Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Ohio by County

Liver & Bile Duct (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Ohio 2 N/A 7.6 (7.4, 7.8) N/A 1,236 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.3, -1.5)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 8.6 (8.6, 8.7) N/A 37,201 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.2, -1.2)
Wood County 2 Urban 4.8 (3.4, 6.6) 66 (35, 67) 8 falling falling trend -22.6 (-47.2, -2.5)
Clark County 2 Urban 8.7 (6.9, 10.8) 17 (2, 54) 17 falling falling trend -19.2 (-34.5, -0.8)
Clermont County 2 Urban 7.3 (6.0, 8.9) 33 (10, 60) 21 stable stable trend -9.6 (-20.6, 3.2)
Lucas County 2 Urban 8.7 (7.6, 9.9) 16 (5, 40) 50 stable stable trend -8.9 (-19.7, 2.6)
Montgomery County 2 Urban 9.3 (8.3, 10.3) 11 (4, 31) 71 stable stable trend -6.6 (-16.8, 3.6)
Hancock County 2 Rural 9.3 (6.8, 12.6) 10 (1, 61) 9 stable stable trend -6.1 (-20.1, 5.2)
Ashtabula County 2 Urban 6.5 (4.7, 8.9) 49 (9, 67) 9 falling falling trend -4.6 (-10.5, -0.3)
Warren County 2 Urban 6.5 (5.3, 8.0) 50 (17, 65) 20 stable stable trend -4.2 (-21.2, 3.6)
Lorain County 2 Urban 8.1 (7.0, 9.4) 20 (7, 51) 37 stable stable trend -3.3 (-11.8, 3.9)
Franklin County 2 Urban 7.6 (7.0, 8.3) 27 (15, 46) 107 stable stable trend -3.1 (-8.8, 0.1)
Hamilton County 2 Urban 7.9 (7.2, 8.8) 24 (12, 46) 83 stable stable trend -3.0 (-12.5, 1.6)
Geauga County 2 Urban 5.9 (4.3, 8.0) 57 (15, 67) 9 stable stable trend -2.7 (-19.2, 5.1)
Licking County 2 Urban 6.7 (5.3, 8.4) 45 (12, 65) 16 stable stable trend -1.8 (-11.5, 2.4)
Allen County 2 Urban 4.4 (3.0, 6.4) 67 (38, 67) 7 stable stable trend -0.4 (-5.1, 4.8)
Cuyahoga County 2 Urban 9.1 (8.5, 9.8) 13 (6, 26) 168 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.8, 2.0)
Hocking County 2 Urban 7.0 (4.0, 11.9) 41 (1, 67) 3 stable stable trend 0.8 (-4.4, 7.1)
Jefferson County 2 Urban 6.1 (4.2, 8.8) 55 (10, 67) 7 stable stable trend 2.1 (-1.1, 5.7)
Greene County 2 Urban 6.6 (5.2, 8.3) 48 (14, 65) 16 stable stable trend 2.2 (-0.6, 5.8)
Wayne County 2 Rural 5.1 (3.6, 7.0) 64 (28, 67) 8 stable stable trend 2.2 (-2.0, 7.5)
Delaware County 2 Urban 7.2 (5.7, 8.9) 37 (8, 62) 17 stable stable trend 2.5 (-0.7, 7.2)
Butler County 2 Urban 7.5 (6.5, 8.8) 29 (11, 55) 37 rising rising trend 2.6 (1.3, 4.3)
Erie County 2 Urban 6.1 (4.3, 8.7) 54 (10, 67) 8 stable stable trend 2.6 (-0.2, 6.1)
Miami County 2 Urban 5.8 (4.2, 7.8) 58 (16, 67) 9 stable stable trend 2.7 (-1.1, 7.6)
Richland County 2 Urban 8.1 (6.3, 10.3) 21 (4, 59) 15 stable stable trend 2.8 (-1.0, 7.6)
Tuscarawas County 2 Rural 5.4 (3.8, 7.6) 61 (18, 67) 8 stable stable trend 2.8 (-0.2, 6.5)
Marion County 2 Rural 6.3 (4.2, 9.2) 51 (8, 67) 6 stable stable trend 2.9 (-1.8, 9.3)
Summit County 2 Urban 7.1 (6.3, 8.0) 40 (17, 56) 55 rising rising trend 2.9 (1.2, 4.9)
Trumbull County 2 Urban 7.5 (6.2, 9.0) 30 (10, 58) 25 rising rising trend 3.1 (1.1, 5.5)
Mahoning County 2 Urban 8.4 (7.1, 9.9) 19 (5, 50) 31 rising rising trend 3.3 (1.3, 5.7)
Portage County 2 Urban 6.9 (5.4, 8.8) 43 (10, 64) 15 stable stable trend 3.3 (0.0, 7.5)
Lake County 2 Urban 6.6 (5.5, 8.0) 47 (18, 63) 25 rising rising trend 3.4 (1.1, 6.2)
Fairfield County 2 Urban 7.1 (5.6, 9.1) 38 (9, 63) 14 rising rising trend 3.8 (1.3, 7.5)
Stark County 2 Urban 7.5 (6.5, 8.6) 31 (13, 54) 41 rising rising trend 3.9 (2.1, 6.1)
Ashland County 2 Rural 7.9 (5.2, 11.8) 23 (1, 67) 6 rising rising trend 4.0 (1.5, 7.6)
Pickaway County 2 Urban 12.1 (8.8, 16.4) 1 (1, 39) 9 rising rising trend 4.2 (1.8, 7.7)
