Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Alabama by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Alabama 2 N/A 478.2 (474.6, 481.9) N/A 14,183 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.2, -1.8)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 484.8 (484.4, 485.3) N/A 929,608 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.8)
Sumter County 2 Rural 482.0 (403.7, 571.6) 37 (2, 67) 31 falling falling trend -12.5 (-21.3, -4.7)
Macon County 2 Urban 493.5 (435.5, 557.8) 29 (4, 65) 60 stable stable trend -8.0 (-18.6, 1.9)
Bibb County 2 Urban 475.8 (425.4, 530.8) 44 (7, 66) 68 falling falling trend -7.3 (-15.8, -1.5)
Shelby County 2 Urban 406.0 (389.9, 422.7) 66 (56, 67) 510 falling falling trend -7.3 (-10.8, -3.2)
St. Clair County 2 Urban 486.1 (459.6, 513.9) 36 (12, 53) 270 falling falling trend -5.8 (-10.4, -1.3)
Tallapoosa County 2 Rural 513.5 (476.7, 552.6) 18 (5, 48) 163 falling falling trend -5.6 (-9.3, -1.0)
Dallas County 2 Rural 435.1 (395.9, 477.3) 57 (25, 67) 102 falling falling trend -4.5 (-10.7, -2.0)
Limestone County 2 Urban 449.7 (425.3, 475.3) 50 (31, 64) 275 falling falling trend -4.5 (-10.4, -1.3)
Choctaw County 2 Rural 462.2 (402.0, 530.4) 49 (6, 67) 45 falling falling trend -3.8 (-8.5, -1.4)
Russell County 2 Urban 430.6 (397.0, 466.4) 59 (32, 67) 135 falling falling trend -3.8 (-13.5, -1.6)
Tuscaloosa County 2 Urban 428.4 (410.3, 447.1) 60 (45, 66) 465 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.5, -2.4)
Marengo County 2 Rural 473.3 (418.3, 534.1) 46 (7, 67) 59 falling falling trend -2.5 (-8.2, -1.1)
Coffee County 2 Rural 443.6 (410.5, 478.8) 52 (27, 66) 140 falling falling trend -2.2 (-8.1, -0.9)
Jackson County 2 Rural 442.2 (410.8, 475.5) 53 (27, 66) 161 falling falling trend -2.1 (-6.7, -0.9)
Walker County 2 Urban 537.8 (505.7, 571.6) 9 (3, 36) 227 falling falling trend -2.1 (-7.0, -0.8)
Lauderdale County 2 Urban 440.6 (416.2, 466.2) 56 (37, 65) 264 falling falling trend -2.0 (-7.3, -0.2)
Escambia County 2 Rural 444.3 (405.5, 486.0) 51 (21, 67) 101 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.9, -0.9)
Randolph County 2 Rural 477.1 (427.5, 531.4) 41 (7, 65) 76 falling falling trend -1.9 (-6.6, -0.1)
Talladega County 2 Rural 488.8 (461.1, 517.9) 35 (11, 52) 253 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.6, -1.0)
Chambers County 2 Rural 504.9 (463.1, 549.7) 22 (5, 55) 117 falling falling trend -1.7 (-5.3, -0.8)
Colbert County 2 Urban 498.7 (466.0, 533.4) 23 (8, 52) 184 falling falling trend -1.6 (-4.7, -0.4)
Coosa County 2 Rural 406.8 (344.9, 478.4) 65 (14, 67) 36 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.1, 0.0)
Covington County 2 Rural 441.8 (404.4, 481.9) 55 (24, 67) 113 falling falling trend -1.5 (-5.4, -0.5)
Houston County 2 Urban 481.8 (457.3, 507.3) 38 (14, 54) 311 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -0.9)
Jefferson County 2 Urban 492.2 (481.7, 502.9) 30 (19, 43) 1,794 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -1.0)
Madison County 2 Urban 415.6 (403.1, 428.4) 63 (53, 67) 899 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.8)
Blount County 2 Urban 442.2 (411.7, 474.4) 54 (31, 66) 166 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.5)
Geneva County 2 Urban 494.8 (448.3, 545.2) 27 (5, 61) 90 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.6, 0.0)
Henry County 2 Urban 535.6 (477.6, 599.7) 10 (2, 53) 68 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.6, 0.0)
Morgan County 2 Urban 514.7 (491.3, 539.0) 17 (7, 40) 384 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.7)
Pickens County 2 Urban 477.2 (424.3, 535.5) 40 (6, 66) 63 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.1)
Clay County 2 Rural 525.5 (461.7, 596.6) 12 (2, 59) 53 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.5, 0.3)
Dale County 2 Rural 490.2 (453.8, 528.8) 31 (8, 57) 144 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.1, -0.1)
