State Cancer Profiles > Interpretation of Demographics Data

Demographics > Table > Interpret

Interpretation of Demographics Data

Demographic Data Report for Oklahoma by County
Crowding: Households with >1 person per room
All Ages, All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes
2020-2024 American Community Survey 5-Year Data
Sorted by Percent

Oklahoma

2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : N/A
Value (Percent) : The value is 2.9 percent.
Households (with >1 Person Per Room) : The number of households (with >1 person per room) is 45,041.
Rank within US : This county is ranked 37 of 52

United States

2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : N/A
Value (Percent) : The value is 3.4 percent.
Households (with >1 Person Per Room) : The number of households (with >1 person per room) is 4,449,577.
Rank within US : N/A

Cimarron County

2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
Value (Percent) : The value is 0.0 percent.
Households (with >1 Person Per Room) : The number of households (with >1 person per room) is 0.
Rank within US : This county is ranked 1 of 3143

Harmon County

2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
Value (Percent) : The value is 1.6 percent.
Households (with >1 Person Per Room) : The number of households (with >1 person per room) is 15.
Rank within US : This county is ranked 1176 of 3143

Roger Mills County

2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
Value (Percent) : The value is 1.1 percent.
Households (with >1 Person Per Room) : The number of households (with >1 person per room) is 15.
Rank within US : This county is ranked 590 of 3143

Beaver County

2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
Value (Percent) : The value is 1.0 percent.
Households (with >1 Person Per Room) : The number of households (with >1 person per room) is 17.
Rank within US : This county is ranked 485 of 3143

Cotton County

2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
Value (Percent) : The value is 1.0 percent.
Households (with >1 Person Per Room) : The number of households (with >1 person per room) is 21.
Rank within US : This county is ranked 485 of 3143

Woods County

2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
Value (Percent) : The value is 0.9 percent.
Households (with >1 Person Per Room) : The number of households (with >1 person per room) is 31.
Rank within US : This county is ranked 411 of 3143

Grant County

2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
Value (Percent) : The value is 2.2 percent.
Households (with >1 Person Per Room) : The number of households (with >1 person per room) is 35.
Rank within US : This county is ranked 1853 of 3143

Alfalfa County

2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
Value (Percent) : The value is 1.9 percent.
Households (with >1 Person Per Room) : The number of households (with >1 person per room) is 37.
Rank within US : This county is ranked 1529 of 3143

Greer County

2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
Value (Percent) : The value is 2.0 percent.
Households (with >1 Person Per Room) : The number of households (with >1 person per room) is 39.
Rank within US : This county is ranked 1646 of 3143

Dewey County

2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
Value (Percent) : The value is 2.8 percent.
Households (with >1 Person Per Room) : The number of households (with >1 person per room) is 45.
Rank within US : This county is ranked 2282 of 3143

Ellis County

2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
Value (Percent) : The value is 3.0 percent.
Households (with >1 Person Per Room) : The number of households (with >1 person per room) is 45.
Rank within US : This county is ranked 2379 of 3143

Woodward County

2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
Value (Percent) : The value is 0.6 percent.
Households (with >1 Person Per Room) : The number of households (with >1 person per room) is 45.
Rank within US : This county is ranked 212 of 3143

Tillman County

2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
Value (Percent) : The value is 1.9 percent.
Households (with >1 Person Per Room) : The number of households (with >1 person per room) is 52.
Rank within US : This county is ranked 1529 of 3143

Washita County

2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
Value (Percent) : The value is 1.4 percent.
Households (with >1 Person Per Room) : The number of households (with >1 person per room) is 58.
Rank within US : This county is ranked 935 of 3143

Kiowa County

2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
Value (Percent) : The value is 1.7 percent.
Households (with >1 Person Per Room) : The number of households (with >1 person per room) is 60.
Rank within US : This county is ranked 1311 of 3143

Blaine County

2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
Value (Percent) : The value is 2.0 percent.
Households (with >1 Person Per Room) : The number of households (with >1 person per room) is 66.
Rank within US : This county is ranked 1646 of 3143

Jefferson County

2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
Value (Percent) : The value is 3.1 percent.
Households (with >1 Person Per Room) : The number of households (with >1 person per room) is 67.
Rank within US : This county is ranked 2433 of 3143

