Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for North Carolina by County

Liver & Bile Duct (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
North Carolina 2 N/A 9.0 (8.7, 9.2) N/A 1,231 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.8, 1.3)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 8.6 (8.6, 8.7) N/A 37,201 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.2, -1.2)
Pamlico County 2 Rural 22.9 (13.1, 38.1) 1 (1, 58) 5
*
*
Greene County 2 Rural 16.6 (10.4, 25.5) 2 (1, 72) 5
*
*
Anson County 2 Urban 15.9 (9.7, 24.7) 3 (1, 76) 5
*
*
McDowell County 2 Rural 15.5 (11.6, 20.5) 4 (1, 38) 11
*
*
Granville County 2 Rural 14.6 (11.2, 18.9) 5 (1, 43) 13 rising rising trend 3.8 (0.5, 8.5)
Stanly County 2 Rural 14.2 (10.9, 18.4) 6 (1, 45) 13 rising rising trend 6.8 (4.0, 11.0)
Hertford County 2 Rural 13.5 (8.0, 21.7) 7 (1, 80) 4
*
*
Gaston County 2 Urban 13.2 (11.4, 15.3) 8 (2, 27) 40 stable stable trend -0.7 (-4.0, 1.7)
Scotland County 2 Rural 12.3 (8.2, 18.0) 9 (1, 77) 6
*
*
Chowan County 2 Rural 11.7 (6.6, 20.6) 10 (1, 80) 3
*
*
Vance County 2 Rural 11.6 (8.0, 16.4) 11 (2, 76) 7 rising rising trend 6.5 (3.0, 11.5)
Randolph County 2 Urban 11.4 (9.4, 13.8) 12 (4, 54) 23 rising rising trend 6.0 (4.0, 8.9)
Alamance County 2 Urban 11.2 (9.3, 13.3) 13 (5, 52) 26 rising rising trend 4.2 (1.7, 7.7)
Wilson County 2 Rural 11.2 (8.5, 14.5) 14 (3, 68) 13 rising rising trend 3.8 (2.1, 6.0)
Rutherford County 2 Rural 11.1 (8.4, 14.6) 15 (3, 70) 12
*
*
Yadkin County 2 Urban 11.1 (7.7, 15.9) 16 (2, 77) 7 rising rising trend 6.1 (2.5, 11.8)
Haywood County 2 Rural 11.1 (8.4, 14.6) 17 (3, 70) 12 stable stable trend -11.6 (-22.1, 3.4)
Halifax County 2 Rural 10.8 (7.6, 15.1) 18 (2, 77) 8 falling falling trend -18.6 (-29.4, -9.1)
Wayne County 2 Urban 10.6 (8.3, 13.4) 19 (4, 70) 15 rising rising trend 6.3 (3.8, 9.8)
Cleveland County 2 Rural 10.6 (8.3, 13.4) 20 (4, 70) 15 rising rising trend 7.2 (4.4, 11.7)
Burke County 2 Urban 10.5 (8.2, 13.5) 21 (4, 71) 14 stable stable trend -9.2 (-18.3, 2.6)
Yancey County 2 Rural 10.5 (6.2, 17.6) 22 (2, 80) 4
*
*
Caldwell County 2 Urban 10.4 (7.9, 13.4) 23 (4, 73) 13 rising rising trend 3.6 (0.5, 7.6)
Franklin County 2 Urban 10.3 (7.7, 13.8) 24 (4, 76) 11 stable stable trend 2.8 (-0.8, 8.1)
Onslow County 2 Urban 10.3 (8.1, 12.9) 25 (5, 70) 16 rising rising trend 2.8 (0.6, 6.0)
Robeson County 2 Rural 10.3 (8.0, 13.1) 26 (5, 72) 15 rising rising trend 5.0 (2.1, 8.8)
Northampton County 2 Rural 10.3 (5.7, 18.1) 27 (1, 80) 3 stable stable trend 3.1 (-1.8, 9.8)
Buncombe County 2 Urban 10.2 (8.8, 11.7) 28 (9, 59) 41 stable stable trend -8.4 (-16.5, 1.2)
Lincoln County 2 Urban 10.0 (7.7, 12.9) 29 (6, 72) 13 rising rising trend 4.7 (1.4, 9.7)
Richmond County 2 Rural 9.7 (6.4, 14.4) 30 (3, 80) 6 stable stable trend 1.4 (-3.1, 6.6)
