Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for North Carolina by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
North Carolina 2 N/A 528.3 (525.7, 531.0) N/A 31,748 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.4)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 484.8 (484.4, 485.3) N/A 929,608 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.8)
Harnett County 2 Rural 516.5 (491.2, 542.8) 67 (25, 90) 339 falling falling trend -3.6 (-7.8, -0.7)
Camden County 2 Urban 420.4 (350.4, 501.1) 96 (31, 100) 28 falling falling trend -2.6 (-5.0, -0.1)
Currituck County 2 Urban 322.9 (285.9, 363.8) 99 (97, 100) 62 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.0, -0.8)
Jackson County 2 Rural 494.5 (456.2, 535.5) 83 (24, 95) 137 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.6, 0.7)
Brunswick County 2 Urban 530.6 (510.6, 551.2) 59 (24, 80) 725 falling falling trend -2.0 (-4.6, -0.2)
Rockingham County 2 Urban 536.3 (509.9, 563.8) 50 (11, 82) 341 falling falling trend -2.0 (-5.3, -0.8)
Carteret County 2 Rural 495.5 (468.3, 524.1) 82 (41, 94) 283 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.4, -1.2)
Lenoir County 2 Rural 557.7 (522.3, 595.1) 25 (3, 79) 201 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.8, -0.9)
Vance County 2 Rural 544.9 (503.6, 588.8) 40 (3, 89) 141 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.0, -0.5)
Granville County 2 Rural 592.9 (557.8, 629.8) 5 (1, 48) 233 falling falling trend -1.7 (-5.0, -0.8)
Pasquotank County 2 Rural 419.9 (383.2, 459.3) 97 (85, 98) 102 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.8, -0.5)
Gates County 2 Urban 311.6 (257.4, 375.7) 100 (96, 100) 25 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.3, 1.1)
Wilkes County 2 Rural 478.7 (450.2, 508.7) 90 (54, 96) 230 falling falling trend -1.6 (-4.4, -0.9)
Cabarrus County 2 Urban 521.7 (502.1, 541.8) 64 (27, 85) 581 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.9, -0.8)
Durham County 2 Urban 485.5 (469.5, 501.9) 88 (67, 93) 748 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.8)
Stokes County 2 Urban 513.9 (478.2, 552.0) 68 (18, 94) 169 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.9, 0.6)
Alleghany County 2 Rural 380.1 (326.1, 442.7) 98 (89, 100) 39 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.2)
Hertford County 2 Rural 524.7 (469.9, 584.6) 62 (3, 95) 72 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.3)
Jones County 2 Rural 575.3 (496.1, 665.5) 13 (1, 94) 42 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.1, 0.5)
Nash County 2 Urban 479.0 (453.2, 506.0) 89 (58, 96) 284 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6)
Rowan County 2 Urban 526.0 (504.2, 548.5) 61 (23, 84) 476 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.5)
Cherokee County 2 Rural 487.2 (446.7, 531.1) 87 (24, 96) 133 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.2, -0.3)
Henderson County 2 Urban 511.9 (490.3, 534.3) 70 (35, 90) 469 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.4)
Hoke County 2 Urban 559.3 (512.3, 609.2) 23 (1, 84) 124 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.3)
Perquimans County 2 Rural 453.6 (395.6, 519.5) 94 (27, 98) 52 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.5, 0.2)
Wake County 2 Urban 499.8 (490.8, 508.9) 80 (64, 88) 2,595 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.7)
Craven County 2 Rural 545.9 (519.9, 572.9) 37 (8, 78) 357 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.2)
Hyde County 2 Rural 561.1 (449.8, 695.5) 20 (1, 98) 20 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.6, 1.5)
Iredell County 2 Urban 545.2 (525.1, 565.9) 39 (14, 70) 609 falling falling trend -1.0 (-2.1, -0.4)
Montgomery County 2 Rural 506.2 (459.6, 556.7) 75 (10, 96) 96 falling falling trend -1.0 (-4.4, -0.2)
Lee County 2 Rural 511.6 (478.5, 546.5) 71 (20, 93) 191 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.1)
Mecklenburg County 2 Urban 516.6 (507.1, 526.3) 66 (49, 80) 2,493 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.6)
