Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Georgia by County

Oral Cavity & Pharynx (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Brantley County 7 Urban 23.4 (15.7, 34.1) 1 (1, 83) 6
*
*
Crisp County 7 Rural 22.7 (15.2, 32.9) 2 (1, 90) 6 stable stable trend 20.3 (-0.9, 48.9)
Morgan County 7 Urban 22.2 (14.6, 32.6) 3 (1, 93) 6
*
*
Screven County 7 Rural 19.5 (11.2, 31.9) 4 (1, 102) 4
*
*
Oglethorpe County 7 Urban 19.0 (11.5, 30.2) 5 (1, 101) 4
*
*
Haralson County 7 Urban 18.7 (13.0, 26.2) 6 (1, 96) 7 stable stable trend 1.3 (-2.2, 5.8)
McDuffie County 7 Urban 18.6 (12.0, 27.7) 7 (1, 101) 5 stable stable trend 1.5 (-2.9, 6.9)
Banks County 7 Rural 18.4 (11.5, 28.4) 8 (1, 101) 5
*
*
Camden County 7 Rural 18.3 (13.6, 24.2) 9 (1, 87) 11
*
*
Union County 7 Rural 18.3 (12.3, 26.9) 10 (1, 99) 9 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.3, 3.3)
Berrien County 7 Rural 18.3 (11.4, 28.1) 11 (1, 102) 5
*
*
Greene County 7 Rural 18.1 (11.2, 28.2) 12 (1, 101) 6
*
*
Gilmer County 7 Rural 17.9 (12.7, 24.8) 13 (1, 96) 9 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.5, 5.3)
Pierce County 7 Rural 17.4 (10.8, 26.8) 14 (1, 102) 4
*
*
Jones County 7 Urban 17.3 (11.6, 25.0) 15 (1, 100) 6
*
*
Bryan County 7 Urban 17.1 (11.6, 24.3) 16 (1, 101) 7
*
*
Murray County 7 Urban 17.3 (12.3, 23.7) 17 (1, 97) 8 stable stable trend 1.1 (-3.0, 6.3)
Washington County 7 Rural 17.2 (10.7, 26.5) 18 (1, 102) 5 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.3, 2.5)
Butts County 7 Urban 17.0 (11.0, 25.1) 19 (1, 102) 5 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.8, 7.0)
Jasper County 7 Urban 17.0 (9.9, 27.7) 20 (1, 102) 4
*
*
Madison County 7 Urban 17.0 (11.5, 24.3) 21 (1, 100) 7 stable stable trend 1.2 (-2.1, 6.0)
Bartow County 7 Urban 16.9 (13.8, 20.5) 22 (3, 76) 22 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.6, 3.7)
Pickens County 7 Urban 16.8 (11.9, 23.5) 23 (1, 99) 9 stable stable trend 2.7 (-0.1, 6.9)
Putnam County 7 Rural 16.8 (10.8, 25.5) 24 (1, 102) 6
*
*
Dade County 7 Urban 16.8 (9.8, 27.3) 25 (1, 102) 4
*
*
Grady County 7 Rural 16.5 (10.6, 24.5) 26 (1, 101) 5
*
*
Walker County 7 Urban 16.4 (12.8, 20.8) 27 (3, 90) 15 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.1, 4.0)
Polk County 7 Rural 16.4 (11.9, 22.2) 28 (2, 97) 9 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.8, 5.1)
Stephens County 7 Rural 16.2 (11.0, 23.3) 29 (1, 101) 7 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.7, 5.4)
Tattnall County 7 Rural 16.1 (10.3, 24.2) 30 (1, 102) 5 stable stable trend 2.5 (-0.1, 6.1)
Brooks County 7 Urban 15.9 (9.1, 26.3) 31 (1, 102) 4 stable stable trend 0.5 (-4.1, 6.0)
Spalding County 7 Urban 15.8 (12.3, 20.2) 32 (3, 94) 14 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.3, 5.0)
Richmond County 7 Urban 15.8 (13.5, 18.4) 33 (8, 77) 37 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.3, 2.0)
Catoosa County 7 Urban 15.7 (12.2, 20.1) 34 (4, 92) 14 rising rising trend 2.6 (0.1, 6.3)
Whitfield County 7 Urban 15.7 (12.7, 19.4) 35 (5, 90) 18 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.9, 3.9)
Decatur County 7 Rural 15.7 (10.6, 22.6) 36 (1, 102) 6 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.5, 4.9)
Burke County 7 Urban 15.7 (9.9, 23.9) 37 (1, 102) 5
*
*
White County 7 Rural 15.7 (10.5, 22.7) 38 (1, 102) 7
*
*
Elbert County 7 Rural 15.5 (9.2, 24.7) 39 (1, 102) 4 stable stable trend 3.0 (-0.6, 8.1)
Monroe County 7 Urban 15.5 (10.1, 22.9) 40 (1, 102) 6
*
*
Floyd County 7 Urban 15.3 (12.3, 18.9) 41 (7, 93) 19 rising rising trend 2.1 (0.3, 4.3)
Colquitt County 7 Rural 15.3 (10.9, 20.9) 42 (3, 101) 8
*
*
Effingham County 7 Urban 15.1 (11.3, 19.9) 43 (3, 99) 11 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.5, 6.2)
Lowndes County 7 Urban 15.1 (12.1, 18.8) 44 (7, 92) 17 rising rising trend 1.6 (0.2, 3.5)
Fannin County 7 Rural 15.1 (9.8, 22.7) 45 (1, 102) 7
*
*
Lumpkin County 7 Urban 14.9 (9.9, 21.7) 46 (2, 102) 6 stable stable trend -1.8 (-5.1, 2.3)
Walton County 7 Urban 14.9 (11.9, 18.5) 47 (8, 94) 18 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.2, 3.4)
Coweta County 7 Urban 14.8 (12.3, 17.6) 48 (11, 90) 27 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.5, 5.3)
Carroll County 7 Urban 14.7 (11.9, 18.1) 49 (8, 95) 19 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.2, 4.6)
Gordon County 7 Rural 14.7 (10.8, 19.5) 50 (4, 100) 10 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.4, 4.2)