Cabarrus County 2 Urban 9.7 (8.0, 11.6) 31 (9, 69) 24 rising rising trend 3.5 (1.4, 6.5)
Sampson County 2 Rural 9.6 (6.7, 13.4) 32 (4, 80) 8 rising rising trend 5.7 (1.3, 12.1)
Beaufort County 2 Rural 9.5 (6.7, 13.4) 33 (5, 79) 8 stable stable trend 3.6 (-0.8, 9.8)
Nash County 2 Urban 9.5 (7.2, 12.3) 34 (6, 76) 13 rising rising trend 2.7 (0.5, 5.4)
Columbus County 2 Rural 9.5 (6.5, 13.6) 35 (4, 79) 7
*
*
Craven County 2 Rural 9.5 (7.3, 12.2) 36 (7, 76) 13 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.2, 5.6)
Jackson County 2 Rural 9.4 (6.2, 13.9) 37 (3, 80) 6 stable stable trend 4.1 (-0.7, 11.7)
Brunswick County 2 Urban 9.2 (7.6, 11.3) 38 (11, 73) 28 rising rising trend 4.3 (0.9, 9.7)
Pender County 2 Urban 9.2 (6.5, 12.7) 39 (5, 79) 8 rising rising trend 3.5 (0.2, 8.4)
Forsyth County 2 Urban 9.1 (7.9, 10.4) 40 (17, 67) 45 rising rising trend 3.4 (1.2, 6.2)
Mecklenburg County 2 Urban 9.1 (8.3, 9.9) 41 (22, 61) 102 stable stable trend -0.8 (-6.1, 2.0)
Montgomery County 2 Rural 9.1 (5.3, 15.0) 42 (2, 80) 4
*
*
Carteret County 2 Rural 9.1 (6.8, 12.1) 43 (8, 78) 11 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.6, 4.9)
Rockingham County 2 Urban 8.9 (6.8, 11.5) 44 (9, 77) 13 falling falling trend -5.7 (-16.4, -0.4)
Davidson County 2 Urban 8.8 (7.2, 10.6) 45 (14, 75) 23 stable stable trend -1.3 (-12.0, 3.5)
Guilford County 2 Urban 8.7 (7.7, 9.8) 46 (22, 69) 57 stable stable trend 2.5 (-1.2, 3.6)
Edgecombe County 2 Urban 8.6 (5.9, 12.3) 47 (7, 80) 7 rising rising trend 3.8 (1.3, 7.0)
Davie County 2 Urban 8.5 (5.7, 12.5) 48 (6, 80) 6
*
*
Wilkes County 2 Rural 8.5 (6.2, 11.5) 49 (9, 79) 9 rising rising trend 3.7 (1.1, 7.2)
Harnett County 2 Rural 8.5 (6.5, 10.9) 50 (11, 79) 13 stable stable trend -4.6 (-15.1, 0.1)
Rowan County 2 Urban 8.4 (6.7, 10.5) 51 (15, 78) 17 rising rising trend 2.9 (0.6, 5.8)
Stokes County 2 Urban 8.4 (5.8, 12.2) 52 (7, 80) 7 rising rising trend 4.9 (2.1, 9.1)
Hoke County 2 Urban 8.3 (4.9, 13.2) 53 (4, 80) 4
*
*
Durham County 2 Urban 8.3 (7.0, 9.8) 54 (21, 75) 30 stable stable trend -7.5 (-24.7, 0.7)
Johnston County 2 Urban 8.3 (6.8, 10.1) 55 (19, 77) 22 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.4, 6.0)
Surry County 2 Rural 8.2 (5.9, 11.2) 56 (10, 80) 9 rising rising trend 23.6 (3.0, 57.2)
Transylvania County 2 Rural 8.2 (4.7, 13.6) 57 (4, 80) 5
*
*
Wake County 2 Urban 8.1 (7.4, 8.9) 58 (35, 71) 95 stable stable trend 0.7 (-6.3, 4.1)
Bladen County 2 Rural 8.0 (4.9, 12.8) 59 (5, 80) 4
*
*
Macon County 2 Rural 7.9 (5.0, 12.2) 60 (7, 80) 6 rising rising trend 5.0 (0.6, 12.2)
Henderson County 2 Urban 7.8 (6.1, 10.0) 61 (19, 79) 15 rising rising trend 4.2 (2.3, 6.7)
Cumberland County 2 Urban 7.8 (6.5, 9.3) 62 (25, 77) 27 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.4, 4.6)
Duplin County 2 Rural 7.8 (5.1, 11.5) 63 (9, 80) 6 rising rising trend 5.2 (2.0, 9.8)
