Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Alabama by County

Liver & Bile Duct (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate

County
sort alphabetically by name ascending 		2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
sort by rural urban descending 		Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate †
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate descending 		CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by CI rank descending 		Average Annual Count
sort by count descending 		Recent Trend
 Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
Alabama 2 N/A 8.6 (8.3, 8.9) N/A 589 stable stable trend 1.5 (-2.1, 3.5)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 8.6 (8.6, 8.7) N/A 37,201 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.2, -1.2)
Coffee County 2 Rural 5.3 (3.2, 8.4) 43 (19, 43) 4 stable stable trend 1.7 (-2.7, 7.5)
Lee County 2 Urban 5.6 (4.1, 7.5) 42 (24, 43) 10 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.4, 4.0)
Tallapoosa County 2 Rural 5.7 (3.5, 9.1) 41 (15, 43) 4
*
*
Lauderdale County 2 Urban 6.3 (4.5, 8.5) 40 (17, 43) 9 stable stable trend -1.0 (-11.5, 3.4)
Tuscaloosa County 2 Urban 6.9 (5.5, 8.5) 39 (17, 43) 18 rising rising trend 3.1 (0.7, 6.3)
Houston County 2 Urban 6.9 (5.1, 9.2) 38 (13, 43) 10 stable stable trend 2.1 (-1.1, 6.4)
Chambers County 2 Rural 6.9 (4.0, 11.4) 37 (4, 43) 4 stable stable trend 2.1 (-3.1, 8.8)
Shelby County 2 Urban 7.0 (5.6, 8.6) 36 (17, 43) 20 stable stable trend 2.8 (-0.1, 7.1)
Jackson County 2 Rural 7.0 (4.5, 10.5) 35 (8, 43) 5
*
*
Baldwin County 2 Urban 7.1 (5.9, 8.5) 34 (18, 42) 26 stable stable trend -0.3 (-8.2, 2.8)
Autauga County 2 Urban 7.1 (4.7, 10.4) 33 (8, 43) 6
*
*
Limestone County 2 Urban 7.3 (5.4, 9.8) 32 (11, 43) 10 stable stable trend 2.3 (-0.6, 6.4)
Dale County 2 Rural 7.6 (4.7, 11.6) 31 (3, 43) 5
*
*
Russell County 2 Urban 7.6 (5.0, 11.1) 30 (5, 43) 6
*
*
Madison County 2 Urban 8.1 (7.0, 9.4) 29 (13, 38) 40 rising rising trend 2.9 (2.0, 3.9)
Franklin County 2 Rural 8.2 (4.7, 13.3) 28 (1, 43) 3
*
*
Morgan County 2 Urban 8.3 (6.4, 10.6) 27 (7, 41) 14 rising rising trend 13.1 (5.5, 32.7)
Elmore County 2 Urban 8.3 (6.0, 11.2) 26 (5, 42) 9 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.0, 5.6)
Lawrence County 2 Urban 8.3 (5.0, 13.2) 25 (2, 43) 4
*
*
Barbour County 2 Rural 8.3 (4.7, 14.0) 24 (1, 43) 3
*
*
Cherokee County 2 Rural 8.3 (4.9, 13.9) 23 (1, 43) 4
*
*
Blount County 2 Urban 8.6 (5.9, 12.1) 22 (3, 43) 7
*
*
Winston County 2 Rural 8.6 (4.7, 14.8) 21 (1, 43) 3
*
*
Montgomery County 2 Urban 8.6 (7.1, 10.3) 20 (9, 38) 25 stable stable trend 6.3 (-1.6, 23.9)
Chilton County 2 Urban 8.8 (5.7, 13.1) 19 (1, 43) 5 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.9, 3.7)
Dallas County 2 Rural 8.8 (5.5, 13.5) 18 (1, 43) 5
*
*
Jefferson County 2 Urban 9.1 (8.2, 10.1) 17 (9, 29) 78 rising rising trend 3.0 (1.9, 4.3)
DeKalb County 2 Rural 9.3 (6.7, 12.6) 16 (2, 41) 9 rising rising trend 5.1 (1.5, 10.4)
St. Clair County 2 Urban 9.5 (7.2, 12.3) 15 (3, 38) 12 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.9, 5.0)
Cullman County 2 Rural 9.6 (7.2, 12.5) 14 (2, 38) 12 rising rising trend 6.4 (3.9, 9.9)
Geneva County 2 Urban 10.1 (6.1, 16.1) 13 (1, 43) 4
*
*
Escambia County 2 Rural 10.6 (7.1, 15.5) 12 (1, 41) 6 stable stable trend 2.2 (-0.2, 5.2)
Walker County 2 Urban 10.6 (7.8, 14.3) 11 (1, 37) 10 stable stable trend 4.1 (-0.3, 10.1)
Etowah County 2 Urban 11.0 (8.7, 13.7) 10 (1, 30) 17 stable stable trend 0.0 (-9.5, 3.0)
Talladega County 2 Rural 11.3 (8.7, 14.5) 9 (1, 31) 13 rising rising trend 6.4 (2.8, 12.3)
Marion County 2 Rural 11.3 (7.5, 16.9) 8 (1, 40) 6
*
*
Mobile County 2 Urban 11.5 (10.3, 12.9) 7 (1, 16) 66 rising rising trend 3.8 (2.1, 6.0)
Clarke County 2 Rural 11.6 (6.9, 18.6) 6 (1, 42) 4
*
*
Marshall County 2 Rural 12.1 (9.5, 15.3) 5 (1, 25) 15 rising rising trend 6.9 (4.6, 10.3)
Calhoun County 2 Urban 12.2 (9.8, 15.0) 4 (1, 22) 20 rising rising trend 5.2 (2.3, 9.6)
Colbert County 2 Urban 12.6 (9.3, 16.7) 3 (1, 29) 10
*
*
Randolph County 2 Rural 12.8 (8.2, 19.8) 2 (1, 38) 5
*
*
Washington County 2 Rural 13.6 (7.6, 23.3) 1 (1, 42) 3
*
*
Bibb County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bullock County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Butler County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Choctaw County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cleburne County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Conecuh County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coosa County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Covington County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crenshaw County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fayette County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greene County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hale County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Henry County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lamar County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lowndes County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Macon County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marengo County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Monroe County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pickens County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pike County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sumter County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilcox County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/18/2026 4:29 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top