Incidence Rates Table
Incidence Rate Report for Wisconsin by County
Stomach (All Stages^), 2018-2022
All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages
Sorted by CI*Rank
County
|
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
|
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate † cases per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval)
|
CI*Rank ⋔ (95% Confidence Interval)
|
Average Annual Count
|
Recent Trend |
Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Incidence Rates (95% Confidence Interval)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kenosha County 2 | Urban | 9.1 (7.2, 11.2) | 1 (1, 16) | 18 |
stable
|
2.4 (-0.4, 5.7) |
| Milwaukee County 2 | Urban | 8.5 (7.7, 9.4) | 2 (1, 12) | 85 |
stable
|
0.2 (-1.0, 1.4) |
| Chippewa County 2 | Urban | 8.3 (5.8, 11.6) | 3 (1, 31) | 7 |
stable
|
3.7 (-0.2, 8.8) |
| Monroe County 2 | Rural | 8.1 (5.1, 12.3) | 4 (1, 35) | 5 |
stable
|
3.1 (-1.3, 9.0) |
| Oneida County 2 | Rural | 8.0 (4.7, 13.0) | 5 (1, 36) | 5 |
rising
|
4.0 (0.5, 8.4) |
| Oconto County 2 | Urban | 8.0 (5.1, 12.1) | 6 (1, 35) | 5 |
stable
|
2.3 (-1.3, 7.2) |
| Waushara County 2 | Rural | 7.7 (4.4, 13.2) | 7 (1, 36) | 3 |
stable
|
-1.6 (-6.7, 3.5) |
| Fond du Lac County 2 | Urban | 7.4 (5.5, 9.9) | 8 (1, 30) | 10 |
stable
|
2.4 (-0.3, 5.6) |
| Marinette County 2 | Rural | 7.3 (4.6, 11.3) | 9 (1, 36) | 5 |
|
|
| Lincoln County 2 | Rural | 7.3 (4.1, 12.4) | 10 (1, 37) | 3 |
|
|
| Outagamie County 2 | Urban | 7.2 (5.7, 8.9) | 11 (2, 28) | 17 |
stable
|
1.8 (-0.7, 5.1) |
| Portage County 2 | Rural | 7.1 (4.8, 10.2) | 12 (1, 35) | 6 |
stable
|
-1.6 (-5.2, 2.2) |
| Walworth County 2 | Rural | 6.9 (5.0, 9.3) | 13 (1, 33) | 10 |
stable
|
-1.1 (-3.8, 1.8) |
| Racine County 2 | Urban | 6.6 (5.2, 8.3) | 14 (3, 31) | 16 |
stable
|
1.5 (-0.5, 3.8) |
| Rock County 2 | Urban | 6.5 (5.0, 8.4) | 15 (3, 33) | 14 |
stable
|
1.3 (-1.5, 4.6) |
| Waukesha County 2 | Urban | 6.4 (5.5, 7.4) | 16 (6, 29) | 38 |
stable
|
0.0 (-2.5, 2.9) |
| Douglas County 2 | Urban | 6.2 (3.5, 10.4) | 17 (1, 37) | 3 |
falling
|
-3.3 (-6.6, -0.4) |
| Grant County 2 | Rural | 6.0 (3.6, 9.6) | 18 (1, 37) | 4 |
|
|
| Ozaukee County 2 | Urban | 6.0 (4.3, 8.3) | 19 (3, 36) | 8 |
stable
|
-0.5 (-3.8, 3.0) |
| Calumet County 2 | Urban | 5.9 (3.5, 9.5) | 20 (1, 37) | 4 |
|
|
| Manitowoc County 2 | Rural | 5.7 (3.8, 8.2) | 21 (3, 36) | 7 |
stable
|
-2.7 (-5.9, 0.1) |
| Winnebago County 2 | Urban | 5.7 (4.3, 7.3) | 22 (6, 36) | 12 |
stable
|
-1.5 (-4.3, 1.4) |
| Washington County 2 | Urban | 5.6 (4.2, 7.5) | 23 (6, 36) | 11 |
stable
|
0.4 (-3.0, 4.4) |
| Sheboygan County 2 | Urban | 5.6 (4.1, 7.6) | 24 (5, 36) | 9 |
stable
|
-1.1 (-4.6, 2.6) |
| Barron County 2 | Rural | 5.6 (3.4, 9.0) | 25 (2, 37) | 4 |
stable
|
0.4 (-4.0, 5.5) |
| Eau Claire County 2 | Urban | 5.5 (3.8, 7.8) | 26 (4, 37) | 7 |
stable
|
2.8 (-0.8, 7.6) |
| Brown County 2 | Urban | 5.3 (4.2, 6.7) | 27 (10, 35) | 16 |
stable
|
-1.2 (-3.7, 1.4) |
| St. Croix County 2 | Urban | 5.2 (3.4, 7.6) | 28 (5, 37) | 6 |
stable
|
2.1 (-1.6, 7.0) |
| Marathon County 2 | Urban | 5.2 (3.7, 7.0) | 29 (8, 37) | 9 |
stable
|
-0.1 (-3.6, 3.9) |
| La Crosse County 2 | Urban | 4.9 (3.4, 6.9) | 30 (8, 37) | 8 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-3.9, 3.8) |
| Shawano County 2 | Rural | 4.8 (2.7, 8.3) | 31 (3, 37) | 3 |
falling
|
-17.1 (-41.1, -3.1) |
| Sauk County 2 | Rural | 4.6 (2.9, 7.2) | 32 (8, 37) | 5 |
stable
|
-2.1 (-5.1, 1.1) |
| Dane County 2 | Urban | 4.6 (3.8, 5.4) | 33 (20, 36) | 27 |
stable
|
-1.1 (-3.2, 1.2) |
| Dodge County 2 | Rural | 4.4 (2.9, 6.6) | 34 (10, 37) | 6 |
stable
|
-2.7 (-5.6, 0.1) |
| Waupaca County 2 | Rural | 4.2 (2.4, 7.2) | 35 (7, 37) | 3 |
stable
|
1.1 (-3.3, 6.4) |
| Jefferson County 2 | Rural | 3.9 (2.4, 6.1) | 36 (12, 37) | 4 |
stable
|
-3.2 (-6.8, 0.1) |
| Wood County 2 | Rural | 2.8 (1.5, 4.7) | 37 (26, 37) | 3 |
falling
|
-4.0 (-8.2, -0.2) |
| Adams County 2 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
| Ashland County 2 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
| Bayfield County 2 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
| Buffalo County 2 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
| Burnett County 2 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
| Clark County 2 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
| Columbia County 2 | Urban |
|
|
|
|
|
| Crawford County 2 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
| Door County 2 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
| Dunn County 2 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
| Florence County 2 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
| Forest County 2 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
| Green County 2 | Urban |
|
|
|
|
|
| Green Lake County 2 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
| Iowa County 2 | Urban |
|
|
|
|
|
| Iron County 2 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
| Jackson County 2 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
| Juneau County 2 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
| Kewaunee County 2 | Urban |
|
|
|
|
|
| Lafayette County 2 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
| Langlade County 2 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
| Marquette County 2 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
| Menominee County 2 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
| Pepin County 2 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
| Pierce County 2 | Urban |
|
|
|
|
|
| Polk County 2 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
| Price County 2 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
| Richland County 2 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
| Rusk County 2 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
| Sawyer County 2 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
| Taylor County 2 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
| Trempealeau County 2 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
| Vernon County 2 | Urban |
|
|
|
|
|
| Vilas County 2 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
| Washburn County 2 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/19/2026 9:55 am.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.
Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.


