Incidence > Table
Incidence Rates Table
County |
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate† cases per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval) |
CI*Rank⋔ (95% Confidence Interval) |
Average Annual Count |
Recent Trend |
Recent 5-Year Trend‡ in Incidence Rates (95% Confidence Interval) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
North Carolina 6 | 429.7 (427.5, 432.0) | N/A | 29,006 | stable | 0.2 (0.0, 0.4) |
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 | 416.4 (416.0, 416.8) | N/A | 835,074 | stable | 0.1 (0.0, 0.1) |
Wake County 6 | 428.2 (420.6, 435.9) | 57 (35, 66) | 2,535 | rising | 0.3 (0.1, 0.6) |
Mecklenburg County 6 | 413.1 (405.6, 420.6) | 65 (53, 77) | 2,423 | stable | 0.0 (-1.4, 0.4) |
Guilford County 6 | 434.3 (424.2, 444.6) | 50 (24, 64) | 1,468 | stable | -0.5 (-2.5, 0.2) |
Forsyth County 6 | 431.4 (419.6, 443.5) | 54 (23, 67) | 1,079 | stable | 0.0 (-0.6, 0.6) |
Buncombe County 6 | 444.9 (430.8, 459.2) | 32 (9, 59) | 852 | stable | 0.3 (-0.2, 0.9) |
Durham County 6 | 434.9 (421.2, 449.0) | 47 (17, 67) | 800 | falling | -1.2 (-2.9, -0.1) |
Cumberland County 6 | 430.9 (417.1, 445.1) | 55 (21, 70) | 766 | stable | -0.1 (-3.0, 1.0) |
New Hanover County 6 | 431.7 (416.6, 447.2) | 53 (18, 71) | 679 | stable | 0.2 (-0.4, 0.8) |
Gaston County 6 | 452.1 (436.5, 468.2) | 19 (6, 56) | 669 | rising | 0.6 (0.1, 1.1) |
Union County 6 | 438.5 (422.5, 455.0) | 43 (12, 67) | 585 | rising | 0.8 (0.3, 1.5) |
Brunswick County 6 | 435.7 (416.9, 455.3) | 44 (12, 71) | 571 | stable | 0.6 (0.0, 1.3) |
Cabarrus County 6 | 439.7 (423.1, 456.8) | 39 (11, 67) | 541 | stable | -0.7 (-2.4, 0.1) |
Johnston County 6 | 449.9 (432.8, 467.6) | 22 (5, 58) | 539 | stable | 1.6 (-1.4, 4.6) |
Davidson County 6 | 453.9 (436.1, 472.4) | 17 (4, 57) | 529 | rising | 1.0 (0.6, 1.5) |
Alamance County 6 | 465.1 (446.9, 483.9) | 11 (2, 46) | 524 | rising | 0.9 (0.5, 1.4) |
Iredell County 6 | 446.5 (428.9, 464.7) | 31 (7, 65) | 511 | stable | 0.1 (-2.2, 0.9) |
Henderson County 6 | 447.7 (427.6, 468.6) | 28 (5, 64) | 455 | stable | 0.4 (-0.2, 1.0) |
Randolph County 6 | 458.3 (438.9, 478.5) | 14 (3, 56) | 451 | stable | 0.1 (-2.3, 0.9) |
Rowan County 6 | 468.6 (448.6, 489.2) | 8 (2, 45) | 450 | stable | -0.1 (-1.3, 0.7) |
Catawba County 6 | 395.5 (378.3, 413.4) | 80 (56, 92) | 430 | falling | -3.0 (-6.1, -0.7) |
