Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Minnesota by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Rate

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Minnesota 2 N/A 463.4 (460.2, 466.8) N/A 16,341 rising rising trend 0.7 (0.6, 0.9)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 424.8 (424.4, 425.2) N/A 891,437 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
Koochiching County 2 Rural 384.5 (327.2, 450.5) 87 (33, 87) 40 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.7, 1.5)
Roseau County 2 Rural 387.6 (331.2, 451.4) 86 (30, 87) 39 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.1, 2.3)
Stevens County 2 Rural 395.1 (317.6, 485.9) 85 (8, 87) 22 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.1, 2.6)
Cook County 2 Rural 403.4 (315.2, 512.6) 84 (4, 87) 20 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.1, 3.6)
Yellow Medicine County 2 Rural 409.3 (341.5, 488.1) 83 (11, 87) 29 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.8, 1.6)
Benton County 2 Urban 415.7 (378.3, 455.8) 82 (37, 87) 95 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 1.0)
McLeod County 2 Rural 415.8 (379.7, 454.6) 81 (36, 87) 109 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.4, 1.8)
Winona County 2 Rural 422.6 (389.1, 458.4) 80 (35, 87) 133 falling falling trend -4.7 (-9.4, -2.1)
Rock County 2 Urban 428.9 (357.4, 511.6) 79 (3, 87) 29 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.9, 2.1)
Freeborn County 2 Rural 429.9 (389.1, 474.0) 78 (22, 87) 100 stable stable trend -0.8 (-9.0, 1.2)
Nobles County 2 Rural 431.3 (379.7, 488.1) 77 (12, 87) 56 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.5, 1.3)
Houston County 2 Urban 432.2 (380.6, 489.4) 76 (11, 87) 59 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.4, 2.3)
Todd County 2 Rural 432.5 (386.2, 483.1) 75 (16, 87) 76 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.1, 2.5)
Lake County 2 Rural 434.9 (370.0, 509.7) 74 (5, 87) 40 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.4, 3.1)
Swift County 2 Rural 436.5 (367.3, 516.3) 73 (4, 87) 34 stable stable trend 9.1 (-1.9, 18.6)
Meeker County 2 Rural 437.5 (389.9, 489.8) 72 (12, 87) 70 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.3, 2.2)
Blue Earth County 2 Urban 437.8 (406.6, 470.8) 71 (28, 85) 161 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.2, 1.2)
Lac qui Parle County 2 Rural 437.9 (352.2, 540.6) 70 (2, 87) 24 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.0, 1.9)
Cass County 2 Rural 438.5 (397.8, 482.6) 69 (19, 86) 108 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.9, 0.8)
Jackson County 2 Rural 438.7 (366.9, 521.5) 68 (4, 87) 32 rising rising trend 2.4 (0.7, 4.2)
Hennepin County 2 Urban 441.5 (434.6, 448.4) 67 (54, 77) 3,313 stable stable trend 0.3 (0.0, 0.6)
Aitkin County 2 Rural 445.4 (390.8, 507.1) 66 (7, 87) 69 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 1.2)
Nicollet County 2 Urban 446.2 (403.8, 491.8) 65 (13, 86) 90 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.4, 1.8)
Stearns County 2 Urban 447.9 (427.8, 468.7) 64 (35, 79) 404 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.5, 0.8)
Carver County 2 Urban 449.0 (424.7, 474.3) 63 (29, 81) 269 rising rising trend 0.9 (0.2, 1.7)
Dodge County 2 Urban 450.5 (397.0, 509.3) 62 (7, 86) 54 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.1, 1.9)
