Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Mississippi by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Mississippi 2 N/A 544.7 (539.6, 549.9) N/A 9,193 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.1, -0.9)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 484.8 (484.4, 485.3) N/A 929,608 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.8)
Sunflower County 2 Rural 543.1 (487.9, 603.0) 44 (7, 79) 77 stable stable trend -9.9 (-20.3, 1.4)
Lauderdale County 2 Rural 473.0 (443.8, 503.7) 77 (53, 82) 208 falling falling trend -5.8 (-8.9, -3.6)
Hancock County 2 Urban 522.7 (486.7, 561.0) 53 (23, 78) 173 falling falling trend -5.6 (-12.6, -0.6)
Bolivar County 2 Rural 545.8 (492.2, 603.7) 43 (5, 78) 88 stable stable trend -2.9 (-12.7, 0.4)
Lafayette County 2 Rural 483.4 (442.4, 527.1) 73 (39, 82) 119 falling falling trend -2.9 (-7.3, -1.1)
DeSoto County 2 Urban 515.6 (494.0, 537.9) 59 (38, 73) 471 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.4, -1.0)
Leflore County 2 Rural 571.9 (514.9, 633.5) 31 (2, 71) 80 falling falling trend -2.3 (-8.7, -0.4)
Claiborne County 2 Rural 483.1 (393.7, 587.3) 74 (6, 82) 24 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.6, 0.6)
Leake County 2 Rural 466.5 (413.9, 524.3) 79 (37, 82) 61 falling falling trend -2.0 (-7.8, -0.8)
Adams County 2 Rural 489.1 (444.7, 537.2) 70 (34, 82) 98 falling falling trend -1.9 (-4.8, -0.8)
Perry County 2 Urban 543.0 (469.7, 625.3) 46 (2, 82) 42 stable stable trend -1.8 (-10.6, 0.4)
Lawrence County 2 Rural 617.8 (537.0, 708.0) 8 (1, 68) 46 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.8, -0.5)
Calhoun County 2 Rural 616.2 (540.4, 700.2) 9 (1, 69) 51 stable stable trend -1.6 (-11.7, 0.9)
Lincoln County 2 Rural 510.6 (466.0, 558.4) 61 (22, 81) 105 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.9, -0.4)
Montgomery County 2 Rural 497.7 (422.1, 584.2) 67 (9, 82) 35 stable stable trend -1.6 (-10.6, 0.3)
Sharkey County 2 Rural 534.1 (405.6, 693.5) 49 (1, 82) 13 stable stable trend -1.6 (-5.1, 1.4)
Copiah County 2 Urban 528.5 (479.1, 581.9) 51 (12, 81) 92 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.6)
Kemper County 2 Rural 502.2 (423.1, 593.2) 65 (6, 82) 31 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.0, 0.2)
Scott County 2 Urban 520.8 (468.8, 577.1) 55 (13, 81) 79 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.0, 0.1)
Prentiss County 2 Rural 542.1 (488.5, 600.2) 47 (7, 79) 79 falling falling trend -1.3 (-4.9, -0.2)
Rankin County 2 Urban 471.0 (450.3, 492.5) 78 (60, 82) 409 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6)
Warren County 2 Rural 483.5 (445.0, 524.7) 72 (40, 82) 130 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.5)
Hinds County 2 Urban 576.9 (556.6, 597.7) 26 (12, 47) 669 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.5)
Tate County 2 Urban 520.5 (470.5, 574.5) 56 (15, 81) 87 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.9, 0.1)
Wilkinson County 2 Rural 555.6 (469.5, 654.0) 40 (1, 82) 32 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.9, 2.0)
Winston County 2 Rural 502.1 (445.0, 565.0) 66 (15, 82) 61 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.4, 0.2)
Amite County 2 Rural 511.9 (446.2, 585.9) 60 (10, 82) 52 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.8, 0.7)
Clay County 2 Rural 589.7 (526.9, 658.5) 21 (1, 68) 70 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.6, 0.1)
Franklin County 2 Rural 482.8 (400.4, 578.8) 75 (7, 82) 27 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.0, 1.1)
Grenada County 2 Rural 535.2 (478.8, 596.7) 48 (8, 80) 71 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.5, 0.6)
Pike County 2 Rural 627.8 (581.1, 677.4) 4 (1, 42) 144 falling falling trend -1.0 (-2.0, -0.1)
Alcorn County 2 Rural 502.2 (460.1, 547.5) 64 (30, 81) 109 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.6)
Newton County 2 Rural 516.0 (458.0, 579.6) 58 (12, 82) 61 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.3, 0.4)
Noxubee County 2 Rural 506.5 (425.1, 599.6) 62 (5, 82) 31 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.0, 1.2)
Webster County 2 Rural 609.6 (511.4, 720.9) 14 (1, 79) 33 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.8, 1.0)
Lowndes County 2 Rural 543.1 (506.0, 582.2) 45 (15, 72) 174 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.3)
Stone County 2 Urban 563.3 (499.1, 633.9) 36 (2, 78) 63 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.4)
Harrison County 2 Urban 570.4 (550.3, 590.9) 32 (15, 50) 664 falling falling trend -0.7 (-2.4, -0.2)
Lee County 2 Rural 623.4 (588.8, 659.6) 6 (1, 32) 266 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.2)
Panola County 2 Rural 546.7 (499.9, 596.8) 42 (10, 74) 110 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.4)
Pearl River County 2 Rural 567.9 (532.5, 605.2) 33 (7, 61) 210 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.1)