Harper County

2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
Value (Percent) : The value is 5.4 percent.
Households (with >1 Person Per Room) : The number of households (with >1 person per room) is 72.
Rank within US : This county is ranked 2955 of 3143

Coal County

2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
Value (Percent) : The value is 3.7 percent.
Households (with >1 Person Per Room) : The number of households (with >1 person per room) is 76.
Rank within US : This county is ranked 2649 of 3143

Major County

2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
Value (Percent) : The value is 2.4 percent.
Households (with >1 Person Per Room) : The number of households (with >1 person per room) is 77.
Rank within US : This county is ranked 2021 of 3143

Hughes County

2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
Value (Percent) : The value is 1.9 percent.
Households (with >1 Person Per Room) : The number of households (with >1 person per room) is 78.
Rank within US : This county is ranked 1529 of 3143

Latimer County

2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
Value (Percent) : The value is 2.2 percent.
Households (with >1 Person Per Room) : The number of households (with >1 person per room) is 85.
Rank within US : This county is ranked 1853 of 3143

Pushmataha County

2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
Value (Percent) : The value is 2.2 percent.
Households (with >1 Person Per Room) : The number of households (with >1 person per room) is 99.
Rank within US : This county is ranked 1853 of 3143

Noble County

2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
Value (Percent) : The value is 2.4 percent.
Households (with >1 Person Per Room) : The number of households (with >1 person per room) is 100.
Rank within US : This county is ranked 2021 of 3143

Haskell County

2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
Value (Percent) : The value is 2.8 percent.
Households (with >1 Person Per Room) : The number of households (with >1 person per room) is 129.
Rank within US : This county is ranked 2282 of 3143

Pawnee County

2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
Value (Percent) : The value is 2.1 percent.
Households (with >1 Person Per Room) : The number of households (with >1 person per room) is 129.
Rank within US : This county is ranked 1760 of 3143

Kingfisher County

2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
Value (Percent) : The value is 2.4 percent.
Households (with >1 Person Per Room) : The number of households (with >1 person per room) is 135.
Rank within US : This county is ranked 2021 of 3143

McIntosh County

2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
Value (Percent) : The value is 1.7 percent.
Households (with >1 Person Per Room) : The number of households (with >1 person per room) is 135.
Rank within US : This county is ranked 1311 of 3143

Craig County

2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
Value (Percent) : The value is 2.6 percent.
Households (with >1 Person Per Room) : The number of households (with >1 person per room) is 136.
Rank within US : This county is ranked 2157 of 3143

Choctaw County

2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
Value (Percent) : The value is 2.3 percent.
Households (with >1 Person Per Room) : The number of households (with >1 person per room) is 139.
Rank within US : This county is ranked 1938 of 3143

Johnston County

2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
Value (Percent) : The value is 3.7 percent.
Households (with >1 Person Per Room) : The number of households (with >1 person per room) is 143.
Rank within US : This county is ranked 2649 of 3143

Murray County

2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
Value (Percent) : The value is 3.0 percent.
Households (with >1 Person Per Room) : The number of households (with >1 person per room) is 148.
Rank within US : This county is ranked 2379 of 3143

Okfuskee County

2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
Value (Percent) : The value is 3.8 percent.
Households (with >1 Person Per Room) : The number of households (with >1 person per room) is 154.
Rank within US : This county is ranked 2685 of 3143

Jackson County

2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
Value (Percent) : The value is 1.7 percent.
Households (with >1 Person Per Room) : The number of households (with >1 person per room) is 167.
Rank within US : This county is ranked 1311 of 3143

Marshall County

2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
Value (Percent) : The value is 2.9 percent.
Households (with >1 Person Per Room) : The number of households (with >1 person per room) is 173.
Rank within US : This county is ranked 2339 of 3143

Love County

2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
Value (Percent) : The value is 4.7 percent.
Households (with >1 Person Per Room) : The number of households (with >1 person per room) is 182.
Rank within US : This county is ranked 2877 of 3143

Nowata County

2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
Value (Percent) : The value is 4.9 percent.
Households (with >1 Person Per Room) : The number of households (with >1 person per room) is 182.
Rank within US : This county is ranked 2900 of 3143

