Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Mississippi by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2018-2022

Black Non-Hispanic, Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Mississippi 2 N/A 482.8 (476.9, 488.7) N/A 5,584 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.0, -1.1)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 452.3 (451.4, 453.2) N/A 199,962 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.6)
Hancock County 2 Urban 442.4 (352.6, 548.3) 70 (5, 82) 19 falling falling trend -16.5 (-28.1, -2.7)
Perry County 2 Urban 619.4 (494.8, 768.1) 2 (1, 71) 18 falling falling trend -13.1 (-25.7, -1.2)
Sunflower County 2 Rural 488.5 (443.4, 536.9) 35 (10, 75) 95 stable stable trend -10.0 (-21.4, 1.1)
Franklin County 2 Rural 466.8 (361.3, 594.5) 53 (2, 82) 15 falling falling trend -5.7 (-14.2, -0.9)
Bolivar County 2 Rural 457.3 (415.9, 501.9) 61 (17, 79) 102 falling falling trend -5.2 (-13.4, -1.0)
DeSoto County 2 Urban 456.8 (425.1, 490.1) 62 (25, 77) 207 stable stable trend -4.8 (-10.8, 1.1)
Copiah County 2 Urban 427.9 (382.1, 477.8) 75 (29, 81) 70 falling falling trend -3.7 (-9.3, -1.6)
Prentiss County 2 Rural 485.3 (381.5, 608.0) 37 (2, 82) 16 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.6, -0.4)
Lawrence County 2 Rural 511.7 (417.5, 621.3) 23 (2, 80) 23 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.7, 1.2)
Pearl River County 2 Rural 481.4 (411.9, 559.6) 42 (5, 80) 38 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.4, 0.5)
Clarke County 2 Rural 427.6 (358.9, 506.4) 76 (12, 82) 30 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.2, 0.6)
Itawamba County 2 Rural 517.9 (368.0, 707.9) 20 (1, 82) 8 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.8, 1.4)
Lincoln County 2 Rural 477.9 (419.4, 542.3) 43 (8, 80) 56 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.3, 0.8)
Webster County 2 Rural 451.8 (332.2, 603.2) 65 (2, 82) 12 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.8, 2.2)
Noxubee County 2 Rural 476.6 (410.1, 551.0) 46 (6, 81) 41 stable stable trend -1.2 (-5.8, 0.2)
Smith County 2 Rural 599.9 (489.8, 727.8) 5 (1, 69) 23 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.1, 1.8)
Stone County 2 Urban 429.5 (330.1, 549.1) 73 (4, 82) 15 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.2, 2.2)
Carroll County 2 Rural 444.5 (358.4, 546.8) 69 (5, 82) 20 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.7, 1.6)
Lauderdale County 2 Rural 431.9 (400.3, 465.4) 71 (37, 80) 147 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.3)
Neshoba County 2 Rural 460.7 (387.0, 544.2) 59 (5, 82) 29 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.9, 0.8)
Hinds County 2 Urban 489.0 (473.7, 504.7) 34 (21, 57) 841 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.4)
Lowndes County 2 Rural 483.3 (445.7, 523.1) 41 (12, 74) 136 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.1)
Alcorn County 2 Rural 412.7 (330.5, 509.2) 79 (11, 82) 19 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.1, 2.4)
Lamar County 2 Urban 448.2 (384.8, 518.6) 67 (10, 82) 45 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.3, 0.8)
Pike County 2 Rural 500.6 (458.4, 545.6) 29 (8, 68) 114 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.2, 0.4)
Union County 2 Rural 447.3 (359.0, 550.3) 68 (6, 82) 19 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.5, 1.9)
Kemper County 2 Rural 414.2 (343.7, 495.3) 78 (16, 82) 26 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.5, 0.9)
Lee County 2 Rural 514.3 (469.8, 561.7) 22 (5, 65) 112 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.0)
Madison County 2 Urban 484.7 (451.7, 519.4) 38 (13, 70) 184 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
Jackson County 2 Urban 476.4 (441.5, 513.4) 48 (16, 74) 159 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.3)
Montgomery County 2 Rural 430.0 (355.3, 516.8) 72 (11, 82) 25 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.9, 1.7)
Leflore County 2 Rural 514.7 (470.2, 562.3) 21 (5, 64) 108 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.9, 0.8)
Newton County 2 Rural 466.5 (395.1, 547.0) 54 (7, 81) 32 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.0, 0.8)
Rankin County 2 Urban 449.7 (413.7, 488.0) 66 (25, 79) 133 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.1)
Warren County 2 Rural 475.7 (434.4, 519.9) 50 (14, 76) 109 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.3)
Coahoma County 2 Rural 563.4 (511.2, 619.4) 9 (2, 44) 95 stable stable trend -0.5 (-11.7, 2.3)
Scott County 2 Urban 466.2 (408.6, 529.7) 56 (10, 80) 52 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.6)
Washington County 2 Rural 483.6 (451.0, 518.1) 40 (14, 70) 181 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.8, 0.5)
Chickasaw County 2 Rural 506.8 (438.9, 582.4) 26 (3, 78) 43 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.7, 2.0)
Harrison County 2 Urban 467.8 (439.1, 497.8) 52 (22, 73) 223 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.9)
