Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Mississippi by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Mississippi 2 N/A 419.5 (415.2, 423.7) N/A 8,004 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.4)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 424.8 (424.4, 425.2) N/A 891,437 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
Bolivar County 2 Rural 367.7 (330.0, 408.7) 81 (27, 82) 76 falling falling trend -16.3 (-25.5, -6.9)
Tishomingo County 2 Rural 520.9 (465.3, 581.9) 4 (1, 31) 72 falling falling trend -11.0 (-17.5, -4.3)
Alcorn County 2 Rural 386.0 (349.9, 425.0) 69 (20, 82) 92 falling falling trend -9.4 (-13.3, -1.3)
Pearl River County 2 Rural 432.8 (402.1, 465.2) 28 (9, 67) 165 falling falling trend -5.3 (-11.0, -0.1)
Jefferson County 2 Rural 422.0 (340.5, 518.5) 33 (3, 82) 21 stable stable trend -4.3 (-24.5, 1.3)
Walthall County 2 Rural 405.2 (347.6, 470.1) 49 (6, 82) 40 stable stable trend -4.1 (-12.2, 1.9)
DeSoto County 2 Urban 409.8 (392.5, 427.6) 44 (26, 69) 435 stable stable trend -2.0 (-5.2, 0.4)
Marion County 2 Rural 398.4 (355.6, 445.4) 56 (12, 82) 69 stable stable trend -1.3 (-7.4, 0.5)
Scott County 2 Urban 398.0 (355.8, 444.1) 57 (12, 82) 69 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.7, 0.3)
Stone County 2 Urban 401.3 (349.3, 459.1) 51 (8, 82) 47 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.6, 0.7)
Amite County 2 Rural 374.4 (318.0, 439.0) 78 (10, 82) 39 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.8, 1.0)
Franklin County 2 Rural 365.4 (294.9, 449.3) 82 (9, 82) 21 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.8, 2.1)
Harrison County 2 Urban 443.6 (427.1, 460.6) 22 (11, 46) 581 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.6, 0.7)
Hinds County 2 Urban 421.9 (406.5, 437.8) 34 (20, 59) 604 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.7, 0.3)
Leake County 2 Rural 404.4 (356.7, 457.0) 50 (8, 82) 56 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.2, 1.8)
Panola County 2 Rural 409.8 (371.6, 451.1) 43 (10, 80) 90 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.9, 1.0)
Clarke County 2 Rural 369.8 (319.3, 426.7) 80 (13, 82) 44 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.6, 1.4)
Perry County 2 Urban 451.0 (384.3, 526.8) 18 (2, 80) 35 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.4, 1.3)
Rankin County 2 Urban 395.3 (377.6, 413.5) 60 (33, 77) 395 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.7, 0.6)
Washington County 2 Rural 419.5 (386.3, 454.8) 38 (10, 77) 130 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.0, 0.5)
Winston County 2 Rural 377.4 (329.4, 431.1) 74 (15, 82) 50 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.6, 1.4)
Itawamba County 2 Rural 456.8 (409.3, 508.7) 14 (3, 67) 72 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.9, 1.9)
Jefferson Davis County 2 Rural 395.9 (334.5, 466.4) 59 (7, 82) 35 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.6, 1.6)
Jones County 2 Rural 398.8 (371.4, 427.7) 55 (20, 79) 173 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 1.0)
Jasper County 2 Rural 383.0 (331.0, 441.5) 71 (11, 82) 44 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.3, 2.4)
Lincoln County 2 Rural 377.9 (342.8, 416.0) 73 (27, 82) 90 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.3, 1.7)
Madison County 2 Urban 439.8 (416.9, 463.6) 23 (10, 54) 292 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.6, 1.0)
Warren County 2 Rural 397.1 (364.2, 432.3) 58 (19, 81) 118 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.7, 0.9)
Holmes County 2 Urban 446.7 (390.0, 509.5) 20 (3, 79) 49 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.2, 2.7)
Oktibbeha County 2 Rural 388.0 (351.8, 426.9) 66 (19, 82) 91 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.5, 2.0)
Prentiss County 2 Rural 419.9 (375.4, 468.5) 37 (7, 79) 71 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.5, 2.0)
Forrest County 2 Urban 426.4 (398.7, 455.6) 31 (11, 69) 186 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.8, 1.3)
Lafayette County 2 Rural 392.4 (359.9, 427.1) 61 (21, 81) 113 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.9, 1.6)
Tate County 2 Urban 433.5 (390.4, 480.2) 26 (6, 76) 79 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.7, 1.5)
Carroll County 2 Rural 386.4 (321.1, 463.0) 68 (7, 82) 29 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.7, 2.7)
Lamar County 2 Urban 406.7 (377.8, 437.1) 48 (17, 78) 153 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.5, 1.4)
Lawrence County 2 Rural 400.6 (339.0, 470.9) 52 (5, 82) 33 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.3, 2.1)
Lee County 2 Rural 453.3 (427.4, 480.4) 15 (7, 48) 240 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.1, 1.0)
Montgomery County 2 Rural 433.4 (366.9, 509.9) 27 (3, 82) 34 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.6, 2.3)