Stanly County 2 Rural 559.2 (526.0, 594.1) 24 (3, 73) 228 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.9, -0.2)
Wilson County 2 Rural 524.5 (494.8, 555.7) 63 (17, 89) 252 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Buncombe County 2 Urban 505.6 (490.4, 521.1) 76 (50, 89) 897 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Guilford County 2 Urban 544.7 (532.3, 557.4) 42 (20, 62) 1,549 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Watauga County 2 Rural 470.1 (435.3, 507.3) 92 (55, 97) 146 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
Ashe County 2 Rural 492.5 (449.8, 538.9) 84 (21, 96) 112 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.1)
Bertie County 2 Rural 500.8 (445.1, 562.4) 78 (7, 97) 65 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.4)
Bladen County 2 Rural 513.2 (469.0, 560.9) 69 (9, 95) 111 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.2)
Chatham County 2 Urban 507.2 (480.9, 534.8) 74 (32, 93) 304 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
Macon County 2 Rural 511.5 (474.4, 551.3) 72 (15, 94) 164 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.2)
Martin County 2 Rural 536.0 (483.7, 593.1) 52 (2, 94) 87 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 0.6)
Northampton County 2 Rural 535.5 (478.3, 598.6) 54 (2, 95) 76 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.4)
Person County 2 Urban 554.8 (513.1, 599.1) 31 (3, 85) 148 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.3)
Randolph County 2 Urban 538.7 (516.8, 561.4) 45 (14, 77) 494 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.4)
Warren County 2 Rural 502.1 (451.2, 558.3) 77 (8, 96) 80 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.4)
Caswell County 2 Rural 562.6 (510.7, 618.9) 18 (1, 89) 96 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.1)
Dare County 2 Rural 471.8 (434.7, 511.8) 91 (47, 97) 138 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.5)
Graham County 2 Rural 422.5 (351.2, 506.0) 95 (29, 100) 27 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.8, 2.7)
Greene County 2 Rural 545.4 (486.2, 610.0) 38 (1, 94) 69 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.7, 1.5)
Alamance County 2 Urban 555.9 (534.7, 577.8) 29 (7, 63) 545 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0)
Clay County 2 Rural 499.9 (438.9, 569.6) 79 (4, 97) 57 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.4, 1.6)
Columbus County 2 Rural 538.2 (502.6, 575.9) 46 (6, 89) 182 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0)
Edgecombe County 2 Urban 592.4 (553.0, 634.1) 6 (1, 54) 187 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.9, 0.9)
Gaston County 2 Urban 577.2 (558.1, 596.9) 12 (4, 39) 742 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.1)
Johnston County 2 Urban 532.9 (512.6, 553.8) 56 (20, 78) 590 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.9, -0.1)
Lincoln County 2 Urban 560.4 (532.1, 589.8) 21 (4, 69) 328 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.4)
Catawba County 2 Urban 532.0 (511.2, 553.5) 58 (20, 79) 535 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.1)
Franklin County 2 Urban 556.4 (523.4, 591.1) 28 (3, 77) 234 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.3)
Surry County 2 Rural 536.0 (506.4, 567.1) 51 (10, 86) 263 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.5)
Avery County 2 Rural 491.7 (439.6, 549.3) 86 (10, 97) 68 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.6, 1.1)
Cumberland County 2 Urban 533.2 (516.1, 550.8) 55 (22, 76) 786 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.7, 0.1)
Davidson County 2 Urban 537.6 (517.6, 558.2) 49 (17, 75) 589 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.4)
Halifax County 2 Rural 544.7 (508.3, 583.3) 41 (4, 86) 182 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.3)
Moore County 2 Urban 566.7 (541.7, 592.7) 16 (4, 61) 420 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.5)