Muscogee County 7 Urban 14.4 (12.3, 16.9) 51 (14, 89) 33 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.0, 1.2)
Mitchell County 7 Rural 14.3 (8.6, 22.7) 52 (1, 102) 4 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.3, 3.9)
Douglas County 7 Urban 14.3 (11.5, 17.4) 53 (12, 94) 21 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.1, 3.2)
Cherokee County 7 Urban 14.1 (12.3, 16.2) 54 (20, 86) 45 stable stable trend 1.6 (0.0, 3.8)
Jackson County 7 Rural 14.1 (10.7, 18.2) 55 (6, 100) 12 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.9, 3.3)
Peach County 7 Urban 14.1 (8.8, 21.6) 56 (2, 102) 5 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.6, 4.5)
Wayne County 7 Rural 13.9 (9.1, 20.7) 57 (2, 102) 5 stable stable trend 0.7 (-3.4, 6.0)
Dawson County 7 Urban 14.3 (9.1, 21.7) 58 (2, 102) 5 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.1, 4.0)
Dougherty County 7 Urban 13.9 (10.7, 17.8) 59 (10, 100) 14 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.8, 1.5)
Hart County 7 Rural 13.7 (8.9, 20.7) 60 (3, 102) 5
*
*
Hall County 7 Urban 13.7 (11.7, 15.9) 61 (20, 92) 34 rising rising trend 10.6 (2.6, 16.8)
Troup County 7 Rural 13.7 (10.3, 17.8) 62 (9, 100) 12 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.8, 2.1)
Franklin County 7 Rural 13.6 (8.3, 21.3) 63 (2, 102) 4
*
*
Houston County 7 Urban 13.6 (11.2, 16.3) 64 (18, 96) 24 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.8, 4.0)
Forsyth County 7 Urban 13.6 (11.6, 15.8) 65 (23, 92) 36 rising rising trend 3.1 (0.9, 10.5)
Laurens County 7 Rural 13.6 (9.7, 18.6) 66 (6, 102) 9 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.4, 3.2)
Lamar County 7 Rural 13.6 (8.0, 22.2) 67 (2, 102) 4
*
*
Barrow County 7 Urban 13.2 (10.0, 17.1) 68 (11, 100) 12 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.5, 5.9)
Rabun County 7 Rural 13.2 (7.3, 22.8) 69 (1, 102) 4
*
*
Tift County 7 Rural 13.1 (8.9, 18.7) 70 (5, 102) 6
*
*
Glynn County 7 Urban 13.0 (10.2, 16.4) 71 (14, 100) 16 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.5, 1.6)
Paulding County 7 Urban 13.0 (10.7, 15.8) 72 (21, 98) 23 stable stable trend -0.5 (-5.2, 11.1)
Upson County 7 Rural 13.0 (8.3, 19.7) 73 (4, 102) 5
*
*
Liberty County 7 Urban 13.0 (9.1, 18.0) 74 (9, 102) 8 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.4, 5.2)
Newton County 7 Urban 12.9 (10.2, 16.1) 75 (16, 100) 17 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.9, 3.6)
Chattooga County 7 Rural 12.8 (7.9, 19.8) 76 (4, 102) 4
*
*
Columbia County 7 Urban 12.8 (10.5, 15.4) 77 (24, 100) 23 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.0, 2.3)
Emanuel County 7 Rural 12.6 (7.6, 20.1) 78 (4, 102) 4 stable stable trend 2.1 (-2.1, 8.1)
Toombs County 7 Rural 12.6 (7.9, 19.3) 79 (4, 102) 5
*
*
Clarke County 7 Urban 12.5 (9.7, 15.8) 80 (19, 101) 14 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.4, 4.5)
Baldwin County 7 Rural 12.3 (8.4, 17.6) 81 (8, 102) 7 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.9, 2.1)
Bibb County 7 Urban 12.2 (10.0, 14.8) 82 (28, 100) 22 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.0, 2.2)
Sumter County 7 Rural 12.2 (7.3, 19.1) 83 (4, 102) 4
*
*
Thomas County 7 Rural 12.1 (8.5, 16.8) 84 (12, 102) 8 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.2, 4.4)
Lee County 7 Urban 12.0 (7.6, 18.2) 85 (6, 102) 5
*
*
Oconee County 7 Urban 12.0 (7.9, 17.6) 86 (9, 102) 6 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.1, 6.1)
Habersham County 7 Rural 11.9 (8.3, 16.6) 87 (14, 102) 8 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.4, 3.0)
Cobb County 7 Urban 11.8 (10.8, 12.9) 88 (55, 95) 99 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.1, 1.4)
Henry County 7 Urban 11.6 (9.7, 13.7) 89 (43, 100) 30 rising rising trend 2.6 (0.8, 5.0)
Ware County 7 Rural 11.5 (7.4, 17.3) 90 (8, 102) 5 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.8, 3.5)
Fayette County 7 Urban 11.4 (9.2, 14.1) 91 (37, 102) 19 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.2, 3.0)
Bulloch County 7 Rural 11.4 (8.2, 15.4) 92 (20, 102) 9
*
*
Chatham County 7 Urban 11.4 (9.8, 13.1) 93 (50, 100) 41 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.6, 0.6)
Gwinnett County 7 Urban 11.3 (10.3, 12.4) 94 (62, 98) 107 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.3, 1.6)
Fulton County 7 Urban 11.1 (10.2, 12.0) 95 (68, 99) 124 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Rockdale County 7 Urban 10.7 (8.1, 13.9) 96 (37, 102) 13 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.3, 3.8)
