Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Indiana by County

Pancreas (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name

County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Indiana 2 N/A 14.2 (13.8, 14.6) N/A 1,185 rising rising trend 1.4 (1.0, 1.7)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 13.7 (13.7, 13.8) N/A 56,905 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.5, 0.4)
Adams County 2 Rural 8.0 (4.7, 12.8) 78 (38, 78) 4
*
*
Allen County 2 Urban 13.7 (12.2, 15.4) 46 (17, 66) 60 stable stable trend -4.5 (-13.0, 1.3)
Bartholomew County 2 Urban 14.2 (11.1, 18.1) 36 (5, 74) 14 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.1, 3.9)
Blackford County 2 Rural 17.1 (9.6, 29.1) 9 (1, 78) 3
*
*
Boone County 2 Urban 14.2 (10.6, 18.5) 38 (4, 75) 11 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.2, 3.2)
Brown County 2 Urban 12.8 (7.3, 22.0) 57 (2, 78) 3
*
*
Carroll County 2 Urban 14.5 (8.9, 22.7) 35 (1, 78) 4
*
*
Cass County 2 Rural 11.6 (7.8, 16.8) 70 (8, 78) 6 stable stable trend 2.5 (-0.9, 6.7)
Clark County 2 Urban 12.8 (10.3, 15.7) 56 (14, 75) 19 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.9, 0.9)
Clay County 2 Urban 13.0 (8.4, 19.5) 54 (3, 78) 5 stable stable trend -0.8 (-5.1, 3.8)
Clinton County 2 Rural 14.0 (9.3, 20.5) 41 (2, 78) 6 stable stable trend 2.4 (-2.0, 7.7)
Daviess County 2 Rural 12.1 (7.7, 18.2) 66 (4, 78) 5
*
*
DeKalb County 2 Rural 18.3 (13.6, 24.2) 8 (1, 69) 11 stable stable trend -16.2 (-31.1, 4.1)
Dearborn County 2 Urban 14.2 (10.4, 18.9) 39 (3, 76) 10 falling falling trend -9.2 (-23.1, -0.7)
Decatur County 2 Rural 14.9 (9.6, 22.2) 28 (1, 78) 5 stable stable trend 1.4 (-3.0, 6.5)
Delaware County 2 Urban 12.4 (10.0, 15.4) 65 (15, 75) 18 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.6, 2.3)
Dubois County 2 Rural 13.5 (9.5, 18.8) 48 (3, 77) 8 rising rising trend 3.4 (0.7, 6.9)
Elkhart County 2 Urban 12.1 (10.1, 14.2) 67 (24, 75) 28 stable stable trend -2.6 (-10.7, 0.3)
Fayette County 2 Rural 15.0 (9.7, 22.7) 27 (1, 78) 5 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.4, 5.4)
Floyd County 2 Urban 14.9 (11.6, 18.8) 29 (4, 73) 15 stable stable trend 2.2 (-0.7, 6.0)
Fountain County 2 Rural 18.5 (11.7, 28.5) 7 (1, 77) 5
*
*
Franklin County 2 Urban 13.0 (8.0, 20.3) 53 (2, 78) 4 stable stable trend 1.2 (-2.9, 6.1)
Gibson County 2 Rural 11.6 (7.5, 17.3) 71 (5, 78) 5 stable stable trend -2.5 (-17.0, 1.1)
Grant County 2 Rural 15.5 (11.9, 19.9) 20 (2, 71) 14 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.2, 2.6)
Greene County 2 Rural 16.6 (11.6, 23.2) 12 (1, 76) 8 rising rising trend 4.3 (1.5, 7.9)
Hamilton County 2 Urban 14.6 (12.9, 16.5) 33 (10, 63) 53 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.3, 3.4)
Hancock County 2 Urban 13.3 (10.2, 17.0) 50 (7, 76) 14 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.6, 2.5)
Harrison County 2 Urban 12.8 (8.7, 18.3) 55 (4, 78) 7 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.6, 5.0)
Hendricks County 2 Urban 14.7 (12.4, 17.3) 32 (7, 68) 29 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.2, 3.1)
Henry County 2 Rural 16.0 (12.0, 21.2) 15 (2, 72) 11 stable stable trend 2.3 (-0.8, 6.0)
Howard County 2 Urban 16.9 (13.6, 20.8) 10 (2, 65) 19 rising rising trend 3.0 (0.5, 6.2)
Huntington County 2 Rural 15.7 (11.1, 21.7) 17 (1, 76) 8
*
*
Jackson County 2 Rural 16.2 (11.8, 21.8) 14 (1, 74) 9 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.0, 3.1)
Jasper County 2 Urban 8.2 (5.1, 13.0) 77 (32, 78) 4 stable stable trend -1.0 (-5.6, 4.1)
Jay County 2 Rural 15.5 (9.7, 24.0) 21 (1, 78) 4
*
*
Jefferson County 2 Rural 8.3 (4.9, 13.5) 76 (29, 78) 4
*
*
Jennings County 2 Rural 12.5 (7.7, 19.4) 63 (2, 78) 4 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.9, 5.1)
Johnson County 2 Urban 12.5 (10.3, 14.9) 64 (19, 74) 24 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.5, 3.7)
Knox County 2 Rural 20.2 (14.6, 27.3) 3 (1, 62) 9 stable stable trend 3.4 (-0.2, 7.6)
Kosciusko County 2 Rural 15.1 (11.8, 19.2) 25 (3, 73) 15 stable stable trend 2.3 (0.0, 5.1)
LaGrange County 2 Rural 10.8 (6.9, 16.2) 73 (8, 78) 5 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.4, 3.6)
LaPorte County 2 Urban 12.5 (10.1, 15.4) 62 (14, 75) 20 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.2, 2.6)
