Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Arkansas by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2018-2022

Black Non-Hispanic, Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Arkansas 2 N/A 493.6 (484.3, 503.1) N/A 2,331 rising rising trend 0.4 (0.1, 0.8)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 452.3 (451.4, 453.2) N/A 199,962 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.6)
Cleveland County 2 Rural 698.0 (493.7, 964.6) 1 (1, 41) 8 stable stable trend 2.4 (-2.4, 8.2)
Dallas County 2 Rural 637.5 (521.3, 773.7) 2 (1, 31) 24 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.2, 3.3)
Arkansas County 2 Rural 597.6 (503.5, 704.7) 3 (1, 33) 31 stable stable trend 1.7 (0.0, 3.8)
Poinsett County 2 Urban 592.8 (443.6, 775.7) 4 (1, 44) 12 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.3, 2.1)
Garland County 2 Urban 581.3 (509.9, 659.7) 5 (1, 29) 52 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.3, 2.7)
Desha County 2 Rural 579.8 (495.6, 674.8) 6 (1, 34) 39 rising rising trend 2.5 (0.9, 4.1)
Drew County 2 Rural 562.2 (473.8, 662.7) 7 (1, 38) 31 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.4, 1.5)
Pope County 2 Rural 557.4 (397.0, 759.4) 8 (1, 47) 9 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.7, 4.6)
Faulkner County 2 Urban 550.9 (482.0, 626.3) 9 (2, 35) 55 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.7, 2.9)
Jefferson County 2 Rural 542.9 (510.9, 576.6) 10 (4, 25) 237 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.1, 1.2)
Craighead County 2 Urban 540.7 (466.9, 622.1) 11 (1, 38) 50 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.9, 2.3)
Lonoke County 2 Urban 529.5 (440.9, 630.6) 12 (1, 43) 27 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.7, 3.9)
Hot Spring County 2 Rural 527.6 (432.0, 638.5) 13 (1, 44) 23 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.5, 2.9)
Monroe County 2 Rural 523.5 (419.0, 647.9) 14 (1, 45) 20 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.1, 1.9)
Prairie County 2 Rural 520.2 (345.7, 758.0) 15 (1, 48) 7 stable stable trend 1.7 (-3.3, 7.6)
Mississippi County 2 Rural 515.3 (459.6, 575.7) 16 (4, 38) 72 rising rising trend 1.6 (0.8, 2.5)
Union County 2 Rural 510.4 (457.5, 567.8) 17 (5, 38) 75 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.5, 1.9)
Bradley County 2 Rural 507.6 (409.1, 624.4) 18 (1, 46) 20 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.2, 5.5)
Pulaski County 2 Urban 502.4 (485.0, 520.3) 19 (12, 30) 712 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.4, 0.4)
Ashley County 2 Rural 501.8 (422.2, 592.9) 20 (3, 44) 32 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.5, 2.0)
Clark County 2 Rural 495.6 (414.1, 589.0) 21 (3, 45) 28 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.2, 3.2)
Conway County 2 Rural 494.2 (389.2, 621.1) 22 (2, 47) 17 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.5, 1.9)
Crittenden County 2 Urban 492.3 (451.2, 536.1) 23 (9, 38) 120 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.5, 3.0)
Washington County 2 Urban 491.4 (380.2, 621.9) 24 (1, 47) 21 stable stable trend 1.1 (-3.3, 7.3)
Saline County 2 Urban 491.4 (407.4, 586.4) 25 (2, 45) 36 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.4, 0.5)
Columbia County 2 Rural 485.9 (420.6, 558.6) 26 (5, 44) 42 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.5, 1.9)
Lee County 2 Rural 472.0 (395.1, 560.4) 27 (5, 46) 29 rising rising trend 1.6 (0.1, 3.2)
White County 2 Rural 471.2 (357.8, 607.1) 28 (2, 48) 14 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.2, 3.5)
Grant County 2 Urban 469.9 (259.5, 795.8) 29 (1, 48) 4
*
*
Cross County 2 Rural 466.6 (379.2, 568.7) 30 (4, 47) 22 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.8, 1.8)
Lafayette County 2 Rural 465.3 (359.0, 595.6) 31 (2, 48) 15 stable stable trend -0.3 (-4.2, 3.6)
Ouachita County 2 Rural 462.4 (406.6, 524.2) 32 (10, 45) 56 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.3, 1.1)
Sebastian County 2 Urban 459.8 (392.6, 535.0) 33 (7, 46) 40 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.9, 3.0)
Chicot County 2 Rural 457.7 (389.2, 535.8) 34 (8, 46) 36 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.9, 3.6)
Crawford County 2 Urban 453.4 (281.9, 687.2) 35 (1, 48) 5 stable stable trend -5.2 (-10.8, 0.8)
St. Francis County 2 Rural 443.6 (391.4, 500.8) 36 (14, 46) 58 rising rising trend 1.4 (0.2, 2.8)
Independence County 2 Rural 443.4 (256.4, 706.5) 37 (1, 48) 4
*
*
Howard County 2 Rural 437.4 (335.5, 561.0) 38 (4, 48) 14 stable stable trend -1.0 (-5.7, 4.0)
Lincoln County 2 Rural 433.9 (336.6, 551.1) 39 (5, 48) 15 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.3, 2.5)
Jackson County 2 Rural 432.1 (326.7, 560.1) 40 (4, 48) 12 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.5, 2.5)
Calhoun County 2 Rural 430.2 (294.8, 615.8) 41 (2, 48) 7 stable stable trend 0.6 (-4.3, 6.0)
Phillips County 2 Rural 426.3 (375.0, 483.0) 42 (19, 47) 55 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.6, 2.7)
Miller County 2 Urban 408.9 (355.9, 467.5) 43 (22, 48) 46 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.0, -0.5)
Nevada County 2 Rural 398.9 (306.9, 511.9) 44 (10, 48) 14 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.6, 1.8)
Benton County 2 Urban 383.7 (290.7, 495.9) 45 (11, 48) 15 stable stable trend -4.3 (-8.0, 2.2)
Hempstead County 2 Rural 381.9 (318.0, 455.2) 46 (24, 48) 27 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.1, 0.7)
Little River County 2 Urban 372.2 (279.3, 488.0) 47 (14, 48) 12 stable stable trend -2.7 (-6.3, 0.7)
Woodruff County 2 Rural 304.4 (218.7, 420.2) 48 (31, 48) 9 falling falling trend -6.2 (-29.2, -1.4)
Baxter County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Boone County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carroll County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cleburne County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Franklin County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fulton County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greene County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Izard County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Johnson County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lawrence County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Logan County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Madison County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marion County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montgomery County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Newton County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pike County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Polk County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Randolph County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scott County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Searcy County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sevier County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sharp County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stone County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Van Buren County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yell County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/19/2026 1:58 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

2 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2024 submission).

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top