Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Ohio by County

Liver & Bile Duct (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
sort alphabetically by name ascending 		2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
sort by rural urban descending 		Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate †
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate descending 		CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by CI rank descending 		Average Annual Count
sort by count descending 		Recent Trend
 Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
Pickaway County 2 Urban 12.1 (8.8, 16.4) 1 (1, 39) 9 rising rising trend 4.2 (1.8, 7.7)
Fayette County 2 Rural 11.8 (7.3, 18.1) 2 (1, 62) 5
*
*
Scioto County 2 Rural 11.5 (8.7, 15.0) 3 (1, 35) 12 rising rising trend 4.3 (1.3, 8.3)
Coshocton County 2 Rural 11.4 (7.7, 16.6) 4 (1, 55) 6
*
*
Guernsey County 2 Rural 10.8 (7.1, 16.0) 5 (1, 61) 6
*
*
Columbiana County 2 Rural 10.4 (8.1, 13.1) 6 (1, 41) 16 rising rising trend 4.5 (2.2, 7.3)
Adams County 2 Rural 10.4 (6.3, 16.4) 7 (1, 66) 4
*
*
Lawrence County 2 Urban 9.8 (6.9, 13.5) 8 (1, 57) 8 rising rising trend 4.5 (0.9, 9.4)
Crawford County 2 Rural 9.5 (6.2, 14.0) 9 (1, 65) 6
*
*
Hancock County 2 Rural 9.3 (6.8, 12.6) 10 (1, 61) 9 stable stable trend -6.1 (-20.1, 5.2)
Montgomery County 2 Urban 9.3 (8.3, 10.3) 11 (4, 31) 71 stable stable trend -6.6 (-16.8, 3.6)
Ross County 2 Rural 9.2 (6.8, 12.2) 12 (1, 58) 10 stable stable trend 4.7 (0.0, 11.2)
Cuyahoga County 2 Urban 9.1 (8.5, 9.8) 13 (6, 26) 168 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.8, 2.0)
Muskingum County 2 Rural 9.0 (6.7, 11.9) 14 (1, 58) 11
*
*
Meigs County 2 Rural 8.8 (5.1, 14.9) 15 (1, 67) 3
*
*
Lucas County 2 Urban 8.7 (7.6, 9.9) 16 (5, 40) 50 stable stable trend -8.9 (-19.7, 2.6)
Clark County 2 Urban 8.7 (6.9, 10.8) 17 (2, 54) 17 falling falling trend -19.2 (-34.5, -0.8)
Belmont County 2 Urban 8.6 (6.2, 11.8) 18 (1, 62) 9 rising rising trend 5.2 (0.9, 11.4)
Mahoning County 2 Urban 8.4 (7.1, 9.9) 19 (5, 50) 31 rising rising trend 3.3 (1.3, 5.7)
Lorain County 2 Urban 8.1 (7.0, 9.4) 20 (7, 51) 37 stable stable trend -3.3 (-11.8, 3.9)
Richland County 2 Urban 8.1 (6.3, 10.3) 21 (4, 59) 15 stable stable trend 2.8 (-1.0, 7.6)
Fulton County 2 Urban 8.1 (5.1, 12.4) 22 (1, 67) 5
*
*
Ashland County 2 Rural 7.9 (5.2, 11.8) 23 (1, 67) 6 rising rising trend 4.0 (1.5, 7.6)
Hamilton County 2 Urban 7.9 (7.2, 8.8) 24 (12, 46) 83 stable stable trend -3.0 (-12.5, 1.6)
Medina County 2 Urban 7.8 (6.4, 9.6) 25 (6, 56) 21 rising rising trend 5.8 (1.0, 17.6)
Champaign County 2 Rural 7.8 (4.8, 12.2) 26 (1, 67) 4
*
*
Franklin County 2 Urban 7.6 (7.0, 8.3) 27 (15, 46) 107 stable stable trend -3.1 (-8.8, 0.1)
Highland County 2 Rural 7.6 (4.7, 11.9) 28 (1, 67) 4
*
*
Butler County 2 Urban 7.5 (6.5, 8.8) 29 (11, 55) 37 rising rising trend 2.6 (1.3, 4.3)
Trumbull County 2 Urban 7.5 (6.2, 9.0) 30 (10, 58) 25 rising rising trend 3.1 (1.1, 5.5)
Stark County 2 Urban 7.5 (6.5, 8.6) 31 (13, 54) 41 rising rising trend 3.9 (2.1, 6.1)
Shelby County 2 Rural 7.3 (4.6, 11.2) 32 (2, 67) 5
*
*
Clermont County 2 Urban 7.3 (6.0, 8.9) 33 (10, 60) 21 stable stable trend -9.6 (-20.6, 3.2)
Ottawa County 2 Urban 7.2 (4.8, 10.8) 34 (3, 67) 6
*
*
Washington County 2 Rural 7.2 (4.8, 10.5) 35 (3, 67) 6 rising rising trend 5.7 (3.1, 9.4)
Williams County 2 Rural 7.2 (4.3, 11.4) 36 (2, 67) 4
*
*
Delaware County 2 Urban 7.2 (5.7, 8.9) 37 (8, 62) 17 stable stable trend 2.5 (-0.7, 7.2)
Fairfield County 2 Urban 7.1 (5.6, 9.1) 38 (9, 63) 14 rising rising trend 3.8 (1.3, 7.5)
