Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Oklahoma by County

Liver & Bile Duct (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count

County
sort alphabetically by name ascending 		2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
sort by rural urban descending 		Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate †
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate descending 		CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by CI rank descending 		Average Annual Count
sort by count ascending 		Recent Trend
 Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
Oklahoma 2 N/A 9.3 (9.0, 9.7) N/A 469 stable stable trend 1.5 (-4.7, 3.9)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 8.6 (8.6, 8.7) N/A 37,201 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.2, -1.2)
Oklahoma County 2 Urban 9.9 (9.0, 10.9) 18 (8, 28) 90 rising rising trend 2.6 (1.3, 4.2)
Tulsa County 2 Urban 9.5 (8.6, 10.5) 23 (10, 31) 76 rising rising trend 3.2 (2.0, 4.8)
Cleveland County 2 Urban 8.5 (7.1, 10.1) 31 (11, 37) 28 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.2, 3.7)
Canadian County 2 Urban 9.2 (7.3, 11.6) 26 (6, 36) 16 rising rising trend 3.4 (1.1, 7.0)
Comanche County 2 Urban 8.7 (6.6, 11.4) 29 (6, 38) 12 stable stable trend 2.6 (-0.6, 6.6)
Muskogee County 2 Rural 10.4 (7.6, 14.0) 13 (2, 37) 9 stable stable trend 2.7 (-1.1, 7.4)
Pottawatomie County 2 Rural 10.3 (7.4, 13.8) 14 (2, 37) 9 rising rising trend 4.1 (0.6, 9.1)
Rogers County 2 Urban 6.8 (4.9, 9.2) 37 (16, 39) 9
*
*
Creek County 2 Urban 8.5 (6.1, 11.7) 30 (6, 39) 9 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.8, 5.7)
Cherokee County 2 Rural 13.3 (9.4, 18.4) 3 (1, 32) 8
*
*
Osage County 2 Urban 11.3 (7.9, 15.7) 9 (1, 36) 8 rising rising trend 4.5 (2.1, 7.9)
Wagoner County 2 Urban 6.9 (4.8, 9.6) 35 (14, 39) 8
*
*
Delaware County 2 Rural 9.6 (6.6, 13.8) 22 (3, 39) 7
*
*
Kay County 2 Rural 11.6 (8.0, 16.4) 7 (1, 36) 7 rising rising trend 4.1 (0.4, 9.0)
Bryan County 2 Rural 10.7 (7.4, 15.2) 11 (1, 38) 7 stable stable trend 2.2 (-2.6, 8.4)
Carter County 2 Rural 9.4 (6.4, 13.4) 24 (3, 39) 7
*
*
Logan County 2 Urban 9.8 (6.7, 14.0) 21 (2, 39) 7 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.7, 6.6)
Le Flore County 2 Rural 10.1 (6.8, 14.6) 16 (1, 39) 6 rising rising trend 5.0 (0.2, 12.4)
Sequoyah County 2 Urban 11.7 (7.9, 16.9) 6 (1, 37) 6
*
*
Stephens County 2 Rural 9.4 (6.3, 13.7) 25 (2, 39) 6 rising rising trend 5.2 (1.0, 11.2)
Mayes County 2 Rural 9.9 (6.6, 14.4) 20 (2, 39) 6
*
*
Payne County 2 Rural 7.2 (4.8, 10.5) 33 (9, 39) 6 stable stable trend 0.9 (-3.9, 6.9)
Pittsburg County 2 Rural 9.9 (6.5, 14.6) 19 (1, 39) 6
*
*
Garfield County 2 Urban 6.4 (4.1, 9.5) 39 (16, 39) 5
*
*
Washington County 2 Rural 6.7 (4.3, 10.0) 38 (11, 39) 5 stable stable trend 4.6 (-0.7, 11.9)
Caddo County 2 Rural 15.0 (9.7, 22.5) 2 (1, 33) 5
*
*
Grady County 2 Urban 7.0 (4.4, 10.5) 34 (9, 39) 5
*
*
McCurtain County 2 Rural 11.5 (7.3, 17.5) 8 (1, 39) 5 stable stable trend 2.6 (-0.9, 6.8)
Pontotoc County 2 Rural 10.1 (6.5, 15.2) 17 (1, 39) 5 stable stable trend 2.7 (-1.9, 8.8)
Marshall County 2 Rural 17.2 (10.6, 27.2) 1 (1, 31) 4
*
*
Okmulgee County 2 Urban 8.8 (5.4, 13.6) 28 (3, 39) 4 falling falling trend -20.1 (-35.2, -2.2)
Lincoln County 2 Urban 8.4 (5.0, 13.4) 32 (3, 39) 4 falling falling trend -27.1 (-47.1, -8.7)
McIntosh County 2 Rural 13.1 (7.7, 21.5) 4 (1, 38) 4
*
*
Ottawa County 2 Rural 10.6 (6.4, 16.6) 12 (1, 39) 4
*
*
Garvin County 2 Rural 10.8 (6.4, 17.3) 10 (1, 39) 4
*
*
McClain County 2 Urban 6.8 (4.0, 11.1) 36 (7, 39) 4
*
*
Jackson County 2 Rural 12.2 (6.9, 19.9) 5 (1, 39) 3
*
*
Custer County 2 Rural 10.2 (5.8, 16.9) 15 (1, 39) 3
*
*
Seminole County 2 Rural 9.1 (5.1, 15.4) 27 (1, 39) 3
*
*
Adair County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Alfalfa County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Atoka County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Beaver County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Beckham County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Blaine County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Choctaw County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cimarron County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coal County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cotton County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Craig County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dewey County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ellis County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greer County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harmon County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harper County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Haskell County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hughes County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jefferson County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Johnston County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kingfisher County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kiowa County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Latimer County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Love County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Major County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Murray County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Noble County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Nowata County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Okfuskee County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pawnee County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pushmataha County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roger Mills County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Texas County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tillman County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washita County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Woods County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Woodward County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/25/2026 2:42 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top