Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Tennessee by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Tennessee 2 N/A 504.4 (501.2, 507.6) N/A 20,269 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.7, -1.7)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 484.8 (484.4, 485.3) N/A 929,608 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.8)
Trousdale County 2 Urban 639.1 (545.3, 744.3) 1 (1, 73) 37 falling falling trend -10.6 (-19.2, -0.2)
Bledsoe County 2 Rural 432.0 (379.4, 491.0) 92 (26, 95) 52 falling falling trend -8.9 (-16.1, -0.6)
Meigs County 2 Rural 501.9 (436.7, 575.2) 59 (3, 94) 48 falling falling trend -7.8 (-12.9, -2.3)
Hardeman County 2 Rural 490.8 (444.2, 541.3) 70 (11, 93) 85 falling falling trend -7.2 (-11.6, -2.4)
Scott County 2 Rural 448.0 (397.6, 503.3) 90 (27, 95) 61 falling falling trend -7.1 (-12.6, -2.1)
Chester County 2 Urban 531.2 (466.8, 602.3) 25 (1, 90) 53 stable stable trend -6.4 (-16.0, 0.5)
Bradley County 2 Urban 457.4 (433.4, 482.5) 86 (56, 93) 289 falling falling trend -6.0 (-9.7, -2.3)
Montgomery County 2 Urban 467.4 (445.6, 489.9) 83 (51, 91) 393 falling falling trend -4.8 (-6.2, -3.2)
Morgan County 2 Urban 449.8 (401.2, 503.1) 89 (29, 95) 67 falling falling trend -3.4 (-10.3, -2.0)
Carroll County 2 Rural 557.7 (509.2, 609.9) 15 (1, 78) 105 stable stable trend -3.3 (-11.9, 0.9)
Claiborne County 2 Rural 541.0 (496.4, 588.9) 19 (2, 81) 119 falling falling trend -3.3 (-8.7, -0.8)
Giles County 2 Rural 455.4 (413.8, 500.5) 87 (31, 95) 97 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.8, -1.7)
Greene County 2 Rural 517.2 (488.3, 547.7) 38 (10, 80) 261 stable stable trend -3.0 (-7.4, 0.2)
Lincoln County 2 Rural 403.2 (366.0, 443.5) 94 (79, 95) 94 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.8, -1.6)
Stewart County 2 Urban 457.9 (397.4, 525.8) 85 (13, 95) 45 falling falling trend -2.8 (-14.3, -0.7)
Benton County 2 Rural 533.7 (474.6, 599.1) 24 (1, 88) 67 falling falling trend -2.4 (-5.4, -0.9)
Houston County 2 Rural 492.8 (412.7, 585.6) 68 (2, 95) 29 stable stable trend -2.4 (-14.8, 1.0)
Polk County 2 Urban 512.0 (454.9, 574.9) 46 (2, 92) 65 falling falling trend -2.4 (-7.1, -0.8)
Smith County 2 Urban 530.4 (472.2, 594.3) 26 (2, 89) 67 stable stable trend -2.4 (-11.2, 0.2)
Union County 2 Urban 545.4 (487.1, 609.3) 18 (1, 86) 73 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.9, -1.3)
Jackson County 2 Rural 479.0 (414.8, 551.9) 76 (5, 95) 46 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.8, -0.4)
Anderson County 2 Urban 510.6 (482.7, 539.9) 49 (13, 82) 267 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.1, -1.2)
Blount County 2 Urban 493.9 (473.2, 515.3) 66 (30, 83) 464 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.6, -1.2)
Overton County 2 Rural 461.1 (413.0, 513.8) 84 (20, 94) 73 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.0, -0.5)
Sequatchie County 2 Urban 472.6 (417.6, 533.7) 80 (13, 94) 58 falling falling trend -1.6 (-6.5, -0.1)
Cannon County 2 Urban 526.3 (459.3, 600.7) 29 (1, 93) 48 falling falling trend -1.5 (-5.9, -0.3)
Hamilton County 2 Urban 513.7 (500.0, 527.7) 42 (24, 67) 1,130 stable stable trend -1.4 (-6.0, 0.4)
Knox County 2 Urban 505.4 (493.0, 518.1) 55 (31, 73) 1,332 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.9)
Grainger County 2 Urban 482.4 (434.3, 534.9) 75 (12, 94) 85 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.2)
Fentress County 2 Rural 516.1 (459.8, 578.1) 40 (3, 91) 71 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.1, 1.1)
Sumner County 2 Urban 516.4 (497.0, 536.3) 39 (17, 72) 580 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.8)
Coffee County 2 Rural 498.2 (464.6, 533.7) 62 (17, 88) 173 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.1)
