Return to Home Historical Trends > Interpret

Interpretation of Historical Trends Data

Historical Trends (1975-2016)

Incidence, New Mexico, Prostate, All Races (incl Hisp), All Ages, Male

Incidence, New Mexico, Prostate, All Races (incl Hisp), All Ages, Male

Line graph with 42 years and 6 segments
During 1975-1988, the APC1 in the rate of cancer was rising: 1.8 with a 95% confidence interval from 0.5 to 3.0.
During 1988-1991, the APC1 in the rate of cancer was rising: 22.5 with a 95% confidence interval from 4.1 to 44.2.
During 1991-1995, the APC1 in the rate of cancer was falling: -8.4 with a 95% confidence interval from -14.3 to -2.2.
During 1995-2009, the APC1 in the rate of cancer was falling: -0.8 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.4 to -0.1.
During 2009-2012, the APC1 in the rate of cancer was falling: -16.5 with a 95% confidence interval from -26.6 to -5.0.
During 2012-2016, the APC1 in the rate of cancer was stable: -1.1 with a 95% confidence interval from -5.4 to 3.5.
Yearly points:
In 1975, the observed rate was 96.4. The estimated rate was 97.2.
In 1976, the observed rate was 90.8. The estimated rate was 98.9.
In 1977, the observed rate was 92.4. The estimated rate was 100.7.
In 1978, the observed rate was 100.1. The estimated rate was 102.4.
In 1979, the observed rate was 100.7. The estimated rate was 104.2.
In 1980, the observed rate was 109.7. The estimated rate was 106.1.
In 1981, the observed rate was 113.2. The estimated rate was 107.9.
In 1982, the observed rate was 119.7. The estimated rate was 109.8.
In 1983, the observed rate was 117.3. The estimated rate was 111.7.
In 1984, the observed rate was 123.1. The estimated rate was 113.7.
In 1985, the observed rate was 116.5. The estimated rate was 115.7.
In 1986, the observed rate was 116.1. The estimated rate was 117.7.
In 1987, the observed rate was 120.6. The estimated rate was 119.8.
In 1988, the observed rate was 120.7. The estimated rate was 121.9.
In 1989, the observed rate was 134.7. The estimated rate was 149.3.
In 1990, the observed rate was 175.7. The estimated rate was 182.8.
In 1991, the observed rate was 219.2. The estimated rate was 223.9.
In 1992, the observed rate was 224.7. The estimated rate was 205.1.
In 1993, the observed rate was 185.2. The estimated rate was 187.8.
In 1994, the observed rate was 165.7. The estimated rate was 172.0.
In 1995, the observed rate was 144.3. The estimated rate was 157.5.
In 1996, the observed rate was 147.7. The estimated rate was 156.3.
In 1997, the observed rate was 162.8. The estimated rate was 155.1.
In 1998, the observed rate was 142.6. The estimated rate was 153.9.
In 1999, the observed rate was 166.1. The estimated rate was 152.8.
In 2000, the observed rate was 147.8. The estimated rate was 151.6.
In 2001, the observed rate was 158.2. The estimated rate was 150.5.
In 2002, the observed rate was 154.5. The estimated rate was 149.3.
In 2003, the observed rate was 158.3. The estimated rate was 148.2.
In 2004, the observed rate was 151.5. The estimated rate was 147.1.
In 2005, the observed rate was 139.6. The estimated rate was 145.9.
In 2006, the observed rate was 148.6. The estimated rate was 144.8.
In 2007, the observed rate was 148.8. The estimated rate was 143.7.
In 2008, the observed rate was 131.5. The estimated rate was 142.7.
In 2009, the observed rate was 130.0. The estimated rate was 141.6.
In 2010, the observed rate was 125.0. The estimated rate was 118.3.
In 2011, the observed rate was 99.8. The estimated rate was 98.8.
In 2012, the observed rate was 76.4. The estimated rate was 82.5.
In 2013, the observed rate was 84.9. The estimated rate was 81.7.
In 2014, the observed rate was 83.5. The estimated rate was 80.8.
In 2015, the observed rate was 76.1. The estimated rate was 79.9.
In 2016, the observed rate was 79.7. The estimated rate was 79.1.

Notes: