Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for South Dakota by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
South Dakota 2 N/A 442.0 (433.7, 450.4) N/A 2,393 rising rising trend 0.7 (0.4, 1.6)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 424.8 (424.4, 425.2) N/A 891,437 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
Custer County 2 Urban 358.4 (293.7, 436.9) 54 (18, 64) 30 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.8, 1.1)
Fall River County 2 Rural 423.7 (345.2, 518.0) 35 (7, 61) 27 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.1, 0.6)
Turner County 2 Urban 438.2 (360.5, 528.6) 26 (7, 59) 26 stable stable trend -1.5 (-9.2, 1.1)
Oglala Lakota County 2 Rural 371.4 (299.2, 455.2) 50 (14, 64) 20 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.5, 1.8)
Day County 2 Rural 420.9 (328.0, 534.8) 38 (6, 62) 19 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.2, 1.5)
Lake County 2 Rural 345.4 (282.4, 419.3) 59 (21, 64) 26 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.3, 1.8)
Lawrence County 2 Rural 350.5 (311.1, 394.0) 57 (34, 63) 69 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.8)
Tripp County 2 Rural 367.8 (281.9, 473.8) 51 (11, 64) 16 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.3, 1.1)
Haakon County 2 Rural 440.7 (295.4, 644.8) 25 (2, 64) 7 stable stable trend -0.4 (-4.8, 4.2)
Pennington County 2 Urban 428.8 (406.2, 452.5) 32 (19, 45) 308 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.2)
Union County 2 Urban 433.1 (377.3, 495.3) 28 (10, 55) 47 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.7, 1.0)
Bon Homme County 2 Rural 354.4 (270.9, 457.8) 55 (12, 64) 16 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.5, 2.8)
Bennett County 2 Rural 389.3 (271.4, 542.7) 47 (5, 64) 7 stable stable trend -0.2 (-4.2, 4.1)
Brule County 2 Rural 352.4 (273.3, 450.8) 56 (15, 64) 15 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.4, 3.2)
Davison County 2 Rural 430.6 (379.0, 487.7) 30 (10, 54) 59 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.6, 2.3)
Spink County 2 Rural 364.6 (282.7, 464.3) 52 (13, 64) 17 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.8, 2.3)
Charles Mix County 2 Rural 430.0 (351.1, 521.6) 31 (8, 61) 24 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.5, 2.3)
Douglas County 2 Rural 332.0 (219.2, 487.0) 62 (9, 64) 8 stable stable trend -0.1 (-5.0, 4.3)
Perkins County 2 Rural 346.7 (227.2, 510.0) 58 (7, 64) 7 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.3, 3.1)
Stanley County 2 Rural 448.7 (313.7, 624.0) 23 (2, 64) 8 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.0, 3.5)
Moody County 2 Rural 422.5 (331.8, 531.3) 36 (6, 63) 17 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.1, 2.6)
Potter County 2 Rural 499.4 (335.3, 716.8) 13 (1, 64) 8 stable stable trend 0.2 (-4.3, 4.1)
Beadle County 2 Rural 372.0 (321.7, 428.1) 49 (22, 62) 44 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.8, 2.4)
Brown County 2 Rural 449.3 (410.2, 491.3) 22 (12, 45) 109 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.8, 1.3)
Hughes County 2 Rural 452.4 (396.3, 514.4) 19 (9, 51) 51 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.5, 2.3)
Corson County 2 Rural 269.5 (167.5, 408.4) 64 (21, 64) 5 stable stable trend 0.4 (-5.6, 6.8)
Roberts County 2 Rural 295.3 (236.3, 365.5) 63 (40, 64) 20 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.7, 3.6)
Miner County 2 Rural 433.2 (282.6, 639.9) 27 (2, 64) 7 stable stable trend 0.6 (-3.7, 5.1)
Minnehaha County 2 Urban 513.0 (493.0, 533.5) 11 (7, 21) 535 rising rising trend 0.6 (0.1, 1.1)
Walworth County 2 Rural 375.1 (288.8, 481.8) 48 (10, 64) 16 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.0, 3.2)
Butte County 2 Rural 465.5 (392.7, 548.8) 18 (6, 54) 33 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.7, 2.2)
Deuel County 2 Rural 425.0 (321.0, 555.0) 34 (6, 63) 13 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.7, 3.3)
Grant County 2 Rural 400.2 (324.3, 490.7) 44 (10, 63) 23 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.1, 2.7)
Jones County 2 Rural 665.8 (412.5, 1,049.3) 3 (1, 63) 5 stable stable trend 0.8 (-7.1, 9.0)
Kingsbury County 2 Rural 485.8 (379.2, 614.7) 16 (3, 58) 18 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.5, 4.2)
Hutchinson County 2 Rural 404.7 (324.2, 500.1) 42 (9, 62) 22 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.4, 4.3)
Marshall County 2 Rural 333.2 (249.8, 441.3) 61 (17, 64) 12 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.8, 3.8)
Jerauld County 2 Rural 741.3 (494.1, 1,071.6) 1 (1, 48) 8 stable stable trend 1.1 (-4.4, 6.3)
Lincoln County 2 Urban 449.7 (418.4, 482.7) 21 (12, 43) 160 rising rising trend 1.2 (0.1, 2.7)
Meade County 2 Urban 418.8 (375.2, 466.2) 40 (15, 55) 74 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.3, 3.1)
Gregory County 2 Rural 425.9 (314.3, 567.5) 33 (4, 63) 13 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.5, 4.1)
Codington County 2 Rural 492.2 (446.0, 542.0) 15 (6, 34) 93 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.3, 2.8)
Todd County 2 Rural 512.5 (401.5, 642.7) 12 (2, 55) 17 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.3, 4.8)
McCook County 2 Urban 611.3 (496.6, 745.6) 6 (1, 32) 22 rising rising trend 2.2 (0.6, 3.8)
McPherson County 2 Rural 360.8 (251.5, 515.0) 53 (8, 64) 9 stable stable trend 2.2 (-1.0, 5.5)
Clark County 2 Rural 448.3 (319.2, 612.9) 24 (3, 64) 10 stable stable trend 2.4 (-1.2, 6.0)
Hyde County 2 Rural 404.7 (233.2, 672.0) 43 (2, 64) 4 stable stable trend 2.4 (-2.6, 7.8)
Faulk County 2 Rural 656.9 (467.2, 901.9) 5 (1, 50) 10 stable stable trend 2.5 (-1.2, 6.6)
Dewey County 2 Rural 662.0 (517.8, 832.6) 4 (1, 27) 15 rising rising trend 2.9 (0.5, 5.7)
Jackson County 2 Rural 530.7 (366.2, 741.9) 8 (1, 63) 7 stable stable trend 3.0 (-1.5, 8.3)
Sanborn County 2 Rural 519.6 (356.6, 735.4) 10 (1, 62) 8 stable stable trend 3.0 (-1.3, 7.6)
Clay County 2 Rural 527.4 (446.0, 619.1) 9 (3, 42) 33 rising rising trend 3.1 (1.5, 5.0)
Edmunds County 2 Rural 399.0 (292.8, 533.9) 45 (6, 64) 12 rising rising trend 3.1 (0.7, 5.6)
Hamlin County 2 Rural 421.5 (322.0, 541.9) 37 (5, 63) 13 stable stable trend 3.1 (-0.4, 6.9)
Hand County 2 Rural 393.0 (262.9, 565.5) 46 (4, 64) 8 rising rising trend 3.8 (0.3, 7.3)
Aurora County 2 Rural 683.2 (503.0, 908.0) 2 (1, 44) 12 rising rising trend 4.4 (0.4, 8.8)
Hanson County 2 Rural 472.4 (317.1, 673.8) 17 (1, 64) 7 rising rising trend 4.7 (1.0, 8.7)
Brookings County 2 Rural 407.5 (361.6, 457.6) 41 (16, 57) 63 stable stable trend 6.2 (-0.5, 12.3)
Yankton County 2 Rural 432.3 (383.4, 486.0) 29 (12, 53) 67 rising rising trend 6.9 (3.0, 17.2)
Lyman County 2 Rural 496.1 (359.0, 668.3) 14 (1, 62) 10 rising rising trend 14.5 (0.2, 34.0)
Buffalo County 2 Rural 541.0 (331.8, 830.0) 7 (1, 64) 4
*
*
Mellette County 2 Rural 418.9 (259.8, 643.8) 39 (2, 64) 5
*
*
Sully County 2 Rural 451.7 (277.4, 709.8) 20 (1, 64) 5
*
*
Ziebach County 2 Rural 340.5 (207.3, 528.1) 60 (6, 64) 4
*
*
Campbell County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harding County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/18/2026 2:06 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

2 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2024 submission).

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top