Franklin County 2 Rural 523.7 (485.6, 564.1) 32 (6, 84) 153 stable stable trend -1.0 (-6.4, 0.0)
Hawkins County 2 Urban 490.1 (458.6, 523.3) 72 (21, 90) 200 falling falling trend -1.0 (-2.7, -0.2)
Putnam County 2 Rural 490.2 (460.6, 521.2) 71 (24, 89) 217 stable stable trend -1.0 (-1.9, 0.0)
Shelby County 2 Urban 501.4 (491.8, 511.2) 60 (38, 73) 2,273 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.6)
Sullivan County 2 Urban 492.9 (474.0, 512.5) 67 (33, 83) 555 falling falling trend -1.0 (-2.8, -0.5)
DeKalb County 2 Rural 520.2 (465.6, 579.9) 36 (3, 90) 72 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.2)
Dickson County 2 Urban 559.3 (521.6, 599.0) 12 (2, 63) 178 falling falling trend -0.9 (-2.3, -0.1)
Henry County 2 Rural 557.8 (514.9, 603.7) 14 (2, 71) 138 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.3, 0.0)
White County 2 Rural 520.8 (474.0, 571.3) 35 (4, 89) 97 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.3, 0.5)
Lauderdale County 2 Rural 513.0 (459.8, 570.8) 44 (3, 91) 74 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.9, -0.1)
Roane County 2 Urban 507.3 (475.6, 540.8) 53 (11, 84) 215 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.1)
Sevier County 2 Rural 561.9 (535.4, 589.5) 11 (3, 42) 373 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.6, 0.1)
Unicoi County 2 Urban 425.5 (376.7, 479.9) 93 (43, 95) 59 stable stable trend -0.8 (-8.6, 1.1)
Williamson County 2 Urban 473.3 (456.2, 490.9) 78 (57, 88) 627 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.1)
Campbell County 2 Urban 539.6 (500.6, 581.2) 20 (4, 77) 151 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.4)
Fayette County 2 Urban 523.1 (485.6, 563.1) 34 (6, 81) 164 stable stable trend -0.7 (-8.1, 0.7)
Lewis County 2 Rural 512.7 (446.6, 586.9) 45 (1, 93) 47 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.1, 0.9)
Madison County 2 Urban 504.7 (478.2, 532.2) 56 (18, 83) 295 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.4, 0.6)
Rhea County 2 Rural 576.4 (530.1, 625.8) 7 (1, 55) 124 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.8)
Robertson County 2 Urban 524.2 (491.8, 558.3) 31 (7, 78) 216 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.3)
Washington County 2 Urban 473.1 (452.0, 495.1) 79 (50, 90) 402 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.3, -0.1)
Davidson County 2 Urban 489.9 (478.6, 501.3) 73 (46, 81) 1,584 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 1.3)
Grundy County 2 Rural 496.0 (432.6, 566.9) 65 (3, 94) 47 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.7)
Lawrence County 2 Rural 509.6 (470.9, 550.9) 50 (8, 88) 137 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.6)
Maury County 2 Urban 514.2 (487.5, 542.1) 41 (13, 78) 307 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.2)
Tipton County 2 Urban 570.9 (534.1, 609.7) 9 (1, 47) 196 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.4)
Hickman County 2 Urban 517.3 (467.8, 571.0) 37 (4, 89) 86 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.9, 1.1)
Loudon County 2 Urban 504.2 (473.3, 536.8) 58 (16, 86) 235 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.6)
Rutherford County 2 Urban 501.0 (483.7, 518.7) 61 (29, 78) 728 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.8, 0.1)
Weakley County 2 Rural 496.5 (452.8, 543.5) 64 (8, 91) 101 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.5, 0.6)
McMinn County 2 Rural 511.5 (477.8, 547.2) 47 (11, 84) 185 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.8)
Monroe County 2 Rural 507.8 (472.8, 545.1) 52 (12, 87) 174 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.8, 1.3)
Obion County 2 Rural 488.5 (445.0, 535.4) 74 (13, 93) 101 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.3, 1.6)