Barbour County 2 Rural 521.3 (472.6, 574.1) 14 (3, 54) 88 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.5, 0.6)
Bullock County 2 Rural 475.9 (399.0, 563.7) 43 (3, 67) 30 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.0, 0.4)
Chilton County 2 Urban 489.3 (451.4, 529.6) 34 (7, 58) 132 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.1)
Cullman County 2 Rural 433.8 (408.8, 460.0) 58 (39, 66) 243 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.2)
Lee County 2 Urban 392.3 (372.7, 412.8) 67 (58, 67) 325 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.1)
Winston County 2 Rural 494.2 (445.3, 547.4) 28 (5, 63) 83 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.5, 0.6)
Lawrence County 2 Urban 518.7 (474.6, 566.1) 15 (4, 50) 112 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.7, 1.0)
Marshall County 2 Rural 476.5 (450.6, 503.5) 42 (15, 56) 273 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.1)
Perry County 2 Rural 410.7 (333.3, 502.0) 64 (9, 67) 21 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.3, 1.3)
Etowah County 2 Urban 505.2 (480.2, 531.3) 21 (8, 45) 332 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)
Franklin County 2 Rural 474.0 (430.3, 521.1) 45 (8, 65) 90 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.4, 0.8)
Greene County 2 Urban 496.9 (409.1, 599.4) 24 (2, 67) 26 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.2, 1.6)
Hale County 2 Urban 533.0 (465.6, 608.0) 11 (2, 58) 51 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.5, 1.8)
Washington County 2 Rural 516.2 (453.8, 585.5) 16 (2, 62) 54 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.1, 0.5)
Cherokee County 2 Rural 489.4 (444.4, 538.3) 33 (6, 62) 98 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.7)
Fayette County 2 Rural 421.5 (367.1, 482.3) 62 (19, 67) 48 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.5)
Baldwin County 2 Urban 479.3 (463.8, 495.2) 39 (22, 50) 784 stable stable trend -0.5 (-0.9, 0.0)
Cleburne County 2 Rural 489.9 (428.4, 558.4) 32 (3, 66) 49 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.1, 1.3)
Autauga County 2 Urban 508.2 (473.7, 544.6) 20 (6, 49) 170 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.8)
Lamar County 2 Rural 470.3 (409.3, 538.7) 48 (5, 67) 47 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 0.8)
Clarke County 2 Rural 554.6 (501.2, 612.6) 7 (1, 42) 85 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.7)
Marion County 2 Rural 470.4 (428.5, 515.7) 47 (10, 65) 98 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.6, 1.5)
Monroe County 2 Rural 494.8 (441.2, 553.8) 26 (4, 63) 69 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.4, 1.3)
Elmore County 2 Urban 562.6 (532.2, 594.4) 5 (2, 19) 281 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.6, 0.7)
Montgomery County 2 Urban 509.2 (490.6, 528.4) 19 (9, 39) 601 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.4, 0.3)
Wilcox County 2 Rural 558.4 (476.3, 651.5) 6 (1, 58) 38 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.9, 2.2)
Pike County 2 Rural 522.9 (472.7, 577.1) 13 (3, 53) 86 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.6, 1.3)
Lowndes County 2 Urban 638.6 (551.1, 737.0) 2 (1, 31) 42 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.1, 3.0)
Butler County 2 Rural 546.5 (486.2, 612.8) 8 (1, 51) 65 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.2, 2.2)
Mobile County 2 Urban 495.1 (482.0, 508.6) 25 (16, 43) 1,164 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.1, 2.4)
DeKalb County 2 Rural 424.6 (396.7, 454.0) 61 (41, 67) 187 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.3, 5.3)
Crenshaw County 2 Rural 670.1 (590.6, 758.1) 1 (1, 8) 57 rising rising trend 2.2 (0.8, 3.9)
Calhoun County 2 Urban 584.0 (557.4, 611.7) 4 (1, 12) 397 rising rising trend 2.6 (0.7, 6.9)
Conecuh County 2 Rural 610.9 (533.0, 698.0) 3 (1, 38) 51 rising rising trend 14.7 (3.0, 23.3)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/19/2026 5:11 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top