Atoka County

2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
Value (Percent) : The value is 4.2 percent.
Households (with >1 Person Per Room) : The number of households (with >1 person per room) is 208.
Rank within US : This county is ranked 2777 of 3143

Lincoln County

2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
Value (Percent) : The value is 1.6 percent.
Households (with >1 Person Per Room) : The number of households (with >1 person per room) is 214.
Rank within US : This county is ranked 1176 of 3143

Adair County

2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
Value (Percent) : The value is 3.3 percent.
Households (with >1 Person Per Room) : The number of households (with >1 person per room) is 233.
Rank within US : This county is ranked 2524 of 3143

Custer County

2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
Value (Percent) : The value is 2.2 percent.
Households (with >1 Person Per Room) : The number of households (with >1 person per room) is 246.
Rank within US : This county is ranked 1853 of 3143

Caddo County

2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
Value (Percent) : The value is 2.9 percent.
Households (with >1 Person Per Room) : The number of households (with >1 person per room) is 265.
Rank within US : This county is ranked 2339 of 3143

Garvin County

2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
Value (Percent) : The value is 2.7 percent.
Households (with >1 Person Per Room) : The number of households (with >1 person per room) is 275.
Rank within US : This county is ranked 2226 of 3143

Pontotoc County

2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
Value (Percent) : The value is 1.9 percent.
Households (with >1 Person Per Room) : The number of households (with >1 person per room) is 292.
Rank within US : This county is ranked 1529 of 3143

Seminole County

2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
Value (Percent) : The value is 3.5 percent.
Households (with >1 Person Per Room) : The number of households (with >1 person per room) is 303.
Rank within US : This county is ranked 2593 of 3143

Pittsburg County

2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
Value (Percent) : The value is 1.8 percent.
Households (with >1 Person Per Room) : The number of households (with >1 person per room) is 317.
Rank within US : This county is ranked 1418 of 3143

Texas County

2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
Value (Percent) : The value is 5.1 percent.
Households (with >1 Person Per Room) : The number of households (with >1 person per room) is 349.
Rank within US : This county is ranked 2926 of 3143

McClain County

2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
Value (Percent) : The value is 2.1 percent.
Households (with >1 Person Per Room) : The number of households (with >1 person per room) is 351.
Rank within US : This county is ranked 1760 of 3143

Washington County

2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
Value (Percent) : The value is 1.7 percent.
Households (with >1 Person Per Room) : The number of households (with >1 person per room) is 360.
Rank within US : This county is ranked 1311 of 3143

Beckham County

2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
Value (Percent) : The value is 4.4 percent.
Households (with >1 Person Per Room) : The number of households (with >1 person per room) is 361.
Rank within US : This county is ranked 2825 of 3143

Kay County

2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
Value (Percent) : The value is 2.2 percent.
Households (with >1 Person Per Room) : The number of households (with >1 person per room) is 371.
Rank within US : This county is ranked 1853 of 3143

Stephens County

2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
Value (Percent) : The value is 2.1 percent.
Households (with >1 Person Per Room) : The number of households (with >1 person per room) is 375.
Rank within US : This county is ranked 1760 of 3143

McCurtain County

2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
Value (Percent) : The value is 3.5 percent.
Households (with >1 Person Per Room) : The number of households (with >1 person per room) is 386.
Rank within US : This county is ranked 2593 of 3143

Ottawa County

2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
Value (Percent) : The value is 3.4 percent.
Households (with >1 Person Per Room) : The number of households (with >1 person per room) is 404.
Rank within US : This county is ranked 2556 of 3143

Carter County

2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
Value (Percent) : The value is 2.3 percent.
Households (with >1 Person Per Room) : The number of households (with >1 person per room) is 442.
Rank within US : This county is ranked 1938 of 3143

Logan County

2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
Value (Percent) : The value is 2.5 percent.
Households (with >1 Person Per Room) : The number of households (with >1 person per room) is 454.
Rank within US : This county is ranked 2092 of 3143

Le Flore County

2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
Value (Percent) : The value is 2.6 percent.
Households (with >1 Person Per Room) : The number of households (with >1 person per room) is 461.
Rank within US : This county is ranked 2157 of 3143

Osage County

2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
Value (Percent) : The value is 2.7 percent.
Households (with >1 Person Per Room) : The number of households (with >1 person per room) is 470.
Rank within US : This county is ranked 2226 of 3143