Pitt County 6 | 406.7 (388.9, 425.2) | 72 (40, 88) | 413 | stable | -0.1 (-0.6, 0.3) |
Onslow County 6 | 510.7 (488.3, 533.8) | 2 (1, 9) | 408 | rising | 1.2 (0.6, 2.0) |
Orange County 6 | 439.0 (418.6, 460.1) | 41 (8, 71) | 371 | stable | 0.2 (-0.4, 0.9) |
Wayne County 6 | 448.1 (426.8, 470.2) | 25 (4, 66) | 360 | stable | 0.8 (-4.6, 3.2) |
Moore County 6 | 449.1 (426.6, 472.5) | 24 (4, 68) | 358 | stable | 0.0 (-0.9, 1.0) |
Cleveland County 6 | 468.2 (444.7, 492.6) | 9 (1, 54) | 328 | rising | 1.8 (1.2, 2.4) |
Robeson County 6 | 402.4 (382.5, 423.1) | 74 (44, 91) | 327 | rising | 3.7 (0.6, 8.3) |
Harnett County 6 | 442.3 (420.6, 464.9) | 33 (6, 71) | 321 | stable | 0.7 (0.0, 1.4) |
Rockingham County 6 | 446.9 (423.8, 471.0) | 29 (3, 68) | 318 | stable | 0.3 (-0.3, 0.9) |
Craven County 6 | 435.4 (412.2, 459.6) | 45 (8, 76) | 304 | stable | -0.2 (-1.0, 0.6) |
Burke County 6 | 416.3 (393.6, 440.1) | 62 (21, 86) | 283 | stable | 0.2 (-0.8, 1.3) |
Nash County 6 | 406.8 (384.5, 430.0) | 71 (32, 91) | 274 | stable | -0.1 (-0.8, 0.7) |
Caldwell County 6 | 440.8 (416.4, 466.5) | 36 (5, 73) | 269 | rising | 1.2 (0.2, 2.3) |
Chatham County 6 | 432.7 (407.5, 459.3) | 52 (7, 79) | 265 | stable | 0.7 (-0.2, 1.8) |
Carteret County 6 | 449.6 (423.1, 477.6) | 23 (3, 71) | 264 | stable | 0.2 (-0.4, 0.9) |
Surry County 6 | 461.0 (434.8, 488.5) | 12 (2, 62) | 255 | rising | 1.0 (0.2, 1.7) |
Lincoln County 6 | 439.4 (414.6, 465.5) | 40 (5, 76) | 254 | stable | 0.2 (-1.9, 0.9) |
Haywood County 6 | 466.8 (438.3, 496.8) | 10 (1, 59) | 244 | rising | 1.1 (0.1, 2.1) |
Wilson County 6 | 379.0 (356.1, 403.0) | 87 (62, 96) | 223 | stable | -0.2 (-1.2, 0.8) |
Rutherford County 6 | 410.2 (384.1, 437.9) | 66 (20, 91) | 211 | stable | -0.1 (-0.7, 0.6) |
Stanly County 6 | 473.1 (442.7, 505.2) | 7 (1, 56) | 201 | stable | 0.0 (-6.7, 3.4) |
Wilkes County 6 | 379.2 (354.4, 405.5) | 86 (59, 96) | 200 | stable | -0.1 (-0.8, 0.7) |
Lenoir County 6 | 473.5 (442.5, 506.2) | 6 (1, 59) | 199 | rising | 4.3 (0.5, 7.3) |
Granville County 6 | 474.6 (443.7, 507.2) | 5 (1, 56) | 191 | rising | 1.3 (0.5, 2.2) |
Franklin County 6 | 407.0 (380.5, 434.9) | 70 (21, 93) | 191 | stable | 0.4 (-0.6, 1.6) |
Sampson County 6 | 440.9 (411.6, 472.0) | 35 (3, 77) | 185 | rising | 1.2 (0.1, 2.4) |
Halifax County 6 | 458.7 (426.3, 493.1) | 13 (1, 70) | 176 | rising | 1.1 (0.5, 1.7) |
Lee County 6 | 418.6 (389.6, 449.3) | 60 (12, 89) | 167 | stable | -0.2 (-1.3, 1.0) |
