Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for North Carolina by County

Pancreas (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
North Carolina 2 N/A 14.3 (14.0, 14.6) N/A 1,873 rising rising trend 1.6 (1.3, 2.0)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 13.7 (13.7, 13.8) N/A 56,905 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.5, 0.4)
Swain County 2 Rural 20.1 (12.5, 31.4) 1 (1, 85) 4
*
*
Bertie County 2 Rural 19.2 (12.4, 29.0) 2 (1, 85) 6
*
*
Montgomery County 2 Rural 19.1 (13.5, 26.5) 3 (1, 80) 8
*
*
Halifax County 2 Rural 18.8 (14.6, 24.0) 4 (1, 69) 14 rising rising trend 4.3 (1.3, 8.4)
Anson County 2 Urban 18.6 (12.2, 27.5) 5 (1, 85) 6 rising rising trend 4.3 (0.1, 10.0)
Columbus County 2 Rural 18.2 (14.0, 23.4) 6 (1, 75) 13 stable stable trend 2.2 (-1.2, 6.3)
Robeson County 2 Rural 18.1 (15.0, 21.7) 7 (1, 66) 25 rising rising trend 5.7 (3.4, 13.3)
Caswell County 2 Rural 18.1 (12.0, 26.6) 8 (1, 85) 6 stable stable trend -23.6 (-48.3, 4.7)
Alleghany County 2 Rural 17.8 (10.5, 30.0) 9 (1, 87) 4
*
*
Sampson County 2 Rural 17.8 (13.8, 22.7) 10 (1, 76) 14 stable stable trend 2.2 (-1.1, 6.2)
Scotland County 2 Rural 17.7 (12.4, 24.6) 11 (1, 84) 8 stable stable trend 2.1 (-2.2, 7.2)
Lenoir County 2 Rural 17.5 (13.5, 22.4) 12 (1, 78) 14 rising rising trend 2.8 (0.6, 5.6)
Macon County 2 Rural 17.4 (12.9, 23.3) 13 (1, 81) 12 stable stable trend 2.7 (-0.6, 6.9)
Harnett County 2 Rural 17.4 (14.4, 20.9) 14 (1, 68) 24 stable stable trend -4.8 (-12.9, 6.2)
Stanly County 2 Rural 17.3 (13.6, 21.9) 15 (1, 76) 15 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.8, 4.8)
Pitt County 2 Urban 17.0 (14.4, 20.0) 16 (2, 65) 30 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.5, 4.1)
Richmond County 2 Rural 16.9 (12.4, 22.6) 17 (1, 84) 10 stable stable trend 3.0 (0.0, 6.6)
Wayne County 2 Urban 16.9 (13.9, 20.3) 18 (1, 72) 24 rising rising trend 2.5 (0.2, 5.2)
Caldwell County 2 Urban 16.8 (13.6, 20.7) 19 (1, 75) 20 rising rising trend 3.1 (0.1, 12.6)
Vance County 2 Rural 16.8 (12.5, 22.4) 20 (1, 83) 10 rising rising trend 3.4 (1.2, 6.0)
Henderson County 2 Urban 16.6 (14.1, 19.5) 21 (3, 69) 34 rising rising trend 3.1 (1.3, 5.3)
Moore County 2 Urban 16.6 (13.8, 19.9) 22 (2, 71) 27 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.1, 3.8)
Martin County 2 Rural 16.4 (10.8, 24.5) 23 (1, 87) 6 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.6, 5.8)
Edgecombe County 2 Urban 16.3 (12.2, 21.5) 24 (1, 82) 11 stable stable trend 0.6 (-3.0, 4.4)
Haywood County 2 Rural 16.1 (12.8, 20.2) 25 (2, 78) 18 stable stable trend 0.6 (-3.2, 4.8)
Warren County 2 Rural 16.1 (10.9, 24.0) 26 (1, 86) 6 stable stable trend 1.4 (-2.4, 6.1)
Cherokee County 2 Rural 16.0 (11.0, 23.1) 27 (1, 86) 8 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.9, 4.9)
Johnston County 2 Urban 15.9 (13.5, 18.5) 28 (5, 72) 35 rising rising trend 3.0 (0.6, 6.4)
Yancey County 2 Rural 15.7 (10.3, 23.9) 29 (1, 87) 5
*
*
Franklin County 2 Urban 15.6 (12.0, 19.9) 30 (1, 83) 14 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.8, 4.8)
Davie County 2 Urban 15.5 (11.4, 20.9) 31 (1, 85) 10 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.8, 4.9)
New Hanover County 2 Urban 15.3 (13.4, 17.5) 32 (7, 72) 47 rising rising trend 3.8 (2.4, 5.8)