Carlton County 2 Urban 454.0 (414.4, 496.7) 61 (11, 85) 108 rising rising trend 1.2 (0.1, 2.4)
Crow Wing County 2 Rural 455.2 (426.6, 485.4) 60 (22, 83) 228 rising rising trend 0.6 (0.2, 1.1)
Ramsey County 2 Urban 455.4 (444.8, 466.3) 59 (38, 71) 1,489 stable stable trend 0.4 (0.0, 0.8)
Kanabec County 2 Rural 456.4 (399.6, 519.6) 58 (4, 87) 53 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.4, 2.8)
Dakota County 2 Urban 460.0 (448.2, 472.0) 57 (35, 69) 1,222 rising rising trend 0.6 (0.3, 0.9)
Scott County 2 Urban 460.3 (438.9, 482.6) 56 (24, 77) 360 rising rising trend 0.6 (0.1, 1.2)
Steele County 2 Rural 460.4 (421.6, 502.0) 55 (8, 83) 114 rising rising trend 1.6 (0.5, 2.8)
Sherburne County 2 Urban 461.2 (434.4, 489.3) 54 (18, 79) 230 rising rising trend 0.9 (0.1, 1.8)
St. Louis County 2 Urban 462.8 (445.5, 480.5) 53 (26, 72) 636 rising rising trend 0.6 (0.1, 1.1)
Fillmore County 2 Urban 464.2 (412.7, 520.7) 52 (5, 86) 70 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.9, 1.1)
Wadena County 2 Rural 466.4 (405.1, 535.1) 51 (3, 87) 48 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.9, 2.5)
Faribault County 2 Rural 469.4 (407.4, 539.1) 50 (2, 86) 49 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.1, 3.5)
Goodhue County 2 Rural 471.3 (436.9, 507.9) 49 (9, 79) 158 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.4, 1.4)
Martin County 2 Rural 472.3 (419.3, 530.6) 48 (3, 85) 71 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.8, 1.6)
Cottonwood County 2 Rural 472.7 (403.7, 550.9) 47 (2, 87) 41 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.2, 3.8)
Pope County 2 Rural 473.5 (402.1, 554.9) 46 (2, 87) 40 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.3, 10.2)
Wabasha County 2 Urban 474.4 (423.5, 530.1) 45 (4, 84) 75 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.6, 2.6)
Mille Lacs County 2 Urban 475.0 (429.0, 524.9) 44 (5, 82) 86 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.1, 2.7)
Marshall County 2 Rural 477.1 (396.5, 570.0) 43 (1, 87) 30 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.1, 3.7)
Red Lake County 2 Rural 478.9 (359.3, 628.0) 42 (1, 87) 13 stable stable trend 2.0 (-1.3, 5.5)
Polk County 2 Urban 480.0 (435.7, 527.8) 41 (4, 80) 98 rising rising trend 1.2 (0.3, 2.0)
Wright County 2 Urban 480.2 (458.2, 503.1) 40 (13, 65) 368 rising rising trend 1.4 (0.6, 2.3)
Pine County 2 Rural 480.9 (435.8, 529.9) 39 (4, 81) 99 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.5, 1.3)
Clearwater County 2 Rural 481.6 (399.1, 577.2) 38 (1, 87) 28 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.9, 4.2)
Itasca County 2 Rural 483.0 (446.7, 521.7) 37 (6, 75) 162 rising rising trend 1.2 (0.5, 2.0)
Mower County 2 Rural 483.1 (443.8, 525.0) 36 (5, 77) 125 stable stable trend 1.0 (0.0, 2.1)
Le Sueur County 2 Urban 483.4 (437.8, 532.7) 35 (3, 80) 89 rising rising trend 1.6 (0.6, 2.6)
Rice County 2 Rural 483.8 (452.0, 517.4) 34 (7, 73) 188 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.1, 1.9)
Sibley County 2 Rural 485.0 (420.9, 556.6) 33 (2, 85) 47 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.9, 3.3)
Otter Tail County 2 Rural 486.6 (454.6, 520.3) 32 (6, 71) 220 rising rising trend 1.7 (1.2, 2.3)
Hubbard County 2 Rural 487.1 (435.1, 544.2) 31 (2, 82) 80 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.1, 1.7)