Mayes County

2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
Value (Percent) : The value is 3.6 percent.
Households (with >1 Person Per Room) : The number of households (with >1 person per room) is 546.
Rank within US : This county is ranked 2618 of 3143

Okmulgee County

2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
Value (Percent) : The value is 4.1 percent.
Households (with >1 Person Per Room) : The number of households (with >1 person per room) is 582.
Rank within US : This county is ranked 2753 of 3143

Sequoyah County

2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
Value (Percent) : The value is 3.9 percent.
Households (with >1 Person Per Room) : The number of households (with >1 person per room) is 599.
Rank within US : This county is ranked 2708 of 3143

Bryan County

2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
Value (Percent) : The value is 3.5 percent.
Households (with >1 Person Per Room) : The number of households (with >1 person per room) is 649.
Rank within US : This county is ranked 2593 of 3143

Delaware County

2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
Value (Percent) : The value is 3.8 percent.
Households (with >1 Person Per Room) : The number of households (with >1 person per room) is 654.
Rank within US : This county is ranked 2685 of 3143

Cherokee County

2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
Value (Percent) : The value is 3.6 percent.
Households (with >1 Person Per Room) : The number of households (with >1 person per room) is 672.
Rank within US : This county is ranked 2618 of 3143

Garfield County

2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
Value (Percent) : The value is 3.2 percent.
Households (with >1 Person Per Room) : The number of households (with >1 person per room) is 758.
Rank within US : This county is ranked 2480 of 3143

Pottawatomie County

2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
Value (Percent) : The value is 2.9 percent.
Households (with >1 Person Per Room) : The number of households (with >1 person per room) is 791.
Rank within US : This county is ranked 2339 of 3143

Grady County

2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
Value (Percent) : The value is 3.9 percent.
Households (with >1 Person Per Room) : The number of households (with >1 person per room) is 808.
Rank within US : This county is ranked 2708 of 3143

Wagoner County

2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
Value (Percent) : The value is 2.6 percent.
Households (with >1 Person Per Room) : The number of households (with >1 person per room) is 821.
Rank within US : This county is ranked 2157 of 3143

Muskogee County

2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
Value (Percent) : The value is 3.5 percent.
Households (with >1 Person Per Room) : The number of households (with >1 person per room) is 908.
Rank within US : This county is ranked 2593 of 3143

Creek County

2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
Value (Percent) : The value is 3.3 percent.
Households (with >1 Person Per Room) : The number of households (with >1 person per room) is 946.
Rank within US : This county is ranked 2524 of 3143

Payne County

2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
Value (Percent) : The value is 2.9 percent.
Households (with >1 Person Per Room) : The number of households (with >1 person per room) is 948.
Rank within US : This county is ranked 2339 of 3143

Comanche County

2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
Value (Percent) : The value is 2.1 percent.
Households (with >1 Person Per Room) : The number of households (with >1 person per room) is 959.
Rank within US : This county is ranked 1760 of 3143

Rogers County

2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
Value (Percent) : The value is 2.9 percent.
Households (with >1 Person Per Room) : The number of households (with >1 person per room) is 1,048.
Rank within US : This county is ranked 2339 of 3143

Canadian County

2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
Value (Percent) : The value is 2.5 percent.
Households (with >1 Person Per Room) : The number of households (with >1 person per room) is 1,470.
Rank within US : This county is ranked 2092 of 3143

Cleveland County

2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
Value (Percent) : The value is 2.7 percent.
Households (with >1 Person Per Room) : The number of households (with >1 person per room) is 3,175.
Rank within US : This county is ranked 2226 of 3143

Tulsa County

2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
Value (Percent) : The value is 3.3 percent.
Households (with >1 Person Per Room) : The number of households (with >1 person per room) is 9,097.
Rank within US : This county is ranked 2524 of 3143

Oklahoma County

2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
Value (Percent) : The value is 2.8 percent.
Households (with >1 Person Per Room) : The number of households (with >1 person per room) is 9,286.
Rank within US : This county is ranked 2282 of 3143

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/22/2026 6:28 pm.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Source: Demographic data provided by the Census Bureau and the American Community Survey.

For more information about Crowding: Households with >1 person per room, see the dictionary.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

State Cancer Profiles