Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Oklahoma by County

Colon & Rectum (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name

County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Oklahoma 2 N/A 40.6 (39.7, 41.4) N/A 1,854 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 1.7)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 36.7 (36.6, 36.7) N/A 145,073 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.0, -0.8)
Adair County 2 Rural 49.9 (37.6, 65.2) 18 (2, 63) 11 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.5, 3.4)
Alfalfa County 2 Rural 41.5 (23.5, 69.6) 40 (1, 66) 3
*
*
Atoka County 2 Rural 41.3 (29.1, 57.3) 41 (4, 66) 8 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.8, 2.5)
Beckham County 2 Rural 40.9 (30.2, 54.2) 45 (6, 66) 10 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.1, 3.2)
Blaine County 2 Rural 42.5 (27.8, 63.4) 35 (2, 66) 6 stable stable trend -1.4 (-5.6, 2.4)
Bryan County 2 Rural 50.3 (42.0, 59.7) 16 (3, 50) 28 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.8, 2.3)
Caddo County 2 Rural 46.6 (36.4, 58.8) 24 (4, 64) 15 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.8, 2.9)
Canadian County 2 Urban 40.1 (35.8, 44.9) 48 (22, 62) 64 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.6, 0.2)
Carter County 2 Rural 35.0 (28.4, 42.8) 62 (25, 66) 21 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.7, -0.2)
Cherokee County 2 Rural 43.0 (35.4, 51.7) 33 (8, 64) 24 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.2, 1.5)
Choctaw County 2 Rural 52.0 (38.1, 69.8) 11 (1, 64) 10 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.2, 1.0)
Cleveland County 2 Urban 34.2 (31.2, 37.3) 64 (43, 65) 106 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.8, -1.7)
Coal County 2 Rural 41.1 (23.1, 69.5) 43 (1, 66) 3
*
*
Comanche County 2 Urban 41.3 (36.3, 46.8) 42 (18, 61) 52 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.5)
Craig County 2 Rural 39.6 (28.0, 54.9) 49 (5, 66) 8 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.7, 1.9)
Creek County 2 Urban 48.0 (41.5, 55.3) 22 (6, 49) 43 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.7, 0.9)
Custer County 2 Rural 41.8 (32.0, 53.7) 38 (7, 66) 13 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.2, 2.0)
Delaware County 2 Rural 39.0 (31.6, 47.9) 51 (14, 66) 23 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.2, 2.0)
Dewey County 2 Rural 73.3 (42.4, 118.1) 1 (1, 65) 4 stable stable trend 1.7 (-2.6, 5.9)
Garfield County 2 Urban 44.2 (37.5, 51.9) 30 (9, 60) 32 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 1.6)
Garvin County 2 Rural 42.0 (32.4, 53.7) 36 (6, 66) 14 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.1, 1.0)
Grady County 2 Urban 37.6 (31.2, 44.9) 56 (21, 66) 26 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.4, 1.2)
Haskell County 2 Rural 48.7 (34.1, 67.9) 21 (1, 66) 8 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.3, 3.7)
Hughes County 2 Rural 42.7 (29.9, 59.6) 34 (3, 66) 8 stable stable trend -1.2 (-5.3, 2.6)
Jackson County 2 Rural 26.1 (18.3, 36.3) 66 (40, 66) 8 falling falling trend -27.8 (-41.0, -19.1)
Jefferson County 2 Rural 70.0 (44.4, 106.2) 2 (1, 63) 5
*
*
Johnston County 2 Rural 39.4 (25.1, 59.3) 50 (3, 66) 5
*
*
Kay County 2 Rural 49.1 (40.9, 58.5) 19 (5, 52) 28 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 0.5)
Kingfisher County 2 Rural 48.8 (35.3, 66.1) 20 (1, 65) 9 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.8, 12.2)
Kiowa County 2 Rural 56.8 (37.7, 82.7) 7 (1, 65) 6 stable stable trend -2.0 (-5.3, 0.9)
Latimer County 2 Rural 59.7 (41.3, 84.1) 6 (1, 63) 8
*
*
Le Flore County 2 Rural 40.2 (33.1, 48.5) 47 (12, 65) 24 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.3, 1.3)
Lincoln County 2 Urban 44.3 (35.7, 54.5) 28 (6, 64) 20 stable stable trend 1.2 (-2.0, 13.4)
Logan County 2 Urban 35.8 (29.2, 43.5) 60 (22, 66) 22 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.6, -0.7)
Marshall County 2 Rural 38.1 (27.6, 52.0) 53 (7, 66) 9 stable stable trend -0.7 (-4.1, 2.7)
