Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Oklahoma by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Rate

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Oklahoma 2 N/A 431.0 (427.2, 434.8) N/A 10,395 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.4, 0.3)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 424.8 (424.4, 425.2) N/A 891,437 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
Cimarron County 2 Rural 218.6 (130.7, 355.9) 77 (58, 77) 4 stable stable trend -2.1 (-8.6, 3.5)
Harmon County 2 Rural 271.7 (177.6, 406.8) 76 (23, 77) 6 stable stable trend -11.7 (-32.8, 0.7)
Love County 2 Rural 318.8 (257.6, 390.9) 75 (41, 77) 20 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.3, 2.9)
Ellis County 2 Rural 341.6 (246.8, 465.1) 74 (4, 77) 10 stable stable trend -2.2 (-29.6, 1.7)
Cotton County 2 Urban 345.9 (265.7, 445.3) 73 (6, 77) 14 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.3, 1.2)
Greer County 2 Rural 349.7 (261.3, 460.7) 72 (3, 77) 12 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.7, 1.7)
Woodward County 2 Rural 356.0 (308.7, 408.7) 71 (32, 76) 44 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.3, 1.2)
Roger Mills County 2 Rural 357.5 (253.1, 494.5) 70 (1, 77) 9 stable stable trend 1.4 (-2.5, 5.7)
Major County 2 Rural 358.6 (285.6, 445.6) 69 (8, 77) 19 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.0, 1.6)
Texas County 2 Rural 362.3 (309.7, 421.1) 68 (26, 76) 35 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.5, 2.9)
Woods County 2 Rural 365.3 (289.5, 455.5) 67 (8, 77) 18 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.2, 2.3)
Murray County 2 Rural 380.5 (323.4, 445.5) 66 (13, 76) 35 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.0, 1.7)
Custer County 2 Rural 383.9 (339.8, 432.3) 65 (19, 75) 59 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.3, 1.4)
Atoka County 2 Rural 386.3 (326.8, 454.3) 64 (9, 76) 35 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.6, 2.5)
Beaver County 2 Rural 388.7 (294.5, 505.6) 63 (1, 77) 13 stable stable trend 2.3 (-0.5, 5.3)
Marshall County 2 Rural 391.2 (337.8, 451.2) 62 (12, 75) 44 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.9, 2.7)
Bryan County 2 Rural 394.3 (362.3, 428.5) 61 (27, 72) 121 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.3)
Tillman County 2 Rural 396.2 (315.4, 492.7) 60 (1, 76) 19 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.6, 2.6)
Delaware County 2 Rural 396.4 (363.1, 432.2) 59 (24, 72) 128 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 0.9)
Carter County 2 Rural 397.0 (365.1, 431.1) 58 (26, 72) 124 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 0.8)
Beckham County 2 Rural 399.5 (347.9, 456.6) 57 (9, 74) 47 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.5, 0.9)
Jackson County 2 Rural 400.6 (353.7, 452.0) 56 (10, 73) 57 falling falling trend -1.4 (-7.1, -0.2)
Cleveland County 2 Urban 404.1 (390.2, 418.4) 55 (38, 66) 667 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.1)
Canadian County 2 Urban 405.5 (386.3, 425.3) 54 (35, 67) 349 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
Kingfisher County 2 Rural 406.6 (348.3, 472.1) 53 (4, 74) 38 falling falling trend -7.1 (-12.6, -4.2)
Adair County 2 Rural 410.5 (358.7, 468.0) 52 (5, 73) 48 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.5, 2.0)
Pittsburg County 2 Rural 412.7 (378.9, 448.8) 51 (15, 70) 125 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.5, 1.3)
Wagoner County 2 Urban 415.7 (390.3, 442.5) 50 (22, 67) 212 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.2, 1.2)
Oklahoma County 2 Urban 422.7 (414.1, 431.5) 49 (31, 55) 1,912 stable stable trend 0.4 (0.0, 2.1)
Haskell County 2 Rural 423.8 (359.0, 497.8) 48 (1, 74) 34 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.9, 2.1)
Logan County 2 Urban 425.7 (392.9, 460.6) 47 (12, 67) 135 falling falling trend -1.5 (-3.1, -0.5)
Comanche County 2 Urban 426.0 (403.1, 449.8) 46 (17, 62) 275 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.2, 1.1)
Seminole County 2 Rural 426.3 (380.8, 476.0) 45 (5, 70) 69 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.7, 1.1)
Pushmataha County 2 Rural 427.1 (361.9, 501.7) 44 (1, 73) 36 stable stable trend -4.5 (-13.2, 3.7)
McIntosh County 2 Rural 427.7 (379.1, 481.6) 43 (4, 70) 68 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.1, 1.6)
Craig County 2 Rural 428.7 (369.3, 495.7) 42 (2, 72) 42 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.9, 1.0)
Creek County 2 Urban 430.0 (403.3, 458.1) 41 (13, 62) 210 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.4)
Garfield County 2 Urban 432.3 (402.2, 464.1) 40 (10, 63) 167 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.6)
