Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Indiana by County

Liver & Bile Duct (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
sort alphabetically by name ascending 		2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
sort by rural urban descending 		Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate †
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate descending 		CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by CI rank descending 		Average Annual Count
sort by count descending 		Recent Trend
 Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
Indiana 2 N/A 8.2 (7.9, 8.5) N/A 710 falling falling trend -4.5 (-6.2, -2.1)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 8.6 (8.6, 8.7) N/A 37,201 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.2, -1.2)
Starke County 2 Rural 11.8 (7.3, 18.6) 1 (1, 53) 4
*
*
Jennings County 2 Rural 11.8 (7.2, 18.5) 2 (1, 53) 4
*
*
Marion County 2 Urban 11.5 (10.6, 12.5) 3 (1, 14) 121 falling falling trend -8.3 (-13.6, -2.5)
White County 2 Rural 11.0 (6.7, 17.5) 4 (1, 53) 4
*
*
Owen County 2 Urban 11.0 (6.8, 17.7) 5 (1, 54) 4
*
*
Morgan County 2 Urban 10.9 (8.1, 14.4) 6 (1, 42) 11 rising rising trend 5.9 (3.1, 10.2)
Decatur County 2 Rural 10.3 (5.8, 17.0) 7 (1, 55) 3
*
*
Orange County 2 Rural 10.3 (5.7, 17.5) 8 (1, 55) 3
*
*
Huntington County 2 Rural 10.0 (6.5, 15.0) 9 (1, 53) 5
*
*
Gibson County 2 Rural 9.9 (6.2, 15.3) 10 (1, 54) 5
*
*
Cass County 2 Rural 9.9 (6.3, 14.8) 11 (1, 54) 5
*
*
Greene County 2 Rural 9.8 (6.2, 15.1) 12 (1, 53) 5
*
*
Vigo County 2 Urban 9.4 (7.3, 12.1) 13 (2, 45) 13 rising rising trend 3.6 (0.7, 7.3)
Shelby County 2 Urban 9.4 (6.3, 13.7) 14 (1, 53) 6
*
*
Clay County 2 Urban 9.4 (5.4, 15.5) 15 (1, 55) 3
*
*
Wayne County 2 Rural 9.3 (6.8, 12.6) 16 (1, 51) 9
*
*
Lake County 2 Urban 9.3 (8.3, 10.4) 17 (6, 32) 64 stable stable trend -10.1 (-23.5, 2.4)
Delaware County 2 Urban 9.1 (6.9, 11.8) 18 (2, 49) 13
*
*
Jackson County 2 Rural 9.0 (5.8, 13.4) 19 (1, 54) 5
*
*
Henry County 2 Rural 8.9 (6.0, 12.8) 20 (1, 53) 6
*
*
Whitley County 2 Urban 8.7 (5.3, 13.7) 21 (1, 55) 4
*
*
Wells County 2 Urban 8.6 (4.8, 14.6) 22 (1, 55) 3
*
*
LaPorte County 2 Urban 8.6 (6.6, 11.1) 23 (4, 50) 14 stable stable trend 4.0 (-0.4, 10.4)
Madison County 2 Urban 8.6 (6.8, 10.9) 24 (5, 49) 15 rising rising trend 4.8 (2.7, 7.5)
Vanderburgh County 2 Urban 8.6 (7.0, 10.5) 25 (5, 46) 21 falling falling trend -16.3 (-28.4, -2.9)
Johnson County 2 Urban 8.5 (6.8, 10.6) 26 (5, 48) 17 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.6, 3.7)
Grant County 2 Rural 8.5 (6.0, 11.7) 27 (2, 53) 8 stable stable trend 3.8 (0.0, 8.7)
Allen County 2 Urban 8.3 (7.1, 9.6) 28 (9, 44) 37 rising rising trend 4.8 (2.9, 7.4)
Dearborn County 2 Urban 8.1 (5.3, 11.8) 29 (2, 55) 6 stable stable trend 3.9 (-0.7, 10.7)
Elkhart County 2 Urban 7.9 (6.3, 9.7) 30 (9, 50) 19 rising rising trend 3.4 (0.8, 7.0)
Monroe County 2 Urban 7.9 (5.9, 10.3) 31 (5, 53) 11 stable stable trend -7.5 (-18.3, 0.4)
Putnam County 2 Rural 7.8 (4.8, 12.3) 32 (1, 55) 4
*
*
Hendricks County 2 Urban 7.7 (6.1, 9.7) 33 (8, 51) 16 rising rising trend 3.2 (0.6, 6.9)
Knox County 2 Rural 7.7 (4.7, 12.1) 34 (2, 55) 4 stable stable trend 1.8 (-2.0, 6.7)
Clark County 2 Urban 7.5 (5.7, 9.7) 35 (8, 53) 13 falling falling trend -18.0 (-29.1, -3.9)
Clinton County 2 Rural 7.5 (4.2, 12.4) 36 (1, 55) 3
*
*
Harrison County 2 Urban 7.4 (4.6, 11.6) 37 (3, 55) 4
*
*
Hancock County 2 Urban 7.3 (5.2, 10.1) 38 (7, 55) 8 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.3, 5.4)
Jefferson County 2 Rural 7.1 (4.2, 11.5) 39 (3, 55) 4
*
*
Marshall County 2 Rural 7.1 (4.3, 11.0) 40 (3, 55) 4 stable stable trend 3.0 (-1.8, 9.5)