Pender County 6 | 388.7 (361.4, 417.6) | 82 (41, 96) | 165 | stable | -0.2 (-1.8, 1.6) |
Columbus County 6 | 396.7 (368.4, 426.8) | 77 (33, 94) | 164 | stable | 0.3 (-0.7, 1.4) |
Edgecombe County 6 | 395.8 (366.9, 426.6) | 79 (28, 95) | 159 | stable | -0.2 (-1.3, 0.8) |
Stokes County 6 | 442.0 (409.7, 476.4) | 34 (2, 83) | 158 | stable | 0.7 (-0.1, 1.6) |
McDowell County 6 | 454.3 (420.9, 489.9) | 16 (2, 73) | 155 | stable | 0.9 (-0.2, 2.0) |
Beaufort County 6 | 385.7 (356.0, 417.4) | 84 (44, 96) | 150 | falling | -1.3 (-2.6, -0.7) |
Duplin County 6 | 369.9 (342.3, 399.2) | 91 (62, 98) | 149 | stable | 0.3 (-1.0, 1.6) |
Davie County 6 | 450.5 (415.9, 487.5) | 21 (1, 76) | 143 | stable | -3.1 (-7.9, 0.4) |
Person County 6 | 476.9 (439.9, 516.4) | 4 (1, 64) | 140 | falling | -3.4 (-6.5, -0.1) |
Vance County 6 | 434.9 (401.3, 470.8) | 46 (4, 84) | 140 | stable | -2.5 (-8.2, 2.2) |
Richmond County 6 | 439.9 (406.3, 475.8) | 38 (2, 83) | 138 | stable | 0.5 (-0.6, 1.6) |
Macon County 6 | 425.6 (389.3, 464.9) | 58 (4, 92) | 135 | stable | 0.2 (-1.2, 1.6) |
Transylvania County 6 | 384.9 (351.0, 421.8) | 85 (32, 97) | 126 | stable | 0.6 (-0.7, 1.9) |
Alexander County 6 | 452.0 (414.4, 492.4) | 20 (1, 79) | 120 | rising | 1.3 (0.1, 2.7) |
Cherokee County 6 | 438.6 (398.9, 481.9) | 42 (2, 88) | 117 | stable | -4.2 (-9.2, 1.2) |
Watauga County 6 | 364.1 (332.8, 397.9) | 94 (60, 98) | 114 | stable | -1.1 (-2.5, 0.4) |
Yadkin County 6 | 404.4 (369.6, 441.9) | 73 (14, 95) | 112 | stable | 0.7 (-0.9, 2.3) |
Hoke County 6 | 414.2 (379.1, 451.6) | 64 (6, 94) | 110 | stable | 0.7 (-1.0, 2.6) |
Jackson County 6 | 378.2 (344.6, 414.4) | 89 (41, 97) | 109 | stable | -1.6 (-7.7, 0.0) |
Pasquotank County 6 | 409.7 (374.4, 447.5) | 68 (9, 95) | 109 | stable | -6.6 (-14.4, 0.9) |
Dare County 6 | 378.9 (345.2, 415.4) | 88 (37, 98) | 108 | stable | -0.4 (-1.7, 1.1) |
Bladen County 6 | 415.3 (377.9, 455.8) | 63 (7, 93) | 106 | stable | 1.1 (-0.2, 2.5) |
Scotland County 6 | 430.7 (392.4, 471.9) | 56 (3, 92) | 104 | stable | 0.1 (-1.2, 1.4) |
Martin County 6 | 455.8 (410.0, 506.0) | 15 (1, 85) | 87 | stable | 1.1 (-0.6, 3.0) |
Ashe County 6 | 372.1 (333.4, 414.7) | 90 (39, 98) | 84 | stable | -6.1 (-12.6, 0.1) |
Montgomery County 6 | 396.9 (356.9, 440.6) | 76 (10, 97) | 81 | stable | 0.6 (-1.1, 2.4) |
Polk County 6 | 397.1 (350.4, 449.1) | 75 (5, 97) | 77 | stable | 0.2 (-2.2, 2.7) |
