Incidence > Table
Incidence Rates Table
County |
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate† cases per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval) |
CI*Rank⋔ (95% Confidence Interval) |
Average Annual Count |
Recent Trend |
Recent 5-Year Trend‡ in Incidence Rates (95% Confidence Interval) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
North Carolina 6 | 429.7 (427.5, 432.0) | N/A | 29,006 | stable | 0.2 (0.0, 0.4) |
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 | 416.4 (416.0, 416.8) | N/A | 835,074 | stable | 0.1 (0.0, 0.1) |
Tyrrell County 6 | 512.5 (380.2, 678.4) | 1 (1, 98) | 13 | stable | 2.9 (-1.7, 8.3) |
Onslow County 6 | 510.7 (488.3, 533.8) | 2 (1, 9) | 408 | rising | 1.2 (0.6, 2.0) |
Swain County 6 | 479.5 (418.1, 548.1) | 3 (1, 86) | 48 | stable | 0.2 (-1.7, 2.2) |
Person County 6 | 476.9 (439.9, 516.4) | 4 (1, 64) | 140 | falling | -3.4 (-6.5, -0.1) |
Granville County 6 | 474.6 (443.7, 507.2) | 5 (1, 56) | 191 | rising | 1.3 (0.5, 2.2) |
Lenoir County 6 | 473.5 (442.5, 506.2) | 6 (1, 59) | 199 | rising | 4.3 (0.5, 7.3) |
Stanly County 6 | 473.1 (442.7, 505.2) | 7 (1, 56) | 201 | stable | 0.0 (-6.7, 3.4) |
Rowan County 6 | 468.6 (448.6, 489.2) | 8 (2, 45) | 450 | stable | -0.1 (-1.3, 0.7) |
Cleveland County 6 | 468.2 (444.7, 492.6) | 9 (1, 54) | 328 | rising | 1.8 (1.2, 2.4) |
Haywood County 6 | 466.8 (438.3, 496.8) | 10 (1, 59) | 244 | rising | 1.1 (0.1, 2.1) |
Alamance County 6 | 465.1 (446.9, 483.9) | 11 (2, 46) | 524 | rising | 0.9 (0.5, 1.4) |
Surry County 6 | 461.0 (434.8, 488.5) | 12 (2, 62) | 255 | rising | 1.0 (0.2, 1.7) |
Halifax County 6 | 458.7 (426.3, 493.1) | 13 (1, 70) | 176 | rising | 1.1 (0.5, 1.7) |
Randolph County 6 | 458.3 (438.9, 478.5) | 14 (3, 56) | 451 | stable | 0.1 (-2.3, 0.9) |
Martin County 6 | 455.8 (410.0, 506.0) | 15 (1, 85) | 87 | stable | 1.1 (-0.6, 3.0) |
McDowell County 6 | 454.3 (420.9, 489.9) | 16 (2, 73) | 155 | stable | 0.9 (-0.2, 2.0) |
Davidson County 6 | 453.9 (436.1, 472.4) | 17 (4, 57) | 529 | rising | 1.0 (0.6, 1.5) |
Jones County 6 | 452.8 (380.1, 536.8) | 18 (1, 95) | 34 | stable | 1.6 (-0.1, 3.4) |
Gaston County 6 | 452.1 (436.5, 468.2) | 19 (6, 56) | 669 | rising | 0.6 (0.1, 1.1) |
Alexander County 6 | 452.0 (414.4, 492.4) | 20 (1, 79) | 120 | rising | 1.3 (0.1, 2.7) |
Davie County 6 | 450.5 (415.9, 487.5) | 21 (1, 76) | 143 | stable | -3.1 (-7.9, 0.4) |
