Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Nebraska by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Greeley County 2 Rural 646.7 (472.2, 870.6) 1 (1, 73) 11 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.5, 3.2)
Garfield County 2 Rural 628.8 (439.7, 881.1) 2 (1, 77) 9 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.3, 2.8)
Nance County 2 Rural 622.4 (460.0, 823.5) 3 (1, 73) 12 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.6, 5.3)
Logan County 2 Rural 598.4 (311.4, 1,055.7) 4 (1, 81) 3
*
*
Webster County 2 Rural 574.2 (445.3, 733.5) 5 (1, 71) 15 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.0, 2.6)
Burt County 2 Rural 561.3 (469.4, 668.2) 6 (1, 63) 30 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.9, 1.4)
Clay County 2 Rural 555.9 (455.0, 674.2) 7 (1, 67) 24 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.2, 0.9)
Valley County 2 Rural 555.0 (435.8, 700.2) 8 (1, 74) 17 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.5, 3.8)
Antelope County 2 Rural 546.9 (450.5, 659.8) 9 (1, 66) 26 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.2, 3.1)
Rock County 2 Rural 546.5 (341.3, 844.7) 10 (1, 81) 5 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.7, 3.5)
Kearney County 2 Rural 546.3 (453.0, 654.9) 11 (1, 68) 26 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.4, 2.6)
Lincoln County 2 Rural 545.5 (502.9, 591.2) 12 (3, 39) 129 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 0.9)
Nuckolls County 2 Rural 544.0 (433.9, 678.5) 13 (1, 73) 19 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.7, 2.0)
Perkins County 2 Rural 543.2 (407.5, 714.7) 14 (1, 79) 12 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.6, 4.0)
Hitchcock County 2 Rural 543.1 (406.1, 719.2) 15 (1, 76) 12 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.1, 2.7)
Douglas County 2 Urban 538.1 (525.7, 550.8) 16 (6, 27) 1,539 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.0, -0.7)
Furnas County 2 Rural 527.7 (419.3, 658.6) 17 (1, 74) 19 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.1, 1.7)
Cedar County 2 Rural 518.5 (436.9, 612.4) 18 (2, 69) 32 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.3, 2.1)
Frontier County 2 Rural 511.4 (383.7, 677.7) 19 (1, 78) 12 rising rising trend 12.3 (5.9, 28.1)
Washington County 2 Urban 510.3 (455.3, 570.5) 20 (4, 60) 69 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.0, 1.0)
Jefferson County 2 Rural 509.8 (424.3, 609.5) 21 (2, 72) 29 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.7, 1.7)
Pierce County 2 Rural 507.5 (419.1, 610.4) 22 (2, 73) 25 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.2, 0.8)
Cass County 2 Urban 507.2 (459.4, 559.0) 23 (5, 58) 91 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.6)
Buffalo County 2 Rural 500.4 (462.2, 541.0) 24 (8, 56) 134 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.5)
Sarpy County 2 Urban 500.2 (478.9, 522.2) 25 (13, 46) 448 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3)
Custer County 2 Rural 500.1 (429.2, 580.4) 26 (3, 68) 39 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.4, 0.1)
Howard County 2 Urban 498.4 (411.8, 600.1) 27 (2, 73) 25 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.9, -1.0)
Cuming County 2 Rural 498.3 (420.4, 587.6) 28 (3, 72) 33 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.0, 1.7)
Franklin County 2 Rural 495.7 (361.0, 669.6) 29 (1, 80) 11 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.6, 3.9)
Boone County 2 Rural 495.3 (401.8, 607.3) 30 (2, 76) 21 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.7, 1.4)
Merrick County 2 Urban 495.3 (410.5, 593.8) 31 (2, 74) 26 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.3, 1.7)
Adams County 2 Rural 492.7 (448.1, 540.7) 32 (7, 62) 96 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.6, 0.3)
Brown County 2 Rural 490.1 (365.5, 649.9) 33 (1, 80) 11 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.8, 1.0)
Colfax County 2 Rural 488.7 (408.8, 579.6) 34 (3, 73) 28 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.8, 0.4)
Hamilton County 2 Rural 486.7 (410.9, 573.4) 35 (3, 73) 31 stable stable trend -15.1 (-30.2, 0.3)
Harlan County 2 Rural 486.7 (370.8, 635.0) 36 (1, 79) 14 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.3, 0.9)
Gage County 2 Rural 485.5 (435.7, 539.8) 37 (7, 65) 76 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.9, 1.0)
Nemaha County 2 Rural 484.9 (397.8, 587.0) 38 (2, 75) 24 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.7, 2.5)
Keith County 2 Rural 484.2 (411.3, 568.7) 39 (4, 73) 36 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.4, 2.2)
Thayer County 2 Rural 471.1 (372.9, 590.3) 40 (2, 78) 18 falling falling trend -5.1 (-17.1, -1.5)
Platte County 2 Rural 469.6 (428.0, 514.3) 41 (15, 67) 100 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.5, -0.7)
York County 2 Rural 468.9 (407.5, 537.7) 42 (8, 73) 45 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.2, 0.8)
Hall County 2 Urban 468.4 (436.2, 502.5) 43 (18, 63) 163 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.7, -1.1)