Surry County 2 Rural 15.3 (12.1, 19.1) 33 (3, 80) 16 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.1, 4.0)
Union County 2 Urban 15.1 (13.0, 17.5) 34 (7, 74) 38 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.6, 2.9)
Forsyth County 2 Urban 15.1 (13.5, 16.8) 35 (12, 68) 71 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.3, 2.6)
Cumberland County 2 Urban 15.1 (13.2, 17.1) 36 (9, 71) 49 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.3, 3.6)
Granville County 2 Rural 15.0 (11.4, 19.5) 37 (2, 85) 12 stable stable trend 21.3 (-0.8, 41.3)
Rowan County 2 Urban 15.0 (12.6, 17.8) 38 (6, 77) 29 rising rising trend 2.5 (0.1, 5.6)
Rockingham County 2 Urban 14.9 (12.1, 18.3) 39 (4, 81) 21 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.0, 3.4)
Rutherford County 2 Rural 14.7 (11.4, 18.8) 40 (3, 84) 15 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.5, 3.0)
Durham County 2 Urban 14.6 (12.8, 16.6) 41 (12, 75) 49 stable stable trend 1.3 (0.0, 2.9)
Chatham County 2 Urban 14.5 (11.8, 17.9) 42 (5, 82) 20 rising rising trend 3.4 (1.9, 5.5)
Onslow County 2 Urban 14.5 (11.9, 17.5) 43 (6, 81) 23 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.7, 2.5)
McDowell County 2 Rural 14.4 (10.6, 19.4) 44 (2, 85) 10 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.4, 3.0)
Davidson County 2 Urban 14.3 (12.2, 16.7) 45 (12, 80) 35 stable stable trend 1.6 (0.0, 3.7)
Mecklenburg County 2 Urban 14.3 (13.2, 15.4) 46 (25, 70) 147 rising rising trend 1.6 (0.8, 2.5)
Wilson County 2 Rural 14.2 (11.2, 17.9) 47 (4, 84) 16 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.8, 3.7)
Person County 2 Urban 14.2 (10.2, 19.5) 48 (2, 87) 9 stable stable trend -0.7 (-4.6, 3.7)
Iredell County 2 Urban 14.2 (12.1, 16.6) 49 (12, 79) 34 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.7, 2.7)
Cabarrus County 2 Urban 14.2 (12.0, 16.6) 50 (12, 79) 33 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.9, 2.9)
Lincoln County 2 Urban 14.0 (11.0, 17.5) 51 (6, 84) 16 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.2, 4.6)
Gaston County 2 Urban 13.9 (12.0, 16.0) 52 (15, 79) 39 rising rising trend 1.4 (0.4, 2.7)
Pamlico County 2 Rural 13.9 (7.4, 25.6) 53 (1, 87) 3
*
*
Chowan County 2 Rural 13.9 (7.7, 24.0) 54 (1, 87) 3
*
*
Wilkes County 2 Rural 13.8 (10.8, 17.5) 55 (6, 84) 15 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.8, 4.7)
Burke County 2 Urban 13.8 (11.0, 17.1) 56 (9, 84) 18 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.6, 5.6)
Carteret County 2 Rural 13.7 (10.9, 17.3) 57 (6, 84) 18 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.3, 4.5)
Buncombe County 2 Urban 13.7 (12.1, 15.5) 58 (23, 78) 56 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.2, 2.2)
Nash County 2 Urban 13.7 (10.9, 17.1) 59 (7, 85) 18 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.5, 4.0)
Alamance County 2 Urban 13.7 (11.5, 16.1) 60 (14, 82) 30 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.1, 3.6)
Guilford County 2 Urban 13.7 (12.4, 15.0) 61 (25, 76) 86 stable stable trend -1.1 (-8.0, 1.9)
Northampton County 2 Rural 13.7 (7.9, 22.8) 62 (1, 87) 4 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.9, 6.1)
