Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Ohio by County

Liver & Bile Duct (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Ohio 2 N/A 7.6 (7.4, 7.8) N/A 1,236 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.3, -1.5)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 8.6 (8.6, 8.7) N/A 37,201 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.2, -1.2)
Cuyahoga County 2 Urban 9.1 (8.5, 9.8) 13 (6, 26) 168 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.8, 2.0)
Franklin County 2 Urban 7.6 (7.0, 8.3) 27 (15, 46) 107 stable stable trend -3.1 (-8.8, 0.1)
Hamilton County 2 Urban 7.9 (7.2, 8.8) 24 (12, 46) 83 stable stable trend -3.0 (-12.5, 1.6)
Montgomery County 2 Urban 9.3 (8.3, 10.3) 11 (4, 31) 71 stable stable trend -6.6 (-16.8, 3.6)
Summit County 2 Urban 7.1 (6.3, 8.0) 40 (17, 56) 55 rising rising trend 2.9 (1.2, 4.9)
Lucas County 2 Urban 8.7 (7.6, 9.9) 16 (5, 40) 50 stable stable trend -8.9 (-19.7, 2.6)
Stark County 2 Urban 7.5 (6.5, 8.6) 31 (13, 54) 41 rising rising trend 3.9 (2.1, 6.1)
Lorain County 2 Urban 8.1 (7.0, 9.4) 20 (7, 51) 37 stable stable trend -3.3 (-11.8, 3.9)
Butler County 2 Urban 7.5 (6.5, 8.8) 29 (11, 55) 37 rising rising trend 2.6 (1.3, 4.3)
Mahoning County 2 Urban 8.4 (7.1, 9.9) 19 (5, 50) 31 rising rising trend 3.3 (1.3, 5.7)
Trumbull County 2 Urban 7.5 (6.2, 9.0) 30 (10, 58) 25 rising rising trend 3.1 (1.1, 5.5)
Lake County 2 Urban 6.6 (5.5, 8.0) 47 (18, 63) 25 rising rising trend 3.4 (1.1, 6.2)
Clermont County 2 Urban 7.3 (6.0, 8.9) 33 (10, 60) 21 stable stable trend -9.6 (-20.6, 3.2)
Medina County 2 Urban 7.8 (6.4, 9.6) 25 (6, 56) 21 rising rising trend 5.8 (1.0, 17.6)
Warren County 2 Urban 6.5 (5.3, 8.0) 50 (17, 65) 20 stable stable trend -4.2 (-21.2, 3.6)
Clark County 2 Urban 8.7 (6.9, 10.8) 17 (2, 54) 17 falling falling trend -19.2 (-34.5, -0.8)
Delaware County 2 Urban 7.2 (5.7, 8.9) 37 (8, 62) 17 stable stable trend 2.5 (-0.7, 7.2)
Columbiana County 2 Rural 10.4 (8.1, 13.1) 6 (1, 41) 16 rising rising trend 4.5 (2.2, 7.3)
Licking County 2 Urban 6.7 (5.3, 8.4) 45 (12, 65) 16 stable stable trend -1.8 (-11.5, 2.4)
Greene County 2 Urban 6.6 (5.2, 8.3) 48 (14, 65) 16 stable stable trend 2.2 (-0.6, 5.8)
Richland County 2 Urban 8.1 (6.3, 10.3) 21 (4, 59) 15 stable stable trend 2.8 (-1.0, 7.6)
Portage County 2 Urban 6.9 (5.4, 8.8) 43 (10, 64) 15 stable stable trend 3.3 (0.0, 7.5)
Fairfield County 2 Urban 7.1 (5.6, 9.1) 38 (9, 63) 14 rising rising trend 3.8 (1.3, 7.5)
Scioto County 2 Rural 11.5 (8.7, 15.0) 3 (1, 35) 12 rising rising trend 4.3 (1.3, 8.3)
Muskingum County 2 Rural 9.0 (6.7, 11.9) 14 (1, 58) 11
*
*
Ross County 2 Rural 9.2 (6.8, 12.2) 12 (1, 58) 10 stable stable trend 4.7 (0.0, 11.2)
Ashtabula County 2 Urban 6.5 (4.7, 8.9) 49 (9, 67) 9 falling falling trend -4.6 (-10.5, -0.3)
Belmont County 2 Urban 8.6 (6.2, 11.8) 18 (1, 62) 9 rising rising trend 5.2 (0.9, 11.4)
Geauga County 2 Urban 5.9 (4.3, 8.0) 57 (15, 67) 9 stable stable trend -2.7 (-19.2, 5.1)
Hancock County 2 Rural 9.3 (6.8, 12.6) 10 (1, 61) 9 stable stable trend -6.1 (-20.1, 5.2)
Miami County 2 Urban 5.8 (4.2, 7.8) 58 (16, 67) 9 stable stable trend 2.7 (-1.1, 7.6)
Pickaway County 2 Urban 12.1 (8.8, 16.4) 1 (1, 39) 9 rising rising trend 4.2 (1.8, 7.7)
Lawrence County 2 Urban 9.8 (6.9, 13.5) 8 (1, 57) 8 rising rising trend 4.5 (0.9, 9.4)
Wayne County 2 Rural 5.1 (3.6, 7.0) 64 (28, 67) 8 stable stable trend 2.2 (-2.0, 7.5)
Wood County 2 Urban 4.8 (3.4, 6.6) 66 (35, 67) 8 falling falling trend -22.6 (-47.2, -2.5)
