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 11.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,062.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 136 of 3143

Lincoln County, Minnesota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,063.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1087 of 3143

Ottawa County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,063.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 955 of 3143

Poquoson City, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 8.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,063.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 25 of 3143

Dewey County, Oklahoma

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,064.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1904 of 3143

Fremont County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,064.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 627 of 3143

Mercer County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 31.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,064.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2601 of 3143

Merrick County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,065.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 305 of 3143

Putnam County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,066.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1677 of 3143

Alfalfa County, Oklahoma

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,070.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1799 of 3143

Doniphan County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,075.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 512 of 3143

Morris County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,078.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1216 of 3143

Union County, Indiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,097.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 512 of 3143

Madison County, Montana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 12.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,107.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 170 of 3143

Coke County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 34.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,111.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2833 of 3143

Wayne County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,113.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 744 of 3143

Delta County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,118.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1264 of 3143

Baylor County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 32.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,122.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2734 of 3143

Morrill County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,122.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1971 of 3143

Antelope County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,125.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 837 of 3143

Worth County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,130.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 487 of 3143

Phillips County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,134.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1781 of 3143

Bon Homme County, South Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,136.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1233 of 3143

Los Alamos County, New Mexico

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 5.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,136.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 5 of 3143

Cochran County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 46.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,141.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3098 of 3143

Grant County, Oklahoma

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,144.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2349 of 3143

Baca County, Colorado

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 34.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,155.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2837 of 3143

Custer County, Colorado

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,155.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1476 of 3143

Iron County, Wisconsin

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,160.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1013 of 3143

Monroe County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,160.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 512 of 3143

Boise County, Idaho

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,161.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 316 of 3143

Mitchell County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,162.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1233 of 3143

Gallatin County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,164.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1829 of 3143

Garza County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 31.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,169.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2612 of 3143

Schley County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,170.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2045 of 3143

Lyman County, South Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 32.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,178.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2682 of 3143

Crowley County, Colorado

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 30.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,179.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2523 of 3143

Menominee County, Wisconsin

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,179.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2316 of 3143

Republic County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,179.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2088 of 3143

Upton County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 38.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,179.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2995 of 3143

Norman County, Minnesota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,183.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 998 of 3143

Phillips County, Montana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,187.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2406 of 3143

Carlisle County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,188.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1958 of 3143

Surry County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,188.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 886 of 3143

Baker County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 42.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,191.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3071 of 3143

Caribou County, Idaho

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,195.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 684 of 3143

Hot Springs County, Wyoming

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,198.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2132 of 3143

Pepin County, Wisconsin

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,199.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 595 of 3143

Hickman County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,200.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2349 of 3143

Dixon County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,201.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1476 of 3143

Wahkiakum County, Washington

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,205.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2060 of 3143

Catron County, New Mexico

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 32.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,206.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2691 of 3143

Greer County, Oklahoma

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,207.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2253 of 3143

San Saba County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,208.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1738 of 3143

Kane County, Utah

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,209.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 436 of 3143

Richmond County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,209.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 565 of 3143

Brule County, South Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,214.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1738 of 3143

Spink County, South Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,219.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1127 of 3143

Audubon County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,224.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1547 of 3143

Camden County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 11.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,227.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 130 of 3143

Hyde County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 31.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,228.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2630 of 3143

Walworth County, South Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,228.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1757 of 3143

McLean County, North Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 12.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,235.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 222 of 3143

Beaver County, Oklahoma

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,237.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1936 of 3143

Union County, New Mexico

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 35.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,237.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2861 of 3143

Day County, South Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,242.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1696 of 3143

Mora County, New Mexico

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 30.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,242.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2506 of 3143

Chattahoochee County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,245.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2385 of 3143

Stillwater County, Montana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 13.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,257.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 291 of 3143

Pembina County, North Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,258.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1033 of 3143

Grant County, Minnesota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,259.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1264 of 3143

Valley County, Montana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,262.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 721 of 3143

Chariton County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,264.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 810 of 3143

Chouteau County, Montana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,266.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1414 of 3143

Grant County, South Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,270.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 759 of 3143

Davis County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,273.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 316 of 3143

Bath County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 32.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,274.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2672 of 3143

Charles City County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,275.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1063 of 3143

Wilkin County, Minnesota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,280.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1216 of 3143

Wallowa County, Oregon

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,292.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 744 of 3143

Teton County, Montana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,300.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1283 of 3143

Greenwood County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,304.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1523 of 3143

Jefferson County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,304.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 944 of 3143

Mathews County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,305.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 462 of 3143

Jackson County, Minnesota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 13.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,306.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 254 of 3143

White Pine County, Nevada

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,315.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 810 of 3143

Hansford County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,317.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2075 of 3143

Toole County, Montana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 29.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,328.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2445 of 3143

Butler County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,330.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 537 of 3143

Broadwater County, Montana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,331.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 776 of 3143

Kit Carson County, Colorado

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,333.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1043 of 3143

Moore County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,339.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1199 of 3143

Haskell County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,341.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2015 of 3143

Keith County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,344.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 627 of 3143

Alger County, Michigan

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,349.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 759 of 3143

Adams County, Idaho

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,351.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2393 of 3143

Prince of Wales-Hyder Census Area, Alaska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,351.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1772 of 3143

Thomas County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,352.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 854 of 3143

Ontonagon County, Michigan

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,354.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1677 of 3143

Stevens County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,363.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2178 of 3143

Grundy County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 11.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,364.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 120 of 3143

Calhoun County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 36.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,367.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2911 of 3143

Musselshell County, Montana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,367.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2171 of 3143

Murray County, Minnesota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,378.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 721 of 3143

Hidalgo County, New Mexico

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 34.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,386.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2852 of 3143

Dawson County, Montana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,388.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 609 of 3143

Cumberland County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 13.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,389.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 283 of 3143

Cherry County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,391.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1995 of 3143

Costilla County, Colorado

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 39.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,398.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3012 of 3143

Childress County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,401.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2115 of 3143

Luce County, Michigan

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,401.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2143 of 3143

Dillingham Census Area, Alaska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 29.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,402.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2496 of 3143

Atchison County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,403.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2265 of 3143

Mercer County, North Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,404.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 721 of 3143

Sullivan County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,405.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1871 of 3143

Burt County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,406.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1337 of 3143

Norton City, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 39.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,409.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3033 of 3143

Hutchinson County, South Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,410.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1117 of 3143

Turner County, South Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,411.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 581 of 3143

Richland County, Montana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 12.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,413.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 205 of 3143

Lyon County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 11.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,414.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 152 of 3143

Somervell County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,414.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 389 of 3143

Stewart County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 36.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,414.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2921 of 3143

Warren County, Indiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,414.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 695 of 3143

Major County, Oklahoma

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,420.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 988 of 3143

Cuming County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,423.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 537 of 3143

Archer County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,435.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 581 of 3143

Osceola County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,435.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1781 of 3143

Lynn County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,437.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1946 of 3143

Wheeler County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 30.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,440.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2534 of 3143

Pocahontas County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,447.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1305 of 3143

Alexander County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 30.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,449.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2549 of 3143

San Miguel County, Colorado

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,450.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 873 of 3143

Custer County, South Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,454.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 627 of 3143

Kingman County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,454.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1233 of 3143

Ida County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,464.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1414 of 3143

Mineral County, Nevada

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 33.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,473.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2759 of 3143

Emporia City, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,475.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2281 of 3143

Emmet County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,481.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 695 of 3143

Rappahannock County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,485.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1145 of 3143

Valdez-Cordova Census Area, Alaska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,485.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 565 of 3143

Wirt County, West Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 29.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,485.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2475 of 3143

Marshall County, Minnesota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,491.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 695 of 3143

Southeast Fairbanks Census Area, Alaska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,492.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1383 of 3143

Adair County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,495.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1216 of 3143

Platte County, Wyoming

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,499.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 799 of 3143

Henderson County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,504.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1892 of 3143

Dawes County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,512.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1233 of 3143

Jackson County, South Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 55.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,515.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3140 of 3143

Coffey County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,517.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 944 of 3143

Pendleton County, West Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,517.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1986 of 3143

Jefferson County, Montana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 12.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,519.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 170 of 3143

Lyon County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,519.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1252 of 3143

Guadalupe County, New Mexico

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 38.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,522.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2995 of 3143

Nemaha County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,527.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1664 of 3143

Edwards County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,530.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1958 of 3143

Anderson County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,531.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1117 of 3143

Grant County, Oregon

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,532.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1441 of 3143

Bennett County, South Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 46.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,534.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3094 of 3143

Yukon-Koyukuk Census Area, Alaska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 29.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,538.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2483 of 3143

Clarke County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 10.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,542.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 80 of 3143

Crane County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 34.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,544.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2846 of 3143

Greene County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,544.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 837 of 3143

Floyd County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 30.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,548.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2506 of 3143

Cotton County, Oklahoma

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,556.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2406 of 3143

Guthrie County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,571.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 400 of 3143

Essex County, Vermont

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,572.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2102 of 3143

Crosby County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 31.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,573.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2664 of 3143

Bent County, Colorado

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 36.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,575.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2916 of 3143

Tucker County, West Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,575.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1829 of 3143

Juab County, Utah

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 12.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,586.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 222 of 3143

Liberty County, Florida

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,590.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2030 of 3143

Blanco County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 12.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,592.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 229 of 3143

Phelps County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,594.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 873 of 3143

Maries County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,604.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1013 of 3143

Howard County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,614.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 759 of 3143

Rock County, Minnesota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,614.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 721 of 3143

Linn County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,615.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 651 of 3143

Park County, Colorado

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 9.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,617.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 45 of 3143

Custer County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,630.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 512 of 3143

DeKalb County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,630.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 886 of 3143

Dallas County, Arkansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,632.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2216 of 3143

Jefferson County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 9.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,635.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 42 of 3143

Harper County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 31.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,644.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2601 of 3143

Richardson County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,644.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1401 of 3143

Gentry County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,645.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2178 of 3143

Van Buren County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,647.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2115 of 3143

Sac County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,649.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 744 of 3143

Russell County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,654.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1986 of 3143

Fall River County, South Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,655.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1725 of 3143

Nemaha County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,665.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 684 of 3143

Clay County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,667.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1353 of 3143

Chickasaw County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,668.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 354 of 3143

Washakie County, Wyoming

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,672.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1501 of 3143

Thurston County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,677.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2060 of 3143

Palo Alto County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,679.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1103 of 3143

Refugio County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,679.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1995 of 3143

Rice County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,686.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1043 of 3143

Mahnomen County, Minnesota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 32.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,694.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2691 of 3143

Teton County, Idaho

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 13.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,699.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 283 of 3143

Winkler County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,702.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1644 of 3143

Buena Vista City, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,707.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2316 of 3143

Tripp County, South Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 31.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,709.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2655 of 3143

Bailey County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,710.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1971 of 3143

Goliad County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,718.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1847 of 3143

McLean County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,718.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1013 of 3143

Clay County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,719.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 627 of 3143

Pleasants County, West Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,721.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1813 of 3143

Warren County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 33.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,722.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2777 of 3143

Yellow Medicine County, Minnesota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,723.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 923 of 3143

Monona County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,724.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1233 of 3143

Louisa County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,725.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 595 of 3143

Jasper County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,732.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1013 of 3143

North Slope Borough, Alaska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,736.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 581 of 3143

Greenlee County, Arizona

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,739.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 923 of 3143

King and Queen County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,747.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2075 of 3143

Mono County, California

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 13.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,750.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 262 of 3143

Conejos County, Colorado

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,755.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1712 of 3143

King William County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 9.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,759.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 57 of 3143

Caldwell County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,764.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1183 of 3143

Trimble County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,767.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1283 of 3143

Ballard County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,769.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1725 of 3143

Yoakum County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,775.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1738 of 3143

Barnes County, North Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,776.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 776 of 3143

Wayne County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,777.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1337 of 3143

Dukes County, Massachusetts

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 8.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,781.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 30 of 3143

Shelby County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,787.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 472 of 3143

Goochland County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 7.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,794.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 10 of 3143

Piatt County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 10.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,794.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 105 of 3143

Doddridge County, West Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,795.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2193 of 3143

Lake County, South Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,797.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 721 of 3143

Tensas Parish, Louisiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 49.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,798.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3112 of 3143

Walsh County, North Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,798.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 792 of 3143

Hancock County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,806.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 744 of 3143

Gilmer County, West Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 35.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,808.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2877 of 3143

Emery County, Utah

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,810.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 873 of 3143

Jefferson County, Oklahoma

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 34.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,810.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2837 of 3143

Clarke County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,812.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1013 of 3143

Lake County, Minnesota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,812.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 695 of 3143

Coal County, Oklahoma

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 34.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,813.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2826 of 3143

Pickett County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 36.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,815.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2916 of 3143

Houston County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,816.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1523 of 3143

Huerfano County, Colorado

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,816.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2132 of 3143

Graham County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,817.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1615 of 3143

Clearwater County, Idaho

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,819.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1453 of 3143

Decatur County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,820.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1995 of 3143

Van Buren County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,820.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1971 of 3143

Pulaski County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 37.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,822.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2978 of 3143

Calhoun County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,825.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1127 of 3143

Brewster County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,828.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1174 of 3143

Franklin County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,840.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 776 of 3143

Mitchell County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,844.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 810 of 3143

Pope County, Minnesota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,847.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 609 of 3143

West Feliciana Parish, Louisiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,849.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 707 of 3143

Pondera County, Montana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 31.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,851.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2612 of 3143

Clearwater County, Minnesota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,854.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1453 of 3143

Sabine County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,859.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 970 of 3143

Lake County, Oregon

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,863.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1813 of 3143

Lewis County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,867.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1199 of 3143

Grand County, Colorado

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 11.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,869.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 152 of 3143

Clark County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,875.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2393 of 3143

Shelby County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 32.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,875.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2713 of 3143

Miller County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 32.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,877.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2734 of 3143

Stevens County, Minnesota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,877.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1183 of 3143

Reynolds County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 32.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,881.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2691 of 3143

McCulloch County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,884.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1995 of 3143

Osage County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,884.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 354 of 3143

Union County, South Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 11.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,885.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 125 of 3143

Butte County, South Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,892.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 826 of 3143

Sharkey County, Mississippi

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 50.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,892.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3120 of 3143

Carbon County, Montana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,896.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 721 of 3143

Johnson County, Wyoming

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,898.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1476 of 3143

Pratt County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,898.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1476 of 3143

Hamilton County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 13.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,902.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 237 of 3143

Blaine County, Oklahoma

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,903.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1781 of 3143

Hamilton County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,905.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1829 of 3143

Schuyler County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,913.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2406 of 3143

Knox County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,916.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1696 of 3143

Madison County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 11.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,922.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 140 of 3143

Daviess County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,924.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1644 of 3143

Northumberland County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,924.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 512 of 3143

Ferry County, Washington

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,929.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2115 of 3143

Winnebago County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,929.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1043 of 3143

Jackson County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,939.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 378 of 3143

La Salle County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 34.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,945.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2802 of 3143

Cloud County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,950.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1664 of 3143

Newton County, Arkansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,976.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2329 of 3143

Trousdale County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,976.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1305 of 3143

Talbot County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 34.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,978.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2846 of 3143

Sioux County, North Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 54.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,979.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3135 of 3143

Cumberland County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,987.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1183 of 3143

Mitchell County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,987.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2075 of 3143

Kodiak Island Borough, Alaska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,988.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 551 of 3143

Schoolcraft County, Michigan

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,989.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1904 of 3143

Pipestone County, Minnesota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,990.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1441 of 3143

Twiggs County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,990.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2045 of 3143

Washington County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,990.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 400 of 3143

Marion County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,992.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 854 of 3143

Owsley County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 51.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,993.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3125 of 3143

Baraga County, Michigan

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,994.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2291 of 3143

Mills County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 13.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,001.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 297 of 3143

Brown County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,002.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1453 of 3143

Brooks County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 30.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,003.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2549 of 3143

Woods County, Oklahoma

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,005.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2102 of 3143

Skamania County, Washington

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,006.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 581 of 3143

Parmer County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,009.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1283 of 3143

Cleveland County, Arkansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,010.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2232 of 3143

Beaverhead County, Montana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,014.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1383 of 3143

Wilson County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,016.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1799 of 3143

Hamilton County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,023.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1892 of 3143

Menard County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,023.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 684 of 3143

Lemhi County, Idaho

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,024.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1904 of 3143

Colfax County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,034.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1043 of 3143

Teton County, Wyoming

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 8.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,038.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 37 of 3143

Koochiching County, Minnesota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,039.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 799 of 3143

Holt County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,049.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1216 of 3143

Ketchikan Gateway Borough, Alaska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,050.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 425 of 3143

Gates County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,054.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1154 of 3143

Jack County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,063.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2115 of 3143

Corson County, South Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 54.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,064.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3138 of 3143

Shannon County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 29.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,064.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2496 of 3143

Menifee County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 33.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,075.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2768 of 3143

Carter County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 39.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,085.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3029 of 3143

Stephens County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,091.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1738 of 3143

Marshall County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,092.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 905 of 3143

Keokuk County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,095.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1383 of 3143

Tillman County, Oklahoma

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 31.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,096.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2601 of 3143

Humboldt County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,098.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1501 of 3143

Switzerland County, Indiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,098.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1383 of 3143

Howard County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,107.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1547 of 3143

Saguache County, Colorado

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 32.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,110.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2682 of 3143

Essex County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,113.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1154 of 3143

Covington City, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 37.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,114.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2974 of 3143

Pennington County, Minnesota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,114.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 487 of 3143

Ralls County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,114.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1199 of 3143

Cherokee County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,120.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 955 of 3143

Lafayette County, Florida

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 31.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,123.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2655 of 3143

Grand County, Utah

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,124.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1453 of 3143

Red Willow County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,124.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1323 of 3143

Lafayette County, Arkansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 35.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,127.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2867 of 3143

Sussex County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,128.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1677 of 3143

Blaine County, Montana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 31.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,130.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2601 of 3143

Treutlen County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 35.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,130.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2867 of 3143

Harney County, Oregon

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 29.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,131.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2425 of 3143

Lake County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 48.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,132.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3108 of 3143

Middlesex County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,136.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1233 of 3143

Nicholas County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,136.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2338 of 3143

Benton County, Indiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,139.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1916 of 3143

Benson County, North Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 37.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,141.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2949 of 3143

New Kent County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 8.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,141.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 37 of 3143

Seward County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 13.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,146.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 244 of 3143

Fulton County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 36.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,147.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2927 of 3143

Martin County, Indiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,147.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1501 of 3143

Runnels County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,157.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1547 of 3143

Otoe County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 13.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,158.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 275 of 3143

Harrison County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,163.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 413 of 3143

Hughes County, South Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 12.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,165.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 229 of 3143

Prairie County, Arkansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,165.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2281 of 3143

Lincoln County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,172.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2291 of 3143

Swift County, Minnesota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,173.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1591 of 3143

Hancock County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,175.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1857 of 3143

Mountrail County, North Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,175.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1664 of 3143

Monroe County, Arkansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 33.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,185.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2777 of 3143

Dewey County, South Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 42.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,191.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3074 of 3143

Monroe County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,191.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1995 of 3143

Power County, Idaho

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,192.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2216 of 3143

Watonwan County, Minnesota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,192.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1117 of 3143

Dodge County, Minnesota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 10.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,195.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 93 of 3143

Houston County, Minnesota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 11.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,201.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 159 of 3143

Pitkin County, Colorado

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 13.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,203.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 237 of 3143

Valley County, Idaho

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,207.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 837 of 3143

Carroll County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,211.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2143 of 3143

Presidio County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 37.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,215.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2961 of 3143

Marshall County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,217.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1591 of 3143

Moultrie County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,220.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 498 of 3143

Buffalo County, Wisconsin

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,221.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 651 of 3143

Tyler County, West Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,221.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2291 of 3143

Dallam County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 30.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,223.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2564 of 3143

Wilcox County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 31.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,224.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2655 of 3143

Colonial Heights City, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 12.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,226.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 184 of 3143

Lancaster County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,256.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1323 of 3143

Rains County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,258.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 810 of 3143

Lincoln County, Washington

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,262.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1127 of 3143

Allen County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,263.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 970 of 3143