Cherokee County 2 Rural 7.7 (4.3, 13.3) 64 (5, 80) 4
*
*
New Hanover County 2 Urban 7.6 (6.3, 9.1) 65 (28, 79) 25 stable stable trend -1.0 (-9.2, 2.0)
Person County 2 Urban 7.5 (4.6, 11.7) 66 (9, 80) 5 stable stable trend -1.6 (-13.5, 2.9)
Ashe County 2 Rural 7.5 (4.4, 12.6) 67 (6, 80) 4
*
*
Iredell County 2 Urban 7.4 (5.9, 9.2) 68 (27, 79) 19 stable stable trend 1.6 (-2.0, 6.3)
Orange County 2 Urban 7.4 (5.7, 9.5) 69 (22, 80) 14 stable stable trend 2.8 (-0.4, 7.3)
Moore County 2 Urban 7.3 (5.6, 9.4) 70 (24, 80) 13 stable stable trend 1.1 (-2.6, 6.0)
Lenoir County 2 Rural 7.2 (4.8, 10.6) 71 (15, 80) 6 stable stable trend 1.5 (-2.2, 6.1)
Lee County 2 Rural 7.1 (4.7, 10.3) 72 (14, 80) 6 falling falling trend -28.0 (-53.2, -9.9)
Catawba County 2 Urban 7.0 (5.5, 8.8) 73 (33, 80) 16 stable stable trend 3.4 (-0.2, 8.7)
Union County 2 Urban 6.9 (5.5, 8.5) 74 (34, 80) 18 stable stable trend -5.5 (-16.3, 3.2)
Pitt County 2 Urban 6.7 (5.1, 8.6) 75 (34, 80) 13 rising rising trend 3.3 (1.1, 6.0)
Alexander County 2 Urban 6.3 (3.6, 10.5) 76 (12, 80) 3
*
*
Pasquotank County 2 Rural 5.9 (3.3, 10.0) 77 (13, 80) 3 stable stable trend 3.1 (-0.6, 7.9)
Watauga County 2 Rural 5.9 (3.6, 9.5) 78 (23, 80) 4 stable stable trend 2.7 (-1.0, 7.9)
Dare County 2 Rural 5.9 (3.5, 9.8) 79 (17, 80) 4
*
*
Chatham County 2 Urban 5.8 (4.2, 8.1) 80 (43, 80) 8 stable stable trend 2.5 (-1.3, 8.4)
Alleghany County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Avery County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bertie County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Camden County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Caswell County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Currituck County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gates County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Graham County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hyde County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jones County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Madison County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mitchell County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perquimans County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Polk County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Swain County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tyrrell County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Warren County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washington County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/18/2026 9:21 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

2 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2024 submission).

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top