Johnston County 6 | 449.9 (432.8, 467.6) | 22 (5, 58) | 539 | stable | 1.6 (-1.4, 4.6) |
Carteret County 6 | 449.6 (423.1, 477.6) | 23 (3, 71) | 264 | stable | 0.2 (-0.4, 0.9) |
Moore County 6 | 449.1 (426.6, 472.5) | 24 (4, 68) | 358 | stable | 0.0 (-0.9, 1.0) |
Wayne County 6 | 448.1 (426.8, 470.2) | 25 (4, 66) | 360 | stable | 0.8 (-4.6, 3.2) |
Anson County 6 | 447.8 (401.0, 499.0) | 26 (1, 87) | 75 | stable | 2.2 (-0.1, 4.8) |
Madison County 6 | 447.8 (400.7, 499.4) | 27 (1, 88) | 76 | stable | 0.5 (-1.1, 2.2) |
Henderson County 6 | 447.7 (427.6, 468.6) | 28 (5, 64) | 455 | stable | 0.4 (-0.2, 1.0) |
Rockingham County 6 | 446.9 (423.8, 471.0) | 29 (3, 68) | 318 | stable | 0.3 (-0.3, 0.9) |
Yancey County 6 | 446.6 (395.0, 504.0) | 30 (1, 94) | 67 | stable | 0.7 (-0.7, 2.3) |
Iredell County 6 | 446.5 (428.9, 464.7) | 31 (7, 65) | 511 | stable | 0.1 (-2.2, 0.9) |
Buncombe County 6 | 444.9 (430.8, 459.2) | 32 (9, 59) | 852 | stable | 0.3 (-0.2, 0.9) |
Harnett County 6 | 442.3 (420.6, 464.9) | 33 (6, 71) | 321 | stable | 0.7 (0.0, 1.4) |
Stokes County 6 | 442.0 (409.7, 476.4) | 34 (2, 83) | 158 | stable | 0.7 (-0.1, 1.6) |
Sampson County 6 | 440.9 (411.6, 472.0) | 35 (3, 77) | 185 | rising | 1.2 (0.1, 2.4) |
Caldwell County 6 | 440.8 (416.4, 466.5) | 36 (5, 73) | 269 | rising | 1.2 (0.2, 2.3) |
Caswell County 6 | 440.6 (392.5, 493.5) | 37 (1, 92) | 75 | stable | 0.5 (-0.7, 1.7) |
Richmond County 6 | 439.9 (406.3, 475.8) | 38 (2, 83) | 138 | stable | 0.5 (-0.6, 1.6) |
Cabarrus County 6 | 439.7 (423.1, 456.8) | 39 (11, 67) | 541 | stable | -0.7 (-2.4, 0.1) |
Lincoln County 6 | 439.4 (414.6, 465.5) | 40 (5, 76) | 254 | stable | 0.2 (-1.9, 0.9) |
Orange County 6 | 439.0 (418.6, 460.1) | 41 (8, 71) | 371 | stable | 0.2 (-0.4, 0.9) |
Cherokee County 6 | 438.6 (398.9, 481.9) | 42 (2, 88) | 117 | stable | -4.2 (-9.2, 1.2) |
Union County 6 | 438.5 (422.5, 455.0) | 43 (12, 67) | 585 | rising | 0.8 (0.3, 1.5) |
Brunswick County 6 | 435.7 (416.9, 455.3) | 44 (12, 71) | 571 | stable | 0.6 (0.0, 1.3) |
Craven County 6 | 435.4 (412.2, 459.6) | 45 (8, 76) | 304 | stable | -0.2 (-1.0, 0.6) |
Vance County 6 | 434.9 (401.3, 470.8) | 46 (4, 84) | 140 | stable | -2.5 (-8.2, 2.2) |
Durham County 6 | 434.9 (421.2, 449.0) | 47 (17, 67) | 800 | falling | -1.2 (-2.9, -0.1) |
Bertie County 6 | 434.7 (384.0, 490.9) | 48 (1, 95) | 66 | stable | 7.3 (-0.2, 16.7) |