Chase County 2 Rural 467.6 (355.9, 606.7) 44 (2, 79) 13 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.2, 1.9)
Johnson County 2 Rural 466.7 (373.0, 579.1) 45 (3, 78) 18 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.2, 3.1)
Madison County 2 Rural 465.5 (423.9, 510.2) 46 (15, 68) 99 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.6, -0.7)
Dodge County 2 Rural 464.2 (425.4, 505.7) 47 (17, 68) 111 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.5, -0.9)
Scotts Bluff County 2 Rural 462.7 (422.4, 506.0) 48 (16, 67) 104 stable stable trend 1.3 (-2.0, 9.7)
Dixon County 2 Rural 461.7 (364.7, 578.3) 49 (3, 79) 18 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.4, 1.8)
Fillmore County 2 Rural 461.7 (373.9, 567.2) 50 (4, 78) 21 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.9, 0.9)
Saline County 2 Rural 454.8 (391.2, 526.0) 51 (9, 75) 38 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.6, 0.6)
Thurston County 2 Rural 450.7 (347.0, 575.1) 52 (3, 80) 14 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.9, 0.4)
Holt County 2 Rural 447.0 (376.1, 528.4) 53 (8, 77) 33 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.1, 0.8)
Lancaster County 2 Urban 446.3 (431.4, 461.6) 54 (37, 64) 726 falling falling trend -7.3 (-12.1, -3.0)
Otoe County 2 Rural 440.9 (385.4, 502.8) 55 (13, 75) 49 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.4, 1.2)
Polk County 2 Rural 438.7 (345.0, 552.8) 56 (4, 80) 17 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.3, 1.8)
Richardson County 2 Rural 438.1 (364.4, 524.5) 57 (10, 78) 28 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.2, 1.5)
Saunders County 2 Urban 434.3 (386.5, 486.8) 58 (22, 74) 66 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.1)
Garden County 2 Rural 430.7 (304.2, 612.3) 59 (2, 81) 8 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.3, 2.9)
Gosper County 2 Rural 426.8 (281.6, 630.1) 60 (1, 81) 7 falling falling trend -6.2 (-16.0, -2.7)
Dakota County 2 Urban 426.6 (371.7, 487.4) 61 (19, 77) 46 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.0, 1.4)
Butler County 2 Rural 424.3 (352.0, 508.6) 62 (12, 79) 26 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.2, 0.2)
Cherry County 2 Rural 418.5 (331.0, 524.4) 63 (7, 81) 17 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.4, 1.2)
Red Willow County 2 Rural 418.4 (353.9, 492.4) 64 (17, 79) 32 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.4, -1.5)
Dawson County 2 Rural 413.4 (366.8, 464.4) 65 (31, 77) 60 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.2)
Knox County 2 Rural 411.9 (341.3, 494.8) 66 (13, 80) 27 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.6, 0.2)
Phelps County 2 Rural 399.7 (329.0, 482.2) 67 (15, 80) 24 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.1, 1.1)
Deuel County 2 Rural 399.6 (269.7, 588.1) 68 (2, 81) 7 stable stable trend 2.6 (-1.4, 19.8)
Dundy County 2 Rural 394.2 (255.5, 599.6) 69 (2, 81) 6 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.9, 0.8)
Cheyenne County 2 Rural 389.7 (323.9, 466.3) 70 (27, 80) 27 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.9, 0.7)
Morrill County 2 Rural 388.8 (297.2, 502.6) 71 (10, 81) 13 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.6, 1.9)
Sherman County 2 Rural 388.4 (279.2, 533.3) 72 (6, 81) 10 stable stable trend -2.2 (-6.1, 1.4)
Wayne County 2 Rural 387.2 (315.1, 471.5) 73 (21, 81) 21 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.4, 0.3)
Box Butte County 2 Rural 385.1 (320.7, 459.5) 74 (30, 81) 29 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.4, 0.9)
Boyd County 2 Rural 376.4 (261.3, 550.9) 75 (6, 81) 7 stable stable trend 1.6 (-2.1, 17.2)
Seward County 2 Urban 355.8 (306.4, 411.4) 76 (54, 81) 39 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.7, -1.1)
Stanton County 2 Rural 332.1 (253.2, 429.4) 77 (38, 81) 13 falling falling trend -4.4 (-7.3, -1.9)
Pawnee County 2 Rural 326.9 (225.8, 469.3) 78 (15, 81) 8 falling falling trend -9.6 (-27.8, -2.7)
Sheridan County 2 Rural 317.8 (242.0, 413.5) 79 (45, 81) 13 falling falling trend -11.0 (-24.8, -4.4)
Dawes County 2 Rural 310.8 (245.0, 390.5) 80 (58, 81) 16 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.1, 0.6)
Kimball County 2 Rural 289.9 (210.2, 398.5) 81 (55, 81) 9 falling falling trend -3.7 (-6.7, -1.0)
Arthur County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Banner County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Blaine County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hayes County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hooker County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Keya Paha County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Loup County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McPherson County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sioux County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Thomas County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wheeler County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/21/2026 3:16 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top