Dade County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 30.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,264.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2534 of 3143

Ochiltree County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,266.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1677 of 3143

Choctaw County, Mississippi

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,271.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2376 of 3143

Cumberland County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 39.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,274.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3012 of 3143

Forest County, Wisconsin

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,274.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1892 of 3143

Alcona County, Michigan

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,278.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1501 of 3143

Elbert County, Colorado

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 8.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,278.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 20 of 3143

Deer Lodge County, Montana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,291.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1916 of 3143

York County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,300.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 707 of 3143

Winneshiek County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 12.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,301.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 216 of 3143

Cheyenne County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,306.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1871 of 3143

Box Butte County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,311.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1441 of 3143

Marion County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 31.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,315.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2622 of 3143

Coleman County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 29.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,318.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2483 of 3143

Dooly County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,329.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2216 of 3143

Saline County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,331.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 627 of 3143

Butler County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,335.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 627 of 3143

Northwest Arctic Borough, Alaska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 31.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,339.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2655 of 3143

Southampton County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,342.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 334 of 3143

Bracken County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,343.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2316 of 3143

Clay County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,344.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1264 of 3143

Osage County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,344.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 425 of 3143

Calhoun County, West Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 39.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,347.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3012 of 3143

Yuma County, Colorado

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,349.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1799 of 3143

Woodruff County, Arkansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 40.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,354.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3038 of 3143

Washington County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 11.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,364.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 130 of 3143

Modoc County, California

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,366.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2316 of 3143

Andrew County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 13.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,367.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 254 of 3143

Castro County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 32.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,374.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2724 of 3143

Montgomery County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,374.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1772 of 3143

Benton County, Mississippi

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 31.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,381.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2655 of 3143

Nevada County, Arkansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 29.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,381.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2483 of 3143

Webster County, Mississippi

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,383.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1813 of 3143

Custer County, Montana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,391.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1283 of 3143

Elliott County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 38.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,391.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2986 of 3143

Brown County, Indiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,394.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 472 of 3143

McCormick County, South Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,395.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2193 of 3143

Franklin County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,397.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1857 of 3143

Saunders County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 10.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,402.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 93 of 3143

Pike County, Indiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,404.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1154 of 3143

Sibley County, Minnesota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,407.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 565 of 3143

Manassas Park City, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,408.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 334 of 3143

Union County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,413.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1233 of 3143

Crawford County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,436.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1183 of 3143

Madison County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,437.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1369 of 3143

Lucas County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,440.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2349 of 3143

Harrison County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 30.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,442.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2564 of 3143

Noble County, Oklahoma

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,444.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1644 of 3143

Gallatin County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,452.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2349 of 3143

Madison County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,457.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 826 of 3143

Lincoln County, Arkansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,459.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2349 of 3143

McKenzie County, North Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,459.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 759 of 3143

Pulaski County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,462.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2367 of 3143

Cedar County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 13.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,469.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 283 of 3143

Galax City, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 38.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,472.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2986 of 3143

Ritchie County, West Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 30.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,474.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2564 of 3143

Gunnison County, Colorado

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,475.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 450 of 3143

Millard County, Utah

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,475.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 970 of 3143

Pulaski County, Indiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,477.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1183 of 3143

Montgomery County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 31.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,481.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2664 of 3143

Livingston County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,484.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2329 of 3143

Big Horn County, Wyoming

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,488.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1401 of 3143

Grant County, West Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,489.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1615 of 3143

Webster County, West Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 30.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,492.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2588 of 3143

Perry County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 29.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,496.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2452 of 3143

Converse County, Wyoming

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,499.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 886 of 3143

Greensville County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 31.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,501.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2593 of 3143

Montgomery County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,506.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1571 of 3143

Jim Hogg County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 54.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,507.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3136 of 3143

Pocahontas County, West Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 33.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,507.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2783 of 3143

Richland County, North Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,516.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 609 of 3143

Catahoula Parish, Louisiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 33.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,523.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2768 of 3143

Wabasha County, Minnesota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 11.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,526.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 152 of 3143

Carroll County, Mississippi

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,529.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2232 of 3143

Leelanau County, Michigan

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 11.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,529.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 125 of 3143

Greene County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,530.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1501 of 3143

Noble County, Ohio

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,530.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1353 of 3143

De Witt County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,534.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 666 of 3143

Lincoln County, Wyoming

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 12.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,535.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 190 of 3143

Rio Grande County, Colorado

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,538.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1632 of 3143

Kossuth County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,542.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 826 of 3143

Cottonwood County, Minnesota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,544.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1591 of 3143

Nowata County, Oklahoma

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,562.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2265 of 3143

Perquimans County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,570.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1063 of 3143

Hancock County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 38.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,573.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2982 of 3143

Crittenden County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 29.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,588.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2468 of 3143

Montmorency County, Michigan

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,588.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2253 of 3143

Roseau County, Minnesota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,589.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 721 of 3143

Seminole County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,593.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2393 of 3143

Goshen County, Wyoming

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,596.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1501 of 3143

Dickinson County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,598.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 378 of 3143

Tipton County, Indiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,599.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 721 of 3143

Benewah County, Idaho

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,601.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2060 of 3143

Bollinger County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,601.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1925 of 3143

Oscoda County, Michigan

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 31.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,607.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2612 of 3143

Lee County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 41.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,613.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3060 of 3143

Fremont County, Idaho

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,615.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1087 of 3143

Quitman County, Mississippi

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 46.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,617.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3095 of 3143

Wilkes County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,627.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2291 of 3143

Boundary County, Idaho

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,631.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1174 of 3143

Fulton County, Pennsylvania

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,638.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 886 of 3143

Madison County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,641.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1337 of 3143

Wilkinson County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 30.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,648.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2574 of 3143

Allamakee County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,649.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1033 of 3143

Grundy County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,654.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2316 of 3143

Dickinson County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,660.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 378 of 3143

Red River Parish, Louisiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 37.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,662.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2958 of 3143

Moniteau County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,663.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 998 of 3143

Ford County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,665.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1264 of 3143

Love County, Oklahoma

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,665.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2102 of 3143

Chippewa County, Minnesota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,666.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1476 of 3143

Iowa County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,680.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 609 of 3143

Nelson County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,684.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 886 of 3143

Franklin County, Idaho

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,686.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 837 of 3143

Powhatan County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 8.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,690.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 39 of 3143

St. Clair County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 29.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,695.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2425 of 3143

Jenkins County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 36.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,698.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2940 of 3143

Allendale County, South Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 39.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,702.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3033 of 3143

Iron County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 29.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,708.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2483 of 3143

Dade County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,709.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 826 of 3143

Linn County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,718.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1677 of 3143

Clinch County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 40.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,727.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3048 of 3143

Franklin County, Florida

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,730.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1925 of 3143

Clay County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 36.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,744.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2911 of 3143

Johnson County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 35.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,744.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2885 of 3143

Greene County, Mississippi

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,749.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2171 of 3143

Marion County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,751.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2385 of 3143

Callahan County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,752.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1087 of 3143

Johnson County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,754.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1781 of 3143

Newton County, Indiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,757.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1154 of 3143

Washita County, Oklahoma

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,765.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2075 of 3143

Routt County, Colorado

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 11.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,766.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 125 of 3143

Coosa County, Alabama

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,769.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2281 of 3143

Clay County, West Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 35.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,774.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2891 of 3143

Faribault County, Minnesota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,774.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1199 of 3143

East Carroll Parish, Louisiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 52.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,780.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3128 of 3143

Rosebud County, Montana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 34.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,782.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2826 of 3143

Clark County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,789.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 955 of 3143

Moffat County, Colorado

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,790.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1353 of 3143

Amelia County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,803.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1305 of 3143

Jones County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 30.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,805.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2556 of 3143

Montgomery County, Arkansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 33.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,810.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2752 of 3143

Mackinac County, Michigan

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,813.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2075 of 3143

Charles Mix County, South Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 31.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,824.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2630 of 3143

Franklin City, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 34.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,825.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2852 of 3143

Mercer County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,826.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 923 of 3143

Monroe County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 8.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,826.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 20 of 3143

Gulf County, Florida

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,828.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1591 of 3143

Ward County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,829.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2015 of 3143

Floyd County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,840.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 886 of 3143

Perry County, Arkansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,844.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2367 of 3143

Montour County, Pennsylvania

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,851.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 609 of 3143

Kewaunee County, Wisconsin

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 13.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,853.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 297 of 3143

Murray County, Oklahoma

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,854.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1383 of 3143

Fergus County, Montana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,865.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1946 of 3143

Clay County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,866.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 799 of 3143

Swisher County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 45.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,866.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3089 of 3143

Bayfield County, Wisconsin

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,867.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 776 of 3143

Monroe County, West Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,867.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1677 of 3143

Ramsey County, North Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,868.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2060 of 3143

Calhoun County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,879.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 378 of 3143

Williamsburg City, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,885.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2102 of 3143

Franklin County, Mississippi

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 38.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,888.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2998 of 3143

Benzie County, Michigan

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,890.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 537 of 3143

Calhoun County, South Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,899.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1264 of 3143

Teller County, Colorado

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 11.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,908.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 152 of 3143

Ste. Genevieve County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,913.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 551 of 3143

Pamlico County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,914.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1936 of 3143

Live Oak County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 29.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,920.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2425 of 3143

Spencer County, Indiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,924.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 400 of 3143

Kingfisher County, Oklahoma

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,930.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1043 of 3143

Searcy County, Arkansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 37.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,931.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2974 of 3143

Mason County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,934.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1696 of 3143

O'Brien County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,938.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1353 of 3143

Heard County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,945.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1958 of 3143

Renville County, Minnesota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,945.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1252 of 3143

Douglas County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,949.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 436 of 3143

Irwin County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 32.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,957.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2718 of 3143

Oglethorpe County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,962.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1063 of 3143

Webster County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,962.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1738 of 3143

Price County, Wisconsin

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,964.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1353 of 3143

Waseca County, Minnesota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,965.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 627 of 3143

Archuleta County, Colorado

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,972.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1401 of 3143

Carbon County, Wyoming

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,975.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1369 of 3143

Kemper County, Mississippi

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 37.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,978.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2954 of 3143

Washington County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,982.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1925 of 3143

Roberts County, South Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 29.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,988.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2496 of 3143

Cooper County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,989.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1033 of 3143

Macon County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,990.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1145 of 3143

Gasconade County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,006.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1264 of 3143

Wheeler County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 49.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,006.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3114 of 3143

Bond County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,008.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1233 of 3143

Union County, Florida

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,008.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2205 of 3143

Jackson County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,016.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1174 of 3143

Cass County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,018.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1712 of 3143

Oregon County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 36.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,022.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2905 of 3143

Wilkinson County, Mississippi

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 42.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,033.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3073 of 3143

Wadena County, Minnesota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,035.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1433 of 3143

West Carroll Parish, Louisiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 32.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,039.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2724 of 3143

Delaware County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,052.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 792 of 3143

Humboldt County, Nevada

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,056.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 810 of 3143

Wabash County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,059.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2338 of 3143

Fairfax City, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 12.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,061.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 205 of 3143

Karnes County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,064.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2115 of 3143

Lunenburg County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,070.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2291 of 3143

Scott County, Arkansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 31.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,071.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2644 of 3143

Kiowa County, Oklahoma

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 37.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,072.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2961 of 3143

Plymouth County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 12.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,072.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 170 of 3143

Owyhee County, Idaho

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,074.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1916 of 3143

Shoshone County, Idaho

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,074.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1579 of 3143

Iowa County, Wisconsin

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 13.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,087.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 244 of 3143

Towns County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,087.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1995 of 3143

Floyd County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,092.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1216 of 3143

Chaffee County, Colorado

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,093.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 595 of 3143

San Augustine County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 40.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,096.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3042 of 3143

Cass County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,097.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1847 of 3143

Jersey County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,098.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 450 of 3143

Morgan County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,100.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 389 of 3143

Jackson County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,102.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 565 of 3143

Bleckley County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,107.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2291 of 3143

Spencer County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,107.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 472 of 3143

Presque Isle County, Michigan

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,108.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1738 of 3143

Owen County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,117.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2291 of 3143

Carroll County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,120.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 462 of 3143

Buchanan County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,122.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 436 of 3143

Livingston County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,124.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1772 of 3143

Redwood County, Minnesota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,126.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1264 of 3143

Hancock County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 46.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,133.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3102 of 3143

Boone County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 12.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,145.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 162 of 3143

Bremer County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 13.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,148.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 254 of 3143

Pottawatomie County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 12.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,153.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 180 of 3143

Quay County, New Mexico

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 37.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,155.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2954 of 3143

San Juan County, Washington

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,157.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 744 of 3143

Clayton County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,158.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 970 of 3143

Le Sueur County, Minnesota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 11.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,162.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 114 of 3143

Charlotte County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,163.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2349 of 3143

Clinton County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 35.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,169.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2861 of 3143

Morgan County, West Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,175.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 944 of 3143

Iron County, Michigan

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,176.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2338 of 3143

Crockett County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,190.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1677 of 3143

Wright County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,192.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1958 of 3143

Caldwell County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,198.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2015 of 3143

Fillmore County, Minnesota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,199.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 450 of 3143

Randolph County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 53.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,200.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3132 of 3143

Buckingham County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,203.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1401 of 3143

Carroll County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,203.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1632 of 3143

Benton County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 12.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,211.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 222 of 3143

Giles County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,211.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1087 of 3143

Jefferson County, Mississippi

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 48.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,218.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3106 of 3143

Glades County, Florida

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,225.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2385 of 3143

Franklin County, Indiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,231.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 316 of 3143

Lewis County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,241.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1946 of 3143

Candler County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 30.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,256.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2534 of 3143

Northampton County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,257.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2265 of 3143

Ozark County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 37.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,258.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2945 of 3143

Richland County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,258.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1353 of 3143

Marquette County, Wisconsin

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,259.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1283 of 3143

Arenac County, Michigan

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,261.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1441 of 3143

Blaine County, Idaho

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 13.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,262.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 250 of 3143

Pike County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,262.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 666 of 3143

Carroll County, Indiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,264.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 537 of 3143

Reeves County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,266.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2316 of 3143

Pend Oreille County, Washington

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,268.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1712 of 3143

Crawford County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,270.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1013 of 3143

Washington County, Idaho

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 29.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,278.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2496 of 3143

Turner County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 38.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,283.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2988 of 3143

Stewart County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,289.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1738 of 3143

Alleghany County and Clifton Forge City, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,292.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1579 of 3143

Kanabec County, Minnesota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,296.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1199 of 3143

Mitchell County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,296.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1579 of 3143

Massac County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,306.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1857 of 3143

Lafayette County, Wisconsin

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,312.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1103 of 3143

Harrison County, Ohio

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,313.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1725 of 3143

Cass County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 12.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,317.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 190 of 3143

Hardin County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,317.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1264 of 3143

Crawford County, Wisconsin

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,318.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1433 of 3143

Blackford County, Indiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,329.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2349 of 3143

Perry County, Mississippi

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 29.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,330.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2483 of 3143

Taylor County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 43.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,331.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3080 of 3143

Pike County, Arkansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 33.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,334.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2787 of 3143

Avery County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,336.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1414 of 3143

Latimer County, Oklahoma

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 36.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,339.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2927 of 3143

Morrow County, Oregon

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,341.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2216 of 3143

Greene County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,342.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 666 of 3143

Lee County, Arkansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 49.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,343.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3115 of 3143

Wyandot County, Ohio

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,350.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 498 of 3143

Hickory County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 39.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,352.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3036 of 3143

Inyo County, California

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,356.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 886 of 3143

Aitkin County, Minnesota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,357.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1337 of 3143

Metcalfe County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 32.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,357.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2708 of 3143

Meigs County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,363.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1971 of 3143

Burnett County, Wisconsin

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,366.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1154 of 3143

Neosho County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,378.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1523 of 3143

La Salle Parish, Louisiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,382.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1871 of 3143

Rusk County, Wisconsin

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,386.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1829 of 3143

Alleghany County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 30.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,392.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2564 of 3143

Fluvanna County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 12.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,395.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 216 of 3143

Morgan County, Ohio

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,397.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1946 of 3143

Wolfe County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 54.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,397.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3134 of 3143

Lamb County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,408.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2205 of 3143

Crawford County, Michigan

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,410.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2030 of 3143

Warren County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,411.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1523 of 3143

Missaukee County, Michigan

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,420.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1579 of 3143

Kent County, Maryland

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,425.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1013 of 3143

Nome Census Area, Alaska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 35.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,442.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2901 of 3143

Chicot County, Arkansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 38.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,445.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2988 of 3143

Colfax County, New Mexico

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 29.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,452.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2468 of 3143

Poweshiek County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,454.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1216 of 3143

Atchison County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,461.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1738 of 3143

Hood River County, Oregon

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,463.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 372 of 3143

Washburn County, Wisconsin

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,474.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1264 of 3143

Duval County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 38.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,477.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2998 of 3143

Davison County, South Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,480.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 905 of 3143

Hancock County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,493.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1233 of 3143

Clay County, South Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,494.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2241 of 3143

Bradley County, Arkansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 34.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,495.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2837 of 3143

Johnston County, Oklahoma

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 35.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,500.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2877 of 3143

Hamilton County, Florida

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 31.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,504.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2637 of 3143

Nottoway County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,510.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1995 of 3143

Hughes County, Oklahoma

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 30.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,512.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2534 of 3143

Terrell County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 41.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,514.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3049 of 3143

Paulding County, Ohio

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,520.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 988 of 3143

Henry County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,522.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1013 of 3143

Lawrence County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,523.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2075 of 3143

Little River County, Arkansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 30.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,523.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2556 of 3143

Jo Daviess County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,524.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 581 of 3143

Morris County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 29.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,524.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2483 of 3143

Comanche County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,526.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1995 of 3143

Jackson County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 29.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,533.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2483 of 3143

Evans County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 34.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,538.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2852 of 3143

Oconee County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 8.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,542.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 20 of 3143

Grant County, Arkansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,545.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1087 of 3143

Red River County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 31.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,547.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2593 of 3143

King George County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 12.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,552.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 229 of 3143

Jones County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,555.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 854 of 3143

Wetzel County, West Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,558.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2015 of 3143

Mississippi County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 33.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,559.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2783 of 3143

Vinton County, Ohio

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,565.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2393 of 3143

Appanoose County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 29.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,566.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2475 of 3143

Pendleton County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,568.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1871 of 3143

Ashland County, Wisconsin

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,572.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1644 of 3143

Todd County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 29.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,579.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2445 of 3143

Atkinson County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 43.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,591.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3078 of 3143

Monroe County, Ohio

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,595.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2241 of 3143

Idaho County, Idaho

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,602.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1353 of 3143

Pike County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,604.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2015 of 3143

Crenshaw County, Alabama

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,605.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2316 of 3143

Bosque County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,609.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1103 of 3143

Caldwell Parish, Louisiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 39.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,619.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3019 of 3143

Richland County, Wisconsin

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,619.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1369 of 3143

Gem County, Idaho

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,624.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 854 of 3143

Union County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,624.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2291 of 3143

Putnam County, Ohio

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 10.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,625.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 100 of 3143

Atoka County, Oklahoma

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,633.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2376 of 3143

Prowers County, Colorado

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 31.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,640.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2630 of 3143

Haskell County, Oklahoma

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 31.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,642.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2637 of 3143

Taylor County, Wisconsin

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,645.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 905 of 3143

Fayette County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,657.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 400 of 3143

Carroll County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 34.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,659.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2811 of 3143

Montgomery County, Mississippi

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 38.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,668.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3010 of 3143

Yankton County, South Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,670.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 666 of 3143

Sanders County, Montana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,675.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2316 of 3143

Lamoille County, Vermont

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,680.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 354 of 3143

Potter County, Pennsylvania

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,681.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1644 of 3143

Douglas County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 31.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,682.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2601 of 3143

Greene County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,687.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 792 of 3143

Sevier County, Utah

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,689.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 707 of 3143

Lanier County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 37.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,699.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2945 of 3143

Bourbon County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,700.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2115 of 3143

Claiborne County, Mississippi

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 49.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,702.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3112 of 3143

Burleson County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,706.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1127 of 3143

Trinity County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,715.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2178 of 3143

Dawson County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 36.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,722.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2916 of 3143

Uinta County, Wyoming

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,722.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 886 of 3143

Early County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 35.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,724.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2877 of 3143

Choctaw County, Alabama

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 30.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,725.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2549 of 3143

Tama County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,730.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1579 of 3143

Mariposa County, California

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,737.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1476 of 3143

Fountain County, Indiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,740.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1591 of 3143

Dent County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,745.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2075 of 3143

Las Animas County, Colorado

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,746.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2241 of 3143

Howard County, Arkansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 30.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,749.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2523 of 3143

Crawford County, Indiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 36.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,750.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2905 of 3143

Rush County, Indiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,759.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1591 of 3143

Rabun County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,761.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1453 of 3143

Colorado County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,765.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 886 of 3143

Gilchrist County, Florida

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,767.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1283 of 3143

Jefferson County, Florida

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,769.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2205 of 3143

Baker County, Oregon

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,770.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1644 of 3143

Vermillion County, Indiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,770.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1904 of 3143

Greene County, Alabama

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 51.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,775.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3124 of 3143

Bacon County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 35.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,782.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2873 of 3143

Page County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,785.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2193 of 3143

Charlton County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 31.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,789.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2601 of 3143

Buena Vista County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,791.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1013 of 3143

Clay County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 29.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,795.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2468 of 3143

Perry County, Alabama

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 52.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,800.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3129 of 3143

Barton County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 32.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,802.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2734 of 3143

Okfuskee County, Oklahoma

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 37.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,803.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2964 of 3143

White County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,804.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2406 of 3143

Humphreys County, Mississippi

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 52.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,809.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3127 of 3143

Park County, Montana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,814.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1414 of 3143

Pushmataha County, Oklahoma

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 36.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,815.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2905 of 3143

Robertson County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,815.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1571 of 3143

Butler County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 32.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,848.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2670 of 3143

Stone County, Arkansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 30.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,851.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2588 of 3143

Shelby County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,854.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 970 of 3143

Green County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 34.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,859.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2826 of 3143

Sumter County, Alabama

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 39.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,863.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3029 of 3143

Botetourt County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 11.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,865.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 140 of 3143

Wasatch County, Utah

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 10.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,865.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 93 of 3143

Fayette County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,866.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1264 of 3143

Calhoun County, Florida

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 33.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,875.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2741 of 3143

Jones County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,876.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2171 of 3143

Posey County, Indiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,882.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 498 of 3143

Washington County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,885.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 776 of 3143

Cannon County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,887.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2132 of 3143

Summers County, West Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 35.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,888.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2891 of 3143

Pecos County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 30.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,890.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2564 of 3143

Noxubee County, Mississippi

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 39.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,898.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3028 of 3143

Wayne County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 36.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,898.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2931 of 3143

Clay County, Alabama

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,905.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2338 of 3143

Schuyler County, New York

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,907.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1547 of 3143

Bates County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,917.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1904 of 3143

Smith County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,919.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1063 of 3143

Brown County, Minnesota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,922.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 512 of 3143

Kusilvak Census Area, Alaska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 48.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,922.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3109 of 3143

Langlade County, Wisconsin

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,923.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1216 of 3143

Owen County, Indiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,923.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 923 of 3143

Perry County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,923.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1323 of 3143

Scurry County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,924.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2178 of 3143

Gogebic County, Michigan

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,931.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2316 of 3143

Sierra County, New Mexico

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 34.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,933.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2852 of 3143

Hubbard County, Minnesota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,935.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 873 of 3143

Rolette County, North Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 34.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,947.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2811 of 3143

Brunswick County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,950.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2393 of 3143

Decatur County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 34.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,951.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2846 of 3143

Currituck County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 13.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,956.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 237 of 3143

Gillespie County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,959.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 372 of 3143

Stutsman County, North Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,973.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1145 of 3143

Braxton County, West Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 33.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,975.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2783 of 3143

Jefferson County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,975.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2205 of 3143

Swain County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 29.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,979.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2445 of 3143

Antrim County, Michigan

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,980.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 627 of 3143

Taylor County, West Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,980.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1916 of 3143

Meeker County, Minnesota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 3,982.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 721 of 3143

Lake County, Michigan

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 32.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,000.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2713 of 3143

Edmonson County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 32.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,002.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2724 of 3143

Jasper County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,006.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1971 of 3143

Rockbridge County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,007.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 886 of 3143

Larue County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,008.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2193 of 3143

Perry County, Indiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,008.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1547 of 3143

Chowan County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 29.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,011.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2465 of 3143

Kalkaska County, Michigan

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,018.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1523 of 3143

Juneau Borough, Alaska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 12.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,021.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 229 of 3143

Ripley County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 38.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,021.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2982 of 3143

Dickenson County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 30.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,022.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2534 of 3143

Gooding County, Idaho

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,029.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1995 of 3143

Summit County, Utah

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 9.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,034.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 55 of 3143

Lamar County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,039.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1414 of 3143

Lewis County, West Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,039.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1847 of 3143

Baker County, Florida

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,045.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 498 of 3143

Leslie County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 41.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,055.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3058 of 3143

Walthall County, Mississippi

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 29.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,056.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2483 of 3143

Wilcox County, Alabama

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 40.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,057.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3045 of 3143

Charlevoix County, Michigan

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,058.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 498 of 3143

Winn Parish, Louisiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 33.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,061.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2787 of 3143

Appomattox County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,064.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1871 of 3143

Lampasas County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,065.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 854 of 3143

Monroe County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 36.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,069.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2931 of 3143

Camp County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 32.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,076.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2670 of 3143

Washington County, Alabama

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,082.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2216 of 3143

Leon County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,084.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1946 of 3143

Pawnee County, Oklahoma

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,103.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2115 of 3143

Roosevelt County, Montana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 40.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,103.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3039 of 3143

Clinton County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,114.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1087 of 3143

Duchesne County, Utah

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,115.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1252 of 3143

Banks County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,123.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1383 of 3143

Young County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,123.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1664 of 3143

Wilbarger County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 34.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,125.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2793 of 3143

Crawford County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,139.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2015 of 3143

Clay County, Arkansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 29.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,142.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2461 of 3143

McPherson County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,143.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 372 of 3143

Bledsoe County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 30.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,146.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2506 of 3143

Macon County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 42.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,153.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3063 of 3143

Plumas County, California

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,153.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1401 of 3143

Meade County, South Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,155.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 305 of 3143

Madison Parish, Louisiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 50.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,158.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3119 of 3143

Edgar County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,168.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2030 of 3143

Piscataquis County, Maine

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,173.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1871 of 3143

Bamberg County, South Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 34.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,175.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2793 of 3143

Polk County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,175.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1353 of 3143

Andrews County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,183.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1591 of 3143

Juniata County, Pennsylvania

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,183.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 854 of 3143

Wayne County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,194.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2132 of 3143

Bath County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 33.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,202.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2745 of 3143

Henry County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,202.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2158 of 3143

Lee County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,204.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1781 of 3143

Terry County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 38.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,204.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3008 of 3143

Green Lake County, Wisconsin

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,207.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1501 of 3143

St. James Parish, Louisiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,209.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1414 of 3143

Henry County, Ohio

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,212.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 472 of 3143

Jackson County, Wisconsin

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,212.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1353 of 3143

Patrick County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,224.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1892 of 3143

Morgan County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 34.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,228.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2819 of 3143

Pike County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,229.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2132 of 3143

Yalobusha County, Mississippi

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 34.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,232.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2850 of 3143

Brooke County, West Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,239.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1183 of 3143

McIntosh County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 37.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,239.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2978 of 3143

Bandera County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,242.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1087 of 3143

Gloucester County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 10.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,245.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 111 of 3143

Parke County, Indiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,250.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2265 of 3143

Smith County, Mississippi

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 30.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,257.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2556 of 3143

Door County, Wisconsin

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,259.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 316 of 3143

Otsego County, Michigan

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,265.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 684 of 3143

Hutchinson County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,275.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1383 of 3143

Fulton County, Arkansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 35.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,276.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2867 of 3143

Sioux County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 12.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,279.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 205 of 3143

Long County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,280.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1725 of 3143

Washington County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 40.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,280.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3046 of 3143

Gage County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,281.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1154 of 3143

Yancey County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,284.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1615 of 3143

Barbour County, West Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 29.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,293.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2425 of 3143

Newton County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 36.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,295.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2905 of 3143

Mahaska County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,300.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1183 of 3143

Panola County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,300.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1043 of 3143

Marshall County, Oklahoma

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,303.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2265 of 3143

Freestone County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,307.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1664 of 3143

Dakota County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,308.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1199 of 3143

East Feliciana Parish, Louisiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,310.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2030 of 3143

Waushara County, Wisconsin

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,314.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 837 of 3143

Tallahatchie County, Mississippi

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 38.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,319.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3008 of 3143

Stone County, Mississippi

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,322.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1738 of 3143

Polk County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,325.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1871 of 3143

Dimmit County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 52.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,334.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3129 of 3143

Summit County, Colorado

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,335.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 316 of 3143

Hardy County, West Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 30.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,338.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2574 of 3143

Grundy County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 32.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,342.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2672 of 3143

Dawson County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,347.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 854 of 3143

Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,356.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1087 of 3143

Trigg County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 30.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,358.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2564 of 3143

Franklin County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,364.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 707 of 3143

Simpson County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,367.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1547 of 3143

Cleburne County, Alabama

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,374.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2385 of 3143

Perry County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,374.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1813 of 3143

Vilas County, Wisconsin

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,380.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 955 of 3143

Cedar County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 30.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,386.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2549 of 3143

Chester County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,392.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2178 of 3143

Jackson County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 34.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,393.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2802 of 3143

Eastland County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,403.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2015 of 3143

Nodaway County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,403.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1799 of 3143

Screven County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 31.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,405.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2655 of 3143

Lavaca County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,413.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1441 of 3143

Jefferson County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 29.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,416.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2475 of 3143

Decatur County, Indiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,420.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 707 of 3143

Sawyer County, Wisconsin

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,447.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1892 of 3143

Telfair County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 46.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,447.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3095 of 3143

Lowndes County, Alabama

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 46.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,448.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3093 of 3143

Benton County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,455.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2329 of 3143

Lamar County, Alabama

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 32.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,456.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2724 of 3143

Woodford County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,462.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 666 of 3143

Orange County, Vermont

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,467.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 450 of 3143

San Juan County, Utah

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 31.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,486.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2655 of 3143

Montague County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,488.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1401 of 3143

Morton County, North Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 13.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,493.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 280 of 3143

Martin County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 46.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,502.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3099 of 3143

Craig County, Oklahoma

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 33.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,517.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2777 of 3143

Salem City, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,520.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1063 of 3143

Westmoreland County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,522.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1813 of 3143

Crook County, Oregon

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,528.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 759 of 3143

Lee County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,528.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 305 of 3143

Lyon County, Minnesota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,536.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 886 of 3143

Churchill County, Nevada

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,538.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 837 of 3143

Dinwiddie County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,539.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 609 of 3143

Jackson Parish, Louisiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 32.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,542.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2691 of 3143

Codington County, South Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,551.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 551 of 3143

Bristol City, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,554.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2253 of 3143

Martin County, Minnesota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,556.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1677 of 3143

St. Helena Parish, Louisiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 42.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,559.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3067 of 3143

Anderson County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,575.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 988 of 3143

Van Wert County, Ohio

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,575.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 537 of 3143

Estill County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 33.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,579.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2752 of 3143

Orange County, Indiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,582.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1725 of 3143

White County, Indiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,587.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 970 of 3143

Wyoming County, Pennsylvania

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,604.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 886 of 3143

Logan County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,619.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 988 of 3143

Wells County, Indiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,624.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 627 of 3143

Woodford County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 12.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,634.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 197 of 3143

Pacific County, Washington

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,635.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1079 of 3143

Somerset County, Maryland

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,642.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1696 of 3143

Sullivan County, Indiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,642.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1904 of 3143

Frio County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,646.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2376 of 3143

Addison County, Vermont

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 13.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,652.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 275 of 3143

Holmes County, Florida

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,652.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2102 of 3143

Green County, Wisconsin

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 12.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,672.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 222 of 3143

Harvey County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,673.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 354 of 3143

Calhoun County, Mississippi

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 37.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,679.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2945 of 3143

Nicollet County, Minnesota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,681.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 378 of 3143

Brantley County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,685.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2015 of 3143

Grayson County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 32.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,697.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2724 of 3143

Bullock County, Alabama

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 53.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,702.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3133 of 3143

Roane County, West Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 34.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,711.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2833 of 3143

Big Horn County, Montana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 37.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,718.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2964 of 3143

Bristol County, Rhode Island

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 10.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,719.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 69 of 3143

Minidoka County, Idaho

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,727.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1353 of 3143

Humphreys County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,733.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1958 of 3143

Izard County, Arkansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 36.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,735.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2937 of 3143

Powell County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 37.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,754.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2966 of 3143

Harris County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 13.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,769.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 262 of 3143

Dare County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 12.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,788.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 216 of 3143

Clay County, Indiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,789.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 923 of 3143

Labette County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,791.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1925 of 3143

Marion County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,791.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 413 of 3143

Menominee County, Michigan

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,795.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1305 of 3143

Adams County, Wisconsin

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,799.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1712 of 3143

Cherokee County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,803.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1971 of 3143

Lawrence County, South Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,805.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 873 of 3143

Klickitat County, Washington

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,808.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1233 of 3143

Grant Parish, Louisiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,812.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1995 of 3143

Lewis County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 37.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,817.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2966 of 3143

Torrance County, New Mexico

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 31.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,822.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2637 of 3143

Union County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 29.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,823.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2436 of 3143

Ray County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,828.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1323 of 3143

Miami County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,832.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 316 of 3143

Fredericksburg City, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,833.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 854 of 3143

Morgan County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,836.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1958 of 3143

Wayne County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 33.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,840.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2768 of 3143

Madison County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,844.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1644 of 3143

Garrard County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,846.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2305 of 3143

Alamosa County, Colorado

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 30.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,860.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2588 of 3143

Dickinson County, Michigan

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,863.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 998 of 3143

Dixie County, Florida

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 31.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,869.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2644 of 3143

La Paz County, Arizona

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 29.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,869.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2465 of 3143

Bourbon County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,873.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1829 of 3143

LaGrange County, Indiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 12.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,873.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 170 of 3143

Lawrence County, Mississippi

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 41.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,876.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3055 of 3143

Conecuh County, Alabama

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 43.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,877.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3083 of 3143

Falls County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 31.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,886.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2664 of 3143

Dawson County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,887.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 565 of 3143

Butts County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,888.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1199 of 3143

Amador County, California

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 12.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,889.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 229 of 3143

Union County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,890.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 998 of 3143

Amite County, Mississippi

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 39.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,894.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3019 of 3143

Jefferson Davis County, Mississippi

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 44.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,895.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3087 of 3143

Manistee County, Michigan

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,899.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1199 of 3143

Desha County, Arkansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 45.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,900.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3092 of 3143

Choctaw County, Oklahoma

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 34.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,907.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2852 of 3143

Gaines County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,908.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1523 of 3143

Tunica County, Mississippi

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 53.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,918.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3131 of 3143

Llano County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,920.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1501 of 3143

Henry County, Alabama

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,941.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2376 of 3143

Knott County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 37.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,944.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2949 of 3143

Elbert County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,951.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1986 of 3143

Fayette County, Alabama

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 31.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,952.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2622 of 3143

Isle of Wight County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 12.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,962.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 197 of 3143

Madison County, Arkansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 29.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,966.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2425 of 3143

Hampshire County, West Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,967.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1433 of 3143

Sheridan County, Wyoming

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,972.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 528 of 3143

Montgomery County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,973.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1063 of 3143

Park County, Wyoming

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,977.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 666 of 3143

Page County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,978.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1337 of 3143

Yates County, New York

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,982.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1369 of 3143

Warren County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 9.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,990.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 57 of 3143

Harrison County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,991.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2132 of 3143

Hill County, Montana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 31.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,992.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2644 of 3143

Colusa County, California

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,999.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1644 of 3143

New Madrid County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 32.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 4,999.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2718 of 3143

Clinton County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,003.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 334 of 3143

Hale County, Alabama

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 34.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,014.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2819 of 3143

Bertie County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 32.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,026.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2672 of 3143

Kendall County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 10.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,029.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 90 of 3143

Union County, Ohio

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 7.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,036.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 18 of 3143

Woodward County, Oklahoma

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,037.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2045 of 3143

White County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,039.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 837 of 3143

Allen County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,045.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1799 of 3143

Hickman County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,049.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1305 of 3143

West Baton Rouge Parish, Louisiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,055.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 944 of 3143

Fayette County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,066.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1936 of 3143

Van Buren County, Arkansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 32.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,068.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2672 of 3143

Meade County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,071.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 695 of 3143

McLeod County, Minnesota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,077.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 305 of 3143

Arkansas County, Arkansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 31.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,081.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2622 of 3143

Jeff Davis County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 34.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,089.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2819 of 3143

Sevier County, Arkansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 32.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,090.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2718 of 3143

Martinsville City, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 38.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,091.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3006 of 3143

Attala County, Mississippi

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 29.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,111.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2483 of 3143

Wakulla County, Florida

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,111.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 512 of 3143

Clarke County, Mississippi

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 33.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,113.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2777 of 3143

Dodge County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,113.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2349 of 3143

Jasper County, Indiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,118.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 487 of 3143

Franklin County, Arkansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 30.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,121.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2506 of 3143

Boone County, West Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,123.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1892 of 3143

Pointe Coupee Parish, Louisiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,124.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1995 of 3143

Ripley County, Indiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,125.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 826 of 3143

Asotin County, Washington

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,131.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1644 of 3143

Fulton County, Indiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,143.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1986 of 3143

Saluda County, South Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,148.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2216 of 3143

Pierce County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,152.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2030 of 3143

Jackson County, Arkansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 36.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,163.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2916 of 3143

Emmet County, Michigan

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,168.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 462 of 3143

Marion County, Arkansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 30.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,175.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2534 of 3143

Milam County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,178.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1252 of 3143

Zavala County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 55.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,178.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3139 of 3143

Lawrence County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 32.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,181.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2708 of 3143

Texas County, Oklahoma

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,184.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1986 of 3143

Mille Lacs County, Minnesota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,191.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1079 of 3143

Bryan County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 10.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,195.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 105 of 3143

Fleming County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 34.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,202.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2802 of 3143

Staunton City, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,204.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1383 of 3143

Mercer County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,205.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1615 of 3143

Union County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,206.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2030 of 3143

Lincoln County, Maine

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,213.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 378 of 3143

Unicoi County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 30.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,216.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2515 of 3143

Jefferson County, Oregon

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,226.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1414 of 3143

Monroe County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,228.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 923 of 3143

Sumner County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,228.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1781 of 3143

Houston County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,230.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2193 of 3143

Gray County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,236.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2205 of 3143

Ottawa County, Ohio

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 13.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,254.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 254 of 3143

Beadle County, South Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,265.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2291 of 3143

Lassen County, California

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,270.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1476 of 3143

Johnson County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 32.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,273.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2672 of 3143

Sequatchie County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 31.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,282.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2664 of 3143

Logan County, Colorado

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,288.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2349 of 3143

Prince Edward County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 30.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,288.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2564 of 3143

Rockcastle County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 33.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,290.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2768 of 3143

Northampton County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 32.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,302.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2691 of 3143

Todd County, Minnesota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,308.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1305 of 3143

Seward County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,314.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1936 of 3143

Mason County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 31.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,315.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2664 of 3143

Radford City, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 39.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,319.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3012 of 3143

DeWitt County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 29.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,329.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2452 of 3143

Orange County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,329.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 334 of 3143

Cross County, Arkansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 32.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,342.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2713 of 3143

Madison County, Ohio

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 13.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,346.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 262 of 3143

Hockley County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,361.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2030 of 3143

Waynesboro City, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,363.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1738 of 3143

Carbon County, Utah

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,365.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2132 of 3143

Steuben County, Indiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,371.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 565 of 3143

Jefferson County, Washington

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,372.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 565 of 3143

Mineral County, West Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,376.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1233 of 3143