Transylvania County 2 Rural 467.1 (430.8, 506.3) 93 (54, 97) 147 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.9)
Burke County 2 Urban 555.5 (528.5, 583.7) 30 (5, 71) 343 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.6)
Rutherford County 2 Rural 578.6 (546.3, 612.5) 11 (1, 57) 267 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.8, 0.4)
Union County 2 Urban 543.3 (523.9, 563.3) 43 (15, 72) 660 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.7)
Davie County 2 Urban 553.2 (515.2, 593.5) 34 (3, 85) 169 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.7, 0.8)
Chowan County 2 Rural 541.4 (476.6, 613.7) 44 (1, 95) 57 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.9, 2.1)
New Hanover County 2 Urban 532.1 (514.4, 550.3) 57 (24, 76) 722 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.4, 0.6)
Wayne County 2 Urban 582.4 (555.9, 609.8) 9 (2, 52) 391 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.1, 0.8)
Haywood County 2 Rural 550.5 (520.2, 582.4) 35 (5, 79) 272 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.7, 1.1)
Washington County 2 Rural 528.7 (455.9, 611.4) 60 (1, 97) 47 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.4, 1.9)
Sampson County 2 Rural 560.3 (525.3, 597.1) 22 (3, 76) 204 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.5, 1.2)
Alexander County 2 Urban 517.8 (478.0, 560.3) 65 (11, 94) 134 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.8, 3.8)
Pender County 2 Urban 581.0 (546.1, 617.6) 10 (1, 65) 229 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.5, 1.5)
Polk County 2 Rural 492.2 (442.0, 547.6) 85 (17, 97) 88 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.9, 1.9)
McDowell County 2 Rural 631.5 (591.7, 673.4) 2 (1, 30) 203 stable stable trend 0.6 (0.0, 1.3)
Pitt County 2 Urban 507.6 (485.1, 531.0) 73 (34, 91) 411 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.6, 3.1)
Robeson County 2 Rural 556.8 (529.9, 584.6) 27 (5, 69) 356 stable stable trend 0.6 (0.0, 1.4)
Caldwell County 2 Urban 584.8 (555.6, 615.2) 8 (1, 48) 330 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.4, 4.5)
Duplin County 2 Rural 553.9 (516.7, 593.3) 32 (3, 82) 178 stable stable trend 0.8 (0.0, 1.7)
Onslow County 2 Urban 589.9 (564.1, 616.5) 7 (2, 36) 432 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.2, 4.1)
Orange County 2 Urban 496.1 (473.2, 519.9) 81 (45, 93) 382 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.8, 4.5)
Cleveland County 2 Rural 572.1 (544.5, 600.8) 14 (3, 56) 356 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.2, 4.1)
Madison County 2 Urban 535.5 (482.5, 593.4) 53 (2, 94) 82 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.9, 6.6)
Swain County 2 Rural 608.9 (537.6, 687.8) 3 (1, 80) 56 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.3, 3.1)
Forsyth County 2 Urban 538.0 (523.7, 552.7) 48 (23, 69) 1,133 rising rising trend 1.6 (0.1, 3.9)
Anson County 2 Urban 642.1 (582.5, 706.5) 1 (1, 34) 93 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.6, 3.0)
Yancey County 2 Rural 538.1 (484.7, 596.8) 47 (2, 94) 82 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.0, 8.7)
Tyrrell County 2 Rural 570.1 (440.5, 730.3) 15 (1, 98) 15 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.9, 4.9)
Pamlico County 2 Rural 562.1 (497.7, 634.4) 19 (1, 94) 67 stable stable trend 2.0 (-0.3, 8.3)
Beaufort County 2 Rural 553.8 (516.9, 593.0) 33 (3, 82) 192 stable stable trend 2.6 (-0.4, 9.0)
Richmond County 2 Rural 595.2 (553.1, 639.7) 4 (1, 59) 159 rising rising trend 2.7 (1.2, 6.3)
Yadkin County 2 Urban 548.3 (506.9, 592.4) 36 (3, 89) 141 rising rising trend 4.1 (0.3, 10.5)
Mitchell County 2 Rural 557.3 (495.8, 625.4) 26 (1, 93) 67 rising rising trend 6.2 (2.1, 13.3)
Scotland County 2 Rural 563.5 (516.6, 613.6) 17 (1, 85) 115 stable stable trend 8.0 (-0.2, 14.6)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/19/2026 11:53 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

2 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2024 submission).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top