Monroe County 2 Rural 603.6 (556.3, 654.1) 17 (1, 54) 130 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.4)
Washington County 2 Rural 554.6 (511.8, 600.1) 41 (10, 71) 140 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.1, 0.4)
Yazoo County 2 Urban 583.7 (526.0, 645.9) 22 (2, 69) 82 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.1)
Jefferson County 2 Rural 599.5 (497.0, 718.0) 19 (1, 81) 26 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.7, 1.9)
Neshoba County 2 Rural 502.8 (453.7, 555.9) 63 (22, 82) 82 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.9, 0.9)
Benton County 2 Urban 493.7 (407.3, 594.4) 68 (6, 82) 25 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.7, 1.9)
Jefferson Davis County 2 Rural 577.1 (501.2, 662.4) 25 (1, 79) 47 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.8)
Lamar County 2 Urban 533.6 (498.1, 570.9) 50 (18, 75) 179 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.5)
Yalobusha County 2 Rural 574.7 (501.3, 656.7) 29 (1, 78) 49 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.4, 1.8)
Oktibbeha County 2 Rural 463.8 (422.6, 507.9) 81 (48, 82) 99 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.1)
Forrest County 2 Urban 625.8 (589.0, 664.2) 5 (1, 35) 228 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.6, 0.4)
Tishomingo County 2 Rural 558.9 (499.9, 623.5) 39 (3, 78) 71 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 0.9)
Chickasaw County 2 Rural 637.6 (569.7, 711.7) 3 (1, 53) 68 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.4, 1.5)
Tunica County 2 Urban 575.7 (480.5, 684.6) 28 (1, 82) 28 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.6, 1.8)
Union County 2 Rural 574.1 (521.0, 631.4) 30 (2, 71) 90 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.2, 1.1)
Jasper County 2 Rural 611.6 (545.2, 684.4) 12 (1, 61) 68 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.0, 1.2)
Attala County 2 Rural 520.1 (460.2, 586.2) 57 (8, 82) 58 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.5, 2.0)
Carroll County 2 Rural 492.4 (422.9, 571.8) 69 (14, 82) 40 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.6, 2.2)
Jones County 2 Rural 578.0 (543.8, 613.8) 24 (6, 56) 229 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.7, 1.1)
Marshall County 2 Urban 566.0 (520.2, 615.0) 35 (5, 68) 124 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.6, 1.2)
Simpson County 2 Urban 559.6 (507.4, 616.0) 38 (4, 73) 91 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.0, 1.4)
Walthall County 2 Rural 559.6 (490.8, 636.2) 37 (2, 80) 52 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.6, 2.1)
Wayne County 2 Rural 521.4 (462.6, 586.1) 54 (9, 82) 62 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.0, 1.6)
George County 2 Rural 488.8 (435.2, 547.3) 71 (23, 82) 68 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.8, 1.4)
Jackson County 2 Urban 525.4 (503.1, 548.5) 52 (34, 70) 454 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.6, 2.2)
Smith County 2 Rural 609.7 (539.0, 687.8) 13 (1, 66) 58 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.5, 2.2)
Pontotoc County 2 Rural 599.0 (546.8, 655.0) 20 (1, 61) 104 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.5, 1.4)
Tallahatchie County 2 Rural 579.6 (502.2, 666.0) 23 (1, 79) 43 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.0, 1.8)
Covington County 2 Rural 613.2 (548.1, 684.3) 10 (1, 64) 68 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.3, 1.6)
Marion County 2 Rural 603.0 (547.6, 662.8) 18 (1, 60) 93 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.2, 1.9)
Choctaw County 2 Rural 465.3 (389.3, 553.8) 80 (17, 82) 28 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.7, 2.6)
Madison County 2 Urban 567.0 (537.2, 598.0) 34 (12, 59) 315 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.6, 4.9)
Quitman County 2 Rural 619.8 (504.4, 755.0) 7 (1, 80) 22 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.4, 3.3)
Tippah County 2 Rural 606.1 (545.8, 671.6) 15 (1, 60) 79 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.5, 2.8)
Coahoma County 2 Rural 640.9 (572.3, 715.5) 2 (1, 52) 71 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.1, 3.6)
Clarke County 2 Rural 575.9 (510.2, 648.4) 27 (1, 74) 62 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.7, 7.9)
Itawamba County 2 Rural 604.9 (548.9, 665.5) 16 (1, 62) 89 rising rising trend 3.6 (0.2, 10.4)
Humphreys County 2 Rural 612.2 (510.0, 730.0) 11 (1, 78) 28 stable stable trend 7.1 (-1.2, 16.2)
Holmes County 2 Urban 669.4 (593.4, 752.7) 1 (1, 44) 60 rising rising trend 9.3 (0.5, 15.4)
Greene County 2 Rural 477.5 (410.4, 552.7) 76 (18, 82) 39 rising rising trend 10.6 (0.6, 18.7)
Issaquena County 2 Rural 461.0 (262.4, 784.5) 82 (1, 82) 3
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/19/2026 1:55 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

2 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2024 submission).

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top