Neshoba County 2 Rural 390.1 (348.7, 435.2) 64 (15, 82) 69 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.9, 1.8)
Pike County 2 Rural 415.7 (380.2, 453.7) 40 (10, 78) 110 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.6, 1.3)
Copiah County 2 Urban 408.7 (367.2, 453.8) 46 (8, 81) 78 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.8, 3.8)
Jackson County 2 Urban 446.3 (426.7, 466.6) 21 (9, 45) 414 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.5, 1.8)
Lauderdale County 2 Rural 385.2 (360.0, 411.9) 70 (31, 81) 190 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.1, 1.4)
Lowndes County 2 Rural 413.5 (384.5, 444.3) 41 (13, 75) 162 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.6, 1.8)
Wayne County 2 Rural 410.5 (360.2, 466.0) 42 (7, 82) 53 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.8, 2.0)
Yalobusha County 2 Rural 461.3 (397.7, 533.0) 13 (2, 78) 43 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.2, 2.4)
Pontotoc County 2 Rural 465.5 (421.8, 512.7) 12 (3, 59) 87 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.4, 1.9)
Chickasaw County 2 Rural 432.3 (378.4, 492.1) 29 (4, 80) 51 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.8, 3.4)
Sunflower County 2 Rural 391.3 (346.1, 441.0) 63 (11, 82) 59 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.6, 2.2)
Wilkinson County 2 Rural 386.7 (312.7, 474.3) 67 (5, 82) 22 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.3, 4.0)
Calhoun County 2 Rural 420.5 (362.4, 486.2) 36 (5, 82) 42 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.5, 2.4)
Tunica County 2 Urban 505.6 (421.0, 602.2) 7 (1, 76) 27 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.1, 2.9)
Newton County 2 Rural 408.8 (360.2, 462.4) 45 (8, 82) 55 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.3, 2.2)
Adams County 2 Rural 407.4 (366.5, 451.9) 47 (11, 81) 88 stable stable trend 1.1 (0.0, 2.2)
Grenada County 2 Rural 511.8 (458.5, 569.8) 6 (1, 36) 74 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.3, 2.6)
Attala County 2 Rural 434.8 (382.9, 492.3) 25 (4, 79) 56 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.3, 2.7)
Benton County 2 Urban 421.1 (343.4, 512.6) 35 (3, 82) 23 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.4, 3.9)
Hancock County 2 Urban 436.1 (403.1, 471.3) 24 (7, 67) 150 rising rising trend 1.2 (0.2, 2.2)
Marshall County 2 Urban 392.2 (355.8, 431.5) 62 (17, 82) 94 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.2, 2.7)
Union County 2 Rural 418.5 (376.0, 464.8) 39 (8, 80) 74 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.5, 3.1)
Kemper County 2 Rural 381.1 (307.6, 467.6) 72 (6, 82) 23 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.4, 4.0)
Tippah County 2 Rural 375.6 (330.0, 426.0) 75 (18, 82) 53 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.3, 3.0)
Yazoo County 2 Urban 469.5 (418.6, 525.1) 10 (2, 63) 68 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.1, 2.6)
Humphreys County 2 Rural 484.2 (399.3, 582.8) 9 (1, 80) 25 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.2, 4.0)
Leflore County 2 Rural 451.9 (407.0, 500.5) 17 (4, 70) 80 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.1, 3.0)
Noxubee County 2 Rural 375.3 (310.0, 450.8) 76 (9, 82) 25 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.1, 4.0)
George County 2 Rural 399.3 (352.1, 451.3) 53 (11, 82) 56 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.1, 3.9)
Simpson County 2 Urban 467.6 (422.3, 516.9) 11 (3, 60) 84 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.9, 3.0)
Tallahatchie County 2 Rural 424.9 (359.0, 500.0) 32 (4, 82) 33 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.2, 4.1)
Monroe County 2 Rural 452.4 (413.7, 494.1) 16 (5, 60) 112 rising rising trend 2.0 (0.6, 3.6)
Smith County 2 Rural 450.7 (392.0, 516.4) 19 (3, 78) 47 stable stable trend 2.0 (-0.1, 4.1)
Coahoma County 2 Rural 492.6 (440.2, 549.7) 8 (2, 48) 70 rising rising trend 2.2 (0.6, 3.8)
Greene County 2 Rural 388.7 (326.3, 460.4) 65 (7, 82) 30 stable stable trend 2.2 (-0.2, 4.8)
Sharkey County 2 Rural 545.2 (417.4, 702.2) 3 (1, 81) 15 stable stable trend 2.3 (-2.1, 6.4)
Claiborne County 2 Rural 372.4 (300.5, 456.8) 79 (7, 82) 21 rising rising trend 3.3 (0.4, 6.6)
Choctaw County 2 Rural 375.1 (304.8, 458.2) 77 (6, 82) 23 rising rising trend 3.4 (1.2, 5.8)
Quitman County 2 Rural 631.3 (528.4, 750.3) 2 (1, 15) 28 rising rising trend 3.6 (1.2, 6.3)
Covington County 2 Rural 516.9 (458.9, 580.5) 5 (1, 36) 61 rising rising trend 4.9 (2.1, 12.9)
Webster County 2 Rural 430.3 (361.7, 509.1) 30 (3, 82) 31 stable stable trend 8.3 (-1.0, 15.5)
Clay County 2 Rural 399.3 (350.6, 453.2) 54 (10, 82) 54 rising rising trend 9.2 (1.8, 15.1)
Issaquena County 2 Rural 641.2 (385.0, 1,039.7) 1 (1, 82) 4
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/18/2026 12:53 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

2 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2024 submission).

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top