Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for West Virginia by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
West Virginia 2 N/A 525.7 (519.8, 531.7) N/A 6,490 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.1, 1.6)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 484.8 (484.4, 485.3) N/A 929,608 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.8)
Wetzel County 2 Rural 492.6 (432.2, 560.1) 43 (5, 54) 53 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.3, -0.2)
McDowell County 2 Rural 453.9 (403.3, 509.8) 50 (21, 55) 64 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.2, -0.9)
Mercer County 2 Rural 502.7 (471.1, 536.0) 40 (13, 50) 206 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.3, -1.4)
Tucker County 2 Rural 528.7 (442.2, 630.6) 25 (1, 54) 31 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.4, -0.4)
Wirt County 2 Urban 486.3 (386.0, 607.2) 46 (1, 55) 19 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.6, 0.9)
Ohio County 2 Urban 524.1 (485.7, 565.0) 27 (6, 48) 153 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.4)
Webster County 2 Rural 414.8 (345.8, 495.8) 53 (22, 55) 29 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.3, 1.0)
Brooke County 2 Urban 508.9 (459.8, 562.5) 38 (5, 52) 88 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.1, -0.2)
Jefferson County 2 Urban 500.9 (467.0, 536.6) 41 (13, 50) 181 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.3)
Monroe County 2 Rural 447.1 (386.9, 515.3) 51 (16, 55) 46 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.4, 0.1)
Tyler County 2 Rural 511.2 (431.6, 603.1) 37 (1, 54) 33 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.6, 0.4)
Boone County 2 Urban 511.9 (461.8, 566.6) 35 (3, 52) 84 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.1)
Calhoun County 2 Rural 492.4 (404.1, 597.5) 44 (1, 55) 26 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.4, 1.5)
Hardy County 2 Rural 360.7 (309.5, 419.1) 55 (49, 55) 39 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.9, 1.1)
Mingo County 2 Rural 539.8 (487.7, 596.5) 18 (2, 48) 90 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.4)
Nicholas County 2 Rural 493.9 (447.6, 544.3) 42 (9, 53) 93 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.2, 0.4)
Putnam County 2 Urban 541.6 (507.3, 577.8) 16 (4, 42) 201 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Berkeley County 2 Urban 513.2 (488.6, 538.8) 33 (14, 46) 360 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.2)
Clay County 2 Urban 568.4 (484.5, 664.8) 7 (1, 51) 36 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.5, 0.9)
Greenbrier County 2 Rural 512.5 (471.2, 556.9) 34 (6, 51) 128 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.2)
Hampshire County 2 Urban 454.6 (409.3, 504.3) 49 (23, 54) 85 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.3)
Harrison County 2 Rural 552.1 (520.3, 585.4) 12 (3, 37) 242 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Pleasants County 2 Rural 605.8 (512.9, 712.0) 3 (1, 46) 33 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.6, 1.4)
Upshur County 2 Rural 476.1 (429.5, 526.9) 47 (14, 54) 83 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.0, 0.8)
Wyoming County 2 Rural 511.5 (458.3, 569.6) 36 (4, 52) 77 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.2)
Marshall County 2 Urban 522.9 (480.1, 568.9) 29 (4, 49) 122 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.6)
Mason County 2 Rural 536.9 (488.4, 589.4) 19 (2, 48) 99 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.3)
Roane County 2 Rural 535.7 (472.8, 605.7) 22 (1, 50) 58 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.0, 1.0)
Jackson County 2 Rural 557.4 (510.3, 608.0) 10 (1, 43) 111 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.3)
Ritchie County 2 Rural 513.3 (434.9, 603.7) 32 (1, 54) 35 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.7, 1.0)
Marion County 2 Rural 569.7 (534.4, 607.0) 6 (1, 31) 207 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.3)
Cabell County 2 Urban 573.7 (545.7, 602.8) 5 (2, 26) 333 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.7, 0.4)
Logan County 2 Rural 610.2 (562.8, 660.7) 2 (1, 24) 138 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.6)
Fayette County 2 Urban 546.1 (507.2, 587.5) 14 (3, 42) 161 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.9, 0.6)
Braxton County 2 Rural 525.2 (460.9, 597.2) 26 (2, 52) 53 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.2, 1.2)
Lewis County 2 Rural 559.1 (498.7, 625.6) 8 (1, 47) 67 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.5, 1.5)
Lincoln County 2 Rural 626.6 (567.1, 691.2) 1 (1, 23) 89 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 1.1)
Pendleton County 2 Rural 401.1 (325.8, 492.4) 54 (26, 55) 23 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.5, 1.5)
Grant County 2 Rural 462.4 (397.9, 536.0) 48 (9, 55) 40 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.7, 2.1)
Morgan County 2 Urban 513.9 (457.5, 576.3) 31 (3, 53) 71 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.5, 1.8)
Raleigh County 2 Urban 536.0 (507.0, 566.2) 21 (5, 43) 279 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.8, 1.1)
Gilmer County 2 Rural 523.2 (436.6, 623.4) 28 (1, 54) 26 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.5, 1.9)
Randolph County 2 Rural 548.1 (503.2, 596.5) 13 (2, 46) 117 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.5, 1.1)
Pocahontas County 2 Rural 507.0 (429.6, 596.9) 39 (2, 54) 35 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.7, 2.8)
Taylor County 2 Rural 558.3 (497.6, 625.2) 9 (1, 48) 66 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.1, 1.8)
Monongalia County 2 Urban 487.9 (459.9, 517.2) 45 (23, 51) 247 stable stable trend 1.0 (0.0, 2.8)
Kanawha County 2 Urban 536.0 (517.0, 555.6) 20 (8, 37) 655 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.6, 5.2)
Summers County 2 Rural 529.8 (459.6, 609.4) 24 (1, 52) 50 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.9, 3.3)
Preston County 2 Urban 517.7 (476.4, 562.0) 30 (5, 50) 125 stable stable trend 1.8 (0.0, 6.5)
Wood County 2 Urban 552.6 (524.9, 581.4) 11 (3, 36) 321 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.2, 3.9)
Hancock County 2 Urban 540.9 (496.4, 588.9) 17 (2, 46) 121 stable stable trend 2.3 (-1.1, 5.8)
Doddridge County 2 Rural 434.7 (363.0, 518.6) 52 (10, 55) 28 rising rising trend 2.7 (1.0, 4.7)
Wayne County 2 Urban 595.4 (553.9, 639.5) 4 (1, 26) 166 rising rising trend 3.5 (1.4, 8.3)
Mineral County 2 Rural 532.7 (486.4, 582.7) 23 (3, 48) 105 rising rising trend 3.6 (0.1, 10.3)
Barbour County 2 Rural 544.2 (482.0, 613.0) 15 (1, 50) 60 stable stable trend 8.9 (-0.2, 15.9)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/19/2026 6:48 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

2 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2024 submission).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top