Lafayette County 2 Rural 505.3 (443.7, 572.8) 27 (3, 76) 57 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.0, 1.4)
Humphreys County 2 Rural 575.6 (495.5, 665.3) 8 (1, 64) 39 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.3, 0.9)
Jefferson County 2 Rural 492.8 (421.8, 572.7) 31 (4, 79) 37 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.5, 2.1)
Marion County 2 Rural 507.7 (441.8, 580.9) 25 (3, 78) 46 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.6, 1.1)
Amite County 2 Rural 489.2 (415.9, 572.9) 33 (4, 80) 36 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 1.2)
Choctaw County 2 Rural 398.0 (298.1, 521.7) 80 (7, 82) 12 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.6, 3.2)
Grenada County 2 Rural 518.5 (456.2, 587.2) 19 (3, 74) 55 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.9, 1.6)
Leake County 2 Rural 476.3 (413.4, 546.3) 49 (6, 80) 44 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.7, 1.3)
Pontotoc County 2 Rural 543.2 (454.6, 644.2) 12 (1, 76) 29 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.7, 2.7)
Forrest County 2 Urban 555.8 (512.2, 601.9) 10 (2, 41) 132 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.6)
Tishomingo County 2 Rural 520.0 (321.6, 816.6) 17 (1, 82) 5 stable stable trend -0.1 (-4.9, 5.5)
Attala County 2 Rural 471.3 (407.7, 542.3) 51 (7, 81) 42 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.4, 1.4)
Claiborne County 2 Rural 455.0 (388.7, 529.4) 64 (8, 81) 37 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.8, 1.9)
Wilkinson County 2 Rural 462.6 (392.9, 541.6) 58 (7, 81) 34 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.7, 1.8)
Yazoo County 2 Urban 549.2 (494.3, 608.4) 11 (2, 56) 79 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.4, 1.5)
Jones County 2 Rural 495.4 (450.3, 543.7) 30 (8, 73) 97 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.1, 1.4)
Tate County 2 Urban 466.4 (401.4, 539.0) 55 (7, 81) 43 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.9, 2.2)
Calhoun County 2 Rural 537.0 (441.4, 648.0) 14 (1, 79) 24 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.7, 3.3)
George County 2 Rural 360.1 (248.7, 504.8) 81 (8, 82) 7 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.9, 4.5)
Jasper County 2 Rural 477.3 (419.0, 541.7) 45 (7, 79) 52 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.8, 1.4)
Simpson County 2 Urban 477.5 (417.6, 543.8) 44 (8, 80) 51 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.2, 2.8)
Marshall County 2 Urban 476.5 (431.6, 525.0) 47 (12, 76) 90 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.5, 1.2)
Oktibbeha County 2 Rural 492.3 (443.9, 544.4) 32 (8, 74) 83 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.2, 2.0)
Panola County 2 Rural 488.2 (438.2, 542.2) 36 (7, 76) 79 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.0, 1.7)
Wayne County 2 Rural 428.8 (366.8, 498.4) 74 (15, 82) 37 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.2, 1.9)
Jefferson Davis County 2 Rural 484.1 (419.4, 556.7) 39 (6, 79) 44 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.1, 3.2)
Holmes County 2 Urban 536.5 (484.4, 592.7) 15 (3, 61) 83 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.7, 2.0)
Monroe County 2 Rural 534.1 (475.7, 598.0) 16 (2, 66) 67 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.7, 2.1)
Greene County 2 Rural 356.3 (263.0, 472.0) 82 (19, 82) 10 stable stable trend 0.7 (-3.4, 5.3)
Winston County 2 Rural 502.7 (439.6, 572.5) 28 (4, 76) 50 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.6, 7.2)
Yalobusha County 2 Rural 519.0 (435.8, 614.1) 18 (2, 80) 31 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.7, 2.3)
Clay County 2 Rural 511.0 (454.0, 573.3) 24 (4, 72) 64 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.5, 2.1)
Benton County 2 Urban 427.5 (329.0, 547.4) 77 (4, 82) 14 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.4, 4.8)
Walthall County 2 Rural 459.1 (390.0, 537.4) 60 (7, 81) 34 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.5, 3.0)
Tippah County 2 Rural 466.1 (374.7, 573.8) 57 (3, 82) 20 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.4, 4.6)
Tallahatchie County 2 Rural 537.6 (464.9, 618.5) 13 (2, 72) 41 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.3, 3.3)
Tunica County 2 Urban 578.5 (493.8, 673.1) 7 (1, 67) 39 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.1, 3.4)
Covington County 2 Rural 585.6 (504.2, 676.4) 6 (1, 57) 40 rising rising trend 2.0 (0.4, 3.8)
Quitman County 2 Rural 606.3 (511.4, 714.2) 4 (1, 57) 32 rising rising trend 2.5 (0.8, 4.3)
Adams County 2 Rural 456.5 (414.0, 502.3) 63 (19, 79) 97 stable stable trend 4.6 (-3.1, 15.3)
Issaquena County 2 Rural 840.2 (534.7, 1,268.9) 1 (1, 80) 5 rising rising trend 6.0 (0.9, 12.1)
Sharkey County 2 Rural 607.8 (485.8, 752.1) 3 (1, 74) 20 rising rising trend 15.6 (2.5, 24.7)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/19/2026 3:36 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

2 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2024 submission).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top