Hamblen County 2 Urban 533.9 (500.7, 568.8) 23 (5, 74) 204 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 1.0)
Humphreys County 2 Rural 577.1 (518.6, 641.0) 6 (1, 73) 76 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.8, 1.4)
Pickett County 2 Rural 491.4 (397.4, 606.2) 69 (1, 95) 22 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.4, 2.2)
Warren County 2 Rural 546.9 (505.2, 591.2) 16 (3, 75) 138 stable stable trend -0.2 (-4.0, 0.8)
Wilson County 2 Urban 513.3 (491.1, 536.2) 43 (18, 77) 439 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.6, 0.3)
Carter County 2 Urban 440.8 (411.7, 471.6) 91 (68, 94) 185 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.2, 0.7)
Cheatham County 2 Urban 568.7 (524.2, 616.2) 10 (1, 59) 139 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.2, 1.2)
Perry County 2 Rural 478.1 (401.1, 567.1) 77 (3, 95) 30 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.9, 1.9)
Wayne County 2 Rural 523.7 (464.6, 588.8) 33 (2, 91) 60 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.0, 1.0)
Cocke County 2 Rural 511.3 (471.0, 554.6) 48 (8, 87) 134 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 1.1)
Henderson County 2 Rural 534.1 (486.5, 585.5) 22 (3, 84) 98 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.2, 1.3)
Marshall County 2 Rural 614.3 (565.2, 666.8) 3 (1, 29) 127 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 0.8)
Clay County 2 Rural 469.0 (393.9, 557.0) 82 (5, 95) 29 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.6, 1.8)
Jefferson County 2 Urban 509.1 (476.1, 543.9) 51 (10, 84) 196 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.7, 0.9)
Haywood County 2 Rural 572.5 (508.6, 642.8) 8 (1, 77) 65 stable stable trend 0.2 (-6.0, 3.0)
Moore County 2 Rural 353.1 (281.7, 440.0) 95 (67, 95) 18 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.5, 2.3)
Decatur County 2 Rural 580.4 (506.7, 663.1) 5 (1, 82) 50 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.7, 1.6)
Marion County 2 Urban 581.7 (533.1, 634.0) 4 (1, 59) 117 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.7, 1.7)
Gibson County 2 Urban 546.1 (508.6, 585.8) 17 (3, 71) 166 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.7, 1.7)
Hardin County 2 Rural 504.7 (459.6, 553.5) 57 (6, 90) 103 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.4, 1.5)
Macon County 2 Urban 636.0 (576.6, 700.1) 2 (1, 23) 92 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.7, 1.8)
Bedford County 2 Rural 539.6 (499.5, 581.9) 21 (3, 77) 147 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.4, 1.7)
Hancock County 2 Rural 526.6 (430.8, 638.9) 27 (1, 95) 24 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.0, 3.6)
Lake County 2 Rural 470.7 (378.8, 579.2) 81 (2, 95) 20 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.7, 2.4)
Crockett County 2 Urban 558.6 (488.0, 637.0) 13 (1, 89) 48 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.1, 2.1)
Cumberland County 2 Rural 505.7 (476.8, 536.2) 54 (15, 84) 292 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.4, 3.6)
Dyer County 2 Rural 526.5 (483.3, 572.7) 28 (4, 84) 117 rising rising trend 0.9 (0.1, 1.7)
Johnson County 2 Rural 453.7 (403.7, 509.1) 88 (24, 95) 64 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.7, 2.6)
McNairy County 2 Rural 525.2 (476.2, 578.3) 30 (3, 89) 92 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.1, 2.2)
Van Buren County 2 Rural 498.1 (407.2, 605.7) 63 (1, 95) 24 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.9, 3.7)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/19/2026 10:23 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

2 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2024 submission).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top