Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Tennessee by County

Oral Cavity & Pharynx (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Tennessee 2 N/A 12.9 (12.5, 13.2) N/A 1,125 falling falling trend -2.0 (-4.2, -0.5)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 12.1 (12.1, 12.2) N/A 50,271 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.2)
Bledsoe County 2 Rural 15.7 (8.7, 26.8) 21 (1, 75) 3
*
*
Fentress County 2 Rural 13.0 (7.0, 22.3) 47 (1, 75) 3 stable stable trend 1.4 (-3.5, 7.0)
Lauderdale County 2 Rural 9.6 (5.4, 16.0) 73 (11, 75) 3
*
*
Meigs County 2 Rural 19.3 (11.1, 32.1) 3 (1, 75) 3
*
*
Johnson County 2 Rural 12.3 (7.2, 20.4) 56 (2, 75) 4
*
*
Lewis County 2 Rural 18.5 (10.6, 30.6) 6 (1, 75) 4
*
*
Polk County 2 Urban 12.2 (7.2, 20.3) 58 (3, 75) 4
*
*
Smith County 2 Urban 13.0 (7.5, 21.3) 49 (1, 75) 4
*
*
Unicoi County 2 Urban 12.5 (7.0, 21.2) 53 (2, 75) 4
*
*
Scott County 2 Rural 14.5 (8.5, 23.2) 30 (1, 75) 4 stable stable trend 2.7 (-1.0, 7.2)
Morgan County 2 Urban 14.0 (8.5, 22.3) 34 (1, 75) 4
*
*
Lincoln County 2 Rural 7.9 (4.8, 12.5) 75 (37, 75) 4 stable stable trend -2.8 (-8.0, 2.3)
Benton County 2 Rural 16.9 (10.3, 26.9) 13 (1, 75) 4
*
*
Union County 2 Urban 15.9 (9.7, 24.9) 17 (1, 75) 4
*
*
Grainger County 2 Urban 13.2 (8.2, 20.6) 42 (2, 75) 5 stable stable trend -3.6 (-7.9, 0.9)
Hardeman County 2 Rural 13.3 (8.4, 20.3) 41 (2, 75) 5 stable stable trend 1.2 (-2.3, 5.3)
Obion County 2 Rural 11.8 (7.4, 18.2) 64 (4, 75) 5 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.3, 4.4)
Claiborne County 2 Rural 11.1 (7.0, 16.9) 68 (8, 75) 5 stable stable trend -1.1 (-5.9, 4.3)
Weakley County 2 Rural 11.1 (7.1, 16.9) 67 (8, 75) 5 stable stable trend 0.7 (-3.1, 4.8)
Humphreys County 2 Rural 18.1 (11.6, 27.6) 8 (1, 73) 5 stable stable trend -1.0 (-6.3, 5.1)
White County 2 Rural 14.3 (9.2, 21.5) 32 (1, 75) 5
*
*
Macon County 2 Urban 18.5 (12.0, 27.4) 5 (1, 73) 5 stable stable trend 2.5 (-0.2, 5.9)
Warren County 2 Rural 9.6 (6.2, 14.3) 72 (18, 75) 5
*
*
Wayne County 2 Rural 21.5 (14.1, 32.3) 2 (1, 70) 5
*
*
McNairy County 2 Rural 14.5 (9.5, 21.6) 29 (1, 75) 6 rising rising trend 56.0 (34.4, 91.4)
Henry County 2 Rural 11.6 (7.7, 17.2) 65 (7, 75) 6
*
*
Giles County 2 Rural 15.1 (10.0, 22.1) 26 (1, 75) 6 stable stable trend 0.4 (-5.4, 7.1)
Hickman County 2 Urban 17.3 (11.6, 25.0) 10 (1, 73) 6
*
*
Rhea County 2 Rural 13.8 (9.2, 20.0) 37 (2, 75) 6 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.6, 3.7)
Carroll County 2 Rural 16.7 (11.2, 24.0) 15 (1, 74) 6
*
*
Fayette County 2 Urban 10.4 (7.1, 14.9) 70 (18, 75) 7
*
*
Lawrence County 2 Rural 12.0 (8.3, 16.9) 61 (8, 75) 7 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.5, 1.7)
Marshall County 2 Rural 15.7 (10.8, 22.2) 20 (1, 73) 7
*
*
Henderson County 2 Rural 18.4 (12.7, 25.9) 7 (1, 69) 7
*
*
Cocke County 2 Rural 15.5 (10.6, 22.1) 23 (1, 74) 7 stable stable trend 1.5 (-2.3, 5.8)
Marion County 2 Urban 15.4 (10.7, 21.8) 24 (1, 73) 7 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.9, 4.2)
Cheatham County 2 Urban 14.5 (10.0, 20.4) 31 (2, 74) 8
*
*
Hardin County 2 Rural 18.7 (13.1, 26.1) 4 (1, 68) 8 stable stable trend 1.4 (-2.3, 5.9)
Franklin County 2 Rural 14.0 (10.0, 19.4) 33 (3, 74) 9 stable stable trend 1.0 (-3.3, 5.7)
Bedford County 2 Rural 14.6 (10.5, 19.9) 27 (2, 73) 9 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.9, 2.7)
Dyer County 2 Rural 17.6 (12.7, 24.0) 9 (1, 69) 9 stable stable trend 0.8 (-3.0, 5.3)
Campbell County 2 Urban 16.7 (12.1, 22.6) 14 (1, 71) 10 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.6, 3.6)
Coffee County 2 Rural 14.0 (10.2, 18.8) 35 (3, 74) 10 stable stable trend -15.0 (-32.0, 3.6)
Hawkins County 2 Urban 11.9 (8.7, 16.1) 63 (10, 75) 10 falling falling trend -7.0 (-23.6, -1.1)
Hamblen County 2 Urban 13.0 (9.7, 17.3) 46 (6, 74) 11 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.4, 5.9)
Jefferson County 2 Urban 13.2 (9.7, 17.6) 43 (7, 74) 11 stable stable trend 0.8 (-3.3, 5.6)
Monroe County 2 Rural 15.9 (11.7, 21.2) 18 (1, 70) 11
*
*