Pennington County 2 Rural 487.1 (421.9, 560.0) 30 (1, 85) 45 rising rising trend 2.0 (0.2, 4.0)
Anoka County 2 Urban 487.5 (474.0, 501.3) 29 (15, 50) 1,048 rising rising trend 0.9 (0.6, 1.4)
Douglas County 2 Rural 488.9 (450.5, 529.9) 28 (4, 76) 145 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.9, 2.7)
Brown County 2 Rural 490.6 (442.8, 542.5) 27 (2, 80) 92 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.2, 1.8)
Kandiyohi County 2 Rural 490.9 (453.2, 531.1) 26 (4, 72) 144 stable stable trend 0.8 (0.0, 1.7)
Waseca County 2 Rural 491.5 (436.5, 552.0) 25 (2, 81) 62 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.3, 2.9)
Kittson County 2 Rural 492.7 (380.1, 631.8) 24 (1, 87) 16 stable stable trend -0.2 (-9.9, 2.3)
Watonwan County 2 Rural 492.7 (419.0, 576.2) 23 (1, 86) 37 rising rising trend 5.2 (1.4, 15.9)
Redwood County 2 Rural 492.9 (429.8, 563.0) 22 (1, 84) 52 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.6, 3.0)
Washington County 2 Urban 496.4 (480.9, 512.3) 21 (10, 45) 821 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.6, 1.4)
Isanti County 2 Urban 501.2 (462.0, 543.0) 20 (3, 70) 129 rising rising trend 1.9 (1.3, 2.7)
Morrison County 2 Rural 501.9 (459.2, 547.7) 19 (2, 72) 117 rising rising trend 1.2 (0.1, 2.4)
Lyon County 2 Rural 503.2 (453.0, 557.7) 18 (2, 74) 80 rising rising trend 1.4 (0.4, 2.5)
Lincoln County 2 Rural 503.3 (401.2, 625.4) 17 (1, 87) 21 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.1, 3.5)
Murray County 2 Rural 506.1 (424.0, 601.2) 16 (1, 86) 33 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.7, 3.2)
Becker County 2 Rural 506.6 (463.7, 552.6) 15 (2, 67) 120 rising rising trend 2.3 (1.5, 3.1)
Chippewa County 2 Rural 508.7 (439.2, 586.8) 14 (1, 83) 45 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.3, 2.7)
Norman County 2 Rural 510.7 (412.8, 626.1) 13 (1, 87) 22 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.5, 3.6)
Olmsted County 2 Urban 513.4 (492.8, 534.6) 12 (5, 38) 506 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.2, 1.5)
Chisago County 2 Urban 516.0 (481.1, 552.9) 11 (2, 54) 176 rising rising trend 2.3 (1.1, 6.0)
Lake of the Woods County 2 Rural 524.6 (397.8, 683.4) 10 (1, 87) 14 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.3, 3.7)
Beltrami County 2 Rural 527.8 (487.9, 570.3) 9 (1, 51) 144 rising rising trend 1.8 (0.5, 3.3)
Renville County 2 Rural 528.3 (461.3, 603.0) 8 (1, 78) 53 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.3, 3.0)
Clay County 2 Urban 528.4 (493.6, 565.1) 7 (1, 44) 181 rising rising trend 1.6 (1.1, 2.2)
Big Stone County 2 Rural 533.1 (419.4, 669.9) 6 (1, 87) 21 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.5, 3.4)
Grant County 2 Rural 538.1 (441.1, 652.6) 5 (1, 84) 25 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.9, 3.2)
Wilkin County 2 Rural 538.5 (438.5, 656.1) 4 (1, 86) 23 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.9, 4.6)
Mahnomen County 2 Rural 544.9 (433.0, 677.9) 3 (1, 87) 18 rising rising trend 3.3 (0.9, 11.6)
Pipestone County 2 Rural 570.2 (484.7, 667.3) 2 (1, 69) 37 rising rising trend 7.9 (2.9, 17.9)
Traverse County 2 Rural 594.2 (444.1, 781.4) 1 (1, 87) 14 stable stable trend 3.4 (-0.2, 7.4)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/20/2026 2:24 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top