Mayes County 2 Rural 50.0 (41.6, 59.8) 17 (4, 53) 27 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.7, 10.8)
McClain County 2 Urban 45.1 (36.8, 54.8) 27 (6, 63) 22 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.9, 3.3)
McCurtain County 2 Rural 64.6 (53.0, 77.9) 4 (1, 25) 24 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.2, 3.8)
McIntosh County 2 Rural 45.5 (34.3, 59.6) 26 (4, 65) 14 stable stable trend 16.2 (-0.6, 29.9)
Murray County 2 Rural 33.5 (22.6, 48.3) 65 (11, 66) 7 stable stable trend -2.1 (-5.9, 1.5)
Muskogee County 2 Rural 50.8 (43.8, 58.6) 12 (4, 45) 41 rising rising trend 9.6 (0.4, 19.8)
Noble County 2 Rural 50.5 (35.3, 70.6) 15 (1, 66) 8 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.7, 2.5)
Nowata County 2 Rural 50.6 (33.9, 73.2) 14 (1, 66) 6 stable stable trend 1.5 (-2.9, 6.0)
Okfuskee County 2 Rural 61.4 (44.9, 82.6) 5 (1, 56) 10 stable stable trend 1.3 (-2.3, 5.2)
Oklahoma County 2 Urban 37.8 (35.9, 39.8) 55 (37, 60) 312 stable stable trend 3.3 (-1.7, 6.8)
Okmulgee County 2 Urban 55.7 (46.2, 66.7) 8 (2, 43) 26 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.7, 2.2)
Osage County 2 Urban 42.0 (34.9, 50.2) 37 (11, 64) 27 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.5, 1.9)
Ottawa County 2 Rural 44.3 (35.0, 55.4) 29 (6, 65) 17 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.4, -1.2)
Pawnee County 2 Urban 41.0 (29.8, 55.5) 44 (6, 66) 9 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.3, 0.8)
Payne County 2 Rural 46.2 (39.3, 53.9) 25 (7, 57) 34 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.6, 1.4)
Pittsburg County 2 Rural 41.5 (34.3, 49.9) 39 (11, 64) 25 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.0, 1.5)
Pontotoc County 2 Rural 50.6 (41.5, 61.1) 13 (3, 53) 23 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.3, 1.9)
Pottawatomie County 2 Rural 35.5 (30.1, 41.6) 61 (29, 66) 32 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.4, -0.7)
Pushmataha County 2 Rural 47.0 (31.9, 67.4) 23 (1, 66) 7 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.6, 0.6)
Rogers County 2 Urban 38.1 (33.1, 43.6) 54 (25, 65) 45 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.3)
Seminole County 2 Rural 36.1 (27.3, 47.0) 59 (15, 66) 12 falling falling trend -3.0 (-6.2, -0.3)
Sequoyah County 2 Urban 53.9 (45.0, 64.2) 10 (2, 44) 28 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.5, 5.2)
Stephens County 2 Rural 43.9 (36.3, 52.7) 31 (8, 63) 26 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.9, -0.2)
Texas County 2 Rural 38.2 (26.9, 52.6) 52 (7, 66) 8 falling falling trend -2.8 (-5.2, -0.6)
Tillman County 2 Rural 40.4 (24.7, 63.8) 46 (2, 66) 4 stable stable trend 0.1 (-4.5, 4.8)
Tulsa County 2 Urban 37.5 (35.5, 39.6) 58 (38, 61) 271 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.7)
Wagoner County 2 Urban 34.9 (29.8, 40.7) 63 (31, 66) 34 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.0, 0.5)
Washington County 2 Rural 37.5 (31.0, 45.1) 57 (20, 66) 25 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.5, 0.0)
Washita County 2 Rural 54.7 (36.9, 78.0) 9 (1, 65) 7 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.5, 4.4)
Woods County 2 Rural 68.5 (46.6, 97.6) 3 (1, 58) 7 stable stable trend -1.2 (-6.1, 3.4)
Woodward County 2 Rural 43.7 (32.5, 57.6) 32 (4, 66) 11 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.0, 0.0)
Beaver County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cimarron County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cotton County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ellis County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greer County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harmon County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harper County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Love County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Major County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roger Mills County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/19/2026 12:03 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top