Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for South Carolina by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2018-2022

Black Non-Hispanic, Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Dillon County 2 Rural 516.7 (463.2, 574.7) 1 (1, 22) 76 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.1, 1.7)
Greenville County 2 Urban 507.2 (486.4, 528.7) 2 (1, 10) 484 rising rising trend 2.8 (0.8, 5.8)
Greenwood County 2 Rural 502.4 (461.2, 546.4) 3 (1, 21) 118 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.8)
Abbeville County 2 Rural 490.8 (425.6, 564.0) 4 (1, 37) 46 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.9, 1.6)
Saluda County 2 Urban 486.2 (407.8, 576.4) 5 (1, 43) 31 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.9, 2.3)
Florence County 2 Urban 482.2 (458.0, 507.5) 6 (1, 20) 318 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.5, 0.4)
Orangeburg County 2 Rural 475.5 (451.0, 501.1) 7 (2, 22) 311 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.4)
Georgetown County 2 Rural 468.4 (428.7, 511.0) 8 (1, 34) 118 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.6)
Newberry County 2 Rural 465.7 (413.0, 523.6) 9 (1, 40) 62 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.4, 0.3)
Colleton County 2 Rural 464.6 (420.2, 512.7) 10 (1, 37) 90 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.7)
Anderson County 2 Urban 464.4 (432.8, 497.8) 11 (2, 32) 171 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Oconee County 2 Rural 459.6 (390.9, 537.4) 12 (1, 44) 35 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.5, -0.3)
Laurens County 2 Urban 454.5 (413.1, 499.2) 13 (2, 38) 95 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.1)
Dorchester County 2 Urban 453.9 (424.1, 485.3) 14 (3, 34) 187 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.3)
Chester County 2 Urban 453.5 (402.7, 509.2) 15 (1, 41) 64 falling falling trend -6.0 (-12.2, -1.4)
Pickens County 2 Urban 452.1 (390.1, 521.2) 16 (1, 45) 42 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.1, 0.3)
Darlington County 2 Urban 451.4 (417.4, 487.6) 17 (3, 37) 144 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.7)
Charleston County 2 Urban 445.3 (428.1, 463.0) 18 (9, 31) 564 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Marion County 2 Rural 438.0 (397.5, 481.8) 19 (3, 42) 94 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.9, 1.2)
Union County 2 Urban 437.4 (382.8, 498.1) 20 (1, 45) 53 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.7, 2.4)
Kershaw County 2 Urban 434.2 (393.2, 478.6) 21 (4, 43) 91 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.7)
Hampton County 2 Rural 433.4 (381.8, 490.4) 22 (2, 45) 55 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.2, 1.0)
Williamsburg County 2 Rural 433.0 (397.2, 471.4) 23 (5, 41) 120 falling falling trend -7.2 (-12.6, -0.9)
Calhoun County 2 Urban 432.2 (366.5, 507.3) 24 (1, 46) 36 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.6, 1.5)
Spartanburg County 2 Urban 431.4 (409.0, 454.8) 25 (10, 38) 303 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.7)
Allendale County 2 Rural 428.8 (362.9, 503.9) 26 (1, 46) 33 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.4, 1.6)
York County 2 Urban 427.9 (401.4, 455.5) 27 (10, 40) 222 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.1)
Sumter County 2 Urban 425.3 (401.4, 450.3) 28 (11, 40) 257 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.0)
Bamberg County 2 Rural 423.1 (368.3, 484.6) 29 (2, 46) 49 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.4, 0.3)
Lexington County 2 Urban 419.1 (389.7, 450.0) 30 (11, 43) 175 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.6, -0.2)
Marlboro County 2 Rural 417.9 (374.1, 465.6) 31 (5, 45) 71 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.0, 0.9)
Cherokee County 2 Rural 415.0 (363.4, 471.9) 32 (4, 46) 51 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 0.8)
Clarendon County 2 Rural 414.8 (373.8, 459.5) 33 (7, 45) 86 stable stable trend -2.3 (-11.5, 0.1)
Fairfield County 2 Urban 414.4 (369.4, 463.9) 34 (5, 46) 70 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.4)
McCormick County 2 Rural 413.8 (345.4, 494.6) 35 (1, 46) 28 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.9, 1.6)
Berkeley County 2 Urban 413.3 (389.1, 438.5) 36 (15, 42) 239 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
Richland County 2 Urban 409.1 (395.9, 422.7) 37 (23, 41) 804 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.0)
Chesterfield County 2 Rural 408.2 (365.7, 454.5) 38 (9, 46) 74 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.0, 1.0)
Aiken County 2 Urban 383.2 (357.9, 409.9) 39 (27, 46) 182 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.3)
Barnwell County 2 Rural 381.6 (329.7, 439.6) 40 (11, 46) 43 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.0, 1.1)
Horry County 2 Urban 379.8 (354.0, 406.9) 41 (27, 46) 179 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.5, -0.7)
Lee County 2 Rural 379.3 (332.3, 431.4) 42 (15, 46) 52 falling falling trend -3.3 (-8.9, -1.8)
Lancaster County 2 Urban 374.9 (338.3, 414.5) 43 (24, 46) 84 falling falling trend -5.9 (-14.0, -1.8)
Edgefield County 2 Urban 374.7 (324.4, 431.2) 44 (15, 46) 43 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.9, 1.8)
Jasper County 2 Urban 369.8 (323.9, 420.6) 45 (18, 46) 51 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 1.0)
Beaufort County 2 Urban 350.1 (322.5, 379.6) 46 (38, 46) 130 falling falling trend -4.4 (-7.0, -3.1)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/24/2026 2:18 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top