Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Mississippi by County

Liver & Bile Duct (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate

County
sort alphabetically by name ascending 		2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
sort by rural urban descending 		Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate †
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate descending 		CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by CI rank descending 		Average Annual Count
sort by count descending 		Recent Trend
 Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
Mississippi 2 N/A 8.7 (8.3, 9.1) N/A 339 stable stable trend -2.1 (-6.2, 1.4)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 8.6 (8.6, 8.7) N/A 37,201 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.2, -1.2)
Lauderdale County 2 Rural 4.5 (2.9, 6.9) 33 (25, 33) 5 stable stable trend 2.5 (-2.1, 8.2)
Washington County 2 Rural 5.5 (3.1, 9.2) 32 (14, 33) 3 stable stable trend 1.4 (-2.6, 5.9)
Warren County 2 Rural 5.6 (3.2, 9.2) 31 (14, 33) 4 falling falling trend -18.2 (-39.5, -6.1)
Lamar County 2 Urban 6.1 (3.8, 9.4) 30 (13, 33) 4
*
*
Lincoln County 2 Rural 6.9 (3.9, 11.5) 29 (8, 33) 3 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.8, 5.1)
Rankin County 2 Urban 6.9 (5.4, 8.8) 28 (15, 33) 14 falling falling trend -5.1 (-17.4, -0.3)
Lowndes County 2 Rural 7.2 (4.7, 10.6) 27 (10, 33) 6 stable stable trend -0.5 (-5.7, 5.0)
Pike County 2 Rural 7.8 (4.7, 12.2) 26 (6, 33) 4
*
*
Lee County 2 Rural 7.8 (5.6, 10.7) 25 (10, 32) 8 falling falling trend -19.0 (-31.3, -9.8)
Hinds County 2 Urban 8.1 (6.7, 9.8) 24 (12, 30) 24 stable stable trend -7.0 (-24.0, 1.0)
Jones County 2 Rural 8.3 (5.8, 11.5) 23 (8, 32) 8 stable stable trend 1.1 (-2.7, 5.6)
Hancock County 2 Urban 8.5 (5.7, 12.5) 22 (4, 32) 6 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.6, 4.4)
Madison County 2 Urban 8.6 (6.4, 11.3) 21 (8, 31) 11 stable stable trend -3.4 (-20.3, 3.2)
DeSoto County 2 Urban 8.6 (6.9, 10.6) 20 (10, 30) 18 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.6, 6.1)
Forrest County 2 Urban 8.7 (6.0, 12.1) 19 (6, 32) 7 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.7, 5.3)
Pearl River County 2 Rural 8.9 (6.2, 12.4) 18 (5, 32) 8 stable stable trend -13.5 (-40.3, 5.1)
Tate County 2 Urban 9.0 (5.3, 14.7) 17 (2, 33) 4
*
*
Alcorn County 2 Rural 10.4 (6.8, 15.5) 16 (2, 31) 5
*
*
Yazoo County 2 Urban 10.4 (5.9, 17.2) 15 (1, 33) 3
*
*
Coahoma County 2 Rural 10.8 (6.0, 18.2) 14 (1, 33) 3
*
*
Tishomingo County 2 Rural 11.0 (6.4, 18.5) 13 (1, 33) 3
*
*
Marshall County 2 Urban 11.1 (7.1, 16.8) 12 (1, 31) 5
*
*
Adams County 2 Rural 11.6 (7.4, 17.6) 11 (1, 31) 5
*
*
George County 2 Rural 11.9 (7.1, 19.1) 10 (1, 31) 4
*
*
Simpson County 2 Urban 12.2 (7.5, 18.9) 9 (1, 31) 4
*
*
Neshoba County 2 Rural 12.5 (7.8, 19.1) 8 (1, 30) 5 stable stable trend 2.2 (-0.5, 5.5)
Pontotoc County 2 Rural 12.5 (7.9, 18.9) 7 (1, 30) 5
*
*
Jackson County 2 Urban 12.9 (10.7, 15.5) 6 (1, 16) 25 rising rising trend 5.7 (3.5, 8.8)
Harrison County 2 Urban 13.0 (11.1, 15.1) 5 (1, 15) 36 stable stable trend -1.8 (-6.7, 1.9)
Scott County 2 Urban 13.9 (8.6, 21.2) 4 (1, 30) 4
*
*
Marion County 2 Rural 14.0 (8.8, 21.4) 3 (1, 29) 5 stable stable trend 4.1 (-0.6, 10.3)
Clay County 2 Rural 14.0 (8.1, 22.9) 2 (1, 31) 4
*
*
Itawamba County 2 Rural 14.9 (9.6, 22.4) 1 (1, 26) 5
*
*
Amite County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Attala County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Benton County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bolivar County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Calhoun County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carroll County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chickasaw County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Choctaw County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Claiborne County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clarke County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Copiah County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Covington County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Franklin County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greene County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grenada County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Holmes County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Humphreys County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Issaquena County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jasper County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jefferson County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jefferson Davis County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kemper County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lafayette County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lawrence County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Leake County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Leflore County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Monroe County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montgomery County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Newton County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Noxubee County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oktibbeha County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Panola County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Prentiss County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Quitman County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sharkey County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Smith County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stone County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sunflower County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tallahatchie County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tippah County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tunica County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Union County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Walthall County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wayne County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Webster County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilkinson County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Winston County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yalobusha County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/19/2026 10:23 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top