Perry County 2 Urban 7.1 (4.0, 11.9) 39 (1, 67) 3
*
*
Summit County 2 Urban 7.1 (6.3, 8.0) 40 (17, 56) 55 rising rising trend 2.9 (1.2, 4.9)
Hocking County 2 Urban 7.0 (4.0, 11.9) 41 (1, 67) 3 stable stable trend 0.8 (-4.4, 7.1)
Sandusky County 2 Rural 7.0 (4.7, 10.1) 42 (4, 67) 6 rising rising trend 5.8 (0.7, 13.6)
Portage County 2 Urban 6.9 (5.4, 8.8) 43 (10, 64) 15 stable stable trend 3.3 (0.0, 7.5)
Seneca County 2 Rural 6.7 (4.3, 10.1) 44 (4, 67) 5
*
*
Licking County 2 Urban 6.7 (5.3, 8.4) 45 (12, 65) 16 stable stable trend -1.8 (-11.5, 2.4)
Athens County 2 Rural 6.7 (4.1, 10.3) 46 (3, 67) 4
*
*
Lake County 2 Urban 6.6 (5.5, 8.0) 47 (18, 63) 25 rising rising trend 3.4 (1.1, 6.2)
Greene County 2 Urban 6.6 (5.2, 8.3) 48 (14, 65) 16 stable stable trend 2.2 (-0.6, 5.8)
Ashtabula County 2 Urban 6.5 (4.7, 8.9) 49 (9, 67) 9 falling falling trend -4.6 (-10.5, -0.3)
Warren County 2 Urban 6.5 (5.3, 8.0) 50 (17, 65) 20 stable stable trend -4.2 (-21.2, 3.6)
Marion County 2 Rural 6.3 (4.2, 9.2) 51 (8, 67) 6 stable stable trend 2.9 (-1.8, 9.3)
Knox County 2 Rural 6.2 (4.0, 9.3) 52 (6, 67) 5 rising rising trend 5.0 (1.4, 10.1)
Huron County 2 Rural 6.1 (3.9, 9.3) 53 (7, 67) 5
*
*
Erie County 2 Urban 6.1 (4.3, 8.7) 54 (10, 67) 8 stable stable trend 2.6 (-0.2, 6.1)
Jefferson County 2 Urban 6.1 (4.2, 8.8) 55 (10, 67) 7 stable stable trend 2.1 (-1.1, 5.7)
Mercer County 2 Rural 6.0 (3.3, 10.1) 56 (4, 67) 3
*
*
Geauga County 2 Urban 5.9 (4.3, 8.0) 57 (15, 67) 9 stable stable trend -2.7 (-19.2, 5.1)
Miami County 2 Urban 5.8 (4.2, 7.8) 58 (16, 67) 9 stable stable trend 2.7 (-1.1, 7.6)
Union County 2 Urban 5.7 (3.3, 9.1) 59 (8, 67) 4
*
*
Preble County 2 Rural 5.6 (3.2, 9.3) 60 (7, 67) 4
*
*
Tuscarawas County 2 Rural 5.4 (3.8, 7.6) 61 (18, 67) 8 stable stable trend 2.8 (-0.2, 6.5)
Logan County 2 Rural 5.4 (3.2, 8.9) 62 (9, 67) 4
*
*
Defiance County 2 Rural 5.4 (3.1, 9.1) 63 (8, 67) 3
*
*
Wayne County 2 Rural 5.1 (3.6, 7.0) 64 (28, 67) 8 stable stable trend 2.2 (-2.0, 7.5)
Darke County 2 Rural 4.8 (2.9, 7.7) 65 (19, 67) 4
*
*
Wood County 2 Urban 4.8 (3.4, 6.6) 66 (35, 67) 8 falling falling trend -22.6 (-47.2, -2.5)
Allen County 2 Urban 4.4 (3.0, 6.4) 67 (38, 67) 7 stable stable trend -0.4 (-5.1, 4.8)
Auglaize County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brown County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carroll County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clinton County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gallia County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardin County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harrison County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Henry County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Holmes County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Madison County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Monroe County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morgan County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morrow County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Noble County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Paulding County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pike County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Putnam County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Van Wert County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Vinton County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wyandot County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/20/2026 1:35 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top