Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for North Carolina by County

Stomach (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
North Carolina 2 N/A 6.3 (6.1, 6.5) N/A 804 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.0, 0.5)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 6.5 (6.4, 6.5) N/A 26,110 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.1, 1.9)
Warren County 2 Rural 16.4 (9.3, 26.9) 1 (1, 43) 4
*
*
Hertford County 2 Rural 9.9 (5.7, 16.8) 2 (1, 65) 3
*
*
Rutherford County 2 Rural 9.6 (6.9, 13.2) 3 (1, 50) 9 stable stable trend 1.2 (-4.5, 8.0)
Sampson County 2 Rural 9.1 (6.2, 12.9) 4 (1, 60) 7 stable stable trend 2.4 (-0.9, 6.4)
Hoke County 2 Urban 9.0 (5.5, 13.8) 5 (1, 65) 4
*
*
Lenoir County 2 Rural 8.6 (5.6, 12.5) 6 (1, 63) 6 stable stable trend -0.6 (-5.4, 4.2)
Edgecombe County 2 Urban 8.5 (5.5, 12.7) 7 (1, 65) 6 stable stable trend -2.0 (-7.0, 2.8)
Granville County 2 Rural 8.5 (5.9, 12.0) 8 (1, 59) 7
*
*
Wayne County 2 Urban 8.5 (6.3, 11.1) 9 (2, 52) 11 stable stable trend 0.2 (-4.8, 5.2)
Richmond County 2 Rural 8.2 (5.0, 12.8) 10 (1, 66) 4 rising rising trend 3.8 (0.6, 7.7)
McDowell County 2 Rural 8.1 (5.2, 12.3) 11 (1, 66) 5 stable stable trend 3.2 (-0.3, 8.0)
Durham County 2 Urban 8.0 (6.7, 9.5) 12 (3, 41) 27 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.1, 4.0)
Johnston County 2 Urban 8.0 (6.4, 9.9) 13 (2, 47) 18 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.9, 4.0)
Columbus County 2 Rural 8.0 (5.2, 11.8) 14 (1, 64) 6 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.2, 1.4)
Robeson County 2 Rural 7.9 (5.8, 10.6) 15 (2, 60) 10 rising rising trend 2.2 (0.1, 4.6)
Scotland County 2 Rural 7.9 (4.5, 13.0) 16 (1, 66) 3
*
*
Pasquotank County 2 Rural 7.9 (4.9, 12.2) 17 (1, 66) 4 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.4, 4.2)
Franklin County 2 Urban 7.8 (5.3, 11.1) 18 (2, 64) 7 stable stable trend -3.1 (-6.5, 0.4)
Cumberland County 2 Urban 7.8 (6.5, 9.3) 19 (3, 44) 26 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.0, 2.6)
Halifax County 2 Rural 7.7 (5.0, 11.5) 20 (1, 66) 5 stable stable trend 1.6 (-2.4, 6.4)
Onslow County 2 Urban 7.4 (5.5, 9.6) 21 (3, 61) 11 stable stable trend 2.3 (-0.9, 6.6)
Alexander County 2 Urban 7.3 (4.3, 11.7) 22 (1, 66) 4
*
*
Guilford County 2 Urban 7.1 (6.2, 8.1) 23 (8, 47) 44 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.2, 3.0)
Vance County 2 Rural 7.1 (3.9, 11.8) 24 (1, 66) 3 stable stable trend -0.2 (-4.6, 4.3)
Macon County 2 Rural 7.0 (4.1, 11.4) 25 (2, 66) 4
*
*
Harnett County 2 Rural 6.9 (5.1, 9.3) 26 (3, 64) 9 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.6, 2.6)
Wake County 2 Urban 6.8 (6.1, 7.5) 27 (14, 46) 77 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.2, 2.3)
Cabarrus County 2 Urban 6.7 (5.2, 8.4) 28 (7, 60) 15 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.3, 3.4)
Nash County 2 Urban 6.6 (4.7, 9.1) 29 (4, 65) 8 stable stable trend -3.5 (-7.8, 0.8)
Catawba County 2 Urban 6.5 (5.0, 8.4) 30 (6, 63) 13 rising rising trend 3.2 (0.5, 6.6)
Wilkes County 2 Rural 6.4 (4.1, 9.5) 31 (3, 66) 6 stable stable trend -1.9 (-5.0, 1.2)
Person County 2 Urban 6.4 (3.7, 10.4) 32 (2, 66) 4
*
*
Beaufort County 2 Rural 6.3 (4.0, 9.9) 33 (2, 66) 5 stable stable trend -6.2 (-26.6, 0.8)
Mecklenburg County 2 Urban 6.3 (5.6, 7.0) 34 (18, 54) 68 stable stable trend -6.6 (-19.2, 0.1)
Gaston County 2 Urban 6.3 (5.0, 7.8) 35 (11, 62) 17 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.4, 2.2)
Henderson County 2 Urban 6.1 (4.6, 8.1) 36 (8, 65) 12 stable stable trend 3.1 (-1.3, 18.2)
Pender County 2 Urban 6.1 (3.8, 9.3) 37 (3, 66) 5 stable stable trend -0.1 (-5.4, 5.8)
Surry County 2 Rural 6.1 (4.2, 8.7) 38 (5, 66) 7 stable stable trend 3.1 (-0.9, 8.2)
Pitt County 2 Urban 6.0 (4.6, 7.9) 39 (9, 65) 12 stable stable trend -2.7 (-6.6, 1.2)
Cleveland County 2 Rural 6.0 (4.3, 8.3) 40 (7, 66) 8 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.7, 4.8)
Lincoln County 2 Urban 6.0 (4.1, 8.6) 41 (6, 66) 7 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.4, 4.5)
Iredell County 2 Urban 6.0 (4.6, 7.7) 42 (11, 64) 13 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.7, 2.1)
Wilson County 2 Rural 6.0 (4.1, 8.6) 43 (6, 66) 6 stable stable trend -0.2 (-4.5, 4.5)