Whitley County, Indiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,383.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 498 of 3143

Dallas County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 31.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,389.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2622 of 3143

Nobles County, Minnesota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,395.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1925 of 3143

Tishomingo County, Mississippi

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 29.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,402.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2461 of 3143

Elk County, Pennsylvania

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,405.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 826 of 3143

Nolan County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 38.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,409.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3000 of 3143

Stark County, North Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,416.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 651 of 3143

Lincoln County, Wisconsin

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,421.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1063 of 3143

Saline County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,429.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1925 of 3143

Lafayette County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,430.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 627 of 3143

Warren County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,447.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 389 of 3143

Trempealeau County, Wisconsin

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,456.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 837 of 3143

Pine County, Minnesota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,464.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1063 of 3143

Ogemaw County, Michigan

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,472.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2143 of 3143

Montezuma County, Colorado

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,485.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1323 of 3143

Sharp County, Arkansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 31.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,489.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2622 of 3143

Grant County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,493.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1441 of 3143

Ohio County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,493.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1725 of 3143

Jasper County, Mississippi

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 34.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,494.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2833 of 3143

Roscommon County, Michigan

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,502.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1712 of 3143

Covington County, Mississippi

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 31.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,521.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2593 of 3143

Pickens County, Alabama

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 32.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,521.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2691 of 3143

Marion County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 29.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,526.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2436 of 3143

Schoharie County, New York

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,531.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1043 of 3143

Henry County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,536.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1936 of 3143

Drew County, Arkansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 34.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,537.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2793 of 3143

Freeborn County, Minnesota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,555.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 923 of 3143

Iroquois County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,557.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1369 of 3143

Lee County, South Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 37.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,562.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2949 of 3143

Nicholas County, West Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,564.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1644 of 3143

Garrett County, Maryland

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,568.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1127 of 3143

Tyler County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 31.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,589.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2593 of 3143

Union County, Pennsylvania

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,594.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 627 of 3143

Oldham County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 8.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,609.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 30 of 3143

Lincoln County, Montana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,632.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2178 of 3143

Steele County, Minnesota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,640.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 450 of 3143

Bienville Parish, Louisiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 45.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,644.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3091 of 3143

Madison County, Florida

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 34.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,651.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2826 of 3143

Orleans County, Vermont

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,664.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1323 of 3143

Starke County, Indiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,682.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1857 of 3143

Wabash County, Indiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,695.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1079 of 3143

Haywood County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 33.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,696.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2745 of 3143

Randolph County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,697.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1971 of 3143

Adams County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,700.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1033 of 3143

Breathitt County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 43.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,700.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3080 of 3143

Lawrence County, Arkansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 36.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,701.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2929 of 3143

Lewis County, New York

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,725.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1414 of 3143

Caledonia County, Vermont

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,726.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1043 of 3143

Benton County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,734.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2415 of 3143

Caswell County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,735.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2241 of 3143

Carroll County, Ohio

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,736.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1441 of 3143

Auglaize County, Ohio

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 12.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,742.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 205 of 3143

Assumption Parish, Louisiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,746.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2338 of 3143

Cheboygan County, Michigan

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,747.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1547 of 3143

Caroline County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,750.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 923 of 3143

Curry County, Oregon

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,750.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1916 of 3143

Lincoln County, New Mexico

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,756.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2393 of 3143

Wasco County, Oregon

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,761.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1501 of 3143

Logan County, Arkansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,766.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2253 of 3143

Hart County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,776.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1453 of 3143

Randolph County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,780.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1353 of 3143

Magoffin County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 51.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,784.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3126 of 3143

Scott County, Indiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,787.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1829 of 3143

Vernon County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 30.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,791.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2549 of 3143

Douglas County, Minnesota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,813.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 400 of 3143

Trinity County, California

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 36.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,813.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2940 of 3143

Jay County, Indiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 29.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,827.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2445 of 3143

Cheatham County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,834.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 316 of 3143

Jasper County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,842.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 565 of 3143

Gonzales County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 29.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,844.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2496 of 3143

Manassas City, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 13.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,866.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 291 of 3143

Oconto County, Wisconsin

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,882.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 425 of 3143

Polk County, Minnesota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,889.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1127 of 3143

Jennings County, Indiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,898.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1476 of 3143

Cook County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 34.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,899.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2802 of 3143

Queen Annes County, Maryland

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 11.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,901.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 140 of 3143

Greene County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 32.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,903.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2724 of 3143

Juneau County, Wisconsin

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,904.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1677 of 3143

Casey County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 38.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,928.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2988 of 3143

Macon County, Alabama

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 36.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,929.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2937 of 3143

Meriwether County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,932.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2376 of 3143

Claiborne Parish, Louisiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 49.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,939.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3118 of 3143

Isanti County, Minnesota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,943.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 316 of 3143

Osceola County, Michigan

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,943.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2045 of 3143

Crawford County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,946.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2132 of 3143

Washington County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,955.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 776 of 3143

Polk County, Arkansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 31.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,962.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2612 of 3143

DeKalb County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,973.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2415 of 3143

Cassia County, Idaho

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,979.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1757 of 3143

Beckham County, Oklahoma

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 31.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,985.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2612 of 3143

Livingston County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,987.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 810 of 3143

Marengo County, Alabama

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 32.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,996.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2682 of 3143

Calumet County, Wisconsin

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 11.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,998.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 136 of 3143

Sagadahoc County, Maine

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 5,999.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 581 of 3143

Effingham County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,001.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 792 of 3143

Adair County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 33.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,008.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2768 of 3143

Putnam County, Indiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,015.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 905 of 3143

Tillamook County, Oregon

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,015.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1591 of 3143

Oneida County, Wisconsin

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,027.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 537 of 3143

Brooks County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 37.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,032.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2974 of 3143

Limestone County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,033.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2329 of 3143

Pierce County, Wisconsin

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,033.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 413 of 3143

Champaign County, Ohio

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,038.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 512 of 3143

Barton County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,044.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1871 of 3143

Itawamba County, Mississippi

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,044.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2158 of 3143

Jefferson County, Idaho

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,056.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 905 of 3143

Yell County, Arkansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 30.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,058.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2582 of 3143

Williams County, North Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,068.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 472 of 3143

Todd County, South Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 66.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,074.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3142 of 3143

Clinton County, Indiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,080.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 998 of 3143

Lee County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,080.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1063 of 3143

Aransas County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,086.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1892 of 3143

Christian County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,090.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1033 of 3143

Hampton County, South Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 34.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,092.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2802 of 3143

Otero County, Colorado

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 34.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,097.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2802 of 3143

Russell County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 34.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,102.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2811 of 3143

Winston County, Mississippi

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 35.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,105.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2885 of 3143

Glacier County, Montana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 45.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,120.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3090 of 3143

Chisago County, Minnesota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 10.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,127.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 105 of 3143

Ashe County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,132.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1632 of 3143

Amherst County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,156.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1154 of 3143

Breckinridge County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 30.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,159.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2515 of 3143

Washington County, Florida

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,164.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2178 of 3143

Cherokee County, Alabama

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,180.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1871 of 3143

Randolph County, Indiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,194.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2045 of 3143

Saline County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,202.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2241 of 3143

Miller County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,215.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1925 of 3143

Fayette County, Indiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,226.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2216 of 3143

Vernon County, Wisconsin

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,228.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1183 of 3143

Harrison County, Indiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,241.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 512 of 3143

Hertford County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 34.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,242.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2811 of 3143

Talbot County, Maryland

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,250.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 651 of 3143

Roosevelt County, New Mexico

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 35.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,252.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2863 of 3143

Mercer County, Ohio

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,271.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 425 of 3143

Defiance County, Ohio

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,273.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 627 of 3143

Jones County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,275.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1476 of 3143

Platte County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,276.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 886 of 3143

Peach County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,280.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1664 of 3143

Abbeville County, South Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,293.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2158 of 3143

Monroe County, Alabama

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 32.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,297.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2724 of 3143

Carlton County, Minnesota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,298.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 873 of 3143

Gibson County, Indiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,300.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1079 of 3143

Randolph County, Alabama

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,304.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2406 of 3143

Jefferson County, Indiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,317.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1216 of 3143

Taylor County, Florida

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 33.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,320.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2764 of 3143

Hart County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 33.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,328.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2745 of 3143

Warren County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 34.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,335.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2852 of 3143

Butler County, Alabama

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 34.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,342.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2837 of 3143

Pemiscot County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 43.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,352.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3076 of 3143

Bee County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,354.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2115 of 3143

Clay County, Mississippi

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 35.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,356.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2863 of 3143

Fentress County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 33.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,358.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2764 of 3143

Clark County, Arkansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 34.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,379.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2826 of 3143

Greene County, Pennsylvania

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,382.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1154 of 3143

Putnam County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,404.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2367 of 3143

Elmore County, Idaho

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,406.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1606 of 3143

Grainger County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,408.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2143 of 3143

Martin County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 30.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,428.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2523 of 3143

McDonough County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,428.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2115 of 3143

Socorro County, New Mexico

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 41.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,438.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3060 of 3143

Clarke County, Alabama

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 29.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,458.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2436 of 3143

Deaf Smith County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 35.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,460.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2877 of 3143

Morgan County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 30.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,463.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2534 of 3143

Phillips County, Arkansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 42.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,464.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3064 of 3143

York County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 9.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,465.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 53 of 3143

Bennington County, Vermont

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,470.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 810 of 3143

Dodge County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,475.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 810 of 3143

Allen Parish, Louisiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 34.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,476.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2793 of 3143

Audrain County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,480.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2291 of 3143

Morrison County, Minnesota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,480.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1033 of 3143

Knox County, Maine

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,489.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 609 of 3143

Polk County, Wisconsin

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,489.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 354 of 3143

Overton County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,496.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2393 of 3143

Coos County, New Hampshire

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,513.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1523 of 3143

Mitchell County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 33.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,515.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2752 of 3143

Payette County, Idaho

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,515.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1871 of 3143

Morgan County, Colorado

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,516.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1547 of 3143

Seneca County, New York

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,517.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1283 of 3143

Del Norte County, California

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,518.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2102 of 3143

Howard County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,519.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1571 of 3143

Franklin County, Maine

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,524.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1547 of 3143

Prince George County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,537.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 955 of 3143

Broomfield County, Colorado

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 8.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,539.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 30 of 3143

Scott County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 31.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,542.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2644 of 3143

Fairfield County, South Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 32.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,547.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2691 of 3143

Hempstead County, Arkansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 34.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,549.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2802 of 3143

Randolph County, Arkansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 35.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,551.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2898 of 3143

McDuffie County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 30.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,554.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2582 of 3143

Tippah County, Mississippi

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 31.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,562.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2637 of 3143

Mason County, Michigan

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,567.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1606 of 3143

Appling County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 36.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,568.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2911 of 3143

Morrow County, Ohio

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,585.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 970 of 3143

Wythe County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,589.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1725 of 3143

McIntosh County, Oklahoma

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 34.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,603.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2837 of 3143

Haralson County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,604.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1353 of 3143

Bureau County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,605.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1199 of 3143

Moore County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 31.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,609.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2612 of 3143

Wright County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 35.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,620.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2877 of 3143

Gladwin County, Michigan

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,631.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2060 of 3143

Edgefield County, South Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,635.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2102 of 3143

Buchanan County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 36.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,637.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2929 of 3143

Carroll County, New Hampshire

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 13.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,637.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 237 of 3143

Marion County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,641.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1813 of 3143

Hardeman County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 30.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,647.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2556 of 3143

Jerome County, Idaho

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,647.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2143 of 3143

Boone County, Indiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 9.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,674.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 45 of 3143

Chickasaw County, Mississippi

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 40.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,680.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3042 of 3143

Montgomery County, Indiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,685.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 873 of 3143

Giles County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,693.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1547 of 3143

Transylvania County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,695.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1216 of 3143

Zapata County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 49.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,705.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3117 of 3143

Cass County, Minnesota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,708.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1441 of 3143

Culpeper County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 12.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,713.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 222 of 3143

Essex County, New York

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,716.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1033 of 3143

Pickens County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,716.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1063 of 3143

Columbia County, Arkansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 33.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,718.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2749 of 3143

Bibb County, Alabama

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 32.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,720.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2724 of 3143

Grundy County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 12.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,723.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 222 of 3143

Jackson County, Oklahoma

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,723.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2349 of 3143

Fayette County, Ohio

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,724.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1757 of 3143

Montgomery County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,724.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2143 of 3143

Snyder County, Pennsylvania

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,739.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 923 of 3143

Tate County, Mississippi

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,743.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1946 of 3143

Huron County, Michigan

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,761.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1453 of 3143

Conway County, Arkansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 32.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,767.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2701 of 3143

Upshur County, West Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 30.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,768.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2534 of 3143

Worth County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 33.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,771.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2759 of 3143

Lumpkin County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,786.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1414 of 3143

Austin County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,796.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1453 of 3143

Ben Hill County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 40.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,796.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3042 of 3143

Washington County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 37.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,801.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2966 of 3143

George County, Mississippi

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,811.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2305 of 3143

Louisa County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,820.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 721 of 3143

Preston County, West Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,820.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1579 of 3143

Hancock County, West Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,828.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1847 of 3143

Adair County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 29.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,862.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2452 of 3143

Union County, Oregon

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,869.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2158 of 3143

Prentiss County, Mississippi

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,883.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2376 of 3143

Adams County, Washington

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 33.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,884.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2759 of 3143

Becker County, Minnesota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,886.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1117 of 3143

Anson County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 33.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,890.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2759 of 3143

Oceana County, Michigan

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,895.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2060 of 3143

Madison County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,899.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1127 of 3143

Adair County, Oklahoma

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 36.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,907.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2905 of 3143

Newton County, Mississippi

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 34.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,912.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2826 of 3143

Ashley County, Arkansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 37.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,920.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2978 of 3143

Brown County, South Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,930.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 970 of 3143

McClain County, Oklahoma

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,943.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 462 of 3143

Webster County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,952.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1199 of 3143

Richland Parish, Louisiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 36.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,954.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2940 of 3143

Berrien County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 38.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,961.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2995 of 3143

Eagle County, Colorado

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 12.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,964.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 216 of 3143

DeKalb County, Indiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,972.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 551 of 3143

Lee County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,975.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1476 of 3143

Lincoln County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,986.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2415 of 3143

Wyoming County, West Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 34.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,988.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2793 of 3143

Huntingdon County, Pennsylvania

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 6,999.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 854 of 3143

Washington County, Indiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,006.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1946 of 3143

Russell County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,007.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2281 of 3143

Perry County, Pennsylvania

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,011.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 450 of 3143

Wyoming County, New York

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,013.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1013 of 3143

Concordia Parish, Louisiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 41.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,019.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3049 of 3143

Benton County, Minnesota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,023.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 721 of 3143

Cleburne County, Arkansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,029.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2349 of 3143

Fannin County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,037.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2253 of 3143

Goodhue County, Minnesota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,040.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 413 of 3143

Grimes County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,040.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1971 of 3143

Campbell County, Wyoming

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,058.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 436 of 3143

Douglas County, Washington

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,063.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 551 of 3143

Huntington County, Indiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,070.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1154 of 3143

Morgan County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,074.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1615 of 3143

Davie County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,087.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 565 of 3143

Taylor County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,104.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2338 of 3143

Logan County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,106.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2015 of 3143

Lincoln County, South Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 10.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,108.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 72 of 3143

Sullivan County, New Hampshire

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,110.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 627 of 3143

Palo Pinto County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,112.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1857 of 3143

Wayne County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 36.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,116.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2937 of 3143

Washington County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 31.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,119.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2644 of 3143

Calvert County, Maryland

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 7.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,141.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 15 of 3143

Pulaski County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,141.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1453 of 3143

Barnwell County, South Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 35.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,145.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2885 of 3143

Marshall County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,145.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1632 of 3143

Iosco County, Michigan

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,157.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2376 of 3143

Ravalli County, Montana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,164.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 462 of 3143

Bethel Census Area, Alaska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 39.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,175.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3029 of 3143

Hardin County, Ohio

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,187.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1958 of 3143

Lincoln County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,188.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1183 of 3143

Greene County, Indiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,198.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1712 of 3143

Cherokee County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,208.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1871 of 3143

Marshall County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,212.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1183 of 3143

Montgomery County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,217.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2030 of 3143

Sanpete County, Utah

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,234.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2178 of 3143

Tattnall County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 36.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,235.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2921 of 3143

Des Moines County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,236.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1013 of 3143

Franklin Parish, Louisiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 39.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,242.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3019 of 3143

Hopewell City, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 31.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,242.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2664 of 3143

Warren County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,245.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 826 of 3143

Boyle County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,260.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2060 of 3143

Leake County, Mississippi

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 34.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,261.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2852 of 3143

Bradford County, Florida

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 30.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,268.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2523 of 3143

Uintah County, Utah

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,268.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1127 of 3143

Dearborn County, Indiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,278.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 354 of 3143

Marshall County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,288.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 970 of 3143

Daviess County, Indiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,323.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1501 of 3143

Douglas County, Nevada

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,324.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 389 of 3143

Stephens County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,331.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2349 of 3143

Simpson County, Mississippi

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 29.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,346.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2436 of 3143

Clark County, Wisconsin

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,349.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1383 of 3143

Douglas County, Wisconsin

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,349.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 707 of 3143

Ouachita County, Arkansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 34.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,360.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2793 of 3143

Randolph County, West Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 29.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,360.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2436 of 3143

Stone County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,360.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1677 of 3143

Carver County, Minnesota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 6.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,380.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 8 of 3143

Dubois County, Indiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,382.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 721 of 3143

Macon County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,382.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2376 of 3143

Delta County, Michigan

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,397.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1216 of 3143

Hocking County, Ohio

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,403.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2178 of 3143

McNairy County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 29.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,413.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2425 of 3143

Brookings County, South Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,416.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1632 of 3143

Stoddard County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,421.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2132 of 3143

Emanuel County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 33.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,422.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2787 of 3143

Waldo County, Maine

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,424.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 988 of 3143

Lauderdale County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 32.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,434.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2734 of 3143

Chippewa County, Michigan

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,443.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1677 of 3143

Shawano County, Wisconsin

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,448.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 923 of 3143

Gilmer County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,450.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1644 of 3143

McDowell County, West Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 47.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,470.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3105 of 3143

Lincoln County, West Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 38.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,485.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2988 of 3143

Jasper County, South Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,490.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1857 of 3143

Grady County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 29.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,492.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2425 of 3143

Crisp County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 38.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,499.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3010 of 3143

Preble County, Ohio

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,501.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 944 of 3143

Franklin County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 32.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,513.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2672 of 3143

Rowan County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 34.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,516.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2852 of 3143

Winston County, Alabama

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 32.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,528.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2701 of 3143

Dunn County, Wisconsin

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,553.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 810 of 3143

Fulton County, Ohio

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,553.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 854 of 3143

Willacy County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 41.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,554.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3051 of 3143

Garvin County, Oklahoma

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 29.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,556.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2475 of 3143

Ellis County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,564.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2253 of 3143

Delta County, Colorado

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,583.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1904 of 3143

Hardee County, Florida

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 31.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,586.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2655 of 3143

Jefferson County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,614.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1433 of 3143

Glenn County, California

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,615.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2178 of 3143

Greene County, New York

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,617.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 695 of 3143

Silver Bow County, Montana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,617.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1441 of 3143

Alexander County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,620.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1453 of 3143

Hancock County, Indiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 9.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,634.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 50 of 3143

Iberville Parish, Louisiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,641.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2338 of 3143

Knox County, Indiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,647.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1523 of 3143

Barbour County, Alabama

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 35.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,653.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2877 of 3143

Henry County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,663.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 537 of 3143

Upson County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,666.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2329 of 3143

Holmes County, Ohio

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,680.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 792 of 3143

Jackson County, West Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,680.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2305 of 3143

Fauquier County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 10.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,682.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 83 of 3143

Mecklenburg County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,682.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2060 of 3143

Scotts Bluff County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,685.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1453 of 3143

Caddo County, Oklahoma

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 30.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,688.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2582 of 3143

Lee County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 38.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,704.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2982 of 3143

Lawrence County, Alabama

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,716.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1712 of 3143