Brunswick County 2 Urban 13.6 (11.6, 16.0) 63 (16, 81) 41 rising rising trend 2.1 (0.3, 4.6)
Alexander County 2 Urban 13.5 (9.4, 19.1) 64 (3, 87) 7
*
*
Pender County 2 Urban 13.5 (10.2, 17.7) 65 (5, 86) 12 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.9, 5.0)
Wake County 2 Urban 13.4 (12.4, 14.5) 66 (35, 75) 147 rising rising trend 1.2 (0.5, 2.1)
Randolph County 2 Urban 13.2 (11.0, 15.8) 67 (15, 83) 26 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.3, 3.9)
Cleveland County 2 Rural 13.1 (10.5, 16.2) 68 (13, 85) 18 rising rising trend 2.4 (0.3, 5.1)
Hoke County 2 Urban 13.0 (8.7, 18.8) 69 (2, 87) 6 stable stable trend 4.8 (-0.9, 28.0)
Catawba County 2 Urban 12.9 (10.8, 15.3) 70 (20, 84) 28 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.2, 4.0)
Lee County 2 Rural 12.9 (9.5, 17.1) 71 (7, 87) 10 stable stable trend -0.7 (-4.5, 3.6)
Yadkin County 2 Urban 12.7 (8.7, 18.1) 72 (3, 87) 7 stable stable trend 0.5 (-3.6, 5.2)
Stokes County 2 Urban 12.4 (8.9, 17.2) 73 (6, 87) 9 falling falling trend -18.1 (-32.3, -1.3)
Craven County 2 Rural 12.3 (9.9, 15.3) 74 (20, 86) 18 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.6, 3.2)
Hertford County 2 Rural 12.0 (7.2, 19.5) 75 (2, 87) 4 stable stable trend 0.3 (-4.4, 4.9)
Madison County 2 Urban 11.9 (7.1, 19.2) 76 (2, 87) 4
*
*
Dare County 2 Rural 11.4 (7.7, 16.7) 77 (8, 87) 7 stable stable trend -2.5 (-5.7, 1.1)
Bladen County 2 Rural 11.3 (7.3, 17.2) 78 (5, 87) 5
*
*
Duplin County 2 Rural 11.3 (7.9, 15.8) 79 (12, 87) 8 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.1, 3.1)
Transylvania County 2 Rural 11.1 (7.4, 16.5) 80 (9, 87) 7 rising rising trend 3.5 (0.3, 7.5)
Beaufort County 2 Rural 11.0 (7.9, 15.3) 81 (19, 87) 8 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.9, 3.6)
Ashe County 2 Rural 11.0 (7.3, 16.6) 82 (12, 87) 6 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.9, 3.2)
Orange County 2 Urban 10.7 (8.5, 13.3) 83 (38, 87) 17 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.0, 1.8)
Pasquotank County 2 Rural 10.4 (6.8, 15.5) 84 (13, 87) 5 stable stable trend -1.3 (-6.0, 3.7)
Polk County 2 Rural 9.9 (6.3, 16.4) 85 (20, 87) 5 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.1, 4.4)
Jackson County 2 Rural 9.3 (6.1, 13.8) 86 (33, 87) 6 stable stable trend -0.8 (-5.8, 4.8)
Watauga County 2 Rural 8.0 (5.2, 12.0) 87 (56, 87) 5 stable stable trend -2.8 (-7.3, 1.9)
Avery County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Camden County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Currituck County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gates County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Graham County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greene County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hyde County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jones County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mitchell County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perquimans County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tyrrell County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washington County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/16/2026 6:19 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top