Pamlico County 6 | 434.6 (371.6, 507.0) | 49 (1, 96) | 47 | stable | 0.6 (-1.2, 2.5) |
Guilford County 6 | 434.3 (424.2, 444.6) | 50 (24, 64) | 1,468 | stable | -0.5 (-2.5, 0.2) |
Mitchell County 6 | 434.0 (378.1, 496.9) | 51 (1, 96) | 54 | stable | 1.2 (-0.3, 2.9) |
Chatham County 6 | 432.7 (407.5, 459.3) | 52 (7, 79) | 265 | stable | 0.7 (-0.2, 1.8) |
New Hanover County 6 | 431.7 (416.6, 447.2) | 53 (18, 71) | 679 | stable | 0.2 (-0.4, 0.8) |
Forsyth County 6 | 431.4 (419.6, 443.5) | 54 (23, 67) | 1,079 | stable | 0.0 (-0.6, 0.6) |
Cumberland County 6 | 430.9 (417.1, 445.1) | 55 (21, 70) | 766 | stable | -0.1 (-3.0, 1.0) |
Scotland County 6 | 430.7 (392.4, 471.9) | 56 (3, 92) | 104 | stable | 0.1 (-1.2, 1.4) |
Wake County 6 | 428.2 (420.6, 435.9) | 57 (35, 66) | 2,535 | rising | 0.3 (0.1, 0.6) |
Macon County 6 | 425.6 (389.3, 464.9) | 58 (4, 92) | 135 | stable | 0.2 (-1.2, 1.6) |
Clay County 6 | 425.6 (363.0, 497.8) | 59 (1, 97) | 45 | stable | 1.4 (-0.8, 3.8) |
Lee County 6 | 418.6 (389.6, 449.3) | 60 (12, 89) | 167 | stable | -0.2 (-1.3, 1.0) |
Warren County 6 | 417.6 (367.8, 472.8) | 61 (2, 96) | 68 | stable | 0.4 (-0.8, 1.6) |
Burke County 6 | 416.3 (393.6, 440.1) | 62 (21, 86) | 283 | stable | 0.2 (-0.8, 1.3) |
Bladen County 6 | 415.3 (377.9, 455.8) | 63 (7, 93) | 106 | stable | 1.1 (-0.2, 2.5) |
Hoke County 6 | 414.2 (379.1, 451.6) | 64 (6, 94) | 110 | stable | 0.7 (-1.0, 2.6) |
Mecklenburg County 6 | 413.1 (405.6, 420.6) | 65 (53, 77) | 2,423 | stable | 0.0 (-1.4, 0.4) |
Rutherford County 6 | 410.2 (384.1, 437.9) | 66 (20, 91) | 211 | stable | -0.1 (-0.7, 0.6) |
Northampton County 6 | 409.8 (360.5, 464.7) | 67 (3, 97) | 68 | rising | 1.4 (0.1, 2.7) |
Pasquotank County 6 | 409.7 (374.4, 447.5) | 68 (9, 95) | 109 | stable | -6.6 (-14.4, 0.9) |
Avery County 6 | 408.8 (356.3, 467.9) | 69 (2, 97) | 52 | stable | 1.3 (0.0, 2.7) |
Franklin County 6 | 407.0 (380.5, 434.9) | 70 (21, 93) | 191 | stable | 0.4 (-0.6, 1.6) |
Nash County 6 | 406.8 (384.5, 430.0) | 71 (32, 91) | 274 | stable | -0.1 (-0.8, 0.7) |
Pitt County 6 | 406.7 (388.9, 425.2) | 72 (40, 88) | 413 | stable | -0.1 (-0.6, 0.3) |
Yadkin County 6 | 404.4 (369.6, 441.9) | 73 (14, 95) | 112 | stable | 0.7 (-0.9, 2.3) |
Robeson County 6 | 402.4 (382.5, 423.1) | 74 (44, 91) | 327 | rising | 3.7 (0.6, 8.3) |
Polk County 6 | 397.1 (350.4, 449.1) | 75 (5, 97) | 77 | stable | 0.2 (-2.2, 2.7) |