Madison County 6 | 447.8 (400.7, 499.4) | 27 (1, 88) | 76 | stable | 0.5 (-1.1, 2.2) |
Anson County 6 | 447.8 (401.0, 499.0) | 26 (1, 87) | 75 | stable | 2.2 (-0.1, 4.8) |
Caswell County 6 | 440.6 (392.5, 493.5) | 37 (1, 92) | 75 | stable | 0.5 (-0.7, 1.7) |
Northampton County 6 | 409.8 (360.5, 464.7) | 67 (3, 97) | 68 | rising | 1.4 (0.1, 2.7) |
Warren County 6 | 417.6 (367.8, 472.8) | 61 (2, 96) | 68 | stable | 0.4 (-0.8, 1.6) |
Yancey County 6 | 446.6 (395.0, 504.0) | 30 (1, 94) | 67 | stable | 0.7 (-0.7, 2.3) |
Bertie County 6 | 434.7 (384.0, 490.9) | 48 (1, 95) | 66 | stable | 7.3 (-0.2, 16.7) |
Hertford County 6 | 366.4 (323.7, 413.5) | 93 (36, 99) | 65 | stable | -0.1 (-2.0, 1.9) |
Mitchell County 6 | 434.0 (378.1, 496.9) | 51 (1, 96) | 54 | stable | 1.2 (-0.3, 2.9) |
Avery County 6 | 408.8 (356.3, 467.9) | 69 (2, 97) | 52 | stable | 1.3 (0.0, 2.7) |
Greene County 6 | 389.8 (340.2, 445.1) | 81 (7, 98) | 51 | stable | -0.6 (-3.0, 1.8) |
Currituck County 6 | 272.4 (238.4, 310.3) | 99 (95, 100) | 50 | falling | -13.7 (-23.2, -3.6) |
Swain County 6 | 479.5 (418.1, 548.1) | 3 (1, 86) | 48 | stable | 0.2 (-1.7, 2.2) |
Pamlico County 6 | 434.6 (371.6, 507.0) | 49 (1, 96) | 47 | stable | 0.6 (-1.2, 2.5) |
Chowan County 6 | 387.1 (333.7, 447.7) | 83 (6, 98) | 47 | stable | 0.4 (-1.2, 2.0) |
Clay County 6 | 425.6 (363.0, 497.8) | 59 (1, 97) | 45 | stable | 1.4 (-0.8, 3.8) |
Perquimans County 6 | 358.9 (306.7, 418.6) | 95 (25, 99) | 43 | stable | -0.8 (-3.1, 1.7) |
Washington County 6 | 396.3 (338.3, 462.6) | 78 (2, 98) | 41 | stable | 0.3 (-1.7, 2.5) |
Jones County 6 | 452.8 (380.1, 536.8) | 18 (1, 95) | 34 | stable | 1.6 (-0.1, 3.4) |
Alleghany County 6 | 317.3 (266.1, 377.8) | 98 (66, 100) | 33 | falling | -5.4 (-10.9, -0.7) |
Graham County 6 | 367.4 (302.8, 443.9) | 92 (3, 100) | 26 | stable | -0.2 (-16.5, 5.4) |
Gates County 6 | 266.1 (216.0, 325.5) | 100 (92, 100) | 23 | stable | -1.9 (-5.8, 1.8) |
Camden County 6 | 319.4 (260.0, 389.3) | 97 (55, 100) | 21 | stable | -1.7 (-4.3, 1.2) |
Hyde County 6 | 335.2 (255.4, 437.6) | 96 (5, 100) | 14 | stable | -0.3 (-4.5, 4.0) |
Tyrrell County 6 | 512.5 (380.2, 678.4) | 1 (1, 98) | 13 | stable | 2.9 (-1.7, 8.3) |
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/29/2024 7:45 am.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/29/2024 7:45 am.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.