Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for South Dakota by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
South Dakota 2 N/A 501.1 (492.3, 509.9) N/A 2,711 stable stable trend -0.5 (-0.8, 0.3)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 484.8 (484.4, 485.3) N/A 929,608 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.8)
Hanson County 2 Rural 271.3 (163.9, 423.1) 65 (30, 65) 6 falling falling trend -20.3 (-42.1, -8.0)
Hyde County 2 Rural 405.5 (255.4, 636.2) 53 (2, 65) 5 stable stable trend -2.8 (-6.9, 1.0)
Fall River County 2 Rural 493.1 (416.0, 584.5) 36 (5, 58) 36 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.2, -0.7)
Stanley County 2 Rural 512.4 (389.2, 668.5) 24 (1, 62) 12 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.7, 1.3)
Lyman County 2 Rural 501.0 (377.0, 654.3) 32 (1, 63) 12 stable stable trend -2.1 (-5.3, 1.1)
Walworth County 2 Rural 393.7 (310.4, 495.5) 59 (20, 65) 17 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.7, -0.7)
Lawrence County 2 Rural 396.9 (356.5, 441.3) 56 (39, 63) 81 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.1, -0.8)
Butte County 2 Rural 376.7 (314.3, 449.0) 60 (33, 64) 29 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.5, -0.4)
Haakon County 2 Rural 588.5 (410.7, 827.2) 7 (1, 63) 9 stable stable trend -1.6 (-5.0, 1.4)
Jerauld County 2 Rural 431.7 (283.9, 643.9) 50 (1, 65) 6 stable stable trend -1.6 (-5.4, 2.0)
Pennington County 2 Urban 455.8 (432.5, 480.0) 45 (28, 53) 325 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -0.9)
Bon Homme County 2 Rural 467.8 (387.6, 561.3) 44 (8, 61) 25 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.5, 0.5)
Deuel County 2 Rural 454.6 (350.3, 583.0) 46 (4, 63) 14 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.8, 1.1)
Spink County 2 Rural 501.2 (414.2, 603.8) 31 (3, 59) 25 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.1, 1.5)
Tripp County 2 Rural 428.0 (340.2, 534.0) 51 (10, 63) 18 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.6, 1.2)
Miner County 2 Rural 482.5 (340.4, 671.3) 41 (1, 64) 9 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.3, 1.9)
Codington County 2 Rural 499.4 (454.0, 548.4) 33 (11, 50) 94 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3)
Perkins County 2 Rural 349.4 (248.1, 487.0) 61 (19, 65) 9 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.7, 2.3)
Sanborn County 2 Rural 667.8 (489.1, 894.2) 1 (1, 56) 11 stable stable trend -1.0 (-5.5, 3.1)
Davison County 2 Rural 491.3 (437.2, 550.6) 37 (9, 53) 64 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.7, 3.9)
Douglas County 2 Rural 511.9 (386.0, 673.7) 25 (1, 63) 12 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.2, 1.3)
Jackson County 2 Rural 511.6 (357.3, 710.9) 26 (1, 64) 7 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.0, 2.4)
Brookings County 2 Rural 486.4 (438.0, 538.6) 39 (12, 53) 78 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.1)
Todd County 2 Rural 445.5 (334.3, 579.5) 49 (3, 64) 13 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.2, 1.7)
Aurora County 2 Rural 480.2 (352.6, 643.9) 42 (1, 64) 10 stable stable trend -0.7 (-4.2, 2.9)
Campbell County 2 Rural 309.2 (188.1, 513.0) 63 (12, 65) 5 stable stable trend -0.7 (-5.5, 4.3)
Grant County 2 Rural 532.2 (446.3, 631.4) 16 (2, 54) 30 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.8, 1.5)
Hutchinson County 2 Rural 527.9 (440.4, 629.5) 19 (2, 56) 28 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.3, 1.1)
Minnehaha County 2 Urban 603.8 (580.5, 627.8) 5 (2, 17) 581 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.1, 0.0)
Oglala Lakota County 2 Rural 612.9 (495.8, 747.1) 4 (1, 49) 24 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.6, 1.5)
Custer County 2 Urban 405.2 (342.6, 480.0) 54 (25, 64) 38 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.0, 1.2)