Warrick County, Indiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 12.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,716.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 162 of 3143

Grenada County, Mississippi

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 37.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,734.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2954 of 3143

Holmes County, Mississippi

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 50.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,743.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3123 of 3143

San Jacinto County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,744.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2265 of 3143

Sabine Parish, Louisiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 35.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,751.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2901 of 3143

Orleans County, New York

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,757.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1216 of 3143

Marion County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,768.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2171 of 3143

Carroll County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,788.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2193 of 3143

Fayette County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,796.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 873 of 3143

Lincoln County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,800.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1738 of 3143

Cowley County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,817.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1829 of 3143

Fulton County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,829.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1971 of 3143

Jefferson County, West Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 13.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,829.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 275 of 3143

Columbia County, Wisconsin

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 13.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,841.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 291 of 3143

Marinette County, Wisconsin

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,852.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1013 of 3143

Chambers County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,853.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 462 of 3143

Poinsett County, Arkansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 35.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,874.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2877 of 3143

Callaway County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,908.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1043 of 3143

Susquehanna County, Pennsylvania

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,922.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1283 of 3143

Kandiyohi County, Minnesota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,927.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 905 of 3143

Noble County, Indiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,933.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 695 of 3143

Letcher County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 39.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,937.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3012 of 3143

Union Parish, Louisiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 39.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,960.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3025 of 3143

Custer County, Oklahoma

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 29.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,969.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2475 of 3143

Meigs County, Ohio

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 37.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,978.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2949 of 3143

Lyon County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 7,995.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1995 of 3143

Wapello County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,003.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1664 of 3143

Washington County, Maine

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,005.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2115 of 3143

Tooele County, Utah

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 10.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,012.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 77 of 3143

Finney County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,031.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1383 of 3143

Caroline County, Maryland

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,036.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1813 of 3143

Marshall County, West Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,036.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2265 of 3143

Warren County, Pennsylvania

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,040.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1401 of 3143

White County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,050.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2415 of 3143

McDonald County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 34.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,054.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2811 of 3143

Ford County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,060.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1847 of 3143

Carroll County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 29.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,082.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2461 of 3143

St. Francis County, Arkansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 41.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,094.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3053 of 3143

Clarion County, Pennsylvania

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,097.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1591 of 3143

Belknap County, New Hampshire

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 12.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,100.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 216 of 3143

Johnson County, Arkansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 32.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,100.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2682 of 3143

Grayson County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 31.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,102.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2601 of 3143

Shelby County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 33.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,109.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2787 of 3143

Mower County, Minnesota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,117.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1216 of 3143

Jefferson Davis Parish, Louisiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,121.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2045 of 3143

Polk County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,129.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2060 of 3143

Alpena County, Michigan

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,136.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2393 of 3143

James City County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 10.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,144.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 77 of 3143

Uvalde County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 34.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,152.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2793 of 3143

Clark County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,159.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1547 of 3143

Montgomery County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,161.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2216 of 3143

Wayne County, Mississippi

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 41.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,161.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3053 of 3143

Seminole County, Oklahoma

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 36.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,171.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2905 of 3143

Windsor County, Vermont

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,181.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 334 of 3143

McCreary County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 54.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,186.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3136 of 3143

Winchester City, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 30.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,186.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2564 of 3143

Cerro Gordo County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,210.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1103 of 3143

Williams County, Ohio

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,229.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1644 of 3143

Clatsop County, Oregon

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,230.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1154 of 3143

Itasca County, Minnesota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,236.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 955 of 3143

Perry County, Ohio

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,244.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1696 of 3143

Henderson County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 30.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,245.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2506 of 3143

Mason County, West Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 33.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,249.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2783 of 3143

Waupaca County, Wisconsin

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,262.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 595 of 3143

Dorchester County, Maryland

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,264.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1995 of 3143

Columbia County, Oregon

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,279.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 498 of 3143

Carroll County, Arkansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 29.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,283.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2445 of 3143

Cass County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 29.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,292.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2461 of 3143

Smyth County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,300.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2415 of 3143

Carter County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 32.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,301.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2691 of 3143

Hopkins County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,325.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1547 of 3143

Lake County, Montana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,335.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2045 of 3143

Beauregard Parish, Louisiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,340.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1712 of 3143

Miami County, Indiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,340.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1936 of 3143

Geneva County, Alabama

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 31.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,345.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2630 of 3143

De Soto Parish, Louisiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 31.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,347.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2612 of 3143

Ozaukee County, Wisconsin

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 9.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,361.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 50 of 3143

Chattooga County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 35.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,368.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2891 of 3143

Shelby County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,371.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 792 of 3143

Johnson County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 38.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,395.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3006 of 3143

Pontotoc County, Oklahoma

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,401.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1591 of 3143

Greenup County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,425.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1799 of 3143

Marion County, Mississippi

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 36.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,439.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2911 of 3143

Union County, Mississippi

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 30.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,447.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2534 of 3143

Fremont County, Wyoming

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,455.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1441 of 3143

Burke County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 35.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,472.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2867 of 3143

Ogle County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,473.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 627 of 3143

Madison County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,475.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2216 of 3143

Sweetwater County, Wyoming

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,477.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1252 of 3143

Muhlenberg County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,479.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2415 of 3143

Camden County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,488.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1087 of 3143

Washington County, Vermont

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,493.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 366 of 3143

Fannin County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,510.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1904 of 3143

Hot Spring County, Arkansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,511.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2265 of 3143

Marion County, Alabama

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 29.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,536.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2496 of 3143

Scott County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 39.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,540.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3025 of 3143

Gallia County, Ohio

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 30.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,555.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2515 of 3143

Accomack County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,565.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2075 of 3143

Pasquotank County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,568.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1547 of 3143

Tioga County, Pennsylvania

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,568.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1369 of 3143

San Miguel County, New Mexico

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 33.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,580.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2749 of 3143

Clay County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 46.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,582.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3099 of 3143

Macoupin County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,585.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1127 of 3143

Clarendon County, South Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 29.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,586.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2425 of 3143

Clinton County, Pennsylvania

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,593.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1772 of 3143

Claiborne County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,598.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2281 of 3143

Gratiot County, Michigan

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,601.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1829 of 3143

Windham County, Vermont

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,632.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1063 of 3143

Pontotoc County, Mississippi

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,652.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2265 of 3143

Rockwall County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 7.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,728.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 12 of 3143

Montrose County, Colorado

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,736.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1154 of 3143

Lincoln County, Oklahoma

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,742.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2045 of 3143

Garfield County, Colorado

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,776.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 334 of 3143

Hunterdon County, New Jersey

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 6.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,780.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 9 of 3143

Malheur County, Oregon

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 31.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,786.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2601 of 3143

Hardin County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 32.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,787.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2724 of 3143

Texas County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 37.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,787.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2958 of 3143

Wexford County, Michigan

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,804.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2115 of 3143

Chester County, South Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,811.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2253 of 3143

McKean County, Pennsylvania

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,816.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1757 of 3143

Yazoo County, Mississippi

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 43.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,816.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3080 of 3143

Muscatine County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,851.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1323 of 3143

Cass County, Indiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,852.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1781 of 3143

Nez Perce County, Idaho

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,864.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1369 of 3143

Obion County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 29.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,876.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2465 of 3143

Houghton County, Michigan

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,896.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2158 of 3143

Jackson County, Ohio

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,926.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2291 of 3143

Scott County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,945.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1781 of 3143

Cortland County, New York

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,960.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1305 of 3143

Hill County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 8,993.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1871 of 3143

Worcester County, Maryland

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,001.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 695 of 3143

Adams County, Ohio

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 33.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,025.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2752 of 3143

Crawford County, Ohio

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,034.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1453 of 3143

Logan County, Ohio

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,040.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1127 of 3143

Franklin County, Vermont

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,041.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 837 of 3143

Macon County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,044.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1799 of 3143

Guernsey County, Ohio

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,046.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1781 of 3143

Sunflower County, Mississippi

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 42.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,065.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3071 of 3143

Shelby County, Indiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,089.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1216 of 3143

Dickson County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,092.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 609 of 3143

Wilson County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,093.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 759 of 3143

Medina County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,097.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 810 of 3143

Dunklin County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 34.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,106.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2802 of 3143

Alcorn County, Mississippi

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,107.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2205 of 3143

Cooke County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,109.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1383 of 3143

San Benito County, California

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 13.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,110.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 280 of 3143

Boone County, Arkansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,144.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1847 of 3143

Boone County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,147.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 759 of 3143

Wise County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,153.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2349 of 3143

Pike County, Ohio

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 34.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,164.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2819 of 3143

Brown County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,173.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1936 of 3143

Weakley County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 29.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,192.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2483 of 3143

Pulaski County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,209.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1337 of 3143

Clinton County, Ohio

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,215.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1579 of 3143

Buffalo County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,230.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1013 of 3143

Hood County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,239.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 329 of 3143

Grant County, New Mexico

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 34.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,248.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2811 of 3143

Titus County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 29.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,270.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2483 of 3143

Lincoln County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,304.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 413 of 3143

Tuolumne County, California

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,311.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 854 of 3143

Shelby County, Ohio

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,317.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1103 of 3143

St. Charles Parish, Louisiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,332.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 886 of 3143

Tallapoosa County, Alabama

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,364.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1677 of 3143

Scott County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,376.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 551 of 3143

Lawrence County, Indiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,378.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1323 of 3143

Franklin County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,379.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1571 of 3143

Jackson County, Indiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,389.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1233 of 3143

Oglala Lakota, South Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 71.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,394.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3143 of 3143

Williamsburg County, South Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 32.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,408.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2718 of 3143

Taos County, New Mexico

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,415.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2241 of 3143

Shenandoah County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,418.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1337 of 3143

Marion County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,437.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2088 of 3143

Sherburne County, Minnesota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 9.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,445.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 62 of 3143

Chambers County, Alabama

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,452.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2349 of 3143

Nelson County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,457.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1154 of 3143

Pike County, Pennsylvania

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,465.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 512 of 3143

Burnet County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,468.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 905 of 3143

Box Elder County, Utah

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,479.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 487 of 3143

Logan County, Oklahoma

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,501.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 970 of 3143

Barron County, Wisconsin

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,502.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1233 of 3143

Toombs County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 35.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,519.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2891 of 3143

Graham County, Arizona

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,550.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2088 of 3143

Barry County, Michigan

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,572.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 436 of 3143

Sumter County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 35.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,612.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2863 of 3143

Webster County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,612.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1871 of 3143

Kittitas County, Washington

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,614.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1337 of 3143

Murray County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,624.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1781 of 3143

Henry County, Indiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,626.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1305 of 3143

Ward County, North Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,629.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 334 of 3143

Newberry County, South Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,634.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2060 of 3143

Hancock County, Maine

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,646.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 776 of 3143

Sauk County, Wisconsin

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,665.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 389 of 3143

Copiah County, Mississippi

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 36.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,698.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2916 of 3143

Jasper County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 30.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,704.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2588 of 3143

Calloway County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,706.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2241 of 3143

Jessamine County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,706.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 886 of 3143

Latah County, Idaho

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,708.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2088 of 3143

Union County, South Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 36.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,708.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2935 of 3143

Yadkin County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,721.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2088 of 3143

Henry County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 30.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,726.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2556 of 3143

Genesee County, New York

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,745.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 721 of 3143

Barry County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,759.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2367 of 3143

Tioga County, New York

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,770.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1252 of 3143

Clare County, Michigan

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 31.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,777.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2651 of 3143

Coahoma County, Mississippi

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 49.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,791.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3111 of 3143

Greenbrier County, West Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 31.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,801.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2593 of 3143

Wharton County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,810.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1772 of 3143

Winona County, Minnesota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,829.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1305 of 3143

Mingo County, West Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 44.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,836.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3086 of 3143

Monroe County, Wisconsin

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,847.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1401 of 3143

Bonner County, Idaho

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,853.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1079 of 3143

Stokes County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,855.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1501 of 3143

Highland County, Ohio

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,860.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1632 of 3143

Stephenson County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,860.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1615 of 3143

Geauga County, Ohio

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 10.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,868.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 83 of 3143

McCurtain County, Oklahoma

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 32.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,870.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2701 of 3143

Rhea County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 29.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,881.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2468 of 3143

Marshall County, Indiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,882.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1414 of 3143

Wood County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,889.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1453 of 3143

Halifax County with South Boston City, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 30.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,899.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2523 of 3143

Upshur County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,906.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1725 of 3143

Jefferson County, Pennsylvania

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,907.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1644 of 3143

Sanilac County, Michigan

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,920.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1904 of 3143

Coshocton County, Ohio

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,938.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2253 of 3143

Clinton County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,939.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1453 of 3143

Putnam County, New York

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 10.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,948.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 80 of 3143

Bell County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 43.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,952.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3084 of 3143

Ohio County, West Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,977.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1958 of 3143

Neshoba County, Mississippi

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 35.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,979.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2885 of 3143

Dyer County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,981.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2291 of 3143

Butler County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,982.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 450 of 3143

Morehouse Parish, Louisiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 42.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,995.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3066 of 3143

Marlboro County, South Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 42.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,996.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3068 of 3143

Newport County, Rhode Island

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 12.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,996.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 184 of 3143

Fremont County, Colorado

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 9,999.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1757 of 3143

Calaveras County, California

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 10,001.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1433 of 3143

Lawrence County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 10,011.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2143 of 3143

Kleberg County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 34.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 10,012.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2850 of 3143

Cibola County, New Mexico

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 39.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 10,029.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3033 of 3143

Wayne County, Pennsylvania

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 10,059.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1283 of 3143

Ottawa County, Oklahoma

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 34.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 10,062.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2833 of 3143

Albany County, Wyoming

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 10,073.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2349 of 3143

Decatur County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 35.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 10,091.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2901 of 3143

Bladen County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 34.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 10,106.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2837 of 3143

Osage County, Oklahoma

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 10,127.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1615 of 3143

Adams County, Indiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 10,137.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2367 of 3143

Otter Tail County, Minnesota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 10,146.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 707 of 3143

Wayne County, West Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 10,148.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2158 of 3143

Logan County, West Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 33.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 10,159.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2752 of 3143

Habersham County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 10,180.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1547 of 3143

Chenango County, New York

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 10,191.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1547 of 3143

La Plata County, Colorado

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 10,213.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 955 of 3143

Franklin County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 10,229.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2305 of 3143

Pettis County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 10,260.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1799 of 3143

Bingham County, Idaho

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 10,282.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1283 of 3143

Rice County, Minnesota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 10,286.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 695 of 3143

Frederick County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 11.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 10,303.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 120 of 3143

Monroe County, Mississippi

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 31.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 10,303.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2630 of 3143

Cass County, Michigan

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 10,308.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1174 of 3143

Geary County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 29.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 10,313.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2475 of 3143

Leavenworth County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 13.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 10,387.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 254 of 3143

Fayette County, West Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 10,406.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2216 of 3143

Wayne County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 35.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 10,416.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2898 of 3143

Hale County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 34.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 10,426.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2837 of 3143

Putnam County, West Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 10,433.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 905 of 3143

Erath County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 10,450.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2045 of 3143

Washington County, New York

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 10,453.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 854 of 3143

Delaware County, New York

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 10,458.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1892 of 3143

Whiteside County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 10,458.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1063 of 3143

Mayes County, Oklahoma

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 10,472.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2171 of 3143

Pickaway County, Ohio

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 10,495.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 970 of 3143

Grady County, Oklahoma

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 10,523.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 998 of 3143

Bedford County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 10,529.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1216 of 3143

Bedford County, Pennsylvania

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 10,530.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1547 of 3143

Person County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 10,547.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2178 of 3143

Hanover County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 9.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 10,564.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 62 of 3143

Cheshire County, New Hampshire

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 10,566.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 354 of 3143

Dallas County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 9.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 10,569.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 64 of 3143

Perry County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 39.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 10,570.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3027 of 3143

Madison County, New York

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 10,591.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 721 of 3143

Harlan County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 42.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 10,603.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3064 of 3143

Elko County, Nevada

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 10,618.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1145 of 3143

Franklin County, Alabama

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 33.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 10,646.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2777 of 3143

Stevens County, Washington

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 10,652.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1547 of 3143

Lewis and Clark County, Montana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 10,668.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 389 of 3143

Allegany County, New York

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 10,694.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1958 of 3143

Grant County, Wisconsin

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 10,703.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1523 of 3143

Loudon County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 10,735.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 905 of 3143

Pike County, Alabama

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 35.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 10,739.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2875 of 3143

Saline County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 10,739.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1233 of 3143

Kenai Peninsula Borough, Alaska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 10,742.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 873 of 3143

Matagorda County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 29.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 10,745.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2496 of 3143

Pender County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 10,747.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 651 of 3143

Augusta County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 10,748.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 334 of 3143

Warren County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 10,839.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2075 of 3143

Johnson County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 10,841.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1383 of 3143

Seneca County, Ohio

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 10,854.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1283 of 3143

Scott County, Mississippi

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 39.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 10,866.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3029 of 3143

Laclede County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 30.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 10,870.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2534 of 3143

Lincoln County, Mississippi

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 31.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 10,870.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2644 of 3143

Hancock County, Mississippi

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 10,901.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1757 of 3143

Chilton County, Alabama

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 10,908.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1781 of 3143

Darke County, Ohio

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 10,925.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1369 of 3143

Fairbanks North Star, Alaska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 12.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 10,959.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 162 of 3143

Kerr County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 10,967.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1369 of 3143

Kauai County, Hawaii

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 10,982.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 425 of 3143

St. Croix County, Wisconsin

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 11.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 10,990.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 146 of 3143

Adams County, Mississippi

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 40.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 11,034.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3046 of 3143

Washington County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 11,063.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1305 of 3143

Crow Wing County, Minnesota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 11,092.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 627 of 3143

Walla Walla County, Washington

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 11,094.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1043 of 3143

Jefferson County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 11,108.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1154 of 3143

St. John the Baptist Parish, Louisiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 11,110.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2265 of 3143

Henderson County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 11,114.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1995 of 3143

Union County, Arkansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 29.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 11,130.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2496 of 3143

Petersburg City, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 33.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 11,135.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2768 of 3143

Jackson County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 11,151.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2338 of 3143

Jefferson County, Wisconsin

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 13.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 11,154.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 262 of 3143

Beltrami County, Minnesota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 11,157.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1936 of 3143

Hillsdale County, Michigan

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 11,160.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1958 of 3143

Charlottesville City, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 11,185.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2102 of 3143

Tuscola County, Michigan

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 11,221.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1383 of 3143

Livingston County, New York

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 11,223.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1103 of 3143

Ionia County, Michigan

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 11,241.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 810 of 3143

Siskiyou County, California

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 11,254.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2088 of 3143

Franklin County, New York

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 11,256.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2088 of 3143

Okmulgee County, Oklahoma

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 31.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 11,264.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2651 of 3143

Ashland County, Ohio

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 11,271.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1501 of 3143

McDowell County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 11,290.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2045 of 3143

Caldwell County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 11,302.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1829 of 3143

Polk County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 11,306.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2088 of 3143

Covington County, Alabama

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 30.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 11,340.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2574 of 3143

Carson City, Nevada

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 11,342.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1199 of 3143

Knox County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 11,350.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1936 of 3143

Rutland County, Vermont

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 11,359.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1043 of 3143

Cole County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 11,387.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 487 of 3143

Knox County, Ohio

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 11,387.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1013 of 3143

Lyon County, Nevada

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 11,420.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 944 of 3143

Warren County, Mississippi

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 11,423.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2178 of 3143

Independence County, Arkansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 30.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 11,437.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2564 of 3143

Tazewell County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 30.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 11,452.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2523 of 3143

Pittsburg County, Oklahoma

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 11,457.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2281 of 3143

Dillon County, South Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 41.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 11,460.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3055 of 3143

Effingham County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 11,466.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 651 of 3143

Venango County, Pennsylvania

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 11,479.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1712 of 3143

Campbell County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 11,495.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1323 of 3143

Phelps County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 11,498.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2232 of 3143

Island County, Washington

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 13.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 11,500.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 280 of 3143

Chippewa County, Wisconsin

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 11,508.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 826 of 3143

Fulton County, New York

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 11,519.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1547 of 3143