Montgomery County 6 | 396.9 (356.9, 440.6) | 76 (10, 97) | 81 | stable | 0.6 (-1.1, 2.4) |
Columbus County 6 | 396.7 (368.4, 426.8) | 77 (33, 94) | 164 | stable | 0.3 (-0.7, 1.4) |
Washington County 6 | 396.3 (338.3, 462.6) | 78 (2, 98) | 41 | stable | 0.3 (-1.7, 2.5) |
Edgecombe County 6 | 395.8 (366.9, 426.6) | 79 (28, 95) | 159 | stable | -0.2 (-1.3, 0.8) |
Catawba County 6 | 395.5 (378.3, 413.4) | 80 (56, 92) | 430 | falling | -3.0 (-6.1, -0.7) |
Greene County 6 | 389.8 (340.2, 445.1) | 81 (7, 98) | 51 | stable | -0.6 (-3.0, 1.8) |
Pender County 6 | 388.7 (361.4, 417.6) | 82 (41, 96) | 165 | stable | -0.2 (-1.8, 1.6) |
Chowan County 6 | 387.1 (333.7, 447.7) | 83 (6, 98) | 47 | stable | 0.4 (-1.2, 2.0) |
Beaufort County 6 | 385.7 (356.0, 417.4) | 84 (44, 96) | 150 | falling | -1.3 (-2.6, -0.7) |
Transylvania County 6 | 384.9 (351.0, 421.8) | 85 (32, 97) | 126 | stable | 0.6 (-0.7, 1.9) |
Wilkes County 6 | 379.2 (354.4, 405.5) | 86 (59, 96) | 200 | stable | -0.1 (-0.8, 0.7) |
Wilson County 6 | 379.0 (356.1, 403.0) | 87 (62, 96) | 223 | stable | -0.2 (-1.2, 0.8) |
Dare County 6 | 378.9 (345.2, 415.4) | 88 (37, 98) | 108 | stable | -0.4 (-1.7, 1.1) |
Jackson County 6 | 378.2 (344.6, 414.4) | 89 (41, 97) | 109 | stable | -1.6 (-7.7, 0.0) |
Ashe County 6 | 372.1 (333.4, 414.7) | 90 (39, 98) | 84 | stable | -6.1 (-12.6, 0.1) |
Duplin County 6 | 369.9 (342.3, 399.2) | 91 (62, 98) | 149 | stable | 0.3 (-1.0, 1.6) |
Graham County 6 | 367.4 (302.8, 443.9) | 92 (3, 100) | 26 | stable | -0.2 (-16.5, 5.4) |
Hertford County 6 | 366.4 (323.7, 413.5) | 93 (36, 99) | 65 | stable | -0.1 (-2.0, 1.9) |
Watauga County 6 | 364.1 (332.8, 397.9) | 94 (60, 98) | 114 | stable | -1.1 (-2.5, 0.4) |
Perquimans County 6 | 358.9 (306.7, 418.6) | 95 (25, 99) | 43 | stable | -0.8 (-3.1, 1.7) |
Hyde County 6 | 335.2 (255.4, 437.6) | 96 (5, 100) | 14 | stable | -0.3 (-4.5, 4.0) |
Camden County 6 | 319.4 (260.0, 389.3) | 97 (55, 100) | 21 | stable | -1.7 (-4.3, 1.2) |
Alleghany County 6 | 317.3 (266.1, 377.8) | 98 (66, 100) | 33 | falling | -5.4 (-10.9, -0.7) |
Currituck County 6 | 272.4 (238.4, 310.3) | 99 (95, 100) | 50 | falling | -13.7 (-23.2, -3.6) |
Gates County 6 | 266.1 (216.0, 325.5) | 100 (92, 100) | 23 | stable | -1.9 (-5.8, 1.8) |
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/29/2024 8:00 am.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/29/2024 8:00 am.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.