Erie County 2 Urban 6.1 (4.3, 8.7) 54 (10, 67) 8 stable stable trend 2.6 (-0.2, 6.1)
Tuscarawas County 2 Rural 5.4 (3.8, 7.6) 61 (18, 67) 8 stable stable trend 2.8 (-0.2, 6.5)
Jefferson County 2 Urban 6.1 (4.2, 8.8) 55 (10, 67) 7 stable stable trend 2.1 (-1.1, 5.7)
Allen County 2 Urban 4.4 (3.0, 6.4) 67 (38, 67) 7 stable stable trend -0.4 (-5.1, 4.8)
Washington County 2 Rural 7.2 (4.8, 10.5) 35 (3, 67) 6 rising rising trend 5.7 (3.1, 9.4)
Coshocton County 2 Rural 11.4 (7.7, 16.6) 4 (1, 55) 6
*
*
Sandusky County 2 Rural 7.0 (4.7, 10.1) 42 (4, 67) 6 rising rising trend 5.8 (0.7, 13.6)
Guernsey County 2 Rural 10.8 (7.1, 16.0) 5 (1, 61) 6
*
*
Marion County 2 Rural 6.3 (4.2, 9.2) 51 (8, 67) 6 stable stable trend 2.9 (-1.8, 9.3)
Ottawa County 2 Urban 7.2 (4.8, 10.8) 34 (3, 67) 6
*
*
Crawford County 2 Rural 9.5 (6.2, 14.0) 9 (1, 65) 6
*
*
Ashland County 2 Rural 7.9 (5.2, 11.8) 23 (1, 67) 6 rising rising trend 4.0 (1.5, 7.6)
Seneca County 2 Rural 6.7 (4.3, 10.1) 44 (4, 67) 5
*
*
Knox County 2 Rural 6.2 (4.0, 9.3) 52 (6, 67) 5 rising rising trend 5.0 (1.4, 10.1)
Huron County 2 Rural 6.1 (3.9, 9.3) 53 (7, 67) 5
*
*
Shelby County 2 Rural 7.3 (4.6, 11.2) 32 (2, 67) 5
*
*
Fayette County 2 Rural 11.8 (7.3, 18.1) 2 (1, 62) 5
*
*
Fulton County 2 Urban 8.1 (5.1, 12.4) 22 (1, 67) 5
*
*
Athens County 2 Rural 6.7 (4.1, 10.3) 46 (3, 67) 4
*
*
Champaign County 2 Rural 7.8 (4.8, 12.2) 26 (1, 67) 4
*
*
Highland County 2 Rural 7.6 (4.7, 11.9) 28 (1, 67) 4
*
*
Adams County 2 Rural 10.4 (6.3, 16.4) 7 (1, 66) 4
*
*
Darke County 2 Rural 4.8 (2.9, 7.7) 65 (19, 67) 4
*
*
Williams County 2 Rural 7.2 (4.3, 11.4) 36 (2, 67) 4
*
*
Logan County 2 Rural 5.4 (3.2, 8.9) 62 (9, 67) 4
*
*
Preble County 2 Rural 5.6 (3.2, 9.3) 60 (7, 67) 4
*
*
Union County 2 Urban 5.7 (3.3, 9.1) 59 (8, 67) 4
*
*
Meigs County 2 Rural 8.8 (5.1, 14.9) 15 (1, 67) 3
*
*
Perry County 2 Urban 7.1 (4.0, 11.9) 39 (1, 67) 3
*
*
Defiance County 2 Rural 5.4 (3.1, 9.1) 63 (8, 67) 3
*
*
Hocking County 2 Urban 7.0 (4.0, 11.9) 41 (1, 67) 3 stable stable trend 0.8 (-4.4, 7.1)
Mercer County 2 Rural 6.0 (3.3, 10.1) 56 (4, 67) 3
*
*
Auglaize County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brown County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carroll County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clinton County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gallia County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardin County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harrison County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Henry County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Holmes County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Madison County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Monroe County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morgan County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morrow County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Noble County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Paulding County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pike County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Putnam County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Van Wert County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Vinton County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wyandot County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/30/2026 1:28 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top