Okeechobee County, Florida

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 30.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 11,525.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2534 of 3143

Evangeline Parish, Louisiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 37.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 11,581.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2972 of 3143

Stephens County, Oklahoma

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 11,626.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2205 of 3143

Clinton County, Michigan

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 11,630.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 389 of 3143

Marshall County, Mississippi

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 36.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 11,650.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2921 of 3143

Carteret County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 11,667.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 721 of 3143

Mason County, Washington

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 11,667.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 799 of 3143

Montgomery County, New York

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 11,686.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1781 of 3143

Rio Arriba County, New Mexico

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 29.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 11,686.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2452 of 3143

Rusk County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 11,696.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1847 of 3143

Warren County, New York

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 11,696.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 854 of 3143

Roane County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 11,702.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1369 of 3143

Camden County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 11,715.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1369 of 3143

Kendall County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 8.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 11,722.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 30 of 3143

Branch County, Michigan

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 11,725.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2193 of 3143

Franklin County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 11,756.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1433 of 3143

Columbia County, New York

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 11,774.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1103 of 3143

St. Joseph County, Michigan

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 11,785.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1087 of 3143

Morgan County, Indiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 11,799.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 609 of 3143

Hardin County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 11,805.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1252 of 3143

Fayette County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 9.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 11,835.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 64 of 3143

Huron County, Ohio

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 11,842.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1216 of 3143

Portage County, Wisconsin

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 11,845.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 759 of 3143

Franklin County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 11,862.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1738 of 3143

Brown County, Ohio

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 11,880.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2253 of 3143

Wise County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 11,896.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 565 of 3143

Mifflin County, Pennsylvania

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 11,903.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2102 of 3143

Newaygo County, Michigan

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 11,913.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1738 of 3143

Autauga County, Alabama

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 11,933.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1154 of 3143

Lawrence County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 11,953.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2158 of 3143

Beaufort County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 11,983.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2232 of 3143

Dodge County, Wisconsin

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 12,015.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 334 of 3143

Colleton County, South Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 31.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 12,021.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2644 of 3143

Mississippi County, Arkansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 31.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 12,024.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2637 of 3143

Ware County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 35.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 12,030.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2885 of 3143

Scotland County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 38.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 12,040.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3000 of 3143

Leflore County, Mississippi

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 46.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 12,090.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3099 of 3143

Bedford City and County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 12,098.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 425 of 3143

Mecosta County, Michigan

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 31.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 12,120.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2593 of 3143

Campbell County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 31.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 12,123.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2593 of 3143

Nye County, Nevada

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 12,153.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1615 of 3143

Otsego County, New York

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 12,173.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1476 of 3143

Crawford County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 32.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 12,185.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2713 of 3143

Suwannee County, Florida

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 12,187.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2349 of 3143

Hopkins County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 12,207.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2305 of 3143

Baxter County, Arkansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 29.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 12,263.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2452 of 3143

Luna County, New Mexico

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 48.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 12,263.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3110 of 3143

Hancock County, Ohio

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 12,290.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 666 of 3143

Coles County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 12,303.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2385 of 3143

Floyd County, Indiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 12,303.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 472 of 3143

Lincoln County, Oregon

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 12,322.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1847 of 3143

Marion County, South Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 43.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 12,330.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3079 of 3143

Gibson County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 12,363.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1904 of 3143

Clay County, Minnesota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 12,375.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1087 of 3143

Blount County, Alabama

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 12,381.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1305 of 3143

Thomas County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 12,428.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2241 of 3143

Escambia County, Alabama

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 36.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 12,457.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2931 of 3143

DeSoto County, Florida

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 37.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 12,474.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2949 of 3143

Panola County, Mississippi

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 38.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 12,496.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3000 of 3143

Graves County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 34.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 12,544.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2846 of 3143

Boyd County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 12,551.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2232 of 3143

Van Zandt County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 12,584.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1183 of 3143

Waller County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 12,625.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1501 of 3143

Catoosa County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 12,641.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 944 of 3143

Vance County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 30.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 12,668.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2523 of 3143

Albemarle County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 11.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 12,677.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 159 of 3143

Polk County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 12,693.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2060 of 3143

Baldwin County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 33.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 12,697.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2749 of 3143

Kay County, Oklahoma

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 30.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 12,718.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2506 of 3143

Delaware County, Oklahoma

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 31.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 12,720.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2622 of 3143

Cocke County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 35.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 12,721.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2863 of 3143

Okanogan County, Washington

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 29.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 12,755.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2475 of 3143

Salem County, New Jersey

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 12,809.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1145 of 3143

Sandusky County, Ohio

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 12,816.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1501 of 3143

Tipton County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 12,828.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1323 of 3143

Bolivar County, Mississippi

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 46.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 12,832.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3097 of 3143

Armstrong County, Pennsylvania

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 12,891.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1174 of 3143

Robertson County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 12,897.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 744 of 3143

Carter County, Oklahoma

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 12,927.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2216 of 3143

Marion County, West Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 12,947.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1738 of 3143

Burleigh County, North Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 13.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 12,956.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 262 of 3143

Roanoke County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 13.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 12,979.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 283 of 3143

Manitowoc County, Wisconsin

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 12,988.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 565 of 3143

Herkimer County, New York

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 12,993.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1476 of 3143

McMinn County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 13,000.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1829 of 3143

Carbon County, Pennsylvania

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 13,001.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1183 of 3143

Atascosa County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 13,005.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2030 of 3143

Somerset County, Maine

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 13,010.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2060 of 3143

Natchitoches Parish, Louisiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 37.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 13,011.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2978 of 3143

Levy County, Florida

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 29.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 13,090.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2436 of 3143

Grafton County, New Hampshire

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 13,096.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 450 of 3143

Bradford County, Pennsylvania

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 13,098.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1476 of 3143

Sussex County, New Jersey

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 9.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 13,134.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 45 of 3143

Bullitt County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 13,150.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 498 of 3143

Adams County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 13,167.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1283 of 3143

Howell County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 33.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 13,188.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2752 of 3143

Floyd County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 38.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 13,195.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3000 of 3143

Jackson County, Florida

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 32.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 13,206.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2672 of 3143

Cass County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 12.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 13,224.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 170 of 3143

Cape May County, New Jersey

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 13,235.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 316 of 3143

Greene County, Arkansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 29.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 13,240.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2452 of 3143

Wood County, Wisconsin

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 13,252.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 854 of 3143

Cherokee County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 13,277.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2232 of 3143

Val Verde County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 13,282.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2415 of 3143

Stafford County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 8.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 13,334.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 25 of 3143

Monroe County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 13,344.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2406 of 3143

Lonoke County, Arkansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 13,410.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 837 of 3143

Eddy County, New Mexico

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 13,434.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1523 of 3143

Somerset County, Pennsylvania

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 13,450.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1087 of 3143

Anderson County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 13,451.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2305 of 3143

Colbert County, Alabama

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 13,460.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1696 of 3143

Tift County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 34.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 13,494.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2811 of 3143

Platte County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 12.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 13,519.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 190 of 3143

Kosciusko County, Indiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 13,536.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 721 of 3143

St. Marys County, Maryland

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 12.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 13,550.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 162 of 3143

Chelan County, Washington

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 13,562.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 721 of 3143

Vernon Parish, Louisiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 30.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 13,613.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2506 of 3143

Webster Parish, Louisiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 39.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 13,634.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3017 of 3143

Coffee County, Alabama

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 13,637.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1946 of 3143

Jackson County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 13,686.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 581 of 3143

Whitman County, Washington

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 33.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 13,715.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2764 of 3143

Washington County, Ohio

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 13,724.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1772 of 3143

Granville County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 13,732.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1799 of 3143

Rockingham County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 13,746.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 609 of 3143

Whitley County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 39.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 13,798.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3019 of 3143

Washington County, Oklahoma

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 13,804.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2143 of 3143

Clallam County, Washington

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 13,812.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 854 of 3143

Warren County, New Jersey

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 12.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 13,816.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 205 of 3143

Washington County, Wisconsin

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 10.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 13,834.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 72 of 3143

Reno County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 13,835.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1757 of 3143

St. Martin Parish, Louisiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 13,874.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2216 of 3143

Franklin County, Massachusetts

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 13,892.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1127 of 3143

Bryan County, Oklahoma

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 29.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 13,929.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2468 of 3143

Monroe County, Florida

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 13,934.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 721 of 3143

Gila County, Arizona

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 13,941.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2115 of 3143

Cherokee County, Oklahoma

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 30.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 13,954.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2515 of 3143

Chesterfield County, South Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 32.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 13,957.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2682 of 3143

Wright County, Minnesota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 9.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 13,971.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 57 of 3143

Sequoyah County, Oklahoma

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 35.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 14,007.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2885 of 3143

Knox County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 48.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 14,031.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3106 of 3143

Christian County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 14,084.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 450 of 3143

Hendry County, Florida

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 33.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 14,087.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2787 of 3143

Butler County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 34.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 14,162.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2826 of 3143

Columbia County, Pennsylvania

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 14,171.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1644 of 3143

Marquette County, Michigan

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 14,176.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1547 of 3143

Natrona County, Wyoming

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 14,183.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 837 of 3143

Georgetown County, South Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 14,194.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1476 of 3143

Wagoner County, Oklahoma

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 14,219.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 609 of 3143

Hall County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 14,222.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1644 of 3143

Nassau County, Florida

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 14,225.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 378 of 3143

Erie County, Ohio

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 14,233.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1063 of 3143

Oxford County, Maine

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 14,233.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1857 of 3143

Williamson County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 14,233.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1453 of 3143

Kershaw County, South Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 14,249.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1305 of 3143

Lapeer County, Michigan

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 14,278.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 595 of 3143

Adams County, Pennsylvania

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 14,336.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 316 of 3143

Midland County, Michigan

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 14,338.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 759 of 3143

Gordon County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 14,340.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1857 of 3143

Montcalm County, Michigan

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 14,344.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1476 of 3143

Coffee County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 36.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 14,372.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2921 of 3143

Taney County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 14,388.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2102 of 3143

Grand Forks County, North Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 14,414.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1323 of 3143

Haywood County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 14,443.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1696 of 3143

Coryell County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 14,460.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1337 of 3143

Jim Wells County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 37.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 14,483.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2966 of 3143

Lafayette County, Mississippi

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 14,503.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2291 of 3143

Shiawassee County, Michigan

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 14,537.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1414 of 3143

Lamar County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 29.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 14,548.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2445 of 3143

Barren County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 33.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 14,559.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2741 of 3143

Lamar County, Mississippi

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 14,597.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1547 of 3143

Curry County, New Mexico

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 31.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 14,650.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2637 of 3143

Campbell County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 14,719.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 565 of 3143

Pearl River County, Mississippi

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 14,787.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2102 of 3143

Hoke County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 14,792.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2305 of 3143

Walker County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 14,798.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1476 of 3143

Grand Traverse County, Michigan

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 14,844.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 487 of 3143

Walton County, Florida

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 14,867.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 905 of 3143

Dale County, Alabama

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 30.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 14,871.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2556 of 3143

Columbus County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 31.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 14,877.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2601 of 3143

Hawkins County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 14,912.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2060 of 3143

Newton County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 14,941.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1971 of 3143

Henry County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 30.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 14,955.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2556 of 3143

Jackson County, Alabama

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 15,032.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2406 of 3143

Chatham County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 15,098.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 998 of 3143

Franklin County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 15,108.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1252 of 3143

Crawford County, Arkansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 15,124.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1946 of 3143

Stanly County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 15,190.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1813 of 3143

Washington County, Rhode Island

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 12.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 15,217.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 184 of 3143

Scott County, Minnesota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 10.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 15,218.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 69 of 3143

Avoyelles Parish, Louisiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 42.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 15,234.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3062 of 3143

Crittenden County, Arkansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 33.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 15,297.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2741 of 3143

Carroll County, Maryland

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 8.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 15,307.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 39 of 3143

Gadsden County, Florida

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 37.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 15,320.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2966 of 3143

Le Flore County, Oklahoma

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 32.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 15,369.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2708 of 3143

Garfield County, Oklahoma

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 15,377.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1995 of 3143

Miller County, Arkansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 37.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 15,379.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2961 of 3143

Belmont County, Ohio

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 15,395.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1925 of 3143

St. Bernard Parish, Louisiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 34.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 15,399.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2852 of 3143

St. Clair County, Alabama

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 15,404.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 651 of 3143

Suffolk City, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 15,433.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 512 of 3143

Walworth County, Wisconsin

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 15,488.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 425 of 3143

Pike County, Mississippi

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 40.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 15,508.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3041 of 3143

Duplin County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 31.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 15,516.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2651 of 3143

Blue Earth County, Minnesota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 15,518.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1712 of 3143

Danville City, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 38.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 15,518.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2988 of 3143

Navarro County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 29.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 15,572.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2452 of 3143

St. Mary Parish, Louisiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 33.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 15,575.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2741 of 3143

Marion County, Ohio

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 15,612.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2102 of 3143

Fond du Lac County, Wisconsin

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 15,683.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 487 of 3143

Harrison County, West Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 15,685.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1871 of 3143

Jefferson County, Ohio

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 15,700.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1946 of 3143

Edgecombe County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 32.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 15,707.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2724 of 3143

Aroostook County, Maine

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 15,710.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1799 of 3143

Richmond County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 38.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 15,710.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2982 of 3143

Iron County, Utah

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 15,743.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2015 of 3143

Delaware County, Ohio

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 7.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 15,768.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 10 of 3143

Lawrence County, Ohio

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 15,795.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2338 of 3143

Bartholomew County, Indiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 15,856.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1043 of 3143

Mercer County, West Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 15,886.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2291 of 3143

Harrison County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 15,923.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1712 of 3143

Coffee County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 15,957.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2193 of 3143

Eaton County, Michigan

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 15,989.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 400 of 3143

Rogers County, Oklahoma

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 15,990.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 609 of 3143

Laurens County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 32.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 16,015.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2718 of 3143

Laramie County, Wyoming

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 16,034.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 551 of 3143

Pittsylvania County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 16,036.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2241 of 3143

Dubuque County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 16,038.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 666 of 3143

Madison County, Idaho

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 37.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 16,060.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2954 of 3143

Colquitt County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 35.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 16,062.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2867 of 3143

Clinton County, New York

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 16,099.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1453 of 3143

Washington Parish, Louisiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 37.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 16,127.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2958 of 3143

Coos County, Oregon

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 16,180.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1971 of 3143

Harrisonburg City, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 36.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 16,311.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2940 of 3143

Miami County, Ohio

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 16,385.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 413 of 3143

Cayuga County, New York

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 16,402.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1615 of 3143

Carter County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 29.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 16,418.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2483 of 3143

Dallas County, Alabama

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 45.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 16,424.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3088 of 3143

Moore County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 16,495.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 537 of 3143

Liberty County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 16,601.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2015 of 3143

Santa Cruz County, Arizona

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 34.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 16,601.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2793 of 3143

Lewis County, Washington

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 16,617.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1117 of 3143

Barrow County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 16,626.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 944 of 3143

Athens County, Ohio

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 30.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 16,655.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2574 of 3143

Allegany County, Maryland

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 16,663.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2232 of 3143

Anderson County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 16,715.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1383 of 3143

Boone County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 12.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 16,723.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 170 of 3143

McCracken County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 16,727.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1946 of 3143

Wayne County, New York

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 16,784.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 944 of 3143

Halifax County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 36.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 16,816.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2921 of 3143

Jackson County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 34.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 16,819.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2819 of 3143

Elmore County, Alabama

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 16,885.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1117 of 3143

Oktibbeha County, Mississippi

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 36.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 16,969.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2940 of 3143

St. Francois County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 16,969.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2265 of 3143

Walker County, Alabama

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 16,994.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2158 of 3143

Cherokee County, South Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 30.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 17,005.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2564 of 3143

Creek County, Oklahoma

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 17,005.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1738 of 3143

Ontario County, New York

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 17,050.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 498 of 3143

Riley County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 17,061.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2281 of 3143

Lee County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 17,069.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2115 of 3143

Cumberland County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 17,108.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2205 of 3143

Strafford County, New Hampshire

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 13.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 17,165.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 297 of 3143

Watauga County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 35.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 17,227.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2875 of 3143

Lowndes County, Mississippi

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 30.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 17,319.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2582 of 3143

Tolland County, Connecticut

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 12.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 17,326.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 205 of 3143

Clearfield County, Pennsylvania

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 17,354.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1712 of 3143

Lawrence County, Pennsylvania

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 17,394.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1305 of 3143

Pope County, Arkansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 17,528.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2393 of 3143

Yamhill County, Oregon

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 17,563.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 695 of 3143

Livingston County, Michigan

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 9.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 17,567.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 42 of 3143

Nevada County, California

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 17,570.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 744 of 3143

Hendricks County, Indiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 9.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 17,610.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 67 of 3143

Franklin County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 17,683.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 684 of 3143

Cecil County, Maryland

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 17,684.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 707 of 3143

Sheboygan County, Wisconsin

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 17,729.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 462 of 3143

Wilkes County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 17,776.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2253 of 3143

Tehama County, California

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 17,792.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2265 of 3143

Washington County, Mississippi

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 42.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 17,831.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3068 of 3143

Umatilla County, Oregon

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 17,846.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1696 of 3143

Lenawee County, Michigan

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 17,927.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1013 of 3143

Grays Harbor County, Washington

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 17,941.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1813 of 3143

Van Buren County, Michigan

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 17,944.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1772 of 3143

Pottawatomie County, Oklahoma

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 18,000.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2030 of 3143

Matanuska-Susitna Borough, Alaska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 18,020.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 595 of 3143

Polk County, Oregon

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 18,077.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1252 of 3143

Lincoln County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 18,105.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1103 of 3143

Vermilion Parish, Louisiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 32.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 18,188.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2691 of 3143

Ross County, Ohio

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 18,218.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1995 of 3143

Spotsylvania County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 12.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 18,251.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 197 of 3143

Cascade County, Montana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 18,254.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1476 of 3143

Charles County, Maryland

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 10.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 18,305.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 105 of 3143

Cape Girardeau County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 18,326.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1664 of 3143

Pottawattamie County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 18,375.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1174 of 3143

Sullivan County, New York

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 18,410.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1781 of 3143

Greene County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 18,443.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2115 of 3143

Maury County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 18,443.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 744 of 3143

Middlesex County, Connecticut

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 11.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 18,458.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 146 of 3143

Wayne County, Indiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 18,483.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2393 of 3143

Grant County, Indiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 30.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 18,484.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2534 of 3143

Williamson County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 7.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 18,486.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 12 of 3143

Rutherford County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 29.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 18,502.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2436 of 3143

Lincoln Parish, Louisiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 42.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 18,557.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3070 of 3143

Eau Claire County, Wisconsin

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 18,578.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 837 of 3143

San Patricio County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 18,645.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2178 of 3143

Pennington County, South Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 18,686.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 695 of 3143

Laurens County, South Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 18,738.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2329 of 3143

Russell County, Alabama

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 32.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 18,773.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2682 of 3143

Sampson County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 32.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 18,776.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2682 of 3143

Greenwood County, South Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 18,810.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2367 of 3143

Laurel County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 30.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 18,841.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2574 of 3143

Lee County, Mississippi

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 18,850.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1644 of 3143

Indiana County, Pennsylvania

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 18,863.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1813 of 3143

Limestone County, Alabama

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 18,874.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 776 of 3143

Merrimack County, New Hampshire

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 12.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 18,874.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 205 of 3143

Isabella County, Michigan

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 31.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 18,887.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2655 of 3143

Forsyth County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 7.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 18,892.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 12 of 3143

Flathead County, Montana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 18,914.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 744 of 3143

Troup County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 18,948.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2265 of 3143

Lancaster County, South Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 18,984.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 923 of 3143

Columbia County, Florida

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 19,000.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2338 of 3143

Howard County, Indiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 19,019.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1644 of 3143

Vermilion County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 19,103.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2265 of 3143

Chemung County, New York

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 19,118.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1829 of 3143

Darlington County, South Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 31.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 19,263.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2630 of 3143

Klamath County, Oregon

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 19,270.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2305 of 3143

Lake County, California

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 19,298.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2406 of 3143