Clark County 2 Rural 507.4 (390.7, 651.5) 27 (1, 62) 15 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.2, 2.3)
Hamlin County 2 Rural 501.3 (399.2, 621.9) 30 (2, 61) 18 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.3, 1.5)
Roberts County 2 Rural 394.8 (328.2, 471.8) 58 (28, 64) 28 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.1, 1.2)
Hughes County 2 Rural 493.8 (435.1, 558.7) 35 (9, 54) 56 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 1.3)
Beadle County 2 Rural 562.4 (501.2, 629.3) 13 (2, 43) 67 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.2)
Buffalo County 2 Rural 563.3 (346.4, 863.5) 12 (1, 65) 5 stable stable trend -0.1 (-4.4, 4.9)
Gregory County 2 Rural 524.8 (410.1, 665.1) 20 (1, 61) 16 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.3, 2.9)
Jones County 2 Rural 496.1 (279.8, 843.8) 34 (1, 65) 4 stable stable trend -0.1 (-7.3, 6.8)
Mellette County 2 Rural 593.4 (395.6, 858.3) 6 (1, 63) 6 stable stable trend -0.1 (-4.9, 5.2)
Union County 2 Urban 584.9 (519.0, 657.4) 8 (1, 36) 62 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.2, 2.4)
Charles Mix County 2 Rural 558.4 (470.4, 658.5) 15 (1, 52) 31 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.1, 2.1)
Dewey County 2 Rural 656.2 (495.6, 850.0) 2 (1, 55) 14 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.1, 3.0)
McCook County 2 Urban 570.7 (461.2, 699.5) 9 (1, 53) 21 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.7, 1.6)
Day County 2 Rural 501.6 (407.7, 613.8) 29 (3, 60) 23 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.0, 2.2)
Edmunds County 2 Rural 403.9 (311.6, 520.5) 55 (14, 65) 14 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.2, 2.6)
Brown County 2 Rural 531.9 (489.0, 577.7) 18 (7, 43) 121 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.7, 1.1)
Clay County 2 Rural 522.4 (442.7, 612.4) 22 (3, 55) 34 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.7, 2.3)
Turner County 2 Urban 488.8 (410.3, 579.2) 38 (6, 59) 30 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.1, 1.5)
Kingsbury County 2 Rural 652.6 (538.6, 786.0) 3 (1, 37) 26 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.4, 1.9)
Marshall County 2 Rural 468.8 (368.9, 590.8) 43 (4, 62) 17 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.5, 4.2)
Hand County 2 Rural 567.1 (430.9, 737.4) 10 (1, 60) 14 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.9, 3.5)
Moody County 2 Rural 524.5 (427.1, 638.9) 21 (2, 58) 23 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.0, 2.6)
Potter County 2 Rural 449.9 (314.6, 632.0) 48 (2, 65) 9 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.2, 3.6)
Corson County 2 Rural 293.8 (191.5, 431.6) 64 (32, 65) 6 stable stable trend 0.9 (-4.1, 6.3)
McPherson County 2 Rural 453.2 (322.2, 629.1) 47 (1, 65) 10 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.0, 3.9)
Ziebach County 2 Rural 312.1 (183.3, 497.0) 62 (12, 65) 4 stable stable trend 1.5 (-2.9, 7.1)
Brule County 2 Rural 505.0 (397.6, 634.2) 28 (2, 61) 17 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.2, 11.9)
Faulk County 2 Rural 559.1 (410.1, 754.7) 14 (1, 61) 10 stable stable trend 2.3 (-0.4, 5.3)
Lake County 2 Rural 565.1 (483.8, 656.7) 11 (1, 47) 43 stable stable trend 2.5 (-1.0, 10.0)
Lincoln County 2 Urban 484.4 (450.3, 520.5) 40 (18, 50) 159 stable stable trend 2.7 (-0.8, 9.2)
Yankton County 2 Rural 532.0 (481.1, 587.2) 17 (6, 45) 86 rising rising trend 5.1 (0.2, 15.7)
Meade County 2 Urban 396.5 (355.0, 441.7) 57 (39, 62) 73 stable stable trend 6.4 (-2.6, 12.7)
Bennett County 2 Rural 517.5 (367.9, 706.8) 23 (1, 64) 8 stable stable trend 13.2 (-1.4, 33.0)
Sully County 2 Rural 424.8 (260.1, 668.0) 52 (1, 65) 5
*
*
Harding County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/19/2026 10:23 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top