Howard County 2 Urban 6.9 (5.0, 9.4) 41 (9, 55) 9 stable stable trend -9.2 (-26.1, 1.9)
Boone County 2 Urban 6.8 (4.5, 9.9) 42 (7, 55) 6
*
*
Tippecanoe County 2 Urban 6.8 (5.1, 8.8) 43 (12, 55) 12 stable stable trend 2.0 (-8.8, 7.1)
Steuben County 2 Rural 6.7 (3.8, 11.3) 44 (3, 55) 3
*
*
Warrick County 2 Urban 6.5 (4.3, 9.5) 45 (9, 55) 6
*
*
Bartholomew County 2 Urban 6.4 (4.4, 9.1) 46 (12, 55) 7 rising rising trend 4.7 (1.1, 9.9)
St. Joseph County 2 Urban 6.2 (5.1, 7.6) 47 (26, 54) 21 rising rising trend 2.6 (0.3, 5.4)
Porter County 2 Urban 6.2 (4.8, 7.9) 48 (21, 55) 15 stable stable trend 2.3 (-1.9, 7.8)
Floyd County 2 Urban 6.2 (4.2, 8.8) 49 (12, 55) 7 falling falling trend -8.6 (-35.2, -1.3)
Wabash County 2 Rural 6.0 (3.4, 10.2) 50 (6, 55) 3 stable stable trend 1.1 (-3.6, 6.9)
Hamilton County 2 Urban 5.9 (4.8, 7.1) 51 (30, 55) 22 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.1, 4.4)
Lawrence County 2 Rural 5.4 (3.3, 8.7) 52 (14, 55) 4 stable stable trend 2.1 (-1.9, 7.2)
Dubois County 2 Rural 5.3 (3.0, 8.9) 53 (12, 55) 3
*
*
Noble County 2 Rural 5.1 (2.9, 8.6) 54 (14, 55) 3
*
*
Kosciusko County 2 Rural 4.6 (3.0, 6.9) 55 (32, 55) 5 stable stable trend 2.8 (-1.3, 8.9)
Adams County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Benton County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Blackford County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brown County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carroll County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crawford County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Daviess County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
DeKalb County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fayette County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fountain County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Franklin County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fulton County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jasper County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jay County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
LaGrange County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Miami County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montgomery County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Newton County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ohio County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Parke County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pike County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Posey County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pulaski County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Randolph County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ripley County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rush County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scott County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Spencer County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sullivan County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Switzerland County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tipton County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Union County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Vermillion County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Warren County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washington County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/19/2026 4:32 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

2 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2024 submission).

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top