Tompkins County, New York

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 19,345.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1414 of 3143

Allegan County, Michigan

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 19,368.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 551 of 3143

Orange County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 19,374.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1615 of 3143

Bannock County, Idaho

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 19,385.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1547 of 3143

Alexandria City, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 12.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 19,410.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 197 of 3143

Rockdale County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 19,421.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1233 of 3143

Hamblen County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 30.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 19,439.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2515 of 3143

Yuba County, California

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 19,467.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1696 of 3143

Lynchburg City, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 19,520.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2367 of 3143

Windham County, Connecticut

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 19,528.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 721 of 3143

Jefferson County, Arkansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 33.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 19,559.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2745 of 3143

Madison County, Mississippi

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 19,577.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 810 of 3143

Tazewell County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 19,719.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 472 of 3143

Lenoir County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 36.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 19,752.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2931 of 3143

Coweta County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 13.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 19,787.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 237 of 3143

Spalding County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 29.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 19,815.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2445 of 3143

Twin Falls County, Idaho

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 19,825.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1383 of 3143

Northumberland County, Pennsylvania

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 19,826.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1606 of 3143

Walker County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 31.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 19,884.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2637 of 3143

Medina County, Ohio

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 11.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 19,993.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 114 of 3143

Gallatin County, Montana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 20,027.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 651 of 3143

Crawford County, Pennsylvania

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 20,039.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1995 of 3143

Napa County, California

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 20,051.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 436 of 3143

Wilson County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 12.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 20,107.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 229 of 3143

Surry County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 20,115.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2385 of 3143

Nash County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 20,188.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1369 of 3143

Tuscarawas County, Ohio

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 20,202.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1476 of 3143

Bartow County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 20,265.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 854 of 3143

Jones County, Mississippi

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 31.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 20,287.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2612 of 3143

Muskogee County, Oklahoma

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 32.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 20,300.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2708 of 3143

Wood County, West Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 20,340.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1904 of 3143

Caldwell County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 20,344.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1995 of 3143

Wayne County, Ohio

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 20,349.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 854 of 3143

Pike County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 36.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 20,359.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2935 of 3143

Sarpy County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 10.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 20,377.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 83 of 3143

Walton County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 20,497.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1154 of 3143

Muskingum County, Ohio

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 20,508.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1829 of 3143

Marathon County, Wisconsin

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 20,530.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 413 of 3143

Nacogdoches County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 34.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 20,555.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2811 of 3143

Steuben County, New York

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 20,584.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1579 of 3143

Cattaraugus County, New York

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 20,594.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2316 of 3143

La Salle County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 20,605.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1079 of 3143

Sumter County, Florida

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 20,619.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 436 of 3143

Lauderdale County, Alabama

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 20,639.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1523 of 3143

Paulding County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 11.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 20,731.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 149 of 3143

Pulaski County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 32.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 20,749.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2672 of 3143

Glynn County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 20,795.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1892 of 3143

Madison County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 20,971.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1677 of 3143

Otero County, New Mexico

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 32.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 20,987.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2672 of 3143

Christian County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 31.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 20,998.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2612 of 3143

Missoula County, Montana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 21,003.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 810 of 3143

Blount County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 21,018.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 450 of 3143

Acadia Parish, Louisiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 37.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 21,113.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2966 of 3143

Saline County, Arkansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 21,170.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 666 of 3143

Johnson County, Indiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 13.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 21,172.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 237 of 3143

White County, Arkansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 21,205.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2349 of 3143

Buchanan County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 21,357.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2143 of 3143

Bay County, Michigan

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 21,373.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1283 of 3143

Ascension Parish, Louisiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 21,416.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 627 of 3143

Burke County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 21,425.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1936 of 3143

Lea County, New Mexico

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 30.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 21,433.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2506 of 3143

Henderson County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 21,439.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2015 of 3143

La Crosse County, Wisconsin

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 21,490.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 923 of 3143

Clark County, Indiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 21,496.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 776 of 3143

Flagler County, Florida

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 21,500.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 721 of 3143

Oconee County, South Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 21,525.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2193 of 3143

Olmsted County, Minnesota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 13.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 21,605.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 262 of 3143

Bastrop County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 21,669.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1305 of 3143

Story County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 21,674.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1892 of 3143

Cowlitz County, Washington

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 21,691.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1079 of 3143

Kent County, Rhode Island

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 12.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 21,715.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 222 of 3143

Craven County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 21,773.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1501 of 3143

Kankakee County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 21,848.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1353 of 3143

Comal County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 12.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 21,858.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 162 of 3143

Allen County, Ohio

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 21,943.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1523 of 3143

DeKalb County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 21,985.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1615 of 3143

Maverick County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 38.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 21,989.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2988 of 3143

Hunt County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 22,017.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1283 of 3143

Sutter County, California

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 22,141.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1579 of 3143

LaPorte County, Indiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 22,159.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1337 of 3143

Chaves County, New Mexico

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 35.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 22,165.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2901 of 3143

Talladega County, Alabama

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 22,211.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2393 of 3143

Columbia County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 13.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 22,265.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 291 of 3143

Parker County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 13.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 22,325.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 283 of 3143

Wicomico County, Maryland

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 22,335.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1476 of 3143

Douglas County, Colorado

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 5.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 22,339.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 5 of 3143

Mendocino County, California

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 22,342.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1946 of 3143

Litchfield County, Connecticut

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 12.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 22,396.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 170 of 3143

Raleigh County, West Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 32.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 22,450.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2682 of 3143

Outagamie County, Wisconsin

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 11.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 22,467.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 152 of 3143

Mercer County, Pennsylvania

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 22,533.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1453 of 3143

Skagit County, Washington

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 22,543.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 759 of 3143

Valencia County, New Mexico

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 29.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 22,700.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2475 of 3143

Iberia Parish, Louisiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 33.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 22,783.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2768 of 3143

Putnam County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 22,805.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2415 of 3143

Cullman County, Alabama

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 22,893.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1986 of 3143

Benton County, Oregon

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 22,962.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1986 of 3143

Newton County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 22,987.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1117 of 3143

Macon County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 23,059.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1677 of 3143

Woodbury County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 23,066.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1523 of 3143

Daviess County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 23,157.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1615 of 3143

Wood County, Ohio

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 23,227.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 923 of 3143

Bowie County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 23,295.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2193 of 3143

Canadian County, Oklahoma

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 23,356.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 316 of 3143

Rockingham County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 23,405.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2060 of 3143

Berkshire County, Massachusetts

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 23,441.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 988 of 3143

Sevier County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 23,456.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1757 of 3143

Victoria County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 23,473.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2088 of 3143

Fairfield County, Ohio

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 23,491.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 378 of 3143

Lebanon County, Pennsylvania

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 23,512.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 666 of 3143

Hardin County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 23,556.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1401 of 3143

Scioto County, Ohio

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 34.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 23,556.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2793 of 3143

Hampshire County, Massachusetts

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 23,575.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 684 of 3143

Washington County, Minnesota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 8.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 23,579.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 30 of 3143

Lycoming County, Pennsylvania

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 23,600.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1441 of 3143

Franklin County, Washington

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 23,652.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1871 of 3143

Chittenden County, Vermont

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 23,747.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 400 of 3143

Henderson County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 23,775.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1183 of 3143

El Dorado County, California

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 12.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 23,932.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 197 of 3143

Bonneville County, Idaho

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 23,941.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 955 of 3143

Payne County, Oklahoma

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 32.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 23,961.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2718 of 3143

Columbiana County, Ohio

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 23,976.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1871 of 3143

Kennebec County, Maine

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 24,063.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1087 of 3143

Warren County, Ohio

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 9.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 24,142.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 67 of 3143

Androscoggin County, Maine

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 24,210.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1501 of 3143

Greene County, Ohio

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 24,232.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 400 of 3143

Bradley County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 24,285.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1571 of 3143

Grant County, Washington

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 24,321.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1799 of 3143

Randall County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 24,446.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 707 of 3143

Berkeley County, West Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 24,473.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1013 of 3143

Lauderdale County, Mississippi

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 35.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 24,511.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2891 of 3143

Blair County, Pennsylvania

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 24,594.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1305 of 3143

Tom Green County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 24,641.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1383 of 3143

Maui County, Hawaii

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 24,696.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 436 of 3143

Brunswick County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 24,718.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 595 of 3143

Portsmouth City, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 24,757.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2088 of 3143

Douglas County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 24,864.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1501 of 3143

Whitfield County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 24,882.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1829 of 3143

Bulloch County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 32.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 24,891.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2734 of 3143

Josephine County, Oregon

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 24,935.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2385 of 3143

Franklin County, Pennsylvania

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 24,969.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 551 of 3143

Jefferson County, New York

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 25,025.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1606 of 3143

Angelina County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 29.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 25,054.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2468 of 3143

Rockingham County, New Hampshire

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 7.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 25,133.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 19 of 3143

DeKalb County, Alabama

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 35.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 25,223.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2877 of 3143

Madison County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 25,256.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2132 of 3143

Butler County, Pennsylvania

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 13.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 25,265.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 250 of 3143

Forrest County, Mississippi

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 34.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 25,292.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2819 of 3143

Sandoval County, New Mexico

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 25,454.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 651 of 3143

Rankin County, Mississippi

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 25,476.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 609 of 3143

Montgomery County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 29.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 25,599.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2425 of 3143

Orange County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 25,601.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 923 of 3143

Arlington County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 11.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 25,619.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 114 of 3143

St. Lawrence County, New York

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 25,675.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2143 of 3143

Porter County, Indiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 25,862.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 425 of 3143

Wilson County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 33.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 25,954.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2752 of 3143

LaFourche Parish, Louisiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 25,979.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2281 of 3143

Floyd County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 26,021.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2216 of 3143

Terrebonne Parish, Louisiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 26,099.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1925 of 3143

Orangeburg County, South Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 32.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 26,201.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2734 of 3143

Monroe County, Michigan

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 26,228.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 707 of 3143

Garland County, Arkansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 26,266.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2143 of 3143

Yellowstone County, Montana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 26,315.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 528 of 3143

Cabell County, West Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 29.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 26,419.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2496 of 3143

Shelby County, Alabama

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 11.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 26,438.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 149 of 3143

Frederick County, Maryland

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 9.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 26,482.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 55 of 3143

Beaver County, Pennsylvania

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 26,670.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 581 of 3143

Saratoga County, New York

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 11.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 26,686.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 136 of 3143

Marshall County, Alabama

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 26,746.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2216 of 3143

York County, Maine

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 12.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 26,976.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 205 of 3143

Cleveland County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 26,980.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2232 of 3143

Monongalia County, West Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 26,987.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2171 of 3143

Linn County, Oregon

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 27,056.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1283 of 3143

Ashtabula County, Ohio

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 27,103.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2415 of 3143

Barnstable County, Massachusetts

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 11.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 27,121.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 152 of 3143

Roanoke City, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 27,247.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2338 of 3143

Morgan County, Alabama

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 27,431.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1571 of 3143

Kenosha County, Wisconsin

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 27,523.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 651 of 3143

Cache County, Utah

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 27,574.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1199 of 3143

Rensselaer County, New York

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 27,602.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 826 of 3143

Hamilton County, Indiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 7.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 27,652.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 15 of 3143

Highlands County, Florida

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 27,687.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2143 of 3143

Richland County, Ohio

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 27,839.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1738 of 3143

Cambria County, Pennsylvania

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 27,944.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1523 of 3143

Howard County, Maryland

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 8.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 27,987.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 25 of 3143

Oswego County, New York

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 28,031.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1916 of 3143

Guadalupe County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 28,126.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 472 of 3143

Loudoun County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 6.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 28,139.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 7 of 3143

Carroll County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 28,192.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1677 of 3143

Santa Rosa County, Florida

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 28,193.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 372 of 3143

Madison County, Indiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 28,197.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1523 of 3143

Douglas County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 28,254.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1043 of 3143

Rock County, Wisconsin

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 28,311.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 776 of 3143

Mesa County, Colorado

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 28,367.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 905 of 3143

Putnam County, Florida

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 38.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 28,473.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3000 of 3143

Sumter County, South Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 28,561.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2316 of 3143

Douglas County, Oregon

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 28,694.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2045 of 3143

Indian River County, Florida

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 28,859.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 776 of 3143

Jackson County, Michigan

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 28,972.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1033 of 3143

Schuylkill County, Pennsylvania

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 29,012.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1353 of 3143

Black Hawk County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 29,017.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1632 of 3143

Etowah County, Alabama

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 29,167.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2393 of 3143

Houston County, Alabama

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 29,305.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2241 of 3143

Licking County, Ohio

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 29,307.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 609 of 3143

St. Clair County, Michigan

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 29,359.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 923 of 3143

Grayson County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 29,397.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1283 of 3143

Somerset County, New Jersey

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 8.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 29,477.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 29 of 3143

Bossier Parish, Louisiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 29,516.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1664 of 3143

Hampton City, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 29,537.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1476 of 3143

Wichita County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 29,546.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1925 of 3143

Schenectady County, New York

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 29,547.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 988 of 3143

Sumner County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 29,557.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 372 of 3143

Beaufort County, South Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 29,638.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 498 of 3143

Faulkner County, Arkansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 29,644.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1829 of 3143

Harford County, Maryland

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 11.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 29,735.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 136 of 3143

Liberty County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 30.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 29,977.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2574 of 3143

McLean County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 30,000.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 923 of 3143

Apache County, Arizona

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 46.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 30,011.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3102 of 3143

Dougherty County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 37.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 30,066.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2974 of 3143

Kootenai County, Idaho

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 30,072.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 651 of 3143

Dorchester County, South Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 30,075.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 886 of 3143

Ellis County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 30,114.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 334 of 3143

Monroe County, Pennsylvania

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 30,288.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 905 of 3143

Martin County, Florida

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 30,289.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1013 of 3143

Winnebago County, Wisconsin

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 30,339.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 905 of 3143

Vigo County, Indiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 30.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 30,408.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2588 of 3143

Marin County, California

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 12.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 30,427.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 162 of 3143

Santa Fe County, New Mexico

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 30,606.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1127 of 3143

Fayette County, Pennsylvania

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 30,785.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1958 of 3143

Kenton County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 30,901.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 873 of 3143

Harnett County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 30,912.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1591 of 3143

Washington County, Maryland

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 30,915.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1264 of 3143

Comanche County, Oklahoma

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 30,991.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2281 of 3143

Minnehaha County, South Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 31,057.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 498 of 3143

Calhoun County, Alabama

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 31,098.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2305 of 3143

Midland County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 31,185.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 837 of 3143

Clark County, Ohio

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 31,186.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1725 of 3143

Houston County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 31,359.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 955 of 3143

Rock Island County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 31,391.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1615 of 3143

Cass County, North Dakota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 31,463.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 666 of 3143

Stearns County, Minnesota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 31,518.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1199 of 3143

Delaware County, Indiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 30.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 31,639.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2534 of 3143

Deschutes County, Oregon

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 31,679.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 472 of 3143

Gregg County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 31,709.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2075 of 3143

Portage County, Ohio

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 31,737.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1216 of 3143

Scott County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 31,807.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 944 of 3143

Iredell County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 31,868.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 595 of 3143

Centre County, Pennsylvania

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 32,016.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1696 of 3143

St. Landry Parish, Louisiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 39.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 32,022.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3036 of 3143

DeSoto County, Mississippi

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 32,031.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 684 of 3143

Cochise County, Arizona

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 32,067.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2171 of 3143

Livingston Parish, Louisiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 32,173.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1453 of 3143

Calhoun County, Michigan

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 32,206.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1892 of 3143

Charlotte County, Florida

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 32,298.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 595 of 3143

Kent County, Delaware

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 32,397.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 799 of 3143

Kaufman County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 32,428.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 998 of 3143

Racine County, Wisconsin

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 32,430.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 684 of 3143

Lake County, Ohio

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 32,519.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 329 of 3143

St. Johns County, Florida

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 10.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 32,574.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 100 of 3143

Penobscot County, Maine

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 32,607.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1476 of 3143

Clermont County, Ohio

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 32,619.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 487 of 3143

Union County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 13.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 32,666.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 250 of 3143

Craighead County, Arkansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 29.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 32,695.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2496 of 3143

Taylor County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 32,751.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1696 of 3143

Pickens County, South Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 32,757.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2060 of 3143

Washington County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 32,816.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1916 of 3143

Starr County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 50.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 32,880.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3120 of 3143

McKinley County, New Mexico

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 47.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 32,944.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3104 of 3143

Jackson County, Mississippi

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 33,004.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1632 of 3143

Catawba County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 33,360.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1264 of 3143

Cumberland County, Pennsylvania

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 13.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 33,404.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 244 of 3143

Washington County, Utah

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 33,495.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 721 of 3143

Washington County, Pennsylvania

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 33,527.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 595 of 3143

McHenry County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 10.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 33,642.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 105 of 3143

Lowndes County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 29.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 33,759.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2452 of 3143

Waukesha County, Wisconsin

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 8.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 33,913.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 23 of 3143

Sebastian County, Arkansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 33,936.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2158 of 3143

Jasper County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 34,170.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2316 of 3143

Monroe County, Indiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 34,247.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2205 of 3143

Cherokee County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 12.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 34,363.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 184 of 3143

Rowan County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 34,392.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1725 of 3143

Chautauqua County, New York

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 34,477.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2376 of 3143

Johnson County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 34,478.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 826 of 3143

Coconino County, Arizona

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 34,589.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2075 of 3143

Wayne County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 30.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 34,927.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2523 of 3143

Jefferson County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 34,990.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 462 of 3143

St. Charles County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 8.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 35,430.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 36 of 3143

Gloucester County, New Jersey

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 11.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 35,520.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 152 of 3143

Randolph County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 35,611.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1871 of 3143

Ulster County, New York

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 36,000.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1233 of 3143

Kitsap County, Washington

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 13.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 36,064.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 254 of 3143

Johnson County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 36,143.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1829 of 3143

Shawnee County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 36,262.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1283 of 3143

Berrien County, Michigan

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 36,409.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1813 of 3143

Florence County, South Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 36,469.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2216 of 3143

Clay County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 36,501.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 334 of 3143

Warren County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 36,531.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2205 of 3143

Okaloosa County, Florida

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 36,670.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 744 of 3143

Clay County, Florida

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 36,742.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 581 of 3143

Cumberland County, Maine

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 12.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 36,751.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 184 of 3143

Potter County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 33.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 36,781.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2768 of 3143

Shasta County, California

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 37,099.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1264 of 3143

Bay County, Florida

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 37,232.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1183 of 3143

Linn County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 37,279.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 627 of 3143

Benton County, Washington

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 37,605.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 810 of 3143

Weber County, Utah

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 37,911.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 329 of 3143

Aiken County, South Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 38,167.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1501 of 3143

Citrus County, Florida

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 38,229.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1781 of 3143

Cumberland County, New Jersey

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 38,269.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2115 of 3143

Navajo County, Arizona

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 36.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 38,313.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2921 of 3143

Sangamon County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 38,368.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1154 of 3143

Kings County, California

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 38,416.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2253 of 3143

Chesapeake City, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 38,625.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 487 of 3143

Cabarrus County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 38,635.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 609 of 3143

Dutchess County, New York

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 13.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 38,794.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 283 of 3143

Davidson County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 39,075.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1615 of 3143

Alamance County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 39,082.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1606 of 3143

Morris County, New Jersey

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 7.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 39,097.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 17 of 3143

Rapides Parish, Louisiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 31.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 39,182.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2630 of 3143

New London County, Connecticut

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 39,655.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 436 of 3143

Berkeley County, South Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 39,879.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 609 of 3143

Tangipahoa Parish, Louisiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 30.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 40,047.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2523 of 3143

Ottawa County, Michigan

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 13.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 40,076.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 291 of 3143

Pueblo County, Colorado

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 40,130.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1847 of 3143

Henry County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 40,395.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 581 of 3143

Newport News City, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 40,417.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1606 of 3143

Sullivan County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 40,503.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1995 of 3143

St. Louis County, Minnesota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 40,600.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1305 of 3143

Baldwin County, Alabama

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 40,621.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 651 of 3143

Vanderburgh County, Indiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 40,631.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1677 of 3143

