Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Michigan by County

Esophagus (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
sort alphabetically by name ascending 		2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
sort by rural urban descending 		Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate †
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate descending 		CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by CI rank descending 		Average Annual Count
sort by count descending 		Recent Trend
 Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
Michigan 2 N/A 5.4 (5.2, 5.6) N/A 738 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.8, 0.0)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 4.6 (4.6, 4.6) N/A 19,397 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.5, 0.9)
Branch County 2 Rural 6.1 (3.5, 9.8) 24 (2, 50) 4 stable stable trend -10.4 (-38.9, 4.3)
Clinton County 2 Urban 3.8 (2.3, 6.0) 49 (17, 50) 4 stable stable trend -5.0 (-10.2, 0.1)
St. Joseph County 2 Rural 5.2 (3.2, 8.2) 36 (5, 50) 4 stable stable trend -3.4 (-7.3, 0.4)
Genesee County 2 Urban 5.2 (4.4, 6.2) 38 (16, 47) 30 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.4, -0.6)
Saginaw County 2 Urban 4.3 (3.2, 5.7) 45 (19, 50) 11 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.2, 0.5)
Marquette County 2 Rural 4.1 (2.5, 6.6) 46 (13, 50) 4 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.3, 0.7)
Shiawassee County 2 Rural 6.1 (4.2, 8.9) 22 (4, 49) 6 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.8, 0.7)
Van Buren County 2 Rural 4.0 (2.4, 6.4) 48 (15, 50) 4 stable stable trend -1.4 (-6.2, 3.5)
Kalamazoo County 2 Urban 4.0 (3.1, 5.2) 47 (25, 50) 13 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.1, 1.5)
Ottawa County 2 Urban 4.6 (3.7, 5.8) 41 (18, 50) 17 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.0, 1.8)
Tuscola County 2 Rural 5.7 (3.6, 8.7) 31 (4, 50) 5 stable stable trend -1.2 (-6.4, 4.0)
Wayne County 2 Urban 5.3 (4.8, 5.7) 35 (21, 42) 117 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.6)
Macomb County 2 Urban 5.1 (4.5, 5.7) 40 (21, 46) 61 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.3, 0.5)
Kent County 2 Urban 4.6 (3.9, 5.4) 42 (24, 49) 34 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.6)
Washtenaw County 2 Urban 3.7 (2.9, 4.6) 50 (34, 50) 16 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.8, 1.9)
Muskegon County 2 Urban 5.7 (4.4, 7.4) 29 (8, 48) 13 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.6, 1.7)
Lenawee County 2 Rural 5.2 (3.7, 7.2) 37 (9, 50) 8 stable stable trend -0.3 (-4.2, 4.0)
Oakland County 2 Urban 4.5 (4.1, 5.0) 43 (30, 48) 78 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 1.2)
Allegan County 2 Rural 4.4 (3.0, 6.2) 44 (15, 50) 7 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.3, 3.4)
Livingston County 2 Urban 5.6 (4.4, 7.0) 32 (10, 48) 15 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.2, 2.5)
Isabella County 2 Rural 6.9 (4.2, 10.7) 13 (1, 50) 4 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.6, 4.3)
Chippewa County 2 Rural 6.0 (3.4, 10.2) 26 (2, 50) 3 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.7, 3.4)
Ionia County 2 Urban 5.7 (3.7, 8.7) 30 (4, 50) 5 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.6, 4.0)
Midland County 2 Urban 6.1 (4.3, 8.5) 23 (5, 49) 8 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.7, 4.5)
Newaygo County 2 Rural 8.5 (5.6, 12.7) 6 (1, 46) 6 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.9, 4.7)
St. Clair County 2 Urban 6.3 (5.0, 8.0) 17 (6, 44) 16 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.4, 7.0)
Montcalm County 2 Urban 6.2 (4.1, 9.1) 21 (3, 50) 6 stable stable trend 1.0 (-3.0, 5.9)
Barry County 2 Urban 6.7 (4.4, 9.8) 14 (2, 49) 6 stable stable trend 1.1 (-2.7, 5.7)
Ingham County 2 Urban 5.1 (4.0, 6.4) 39 (14, 49) 16 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.1, 3.5)
Lapeer County 2 Urban 6.3 (4.5, 8.7) 19 (3, 49) 8 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.8, 5.1)
Mecosta County 2 Rural 5.8 (3.4, 9.5) 28 (3, 50) 4 stable stable trend 1.2 (-4.7, 8.3)
Eaton County 2 Urban 6.3 (4.6, 8.4) 18 (5, 47) 10 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.8, 5.0)
Grand Traverse County 2 Urban 5.9 (4.2, 8.1) 27 (5, 49) 9 stable stable trend 1.5 (-2.0, 6.5)
Jackson County 2 Urban 6.2 (4.8, 7.9) 20 (6, 46) 14 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.9, 4.4)
Monroe County 2 Urban 7.6 (6.0, 9.6) 10 (2, 35) 17 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.3, 5.5)
Calhoun County 2 Urban 8.6 (6.7, 10.9) 5 (1, 28) 15 rising rising trend 2.6 (0.1, 5.6)
Hillsdale County 2 Rural 10.3 (7.1, 14.6) 3 (1, 33) 7 stable stable trend 3.3 (-0.9, 9.4)
Bay County 2 Urban 8.1 (6.3, 10.4) 7 (1, 30) 14 rising rising trend 3.4 (0.6, 7.0)
Berrien County 2 Urban 6.0 (4.7, 7.7) 25 (7, 46) 14 rising rising trend 6.9 (1.5, 21.0)
Alpena County 2 Rural 9.0 (5.7, 14.1) 4 (1, 44) 5
*
*
Delta County 2 Rural 8.0 (4.8, 12.8) 9 (1, 50) 5
*
*
Emmet County 2 Rural 5.4 (3.1, 9.3) 34 (3, 50) 3
*
*
Gladwin County 2 Rural 10.5 (6.7, 16.5) 2 (1, 39) 5
*
*
Houghton County 2 Rural 6.4 (3.7, 10.8) 16 (1, 50) 3
*
*
Huron County 2 Rural 5.5 (3.2, 9.5) 33 (3, 50) 3
*
*
Kalkaska County 2 Urban 11.7 (6.5, 20.0) 1 (1, 47) 3
*
*
Manistee County 2 Rural 8.1 (4.3, 14.3) 8 (1, 50) 3
*
*
Menominee County 2 Rural 7.1 (4.1, 12.4) 12 (1, 50) 3
*
*
Sanilac County 2 Rural 7.6 (4.9, 11.7) 11 (1, 49) 5
*
*
Wexford County 2 Rural 6.6 (3.8, 11.1) 15 (1, 50) 3
*
*
Alcona County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Alger County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Antrim County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Arenac County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Baraga County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Benzie County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cass County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Charlevoix County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cheboygan County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clare County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crawford County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dickinson County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gogebic County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gratiot County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Iosco County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Iron County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Keweenaw County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Leelanau County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Luce County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mackinac County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mason County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Missaukee County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montmorency County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oceana County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ogemaw County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ontonagon County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Osceola County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oscoda County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Otsego County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Presque Isle County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roscommon County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schoolcraft County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/22/2026 2:43 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top