Scioto County 2 Rural 11.5 (8.7, 15.0) 3 (1, 35) 12 rising rising trend 4.3 (1.3, 8.3)
Columbiana County 2 Rural 10.4 (8.1, 13.1) 6 (1, 41) 16 rising rising trend 4.5 (2.2, 7.3)
Lawrence County 2 Urban 9.8 (6.9, 13.5) 8 (1, 57) 8 rising rising trend 4.5 (0.9, 9.4)
Ross County 2 Rural 9.2 (6.8, 12.2) 12 (1, 58) 10 stable stable trend 4.7 (0.0, 11.2)
Knox County 2 Rural 6.2 (4.0, 9.3) 52 (6, 67) 5 rising rising trend 5.0 (1.4, 10.1)
Belmont County 2 Urban 8.6 (6.2, 11.8) 18 (1, 62) 9 rising rising trend 5.2 (0.9, 11.4)
Washington County 2 Rural 7.2 (4.8, 10.5) 35 (3, 67) 6 rising rising trend 5.7 (3.1, 9.4)
Medina County 2 Urban 7.8 (6.4, 9.6) 25 (6, 56) 21 rising rising trend 5.8 (1.0, 17.6)
Sandusky County 2 Rural 7.0 (4.7, 10.1) 42 (4, 67) 6 rising rising trend 5.8 (0.7, 13.6)
Adams County 2 Rural 10.4 (6.3, 16.4) 7 (1, 66) 4
*
*
Athens County 2 Rural 6.7 (4.1, 10.3) 46 (3, 67) 4
*
*
Champaign County 2 Rural 7.8 (4.8, 12.2) 26 (1, 67) 4
*
*
Coshocton County 2 Rural 11.4 (7.7, 16.6) 4 (1, 55) 6
*
*
Crawford County 2 Rural 9.5 (6.2, 14.0) 9 (1, 65) 6
*
*
Darke County 2 Rural 4.8 (2.9, 7.7) 65 (19, 67) 4
*
*
Defiance County 2 Rural 5.4 (3.1, 9.1) 63 (8, 67) 3
*
*
Fayette County 2 Rural 11.8 (7.3, 18.1) 2 (1, 62) 5
*
*
Fulton County 2 Urban 8.1 (5.1, 12.4) 22 (1, 67) 5
*
*
Guernsey County 2 Rural 10.8 (7.1, 16.0) 5 (1, 61) 6
*
*
Highland County 2 Rural 7.6 (4.7, 11.9) 28 (1, 67) 4
*
*
Huron County 2 Rural 6.1 (3.9, 9.3) 53 (7, 67) 5
*
*
Logan County 2 Rural 5.4 (3.2, 8.9) 62 (9, 67) 4
*
*
Meigs County 2 Rural 8.8 (5.1, 14.9) 15 (1, 67) 3
*
*
Mercer County 2 Rural 6.0 (3.3, 10.1) 56 (4, 67) 3
*
*
Muskingum County 2 Rural 9.0 (6.7, 11.9) 14 (1, 58) 11
*
*
Ottawa County 2 Urban 7.2 (4.8, 10.8) 34 (3, 67) 6
*
*
Perry County 2 Urban 7.1 (4.0, 11.9) 39 (1, 67) 3
*
*
Preble County 2 Rural 5.6 (3.2, 9.3) 60 (7, 67) 4
*
*
Seneca County 2 Rural 6.7 (4.3, 10.1) 44 (4, 67) 5
*
*
Shelby County 2 Rural 7.3 (4.6, 11.2) 32 (2, 67) 5
*
*
Union County 2 Urban 5.7 (3.3, 9.1) 59 (8, 67) 4
*
*
Williams County 2 Rural 7.2 (4.3, 11.4) 36 (2, 67) 4
*
*
Auglaize County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brown County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carroll County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clinton County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gallia County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardin County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harrison County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Henry County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Holmes County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Madison County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Monroe County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morgan County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morrow County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Noble County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Paulding County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pike County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Putnam County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Van Wert County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Vinton County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wyandot County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/18/2026 4:10 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

2 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2024 submission).

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top