Putnam County 2 Rural 10.5 (7.8, 13.9) 69 (21, 75) 11 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.2, 4.2)
Carter County 2 Urban 12.7 (9.5, 16.8) 51 (10, 74) 11 stable stable trend 0.3 (-4.2, 5.8)
McMinn County 2 Rural 14.6 (11.0, 19.2) 28 (3, 72) 12 stable stable trend 2.3 (-0.2, 5.3)
Tipton County 2 Urban 15.6 (11.7, 20.3) 22 (2, 70) 12 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.4, 4.4)
Roane County 2 Urban 13.4 (10.2, 17.6) 40 (6, 73) 12 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.4, 4.1)
Dickson County 2 Urban 17.2 (13.1, 22.3) 11 (1, 63) 13 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.9, 4.4)
Loudon County 2 Urban 13.6 (10.2, 17.9) 39 (6, 73) 13 stable stable trend 2.1 (-1.1, 6.1)
Bradley County 2 Urban 9.0 (6.9, 11.6) 74 (45, 75) 13 falling falling trend -4.4 (-26.3, -0.5)
Gibson County 2 Urban 21.8 (16.9, 27.8) 1 (1, 32) 14 rising rising trend 5.2 (2.4, 8.9)
Robertson County 2 Urban 15.8 (12.2, 20.2) 19 (2, 68) 14 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.3, 5.2)
Madison County 2 Urban 12.5 (9.8, 15.9) 52 (12, 73) 16 stable stable trend 2.4 (-0.2, 5.7)
Cumberland County 2 Rural 16.3 (12.3, 21.2) 16 (1, 65) 16 stable stable trend 1.4 (-2.3, 5.4)
Maury County 2 Urban 13.0 (10.2, 16.3) 48 (9, 73) 16 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.9, 1.3)
Anderson County 2 Urban 15.2 (12.0, 19.2) 25 (4, 68) 17 rising rising trend 2.5 (0.3, 5.1)
Greene County 2 Rural 17.0 (13.5, 21.4) 12 (2, 59) 18 stable stable trend 2.4 (-0.4, 5.6)
Sevier County 2 Rural 12.7 (10.2, 15.7) 50 (14, 73) 19 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.5, 1.6)
Washington County 2 Urban 11.4 (9.2, 13.9) 66 (25, 74) 21 stable stable trend -13.5 (-30.7, 3.6)
Wilson County 2 Urban 12.1 (9.9, 14.7) 60 (20, 73) 22 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.3, 2.5)
Montgomery County 2 Urban 12.2 (10.0, 14.7) 59 (19, 73) 23 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.3, 3.3)
Blount County 2 Urban 12.3 (10.2, 14.9) 55 (17, 72) 25 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.6, 4.0)
Sullivan County 2 Urban 13.1 (11.0, 15.5) 45 (15, 68) 31 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.3, 3.8)
Sumner County 2 Urban 13.7 (11.7, 16.0) 38 (12, 66) 34 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.1, 2.6)
Williamson County 2 Urban 12.3 (10.5, 14.3) 57 (23, 71) 36 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.9, 2.7)
Rutherford County 2 Urban 12.0 (10.3, 13.8) 62 (27, 71) 41 stable stable trend -4.9 (-11.7, 0.7)
Hamilton County 2 Urban 14.0 (12.5, 15.6) 36 (15, 59) 68 rising rising trend 1.9 (1.0, 2.9)
Knox County 2 Urban 13.1 (11.8, 14.5) 44 (21, 62) 77 stable stable trend 0.0 (-6.2, 1.6)
Davidson County 2 Urban 12.5 (11.3, 13.7) 54 (28, 66) 91 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.8, 0.5)
Shelby County 2 Urban 10.0 (9.1, 10.9) 71 (56, 74) 103 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.1, 2.0)
Cannon County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chester County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crockett County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
DeKalb County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Decatur County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grundy County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hancock County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Haywood County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Houston County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Moore County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Overton County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pickett County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sequatchie County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stewart County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Trousdale County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Van Buren County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/20/2026 3:44 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top