Lake County 2 Urban 14.0 (12.7, 15.4) 42 (19, 63) 89 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.8, 1.2)
Lawrence County 2 Rural 15.4 (11.5, 20.5) 22 (2, 73) 11 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.8, 4.7)
Madison County 2 Urban 13.2 (10.9, 15.9) 51 (13, 73) 24 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.7, 3.0)
Marion County 2 Urban 15.0 (14.0, 16.2) 26 (13, 51) 149 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.4, 2.4)
Marshall County 2 Rural 12.6 (9.0, 17.3) 61 (6, 78) 8 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.0, 2.5)
Miami County 2 Rural 11.1 (7.3, 16.5) 72 (8, 78) 5 stable stable trend 0.1 (-4.5, 5.0)
Monroe County 2 Urban 15.9 (13.0, 19.1) 16 (3, 64) 23 rising rising trend 2.1 (0.3, 4.4)
Montgomery County 2 Rural 12.6 (8.7, 18.0) 60 (6, 78) 7 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.4, 3.7)
Morgan County 2 Urban 15.3 (11.9, 19.4) 24 (3, 71) 15 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.9, 5.2)
Newton County 2 Urban 14.5 (8.2, 24.6) 34 (1, 78) 3
*
*
Noble County 2 Rural 13.3 (9.3, 18.5) 49 (4, 78) 8
*
*
Orange County 2 Rural 13.9 (8.4, 22.3) 43 (1, 78) 4 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.0, 4.5)
Owen County 2 Urban 13.6 (7.9, 22.0) 47 (1, 78) 4
*
*
Pike County 2 Rural 19.3 (11.0, 32.2) 4 (1, 78) 3
*
*
Porter County 2 Urban 13.7 (11.6, 16.2) 45 (11, 70) 31 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.1, 3.0)
Posey County 2 Urban 12.7 (8.0, 19.7) 58 (3, 78) 5 stable stable trend 0.9 (-3.8, 6.2)
Pulaski County 2 Rural 20.3 (11.6, 33.6) 2 (1, 77) 4
*
*
Putnam County 2 Rural 16.5 (11.7, 22.8) 13 (1, 74) 8 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.6, 6.3)
Randolph County 2 Rural 14.8 (9.5, 22.2) 31 (1, 78) 5
*
*
Ripley County 2 Rural 19.2 (13.4, 26.8) 5 (1, 70) 8 rising rising trend 5.5 (1.3, 12.0)
Scott County 2 Rural 9.5 (5.4, 15.9) 75 (10, 78) 3 falling falling trend -5.9 (-18.4, -1.8)
Shelby County 2 Urban 18.5 (14.0, 24.3) 6 (1, 65) 12 rising rising trend 2.1 (0.1, 4.5)
Spencer County 2 Rural 12.0 (6.7, 20.2) 68 (2, 78) 3
*
*
St. Joseph County 2 Urban 16.6 (14.7, 18.8) 11 (4, 47) 54 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.2, 3.1)
Starke County 2 Rural 14.1 (8.9, 21.6) 40 (1, 78) 5
*
*
Steuben County 2 Rural 14.8 (10.4, 20.8) 30 (2, 77) 8 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.2, 4.0)
Tippecanoe County 2 Urban 13.9 (11.4, 16.7) 44 (9, 72) 23 falling falling trend -7.4 (-16.0, -0.7)
Tipton County 2 Urban 24.5 (16.0, 36.6) 1 (1, 67) 6 rising rising trend 3.6 (0.1, 8.2)
Vanderburgh County 2 Urban 15.7 (13.4, 18.2) 18 (4, 59) 37 rising rising trend 3.2 (1.9, 5.7)
Vigo County 2 Urban 15.6 (12.7, 19.0) 19 (4, 67) 21 rising rising trend 3.0 (1.3, 5.0)
Wabash County 2 Rural 13.0 (8.9, 18.8) 52 (4, 78) 7 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.0, 5.4)
Warrick County 2 Urban 14.2 (10.8, 18.4) 37 (4, 75) 12 stable stable trend 2.9 (-0.4, 7.7)
Washington County 2 Urban 10.0 (5.9, 16.2) 74 (7, 78) 4 stable stable trend -1.0 (-6.1, 4.6)
Wayne County 2 Rural 15.4 (12.0, 19.5) 23 (3, 71) 15 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.1, 3.1)
White County 2 Rural 12.7 (7.9, 19.6) 59 (2, 78) 5 stable stable trend 2.0 (-0.8, 5.6)
Whitley County 2 Urban 11.7 (7.6, 17.4) 69 (5, 78) 5 stable stable trend 0.9 (-3.3, 5.8)
Benton County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crawford County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fulton County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ohio County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Parke County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rush County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sullivan County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Switzerland County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Union County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Vermillion County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Warren County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wells County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/18/2026 2:38 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top