Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Michigan by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2018-2022

Asian/Pacific Islander Non-Hispanic, Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
sort alphabetically by name ascending 		2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
sort by rural urban descending 		Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate †
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate descending 		CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by CI rank descending 		Average Annual Count
sort by count descending 		Recent Trend
 Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
Muskegon County 2 Urban 293.8 (175.3, 462.8) 4 (1, 17) 4 falling falling trend -6.6 (-12.0, -0.9)
Midland County 2 Urban 175.8 (98.5, 287.7) 17 (3, 17) 3 stable stable trend -4.1 (-8.4, 0.6)
Jackson County 2 Urban 238.4 (145.4, 370.0) 12 (1, 17) 4 stable stable trend -3.5 (-8.9, 3.4)
Kalamazoo County 2 Urban 191.1 (141.7, 251.6) 15 (7, 17) 11 stable stable trend -3.3 (-7.3, 1.2)
Ottawa County 2 Urban 267.7 (214.6, 329.9) 6 (1, 15) 20 stable stable trend -2.8 (-6.0, 1.9)
Kent County 2 Urban 237.0 (205.4, 271.9) 13 (4, 16) 43 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.5, -1.0)
Genesee County 2 Urban 190.5 (142.3, 250.3) 16 (8, 17) 11 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.5, 1.3)
Oakland County 2 Urban 247.2 (232.6, 262.5) 10 (5, 14) 233 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.6, -1.2)
Eaton County 2 Urban 262.5 (178.4, 372.9) 7 (1, 17) 7 stable stable trend -1.8 (-6.3, 4.6)
Saginaw County 2 Urban 243.8 (165.5, 346.0) 11 (1, 17) 7 stable stable trend -1.8 (-5.9, 3.6)
Ingham County 2 Urban 225.7 (186.9, 269.6) 14 (4, 17) 27 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.8, 1.3)
Macomb County 2 Urban 283.9 (260.0, 309.4) 5 (1, 9) 111 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.7)
Washtenaw County 2 Urban 262.3 (234.9, 291.8) 8 (2, 13) 72 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.0, 2.0)
Wayne County 2 Urban 249.9 (232.5, 268.2) 9 (4, 14) 160 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 1.0)
Berrien County 2 Urban 303.2 (223.6, 401.4) 1 (1, 15) 10 stable stable trend 1.3 (-3.1, 8.0)
Livingston County 2 Urban 300.3 (207.4, 420.6) 2 (1, 16) 7 rising rising trend 3.7 (0.2, 8.8)
Calhoun County 2 Urban 294.8 (210.4, 400.0) 3 (1, 15) 9
*
*
Alcona County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Alger County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Allegan County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Alpena County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Antrim County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Arenac County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Baraga County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Barry County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bay County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Benzie County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Branch County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cass County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Charlevoix County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cheboygan County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chippewa County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clare County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clinton County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crawford County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Delta County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dickinson County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Emmet County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gladwin County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gogebic County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grand Traverse County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gratiot County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hillsdale County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Houghton County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Huron County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ionia County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Iosco County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Iron County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Isabella County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kalkaska County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Keweenaw County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lapeer County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Leelanau County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lenawee County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Luce County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mackinac County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Manistee County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marquette County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mason County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mecosta County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menominee County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Missaukee County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Monroe County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montcalm County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montmorency County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Newaygo County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oceana County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ogemaw County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ontonagon County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Osceola County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oscoda County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Otsego County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Presque Isle County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roscommon County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sanilac County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schoolcraft County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shiawassee County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
St. Clair County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
St. Joseph County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tuscola County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Van Buren County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wexford County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/20/2026 3:27 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top