Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Minnesota by County

Oral Cavity & Pharynx (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
sort alphabetically by name ascending 		2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
sort by rural urban descending 		Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate †
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate descending 		CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by CI rank descending 		Average Annual Count
sort by count descending 		Recent Trend
 Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
Cottonwood County 2 Rural 25.0 (13.7, 42.0) 1 (1, 51) 4
*
*
Aitkin County 2 Rural 24.0 (15.7, 36.2) 2 (1, 40) 8 stable stable trend 1.5 (-3.4, 7.3)
Swift County 2 Rural 23.6 (13.0, 40.2) 3 (1, 52) 3
*
*
Houston County 2 Urban 21.6 (14.2, 31.8) 4 (1, 47) 6
*
*
Kanabec County 2 Rural 20.9 (13.0, 32.3) 5 (1, 50) 5
*
*
Wabasha County 2 Urban 19.2 (12.4, 28.8) 6 (1, 50) 6 stable stable trend 2.1 (-1.8, 6.9)
Hubbard County 2 Rural 19.1 (13.2, 27.4) 7 (1, 46) 8 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.2, 5.7)
Itasca County 2 Rural 19.0 (14.4, 24.7) 8 (1, 36) 14 rising rising trend 3.7 (1.2, 6.7)
Isanti County 2 Urban 18.4 (13.2, 25.0) 9 (1, 45) 9 stable stable trend 3.5 (-0.8, 9.8)
Chisago County 2 Urban 18.2 (14.1, 23.3) 10 (1, 38) 14 rising rising trend 4.4 (1.3, 9.1)
Le Sueur County 2 Urban 17.6 (12.2, 24.8) 11 (1, 50) 7 rising rising trend 4.1 (0.5, 9.4)
Olmsted County 2 Urban 17.1 (14.6, 20.0) 12 (3, 29) 34 rising rising trend 7.4 (2.6, 20.0)
Clay County 2 Urban 16.0 (12.0, 21.0) 13 (2, 49) 11 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.0, 4.5)
Wright County 2 Urban 16.0 (13.2, 19.1) 14 (5, 39) 25 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.6, 3.8)
Carlton County 2 Urban 15.9 (11.4, 21.9) 15 (2, 51) 8 stable stable trend 2.4 (-2.1, 8.2)
Waseca County 2 Rural 15.0 (8.6, 24.5) 16 (1, 53) 3
*
*
Koochiching County 2 Rural 15.0 (8.0, 26.9) 17 (1, 53) 3
*
*
Douglas County 2 Rural 14.9 (10.5, 20.8) 18 (3, 51) 9 stable stable trend 3.5 (-0.5, 8.7)
Becker County 2 Rural 14.8 (10.4, 20.8) 19 (3, 52) 8
*
*
Mower County 2 Rural 14.8 (10.4, 20.6) 20 (2, 52) 8
*
*
Mille Lacs County 2 Urban 14.7 (9.6, 21.9) 21 (2, 53) 5
*
*
Cass County 2 Rural 14.7 (9.8, 21.5) 22 (2, 52) 7 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.0, 3.3)
Winona County 2 Rural 14.4 (10.4, 19.5) 23 (4, 51) 10 stable stable trend 2.7 (-0.4, 6.6)
Anoka County 2 Urban 14.0 (12.4, 15.7) 24 (13, 41) 62 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.3, 2.7)
Goodhue County 2 Rural 13.9 (10.1, 18.8) 25 (5, 52) 10 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.4, 4.1)
Rice County 2 Rural 13.8 (10.3, 18.1) 26 (5, 51) 11 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.1, 3.8)
St. Louis County 2 Urban 13.6 (11.7, 15.8) 27 (12, 46) 39 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.2, 3.5)
McLeod County 2 Rural 13.5 (9.2, 19.2) 28 (5, 53) 7 stable stable trend 3.1 (0.0, 7.0)
Pine County 2 Rural 13.4 (8.9, 19.9) 29 (3, 53) 6 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.5, 4.4)
Otter Tail County 2 Rural 13.3 (10.1, 17.4) 30 (7, 52) 13 stable stable trend 2.5 (-0.1, 5.6)
Beltrami County 2 Rural 12.9 (8.9, 18.1) 31 (5, 53) 7 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.5, 1.8)
Hennepin County 2 Urban 12.8 (11.9, 13.6) 32 (21, 42) 189 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.4, 1.3)
Washington County 2 Urban 12.5 (10.8, 14.4) 33 (17, 49) 42 rising rising trend 3.2 (1.6, 5.2)
Scott County 2 Urban 12.5 (10.1, 15.3) 34 (13, 51) 21 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.9, 2.6)
Steele County 2 Rural 12.4 (8.3, 18.0) 35 (6, 53) 6 stable stable trend 1.8 (-2.2, 6.7)
Brown County 2 Rural 12.4 (8.0, 18.7) 36 (5, 53) 5 rising rising trend 5.7 (1.1, 11.9)
Lyon County 2 Rural 12.1 (7.0, 19.6) 37 (3, 53) 4
*
*
Martin County 2 Rural 12.1 (6.5, 20.6) 38 (4, 53) 3
*
*
Sherburne County 2 Urban 11.9 (9.0, 15.4) 39 (12, 52) 12 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.2, 3.2)
Morrison County 2 Rural 11.9 (7.7, 17.7) 40 (6, 53) 6 stable stable trend 0.6 (-3.4, 5.0)
Benton County 2 Urban 11.9 (7.7, 17.5) 41 (6, 53) 5 stable stable trend -0.3 (-4.2, 3.7)
Crow Wing County 2 Rural 11.7 (8.8, 15.5) 42 (12, 53) 12 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.7, 2.8)
Ramsey County 2 Urban 11.5 (10.3, 12.8) 43 (25, 50) 71 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.5, 2.1)
Dakota County 2 Urban 11.5 (10.2, 12.9) 44 (25, 50) 62 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.9, 2.2)
Polk County 2 Urban 11.1 (7.1, 16.9) 45 (8, 53) 5 stable stable trend 1.1 (-4.5, 7.7)
Fillmore County 2 Urban 11.1 (6.5, 18.1) 46 (7, 53) 4 stable stable trend 1.1 (-4.8, 8.0)
Carver County 2 Urban 11.0 (8.5, 14.1) 47 (17, 53) 14 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.1, 3.4)
Freeborn County 2 Rural 11.0 (6.7, 17.1) 48 (7, 53) 5 stable stable trend -0.3 (-5.1, 4.6)
Nicollet County 2 Urban 10.9 (6.8, 16.8) 49 (8, 53) 5
*
*
Blue Earth County 2 Urban 10.5 (7.5, 14.5) 50 (16, 53) 8 stable stable trend 2.4 (-0.4, 5.8)
Stearns County 2 Urban 10.3 (8.3, 12.7) 51 (25, 53) 20 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.8, 2.9)
Todd County 2 Rural 9.0 (5.2, 15.0) 52 (14, 53) 4
*
*
Kandiyohi County 2 Rural 7.3 (4.5, 11.4) 53 (31, 53) 4 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.5, 0.8)
Big Stone County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chippewa County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clearwater County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cook County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dodge County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Faribault County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kittson County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lac qui Parle County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake of the Woods County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lincoln County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mahnomen County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marshall County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Meeker County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Murray County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Nobles County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Norman County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pennington County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pipestone County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pope County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Red Lake County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Redwood County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Renville County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rock County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roseau County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sibley County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stevens County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Traverse County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wadena County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Watonwan County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilkin County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yellow Medicine County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/20/2026 5:11 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top