Le Flore County 2 Rural 433.3 (399.7, 469.2) 39 (9, 64) 135 stable stable trend -1.3 (-6.6, 1.5)
Alfalfa County 2 Rural 434.1 (329.7, 563.8) 38 (1, 76) 14 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.0, 2.2)
Nowata County 2 Rural 436.2 (364.3, 519.2) 37 (1, 74) 29 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.3, 2.3)
Pontotoc County 2 Rural 436.9 (398.6, 478.1) 36 (5, 66) 104 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.4, 0.8)
Tulsa County 2 Urban 438.5 (429.0, 448.1) 35 (21, 46) 1,725 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.2, 0.9)
Choctaw County 2 Rural 441.0 (381.5, 507.7) 34 (1, 71) 45 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.2)
Noble County 2 Rural 442.0 (374.5, 519.1) 33 (1, 72) 35 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.2, 2.8)
Kiowa County 2 Rural 442.7 (362.0, 536.8) 32 (1, 74) 25 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.1, 2.3)
Rogers County 2 Urban 445.4 (421.0, 470.8) 31 (8, 54) 267 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.3, 1.3)
Grady County 2 Urban 445.4 (413.4, 479.3) 30 (5, 59) 154 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.9, 1.0)
Latimer County 2 Rural 447.9 (373.5, 533.7) 29 (1, 72) 29 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.9, 3.0)
Lincoln County 2 Urban 449.4 (410.0, 491.9) 28 (3, 63) 105 rising rising trend 2.9 (0.8, 9.6)
Osage County 2 Urban 450.5 (416.8, 486.4) 27 (4, 58) 151 stable stable trend 0.9 (0.0, 1.8)
Grant County 2 Rural 450.5 (336.3, 592.7) 26 (1, 76) 13 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.1, 3.1)
Washita County 2 Rural 451.8 (378.4, 535.6) 25 (1, 72) 31 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.9, 2.3)
Hughes County 2 Rural 451.9 (385.2, 527.4) 24 (1, 71) 38 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.9, 2.1)
Stephens County 2 Rural 453.8 (419.5, 490.4) 23 (3, 58) 147 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.4, 0.9)
Garvin County 2 Rural 454.3 (407.3, 505.5) 22 (2, 64) 75 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.6, 1.8)
Washington County 2 Rural 456.8 (424.7, 490.8) 21 (4, 53) 169 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.2, 1.0)
Ottawa County 2 Rural 458.3 (415.0, 505.2) 20 (1, 61) 91 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.6, 1.9)
Johnston County 2 Rural 460.3 (386.2, 545.2) 19 (1, 71) 31 rising rising trend 8.0 (0.8, 19.2)
Blaine County 2 Rural 461.1 (381.9, 552.9) 18 (1, 72) 28 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.9, 2.5)
Kay County 2 Rural 462.7 (426.4, 501.5) 17 (2, 55) 136 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.8, 1.2)
Cherokee County 2 Rural 464.1 (428.4, 502.0) 16 (2, 52) 137 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.3, 1.8)
Dewey County 2 Rural 465.3 (351.1, 605.5) 15 (1, 75) 13 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.7, 4.9)
McClain County 2 Urban 465.9 (427.7, 506.6) 14 (2, 52) 116 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.9, 1.3)
McCurtain County 2 Rural 467.0 (423.4, 514.1) 13 (1, 57) 92 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.1, 2.1)
Payne County 2 Rural 469.1 (437.8, 502.0) 12 (2, 48) 181 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.6, 1.6)
Caddo County 2 Rural 473.3 (423.2, 527.9) 11 (1, 63) 73 falling falling trend -2.5 (-6.3, -0.3)
Coal County 2 Rural 480.8 (376.0, 606.9) 10 (1, 74) 17 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.2, 2.2)
Sequoyah County 2 Urban 482.2 (443.7, 523.2) 9 (1, 46) 127 stable stable trend -2.4 (-10.3, 3.2)
Muskogee County 2 Rural 483.1 (452.8, 515.0) 8 (1, 39) 204 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.1, 1.0)
Pawnee County 2 Urban 485.6 (425.6, 552.3) 7 (1, 60) 53 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.3, 3.2)
Pottawatomie County 2 Rural 485.7 (456.8, 515.9) 6 (1, 33) 223 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.2, 1.5)
Okfuskee County 2 Rural 486.3 (412.0, 570.8) 5 (1, 68) 34 stable stable trend 1.3 (0.0, 2.8)
Jefferson County 2 Rural 490.7 (387.8, 614.2) 4 (1, 73) 18 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.8, 2.4)
Okmulgee County 2 Urban 492.0 (451.4, 535.4) 3 (1, 41) 122 rising rising trend 1.4 (0.9, 2.0)
Mayes County 2 Rural 507.0 (467.1, 549.5) 2 (1, 32) 131 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.3, 2.2)
Harper County 2 Rural 529.5 (400.3, 692.7) 1 (1, 73) 13 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.2, 4.1)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/20/2026 3:03 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

2 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2024 submission).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top