Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Minnesota by County

Liver & Bile Duct (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name

County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Minnesota 2 N/A 8.0 (7.7, 8.3) N/A 581 stable stable trend -0.6 (-5.3, 2.8)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 8.6 (8.6, 8.7) N/A 37,201 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.2, -1.2)
Anoka County 2 Urban 10.3 (9.0, 11.8) 2 (1, 14) 44 rising rising trend 4.4 (3.0, 6.6)
Becker County 2 Rural 5.4 (2.9, 9.4) 32 (5, 33) 3
*
*
Blue Earth County 2 Urban 5.8 (3.6, 9.0) 30 (7, 33) 4
*
*
Carlton County 2 Urban 6.7 (3.9, 11.1) 27 (2, 33) 3
*
*
Carver County 2 Urban 4.4 (2.8, 6.6) 33 (21, 33) 5
*
*
Cass County 2 Rural 8.4 (5.1, 13.6) 15 (1, 33) 5
*
*
Chisago County 2 Urban 6.5 (4.2, 9.9) 29 (3, 33) 5
*
*
Clay County 2 Urban 7.5 (4.9, 11.1) 18 (1, 33) 5
*
*
Crow Wing County 2 Rural 7.0 (4.9, 9.8) 24 (4, 33) 8 stable stable trend 3.0 (0.0, 7.2)
Dakota County 2 Urban 8.7 (7.6, 10.0) 11 (3, 23) 45 rising rising trend 5.3 (3.8, 7.4)
Douglas County 2 Rural 5.6 (3.2, 9.3) 31 (6, 33) 4
*
*
Freeborn County 2 Rural 11.7 (7.3, 18.0) 1 (1, 30) 5
*
*
Goodhue County 2 Rural 8.6 (5.7, 12.6) 12 (1, 32) 6
*
*
Hennepin County 2 Urban 8.5 (7.9, 9.2) 13 (6, 21) 125 stable stable trend -1.3 (-8.6, 3.4)
Isanti County 2 Urban 8.7 (5.5, 13.4) 10 (1, 33) 5
*
*
Itasca County 2 Rural 9.3 (6.4, 13.3) 5 (1, 30) 7 stable stable trend 3.9 (-0.6, 10.3)
Kandiyohi County 2 Rural 7.3 (4.2, 11.9) 19 (1, 33) 4 stable stable trend 5.0 (0.0, 12.0)
Mille Lacs County 2 Urban 9.4 (5.4, 15.5) 4 (1, 33) 3
*
*
Mower County 2 Rural 9.2 (5.9, 13.8) 6 (1, 32) 5
*
*
Olmsted County 2 Urban 9.0 (7.2, 11.1) 8 (1, 26) 18 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.5, 4.0)
Otter Tail County 2 Rural 8.3 (6.1, 11.4) 16 (1, 31) 9
*
*
Pine County 2 Rural 6.6 (3.8, 11.2) 28 (2, 33) 3
*
*
Polk County 2 Urban 9.2 (5.4, 14.8) 7 (1, 33) 4
*
*
Ramsey County 2 Urban 10.2 (9.1, 11.4) 3 (1, 14) 65 rising rising trend 4.8 (3.3, 6.9)
Rice County 2 Rural 7.1 (4.7, 10.3) 21 (2, 33) 6 falling falling trend -21.4 (-37.8, -6.9)
Scott County 2 Urban 7.2 (5.4, 9.4) 20 (5, 32) 11 rising rising trend 4.7 (1.6, 9.7)
Sherburne County 2 Urban 6.8 (4.6, 9.6) 25 (4, 33) 7
*
*
St. Louis County 2 Urban 7.1 (5.7, 8.6) 22 (8, 31) 21 rising rising trend 4.0 (2.4, 6.0)
Stearns County 2 Urban 7.0 (5.4, 9.0) 23 (6, 32) 13 rising rising trend 6.0 (2.5, 11.4)
Steele County 2 Rural 8.8 (5.4, 13.7) 9 (1, 33) 4
*
*
Washington County 2 Urban 8.4 (7.1, 10.0) 14 (3, 26) 28 rising rising trend 4.4 (1.7, 8.8)
Winona County 2 Rural 8.2 (5.4, 12.2) 17 (1, 32) 6
*
*
Wright County 2 Urban 6.8 (5.0, 8.9) 26 (6, 33) 11 rising rising trend 5.9 (3.3, 9.8)
Aitkin County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Beltrami County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Benton County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Big Stone County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brown County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chippewa County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clearwater County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cook County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cottonwood County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dodge County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Faribault County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fillmore County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Houston County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hubbard County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kanabec County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kittson County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Koochiching County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lac qui Parle County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake of the Woods County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Le Sueur County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lincoln County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lyon County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mahnomen County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marshall County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McLeod County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Meeker County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morrison County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Murray County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Nicollet County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Nobles County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Norman County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pennington County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pipestone County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pope County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Red Lake County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Redwood County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Renville County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rock County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roseau County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sibley County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stevens County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Swift County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Todd County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Traverse County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wabasha County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wadena County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Waseca County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Watonwan County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilkin County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yellow Medicine County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/19/2026 11:07 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top