Muskegon County, Michigan

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 40,692.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1772 of 3143

Davis County, Utah

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 11.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 40,920.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 120 of 3143

Humboldt County, California

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 31.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 41,140.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2612 of 3143

Ector County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 41,457.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1986 of 3143

York County, South Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 41,618.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 354 of 3143

Johnston County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 41,722.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 837 of 3143

Brown County, Wisconsin

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 41,944.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 528 of 3143

Hall County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 41,947.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1145 of 3143

Hernando County, Florida

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 42,037.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1233 of 3143

Peoria County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 42,067.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1799 of 3143

Boone County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 42,210.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1738 of 3143

San Juan County, New Mexico

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 35.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 42,223.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2873 of 3143

Anchorage Borough, Alaska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 42,284.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 413 of 3143

Niagara County, New York

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 42,353.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1216 of 3143

Clarke County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 35.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 42,583.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2891 of 3143

Kanawha County, West Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 42,868.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1892 of 3143

Benton County, Arkansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 43,150.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 354 of 3143

Onslow County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 43,213.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1664 of 3143

Thurston County, Washington

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 43,568.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 389 of 3143

Elkhart County, Indiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 43,580.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1353 of 3143

Whatcom County, Washington

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 43,666.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1063 of 3143

Montgomery County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 43,868.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1013 of 3143

Santa Cruz County, California

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 44,177.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 759 of 3143

Sussex County, Delaware

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 44,190.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 776 of 3143

Chesterfield County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 12.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 44,762.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 162 of 3143

Madison County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 44,928.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 759 of 3143

Lee County, Alabama

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 45,000.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2045 of 3143

Hawaii County, Hawaii

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 45,064.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1501 of 3143

Anoka County, Minnesota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 12.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 45,358.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 190 of 3143

Wyandotte County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 45,708.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2265 of 3143

Dakota County, Minnesota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 10.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 46,071.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 83 of 3143

Placer County, California

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 11.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 46,308.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 120 of 3143

Jackson County, Oregon

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 46,674.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1337 of 3143

Hillsborough County, New Hampshire

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 11.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 46,678.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 125 of 3143

Robeson County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
• Value (Percent) : The value is 41.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 46,790.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3052 of 3143

Northampton County, Pennsylvania

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 46,822.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 450 of 3143

Canyon County, Idaho

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 47,433.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1033 of 3143

Anderson County, South Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 47,625.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1632 of 3143

New Hanover County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 47,734.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1264 of 3143

Henrico County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 47,859.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 354 of 3143

Lackawanna County, Pennsylvania

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 48,252.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1664 of 3143

Madera County, California

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 31.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 48,315.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2622 of 3143

Tippecanoe County, Indiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 48,329.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2316 of 3143

Yavapai County, Arizona

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 48,382.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1145 of 3143

Broome County, New York

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 49,519.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2143 of 3143

Ouachita Parish, Louisiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 32.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 49,609.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2701 of 3143

Burlington County, New Jersey

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 11.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 50,481.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 114 of 3143

Yolo County, California

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 50,556.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1757 of 3143

Smith County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 50,598.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1401 of 3143

Pitt County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 29.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 50,919.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2483 of 3143

San Luis Obispo County, California

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 50,964.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 998 of 3143

St. Clair County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 51,005.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1233 of 3143

Champaign County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 51,066.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2115 of 3143

Saginaw County, Michigan

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 51,466.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2329 of 3143

Trumbull County, Ohio

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 51,628.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2088 of 3143

Boulder County, Colorado

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 51,740.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 595 of 3143

Calcasieu Parish, Louisiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 51,985.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1971 of 3143

Hays County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 52,060.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1145 of 3143

St. Tammany Parish, Louisiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 52,218.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1063 of 3143

Norfolk City, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 52,391.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1857 of 3143

Clackamas County, Oregon

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 12.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 52,484.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 197 of 3143

Brazoria County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 53,212.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 316 of 3143

Chester County, Pennsylvania

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 10.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 53,295.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 69 of 3143

Gaston County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 53,373.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1644 of 3143

Bibb County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 35.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 53,658.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2891 of 3143

Anne Arundel County, Maryland

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 9.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 53,746.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 50 of 3143

Oneida County, New York

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 53,761.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1871 of 3143

Harrison County, Mississippi

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 53,924.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2088 of 3143

Prince William County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 11.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 54,537.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 130 of 3143

Buncombe County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 54,582.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1199 of 3143

Kalamazoo County, Michigan

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 54,783.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1383 of 3143

Johnson County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 9.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 55,079.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 42 of 3143

Albany County, New York

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 55,292.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 905 of 3143

Weld County, Colorado

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 55,346.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 551 of 3143

Mohave County, Arizona

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 55,385.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2015 of 3143

Dauphin County, Pennsylvania

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 55,905.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1087 of 3143

Tuscaloosa County, Alabama

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 57,269.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2015 of 3143

Westmoreland County, Pennsylvania

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 57,590.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 651 of 3143

Atlantic County, New Jersey

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 57,644.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1353 of 3143

Yuma County, Arizona

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 57,661.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2349 of 3143

Muscogee County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 29.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 57,738.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2436 of 3143

St. Joseph County, Indiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 57,803.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1476 of 3143

Lexington County, South Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 58,034.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1033 of 3143

Larimer County, Colorado

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 58,387.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 581 of 3143

Plymouth County, Massachusetts

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 11.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 58,642.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 125 of 3143

Butte County, California

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 58,666.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2415 of 3143

Rutherford County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 58,685.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 609 of 3143

Richmond City, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 58,712.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2158 of 3143

Imperial County, California

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 34.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 59,088.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2802 of 3143

Richmond County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 30.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 59,793.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2549 of 3143

Mahoning County, Ohio

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 59,898.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2216 of 3143

Washington County, Arkansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 59,936.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1813 of 3143

Cleveland County, Oklahoma

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 60,077.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1283 of 3143

Lorain County, Ohio

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 60,344.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1087 of 3143

Lancaster County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 60,508.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1043 of 3143

Durham County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 60,808.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 998 of 3143

Erie County, Pennsylvania

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 61,964.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1813 of 3143

Jefferson County, Colorado

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 10.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 62,048.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 111 of 3143

Lafayette Parish, Louisiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 63,050.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2030 of 3143

York County, Pennsylvania

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 63,576.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 305 of 3143

Mercer County, New Jersey

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 63,858.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 744 of 3143

Virginia Beach City, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 63,938.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 334 of 3143

Ingham County, Michigan

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 64,602.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1829 of 3143

Bucks County, Pennsylvania

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 10.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 64,656.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 72 of 3143

Galveston County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 65,321.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 923 of 3143

Chatham County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 65,540.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1591 of 3143

Madison County, Alabama

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 65,999.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 666 of 3143

Lake County, Florida

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 66,139.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 565 of 3143

McLennan County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 66,446.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2045 of 3143

Montgomery County, Alabama

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 30.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 66,516.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2574 of 3143

Sarasota County, Florida

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 66,542.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 389 of 3143

Sonoma County, California

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 67,127.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 305 of 3143

Washtenaw County, Michigan

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 67,683.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1043 of 3143

Monmouth County, New Jersey

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 10.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 67,743.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 93 of 3143

Winnebago County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 67,760.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1829 of 3143

Kane County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 13.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 68,397.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 262 of 3143

Collier County, Florida

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 68,481.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 759 of 3143

Butler County, Ohio

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 69,427.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 873 of 3143

Greene County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 69,733.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1757 of 3143

Clark County, Washington

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 13.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 70,485.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 283 of 3143

Yakima County, Washington

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 70,886.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2305 of 3143

Solano County, California

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 71,216.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 551 of 3143

Ada County, Idaho

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 71,555.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 316 of 3143

Jefferson County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 30.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 71,715.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2515 of 3143

Seminole County, Florida

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 71,861.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 425 of 3143

Fayette County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 71,912.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1644 of 3143

Hinds County, Mississippi

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 34.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 72,085.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2819 of 3143

Hamilton County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 72,224.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1103 of 3143

Leon County, Florida

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 72,411.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2045 of 3143

Brazos County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 32.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 72,692.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2708 of 3143

Charleston County, South Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 72,742.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 799 of 3143

Williamson County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 10.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 72,895.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 111 of 3143

Lehigh County, Pennsylvania

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 72,955.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1103 of 3143

Dona Ana County, New Mexico

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 33.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 73,186.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2764 of 3143

Marion County, Oregon

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 73,893.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1433 of 3143

Norfolk County, Massachusetts

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 10.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 74,185.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 83 of 3143

Escambia County, Florida

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 74,464.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1813 of 3143

St. Lucie County, Florida

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 74,528.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1283 of 3143

Caddo Parish, Louisiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 33.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 75,900.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2777 of 3143

Stark County, Ohio

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 75,915.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1264 of 3143

Lancaster County, Pennsylvania

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 76,160.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 305 of 3143

San Mateo County, California

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 10.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 76,792.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 83 of 3143

Luzerne County, Pennsylvania

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 77,692.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1857 of 3143

Manatee County, Florida

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 78,181.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 905 of 3143

Alachua County, Florida

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 29.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 78,430.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2452 of 3143

Washington County, Oregon

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 13.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 78,966.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 250 of 3143

Spartanburg County, South Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 81,080.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1757 of 3143

Orange County, New York

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 81,391.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1199 of 3143

Berks County, Pennsylvania

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 81,677.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1063 of 3143

Allen County, Indiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 81,733.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1337 of 3143

Lubbock County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 82,513.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2193 of 3143

Rockland County, New York

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 82,883.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1871 of 3143

Will County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 12.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 83,799.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 170 of 3143

Pinal County, Arizona

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 84,652.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 970 of 3143

Cumberland County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 84,702.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2115 of 3143

Dane County, Wisconsin

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 85,173.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 436 of 3143

Adams County, Colorado

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 85,575.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 581 of 3143

Horry County, South Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 85,767.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1606 of 3143

Polk County, Iowa

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 85,811.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 759 of 3143

St. Louis City, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 30.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 85,858.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2574 of 3143

Merced County, California

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 30.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 86,194.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2523 of 3143

Washoe County, Nevada

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 86,848.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 799 of 3143

Clayton County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 30.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 88,525.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2506 of 3143

Forsyth County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 88,825.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1696 of 3143

New Castle County, Delaware

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 88,854.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 512 of 3143

Montgomery County, Pennsylvania

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 10.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 89,992.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 93 of 3143

Webb County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 33.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 90,297.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2787 of 3143

Delaware County, Pennsylvania

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 90,301.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 565 of 3143

Richmond County, New York

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 90,493.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 923 of 3143

Lane County, Oregon

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 91,645.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1847 of 3143

Arapahoe County, Colorado

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 91,863.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 305 of 3143

Union County, New Jersey

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 92,030.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 551 of 3143

Lake County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 13.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 92,101.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 254 of 3143

Bell County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 92,204.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1857 of 3143

Nueces County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 92,947.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2178 of 3143

Monterey County, California

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 93,922.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1523 of 3143

Onondaga County, New York

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 97,526.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1414 of 3143

Marion County, Florida

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 97,527.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1916 of 3143

Knox County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 97,962.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1199 of 3143

Camden County, New Jersey

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 98,170.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 970 of 3143

DuPage County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 10.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 98,561.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 105 of 3143

Osceola County, Florida

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 98,853.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1677 of 3143

Santa Barbara County, California

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 99,209.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1696 of 3143

Bergen County, New Jersey

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 10.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 99,660.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 90 of 3143

Greenville County, South Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 100,369.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 955 of 3143

Pulaski County, Arkansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 101,531.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2045 of 3143

Spokane County, Washington

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 102,458.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1013 of 3143

Utah County, Utah

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 102,745.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 400 of 3143

Richland County, South Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 103,361.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2088 of 3143

Bristol County, Massachusetts

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 103,794.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 873 of 3143

Genesee County, Michigan

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 104,278.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2088 of 3143

Ramsey County, Minnesota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 104,825.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1117 of 3143

Snohomish County, Washington

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 12.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 105,150.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 205 of 3143

El Paso County, Colorado

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 107,330.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 400 of 3143

Mobile County, Alabama

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 107,794.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2158 of 3143

Jefferson Parish, Louisiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 108,707.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1971 of 3143

Montgomery County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 108,757.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 537 of 3143

Hampden County, Massachusetts

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 108,896.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1813 of 3143

Douglas County, Nebraska

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 109,004.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 970 of 3143

Cobb County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 109,365.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 334 of 3143

Lucas County, Ohio

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 109,481.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2075 of 3143

Lake County, Indiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 109,777.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1501 of 3143

Summit County, Ohio

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 109,966.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1264 of 3143

Kent County, Michigan

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 110,027.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 684 of 3143

Brevard County, Florida

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 110,178.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 799 of 3143

Passaic County, New Jersey

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 110,409.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1383 of 3143

Ocean County, New Jersey

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 111,787.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 744 of 3143

Fairfax County, Virginia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 9.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 111,914.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 64 of 3143

Denton County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 11.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 111,965.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 146 of 3143

Sedgwick County, Kansas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 112,694.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1414 of 3143

Middlesex County, New Jersey

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 13.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 113,451.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 262 of 3143

Pasco County, Florida

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 113,657.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 970 of 3143

Volusia County, Florida

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 113,777.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1174 of 3143

Orleans Parish, Louisiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 32.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 116,342.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2701 of 3143

Montgomery County, Ohio

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 117,530.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1579 of 3143

Fort Bend County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 13.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 119,318.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 275 of 3143

Guilford County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 121,586.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1664 of 3143

Collin County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 10.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 123,146.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 100 of 3143

Denver County, Colorado

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 123,472.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 776 of 3143

East Baton Rouge Parish, Louisiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 124,301.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2367 of 3143

Nassau County, New York

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 9.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 125,388.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 45 of 3143

Stanislaus County, California

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 125,539.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1615 of 3143

Essex County, Massachusetts

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 127,141.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 537 of 3143

Ventura County, California

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 127,975.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 472 of 3143

Pierce County, Washington

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 129,349.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 329 of 3143

Montgomery County, Maryland

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 12.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 130,890.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 190 of 3143

Worcester County, Massachusetts

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 132,470.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 498 of 3143

District of Columbia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 132,967.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1183 of 3143

Providence County, Rhode Island

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 133,234.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1283 of 3143

Baltimore County, Maryland

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 134,530.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 565 of 3143

San Francisco County, California

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 135,958.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 627 of 3143

Fairfield County, Connecticut

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 138,356.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 366 of 3143

Westchester County, New York

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 139,040.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 329 of 3143

Honolulu County, Hawaii

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 141,216.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 372 of 3143

Hartford County, Connecticut

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 142,994.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 565 of 3143

Tulare County, California

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 30.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 143,212.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2534 of 3143

Monroe County, New York

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 148,107.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1183 of 3143

Macomb County, Michigan

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 152,184.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 776 of 3143

Davidson County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 153,869.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1501 of 3143

New Haven County, Connecticut

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 154,420.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 886 of 3143

Wake County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 13.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 155,234.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 262 of 3143

St. Louis County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 155,339.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 537 of 3143

Multnomah County, Oregon

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 155,381.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1103 of 3143

Prince Georges County, Maryland

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 155,385.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 627 of 3143

Contra Costa County, California

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 13.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 156,026.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 275 of 3143

Oakland County, Michigan

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 12.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 156,759.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 190 of 3143

Lee County, Florida

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 156,898.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1079 of 3143

San Joaquin County, California

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 157,502.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1154 of 3143

Hudson County, New Jersey

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 158,461.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1523 of 3143

Jackson County, Missouri

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 159,285.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1547 of 3143

Baltimore City, Maryland

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 159,407.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2406 of 3143

Jefferson County, Alabama

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 160,159.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1871 of 3143

Suffolk County, New York

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 10.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 160,260.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 100 of 3143

Tulsa County, Oklahoma

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 160,387.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1781 of 3143

Bernalillo County, New Mexico

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 161,387.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1829 of 3143

Cameron County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 38.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 162,503.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3000 of 3143

DeKalb County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 168,019.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1523 of 3143

Salt Lake County, Utah

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 168,834.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 334 of 3143

Jefferson County, Kentucky

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 172,949.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1571 of 3143

Suffolk County, Massachusetts

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 176,664.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1757 of 3143

Hamilton County, Ohio

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 180,873.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1523 of 3143

Gwinnett County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 181,730.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 955 of 3143

Pinellas County, Florida

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 181,873.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1043 of 3143

Essex County, New Jersey

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 188,005.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1523 of 3143

Middlesex County, Massachusetts

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 11.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 188,123.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 159 of 3143

Polk County, Florida

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 189,911.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1857 of 3143

Hennepin County, Minnesota

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 191,144.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 462 of 3143

Fulton County, Georgia

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 197,520.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 988 of 3143

Mecklenburg County, North Carolina

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 199,689.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 792 of 3143

Oklahoma County, Oklahoma

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 199,931.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1958 of 3143

Erie County, New York

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 201,088.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1414 of 3143

Santa Clara County, California

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 11.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 207,848.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 120 of 3143

Allegheny County, Pennsylvania

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 209,052.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 759 of 3143

Travis County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 215,501.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 609 of 3143

Duval County, Florida

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 227,373.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1591 of 3143

Alameda County, California

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 14.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 234,848.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 366 of 3143

Marion County, Indiana

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 238,205.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1916 of 3143

Pima County, Arizona

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 239,948.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1664 of 3143

Milwaukee County, Wisconsin

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 26.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 241,821.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2143 of 3143

Shelby County, Tennessee

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 27.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 248,149.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2253 of 3143

El Paso County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 31.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 266,060.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2601 of 3143

Kern County, California

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 31.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 279,057.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2622 of 3143

Palm Beach County, Florida

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 284,106.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 970 of 3143

Fresno County, California

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 29.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 290,001.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2425 of 3143

King County, Washington

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 12.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 291,451.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 229 of 3143

Cuyahoga County, Ohio

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 291,604.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1772 of 3143

Franklin County, Ohio

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 295,165.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1591 of 3143

Hillsborough County, Florida

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 312,134.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1283 of 3143

Sacramento County, California

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 19.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 313,628.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1127 of 3143

Orange County, Florida

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 314,925.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1453 of 3143

Hidalgo County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 40.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 357,000.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3040 of 3143

New York County, New York

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 360,918.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1615 of 3143

Tarrant County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 404,029.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 988 of 3143

Broward County, Florida

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 405,059.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1252 of 3143

Riverside County, California

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 18.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 453,207.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 923 of 3143

San Bernardino County, California

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.4 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 482,320.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1547 of 3143

Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 31.7 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 486,688.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2651 of 3143

Queens County, New York

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 21.2 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 487,754.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1337 of 3143

Orange County, California

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 15.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 497,116.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 528 of 3143

Bexar County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.5 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 497,149.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1857 of 3143

Clark County, Nevada

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.0 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 507,974.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1453 of 3143

Wayne County, Michigan

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 30.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 528,747.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2515 of 3143

San Diego County, California

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 16.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 530,621.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 627 of 3143

Bronx County, New York

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 39.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 540,653.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3019 of 3143

Dallas County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 23.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 610,663.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1725 of 3143

Miami-Dade County, Florida

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 24.6 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 663,583.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1871 of 3143

Kings County, New York

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 28.1 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 732,697.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2329 of 3143

Maricopa County, Arizona

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 17.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 804,040.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 826 of 3143

Cook County, Illinois

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 20.9 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,063,614.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1283 of 3143

Harris County, Texas

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 25.8 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,233,647.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 2030 of 3143

Puerto Rico

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 57.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 1,836,774.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 3141 of 3143

Los Angeles County, California

• 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
• Value (Percent) : The value is 22.3 percent.
• People (<150% Of Poverty) : The number of people (<150% of poverty) is 2,152,903.
• Rank within US : This county is ranked 1523 of 3143

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/24/2026 3:10 pm.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Puerto Rico is treated as urban because over 90% of the population lives in urban areas.

Source: Demographic data provided by the Census Bureau and the American Community Survey.

For more information about Poverty: Persons below 150% of poverty, see the dictionary.

Note: This website still uses Connecticut counties instead of planning regions for consistency of geographies across data topics. If/when all data sources have new planning regions, then this website will switch to using them.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.