Lee County 2 Rural 6.0 (3.8, 9.0) 44 (4, 66) 5
*
*
Yadkin County 2 Urban 6.0 (3.3, 10.1) 45 (2, 66) 3
*
*
Haywood County 2 Rural 6.0 (4.0, 8.8) 46 (5, 66) 6 stable stable trend -0.3 (-4.0, 4.0)
Craven County 2 Rural 5.8 (4.1, 8.0) 47 (8, 66) 8 falling falling trend -22.7 (-39.2, -1.6)
Forsyth County 2 Urban 5.8 (4.8, 6.9) 48 (20, 63) 27 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.1, 1.2)
Rockingham County 2 Urban 5.8 (4.1, 7.9) 49 (9, 66) 8 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.6, 1.1)
Stokes County 2 Urban 5.6 (3.5, 9.0) 50 (5, 66) 4 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.3, 4.9)
Brunswick County 2 Urban 5.5 (4.1, 7.3) 51 (12, 66) 14 stable stable trend -0.7 (-4.7, 3.8)
Transylvania County 2 Rural 5.4 (3.1, 9.5) 52 (4, 66) 4
*
*
Union County 2 Urban 5.4 (4.2, 6.9) 53 (18, 65) 14 stable stable trend 2.2 (-1.2, 7.2)
New Hanover County 2 Urban 5.4 (4.2, 6.7) 54 (20, 66) 17 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.7, 2.8)
Rowan County 2 Urban 5.3 (3.9, 7.1) 55 (17, 66) 10 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.6, 3.2)
Randolph County 2 Urban 5.3 (3.9, 7.0) 56 (18, 66) 10 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.3, 2.6)
Alamance County 2 Urban 5.2 (3.9, 6.9) 57 (17, 66) 11 rising rising trend 2.4 (0.2, 5.1)
Davidson County 2 Urban 5.2 (3.9, 6.8) 58 (19, 66) 12 stable stable trend -5.7 (-19.5, 2.9)
Chatham County 2 Urban 5.1 (3.4, 7.6) 59 (11, 66) 6 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.9, 4.8)
Burke County 2 Urban 5.1 (3.4, 7.4) 60 (12, 66) 6 falling falling trend -7.8 (-26.6, -0.7)
Moore County 2 Urban 4.9 (3.4, 6.9) 61 (16, 66) 8 stable stable trend -2.6 (-6.3, 1.1)
Stanly County 2 Rural 4.9 (2.9, 7.7) 62 (9, 66) 4 falling falling trend -18.1 (-42.8, -2.5)
Caldwell County 2 Urban 4.8 (3.2, 7.1) 63 (14, 66) 6
*
*
Orange County 2 Urban 4.8 (3.4, 6.6) 64 (20, 66) 8 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.6, 2.6)
Buncombe County 2 Urban 4.3 (3.4, 5.4) 65 (42, 66) 16 falling falling trend -6.8 (-12.6, -2.7)
Carteret County 2 Rural 3.6 (2.3, 5.8) 66 (36, 66) 5 stable stable trend -1.7 (-7.0, 4.0)
Alleghany County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Anson County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ashe County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Avery County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bertie County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bladen County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Camden County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Caswell County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cherokee County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chowan County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Currituck County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dare County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Davie County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Duplin County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gates County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Graham County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greene County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hyde County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jones County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Madison County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mitchell County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montgomery County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Northampton County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pamlico County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perquimans County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Polk County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Swain County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tyrrell County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washington County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Watauga County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yancey County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/18/2026 7:37 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top