DeKalb County 7 Urban 10.2 (9.2, 11.3) 97 (76, 101) 83 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.6, 0.6)
Clayton County 7 Urban 10.2 (8.4, 12.2) 98 (57, 102) 28 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.7)
Worth County 7 Urban 10.1 (5.5, 17.4) 99 (7, 102) 3 stable stable trend 1.3 (-2.7, 6.4)
Meriwether County 7 Urban 9.6 (5.5, 16.1) 100 (15, 102) 3
*
*
Coffee County 7 Rural 9.2 (5.8, 13.9) 101 (30, 102) 5 stable stable trend -2.2 (-6.3, 2.4)
Harris County 7 Urban 8.6 (5.3, 13.5) 102 (41, 102) 4 stable stable trend -1.4 (-5.2, 2.9)
Appling County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Atkinson County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bacon County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Baker County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ben Hill County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bleckley County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Calhoun County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Candler County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Charlton County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chattahoochee County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clinch County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cook County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crawford County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dodge County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dooly County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Early County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Echols County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Evans County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glascock County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hancock County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Heard County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Irwin County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jeff Davis County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jefferson County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jenkins County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Johnson County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lanier County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lincoln County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Long County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Macon County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marion County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McIntosh County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Miller County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montgomery County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pike County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pulaski County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Quitman County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Randolph County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schley County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Seminole County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stewart County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Talbot County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Taliaferro County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Taylor County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Telfair County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terrell County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Towns County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Treutlen County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Turner County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Twiggs County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Warren County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Webster County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wheeler County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilcox County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilkes County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilkinson County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/20/2026 4:50 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top